Indiana Hoosiers Football · 2026 Season Preview

Indiana Hoosiers

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#5
+24.5 overall · 3rd of 18 in the Big Ten
Projection
10.1
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
10-2
34.6% of outcomes
Off / Def
9/6
National ranks · Connelly model: 9.9 avg wins

Executive read

Indiana Hoosiers enters 2026 rated 3rd in the Big Ten (#5 nationally). The profile is an elite defense (#6) paired with an elite offense (#9). Schedule math puts the season at 10.1 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 9.9. The season turns on 1 close game: Ohio State.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#5
+24.5 rating
Offense
#9
37.4 pts/gm · elite
Defense
#6
13.5 allowed · elite
Special teams
#22
+0.5 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#9
Defense#6
Special teams#22

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

2025 resultRecordConfSP+ rank OffDefST
Where they finished16-0 10-0 #1 #2 #2 #22

Sideline

Curt Cignetti — year 3, 27-2 career.

OC: Mike Shanahan
DC: Bryant Haines

Scouting-and-development advantage; likes this year's transfer class better than last year's

Returning production

56% overall, ranked #52 nationally.

Offense 54% · Defense 58%

139 returning starts, 20 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 10.14 wins; Connelly's published model projects 9.9 (7.0 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #31. His model gives 99.9% odds of six-plus wins and 32.8% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-09-05vs North Texas#109 / -11.8+38.899%Should win
Wk 22026-09-12vs HowardFCS+52.0100%Should win
Wk 32026-09-19vs Western Kentucky#86 / -5.3+32.398%Should win
Wk 42026-09-26vs Northwestern#49 / +4.6+22.494%Should win
Wk 52026-10-04@ Rutgers#62 / +1.8+20.293%Should win
Wk 62026-10-10@ Nebraska#37 / +7.7+14.386%Should win
Wk 72026-10-17vs Ohio State#1 / +31.8-4.835%Lean loss
Wk 82026-10-24@ Michigan#14 / +16.1+5.968%Lean win
Wk 92026-10-31vs Minnesota#45 / +5.2+21.894%Should win
Wk 112026-11-14vs USC#13 / +16.8+10.278%Lean win
Wk 122026-11-21@ Washington#21 / +14.5+7.572%Lean win
Wk 132026-11-28vs Purdue#82 / -2.9+29.998%Should win

Opening third

3.92

expected wins across 4 games
North Texas, Howard, Western Kentucky, Northwestern

Middle third

2.81

expected wins across 4 games
Rutgers, Nebraska, Ohio State, Michigan

Closing third

3.42

expected wins across 4 games
Minnesota, USC, Washington, Purdue

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors Indiana. Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
10.14
across 12 games
Bowl odds
100%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
Big Ten
18 teams rated

Win-total probability

7 wins1.0%
8 wins5.7%
9 wins19.0%
10 wins34.6%
11 wins30.5%
12 wins9.0%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Josh Hoover

transfer (TCU) experienced

9629 career pass yds 71 TDs; more proven than Mendoza was at this time last year; Cignetti's ideal replacement for Heisman winner

Top transfer

Josh Hoover (QB, from TCU)
9629 career pass yds / 71 TDs; replaces Heisman winner Mendoza

Program context

Record 2Yr · 27-2
Flipped from 9-27 over 3 seasons to 27-2 over 2; losingest team in major CFB history now defending champs

Becker Ypr · 3.7
Charlie Becker averaged 3.7 yds per route after injuries thrust him into role; 28 catches 574 yds in final 6 games

Draft Picks · 8
8 total NFL draft picks gone; Mendoza two 1000-yd RBs two 800-yd receivers all departed

DateMatchupWhy it matters
Oct. 17Ohio State at IndianaBig Ten title game rematch; defending champs host No.1 SP+ team; conference desperately trying to ditch title games
Oct. 24Indiana at MichiganCignetti champs vs Whittingham Wolverines; Michigan potentially chest-puffing with chip on shoulder
Nov. 21Indiana at WashingtonWashington a mystery but sneaky big late-season game; Indiana's toughest remaining road test
Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the Big Ten

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1Ohio State#1+31.8#2#160%#31
2Oregon#2+28.3#1#366%#12
3Indiana#5+24.5#9#656%#52
4USC#13+16.8#6#2965%#14
5Michigan#14+16.1#20#1363%#20
6Penn State#17+15.7#14#2352%#67
7Washington#21+14.5#22#1965%#16
8Iowa#22+13.6#38#1744%#104
9Illinois#33+9.3#28#4450%#76
10Nebraska#37+7.7#49#3969%#3
11Minnesota#45+5.2#71#2468%#8
12UCLA#46+5.1#52#5467%#10
13Northwestern#49+4.6#78#2857%#44
14Maryland#55+3.8#65#4371%#2
15Wisconsin#61+1.8#106#2259%#35
16Rutgers#62+1.8#37#9047%#92
17Michigan State#67+0.4#61#6946%#97
18Purdue#82-2.9#86#7958%#40

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (illustrative scale; not validated for this SP+ snapshot). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.