Akron Zips Football · 2026 Season Preview

Akron Zips

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#127
-19.5 overall · 9th of 13 in the MAC
Projection
3.8
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
4-8
27.8% of outcomes
Off / Def
135/106
National ranks · Connelly model: 4.2 avg wins

Executive read

Akron Zips enters 2026 rated 9th in the MAC (#127 nationally). The profile is a poor defense (#106) paired with a poor offense (#135). Schedule math puts the season at 3.8 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 4.2. 6 games project as clear underdog spots (Wake Forest, Minnesota, UNLV, Central Michigan, Miami (OH), Western Michigan). The season turns on 4 close games: Eastern Michigan, Kent State, Ohio, Buffalo.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#127
-19.5 rating
Offense
#135
13.0 pts/gm · poor
Defense
#106
31.9 allowed · poor
Special teams
#131
-0.6 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#135
Defense#106
Special teams#131

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

2025 resultRecordConfSP+ rank OffDefST
Where they finished5-7 4-4 #117 #123 #87 #129

Sideline

Joe Moorhead — year 5, 13-35 career.

OC: returning
DC: returning

Coached butt off in 2025; postseason ban; best SP+ in 7 years best wins in 8; curve-graded but genuine improvement

Returning production

40% overall, ranked #115 nationally.

Offense 44% · Defense 37%

105 returning starts, 11 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 3.79 wins; Connelly's published model projects 4.2 (3.1 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #111. His model gives 17.1% odds of six-plus wins and 0.0% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-09-03@ Wake Forest#58 / +3.6-25.64%Upset needed
Wk 22026-09-12vs Robert MorrisFCS+8.073%Lean win
Wk 32026-09-19@ Minnesota#45 / +5.2-27.23%Upset needed
Wk 42026-09-26vs UNLV#59 / +2.8-19.88%Upset needed
Wk 52026-10-03@ Central Michigan#113 / -12.4-9.623%Upset needed
Wk 62026-10-10vs Eastern Michigan#121 / -15.0-2.044%Lean loss
Wk 72026-10-17@ Miami (OH)#81 / -2.9-19.18%Upset needed
Wk 82026-10-24@ Kent State#128 / -20.1-1.944%Lean loss
Wk 102026-11-04vs Ohio#117 / -13.6-3.440%Lean loss
Wk 112026-11-10vs Western Michigan#95 / -7.2-9.823%Upset needed
Wk 122026-11-18@ Massachusetts#137 / -30.9+8.975%Lean win
Wk 132026-11-27vs Buffalo#110 / -11.9-5.135%Lean loss

Opening third

0.88

expected wins across 4 games
Wake Forest, Robert Morris, Minnesota, UNLV

Middle third

1.19

expected wins across 4 games
Central Michigan, Eastern Michigan, Miami (OH), Kent State

Closing third

1.72

expected wins across 4 games
Ohio, Western Michigan, Massachusetts, Buffalo

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors Akron. Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
3.79
across 12 games
Bowl odds
11%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
MAC
13 teams rated

Win-total probability

1 wins3.6%
2 wins13.3%
3 wins25.2%
4 wins27.8%
5 wins19.0%
6 wins8.2%
7 wins2.2%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Brayden Roggow vs Reese Poffenbarger

battle (sophomore vs well-traveled transfer) limited sample

Poffenbarger 5th school in 6 years; 6669 career yds mostly at Albany 2022-23; 1000-yd rusher Gant returns

Program context

Moorhead Curve
Coached butt off despite postseason ban and 8 wins in 3 years inherited; best SP+ in 7 years best wins in 8; curve-graded but genuine

Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the MAC

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1Miami (OH)#81-2.9#111#4849%#84
2Western Michigan#95-7.2#112#6851%#72
3Toledo#108-11.5#121#8433%#130
4Buffalo#110-11.9#126#8530%#135
5Central Michigan#113-12.4#116#9246%#100
6Bowling Green#115-13.3#128#8835%#124
7Ohio#117-13.6#134#7233%#129
8Eastern Michigan#121-15.0#115#11262%#24
9Akron#127-19.5#135#10640%#115
10Kent State#128-20.1#125#12748%#87
11Sacramento State#130-22.7#127#13132%#131
12Ball State#134-25.2#136#12836%#123
13Massachusetts#137-30.9#138#13646%#96

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (illustrative scale; not validated for this SP+ snapshot). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.