Central Michigan Chippewas Football · 2026 Season Preview

Central Michigan Chippewas

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#113
-12.4 overall · 5th of 13 in the MAC
Projection
6.1
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
6-6
26.7% of outcomes
Off / Def
116/92
National ranks · Connelly model: 6.1 avg wins

Executive read

Central Michigan Chippewas enters 2026 rated 5th in the MAC (#113 nationally). The profile is a below average defense (#92) paired with a poor offense (#116). Schedule math puts the season at 6.1 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 6.1. 3 games project as clear underdog spots (New Mexico, Miami, Miami (OH)). The season turns on 5 close games: Wyoming, Ohio, Western Michigan, Eastern Michigan, Buffalo.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#113
-12.4 rating
Offense
#116
17.4 pts/gm · poor
Defense
#92
29.6 allowed · below average
Special teams
#86
-0.2 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#116
Defense#92
Special teams#86

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

2025 resultRecordConfSP+ rank OffDefST
Where they finished7-6 5-3 #101 #120 #65 #84

Sideline

Matt Drinkall — year 2, 7-6 career.

OC: Jim Chapin
DC: Sean Cronin

Drinkall controls the controllables; Labas quick-pass system; extreme split: walloped vs top-60 walloped everyone else

Returning production

46% overall, ranked #100 nationally.

Offense 62% · Defense 29%

118 returning starts, 9 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 6.05 wins; Connelly's published model projects 6.1 (4.6 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #87. His model gives 67.0% odds of six-plus wins and 0.1% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-09-06@ New Mexico#68 / -0.5-14.414%Upset needed
Wk 22026-09-12vs ColgateFCS+15.187%Should win
Wk 32026-09-19vs Wyoming#106 / -9.6-0.349%Swing
Wk 42026-09-26@ Miami#8 / +21.0-35.91%Upset needed
Wk 52026-10-03vs Akron#127 / -19.5+9.677%Lean win
Wk 62026-10-10@ Ohio#117 / -13.6-1.346%Swing
Wk 72026-10-17vs Western Michigan#95 / -7.2-2.742%Lean loss
Wk 82026-10-24vs Miami (OH)#81 / -2.9-7.029%Upset needed
Wk 102026-11-04vs Eastern Michigan neutral#121 / -15.0+2.658%Swing
Wk 112026-11-11vs Sacramento State#130 / -22.7+12.883%Should win
Wk 122026-11-18@ Buffalo#110 / -11.9-3.041%Lean loss
Wk 132026-11-28@ Ball State#134 / -25.2+10.378%Lean win

Opening third

1.51

expected wins across 4 games
New Mexico, Colgate, Wyoming, Miami

Middle third

1.94

expected wins across 4 games
Akron, Ohio, Western Michigan, Miami (OH)

Closing third

2.60

expected wins across 4 games
Eastern Michigan, Sacramento State, Buffalo, Ball State

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors Central Michigan. Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
6.05
across 12 games
Bowl odds
65%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
MAC
13 teams rated

Win-total probability

2 wins0.6%
3 wins3.3%
4 wins10.4%
5 wins20.8%
6 wins26.7%
7 wins22.1%
8 wins11.7%
9 wins3.7%
10 wins0.6%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Angel Flores

returning (was mobile backup) limited sample

Frequently used as mobile alternative to Labas last season; Labas gone; Flores gets reins; quick-pass system

Program context

Top60 Split · 41-8_vs_29-16
Vs SP+ top-60: walloped by avg 41-8 Labas 9.9 yds/completion 6.9 ypp; vs everyone else 7-2 avg 29-16 Labas 14.2 yds/completion 4.7 ypp

DateMatchupWhy it matters
Oct. 17WMU at CMUCMU gets huge October opportunity; most proven OL in conference; offense crumbled late 2025 but experienced now
Oct. 24Miami at CMUBack-to-back CMU opportunities; title race insertion; Chippewas play only 1 team above 68th all year
Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the MAC

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1Miami (OH)#81-2.9#111#4849%#84
2Western Michigan#95-7.2#112#6851%#72
3Toledo#108-11.5#121#8433%#130
4Buffalo#110-11.9#126#8530%#135
5Central Michigan#113-12.4#116#9246%#100
6Bowling Green#115-13.3#128#8835%#124
7Ohio#117-13.6#134#7233%#129
8Eastern Michigan#121-15.0#115#11262%#24
9Akron#127-19.5#135#10640%#115
10Kent State#128-20.1#125#12748%#87
11Sacramento State#130-22.7#127#13132%#131
12Ball State#134-25.2#136#12836%#123
13Massachusetts#137-30.9#138#13646%#96

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (illustrative scale; not validated for this SP+ snapshot). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.