Missouri State Bears Football · 2026 Season Preview

Missouri State Bears

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#126
-18.7 overall · 8th of 10 in the Conference USA
Projection
3.6
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
4-8
27.4% of outcomes
Off / Def
122/121
National ranks · Connelly model: 3.9 avg wins

Executive read

Missouri State Bears enters 2026 rated 8th in the Conference USA (#126 nationally). The profile is a poor defense (#121) paired with a poor offense (#122). Schedule math puts the season at 3.6 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 3.9. 9 games project as clear underdog spots (Texas A&M, Marshall, SMU, Western Kentucky, Kennesaw State, Delaware, Florida International, Jacksonville State, Liberty). The season turns on 1 close game: New Mexico State.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#126
-18.7 rating
Offense
#122
16.7 pts/gm · poor
Defense
#121
34.9 allowed · poor
Special teams
#122
-0.5 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#122
Defense#121
Special teams#122

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

2025 resultRecordConfSP+ rank OffDefST
Where they finished7-6 5-3 #108 #79 #118 #120

Sideline

Casey Woods — year 1, N/A (new hire) career.

OC: Mark Cala (NEW from UTEP)
DC: NEW

Woods was excellent SMU OC; worked for Bill Clark at UAB; Beard left for Coastal and took players; almost entirely new two-deep

Returning production

34% overall, ranked #128 nationally.

Offense 25% · Defense 44%

59 returning starts, 11 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 3.63 wins; Connelly's published model projects 3.9 (2.8 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #80. His model gives 12.9% odds of six-plus wins and 0.0% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-09-05@ Texas A&M#9 / +20.3-41.51%Upset needed
Wk 22026-09-12vs LindenwoodFCS+8.875%Lean win
Wk 32026-09-19vs Marshall#92 / -6.4-9.823%Upset needed
Wk 42026-09-26@ SMU#28 / +10.9-32.12%Upset needed
Wk 62026-10-08@ Western Kentucky#86 / -5.3-15.912%Upset needed
Wk 72026-10-14vs Kennesaw State#105 / -9.3-6.930%Upset needed
Wk 82026-10-20@ Delaware#114 / -13.0-8.226%Upset needed
Wk 92026-10-28vs Sam Houston#136 / -26.3+10.178%Lean win
Wk 102026-11-07@ Florida International#118 / -13.7-7.528%Upset needed
Wk 112026-11-14vs New Mexico State#123 / -16.4+0.251%Swing
Wk 122026-11-21@ Jacksonville State#98 / -7.7-13.516%Upset needed
Wk 132026-11-28vs Liberty#93 / -6.4-9.823%Upset needed

Opening third

1.00

expected wins across 4 games
Texas A&M, Lindenwood, Marshall, SMU

Middle third

1.46

expected wins across 4 games
Western Kentucky, Kennesaw State, Delaware, Sam Houston

Closing third

1.17

expected wins across 4 games
Florida International, New Mexico State, Jacksonville State, Liberty

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors Missouri State. Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
3.63
across 12 games
Bowl odds
8%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
Conference USA
10 teams rated

Win-total probability

0 wins0.4%
1 wins4.2%
2 wins15.4%
3 wins27.4%
4 wins27.4%
5 wins16.8%
6 wins6.5%
7 wins1.6%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Skyler Locklear vs Henry Belin IV

battle (UTEP transfer vs Duke transfer) limited sample

Both seniors; Locklear followed OC Cala from UTEP; Belin from Duke; almost entirely new offense around them

Program context

Beard Departure
Beard left for Coastal Carolina took truckload of players; Woods hire strong (SMU OC Bill Clark UAB); almost entirely new two-deep

Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the Conference USA

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1Western Kentucky#86-5.3#73#10132%#133
2Liberty#93-6.4#66#10457%#49
3Jacksonville State#98-7.7#77#10757%#47
4Kennesaw State#105-9.3#101#9749%#83
5Delaware#114-13.0#96#12662%#25
6Florida International#118-13.7#100#12247%#95
7New Mexico State#123-16.4#118#11351%#73
8Missouri State#126-18.7#122#12134%#128
9Middle Tennessee#135-26.0#133#13436%#122
10Sam Houston#136-26.3#131#13549%#80

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (illustrative scale; not validated for this SP+ snapshot). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.