Ball State Cardinals Football · 2026 Season Preview

Ball State Cardinals

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#134
-25.2 overall · 12th of 13 in the MAC
Projection
2.9
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
3-9
29.4% of outcomes
Off / Def
136/128
National ranks · Connelly model: 3.0 avg wins

Executive read

Ball State Cardinals enters 2026 rated 12th in the MAC (#134 nationally). The profile is a poor defense (#128) paired with a poor offense (#136). Schedule math puts the season at 2.9 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 3.0. 9 games project as clear underdog spots (Ohio State, Liberty, Kent State, Toledo, Northwestern, Bowling Green, Buffalo, Ohio, Central Michigan). The season turns on 3 close games: Stony Brook, Sacramento State, Massachusetts.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#134
-25.2 rating
Offense
#136
12.2 pts/gm · poor
Defense
#128
36.7 allowed · poor
Special teams
#135
-0.7 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#136
Defense#128
Special teams#135

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

2025 resultRecordConfSP+ rank OffDefST
Where they finished4-8 3-5 #132 #134 #115 #133

Sideline

Mike Uremovich — year 2, 4-8 career.

OC: returning
DC: returning

Uremovich adaptable; NAIA St. Francis to Butler to Ball State; upset Ohio in Year 1; 1 double-digit SP+ ranking since 2014

Returning production

36% overall, ranked #123 nationally.

Offense 47% · Defense 24%

74 returning starts, 19 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 2.94 wins; Connelly's published model projects 3.0 (2.4 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #72. His model gives 3.9% odds of six-plus wins and 0.0% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-09-05@ Ohio State#1 / +31.8-59.50%Upset needed
Wk 22026-09-12vs Stony BrookFCS+2.357%Swing
Wk 32026-09-19@ Liberty#93 / -6.4-21.37%Upset needed
Wk 42026-09-26@ Kent State#128 / -20.1-7.628%Upset needed
Wk 52026-10-03vs Toledo#108 / -11.5-11.220%Upset needed
Wk 62026-10-10@ Northwestern#49 / +4.6-32.32%Upset needed
Wk 72026-10-17@ Bowling Green#115 / -13.3-14.414%Upset needed
Wk 82026-10-24vs Sacramento State#130 / -22.7+0.050%Swing
Wk 102026-11-04@ Massachusetts#137 / -30.9+3.260%Swing
Wk 112026-11-11vs Buffalo#110 / -11.9-10.821%Upset needed
Wk 122026-11-17@ Ohio#117 / -13.6-14.115%Upset needed
Wk 132026-11-28vs Central Michigan#113 / -12.4-10.322%Upset needed

Opening third

0.92

expected wins across 4 games
Ohio State, Stony Brook, Liberty, Kent State

Middle third

0.86

expected wins across 4 games
Toledo, Northwestern, Bowling Green, Sacramento State

Closing third

1.17

expected wins across 4 games
Massachusetts, Buffalo, Ohio, Central Michigan

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors Ball State. Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
2.94
across 12 games
Bowl odds
3%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
MAC
13 teams rated

Win-total probability

0 wins2.1%
1 wins11.3%
2 wins24.9%
3 wins29.4%
4 wins20.5%
5 wins8.9%
6 wins2.5%
7 wins0.4%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Keldric Luster vs Tyler Mizzell

battle (Texas State transfer vs Concord D2 transfer) limited sample

Luster backup from QB-friendly Texas State; Mizzell 300+ yd games at D2; Uremovich adaptable; 8 OL transfers

Top transfer

Tyler Mizzell (QB, from Concord (D2))
300+ yd passing 5 times despite 4-7 team; 277 rush yds in 3-game span; big-play hunter; battling Luster for job

Program context

Decline · 2020
No winning record since 2020; 1 double-digit SP+ ranking since 2014; Uremovich Year 2 after upset of Ohio in Year 1

Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the MAC

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1Miami (OH)#81-2.9#111#4849%#84
2Western Michigan#95-7.2#112#6851%#72
3Toledo#108-11.5#121#8433%#130
4Buffalo#110-11.9#126#8530%#135
5Central Michigan#113-12.4#116#9246%#100
6Bowling Green#115-13.3#128#8835%#124
7Ohio#117-13.6#134#7233%#129
8Eastern Michigan#121-15.0#115#11262%#24
9Akron#127-19.5#135#10640%#115
10Kent State#128-20.1#125#12748%#87
11Sacramento State#130-22.7#127#13132%#131
12Ball State#134-25.2#136#12836%#123
13Massachusetts#137-30.9#138#13646%#96

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (illustrative scale; not validated for this SP+ snapshot). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.