Rutgers Scarlet Knights Football · 2026 Season Preview

Rutgers Scarlet Knights

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#62
+1.8 overall · 16th of 18 in the Big Ten
Projection
5.2
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
5-7
28.2% of outcomes
Off / Def
37/90
National ranks · Connelly model: 5.4 avg wins

Executive read

Rutgers Scarlet Knights enters 2026 rated 16th in the Big Ten (#62 nationally). The profile is a below average defense (#90) paired with a strong offense (#37). Schedule math puts the season at 5.2 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 5.4. 4 games project as clear underdog spots (USC, Indiana, Michigan, Penn State). The season turns on 6 close games: Boston College, Maryland, Northwestern, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Michigan State.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#62
+1.8 rating
Offense
#37
30.4 pts/gm · strong
Defense
#90
28.7 allowed · below average
Special teams
#68
+0.1 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#37
Defense#90
Special teams#68

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

2025 resultRecordConfSP+ rank OffDefST
Where they finished5-7 2-7 #72 #42 #95 #68

Sideline

Greg Schiano — year 18 (over 2 tenures), 99-108 career.

OC: Kirk Ciarrocca
DC: Travis Johansen (NEW)

Johansen first FBS job; from South Dakota; total defensive teardown with only 2 of 17 defenders returning

Returning production

47% overall, ranked #92 nationally.

Offense 49% · Defense 46%

83 returning starts, 23 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 5.18 wins; Connelly's published model projects 5.4 (2.9 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #40. His model gives 45.8% odds of six-plus wins and 0.0% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-09-03vs Massachusetts#137 / -30.9+35.299%Should win
Wk 22026-09-11@ Boston College#74 / -1.5+0.852%Swing
Wk 32026-09-19vs USC#13 / +16.8-12.517%Upset needed
Wk 42026-09-25vs HowardFCS+29.398%Should win
Wk 52026-10-04vs Indiana#5 / +24.5-20.27%Upset needed
Wk 72026-10-17@ Maryland#55 / +3.8-4.536%Lean loss
Wk 82026-10-24@ Northwestern#49 / +4.6-5.334%Lean loss
Wk 92026-10-31vs Michigan#14 / +16.1-11.819%Upset needed
Wk 102026-11-07@ Wisconsin#61 / +1.8-2.542%Lean loss
Wk 112026-11-14vs Nebraska#37 / +7.7-3.440%Lean loss
Wk 122026-11-21@ Penn State#17 / +15.7-16.411%Upset needed
Wk 132026-11-28vs Michigan State#67 / +0.4+3.962%Swing

Opening third

2.66

expected wins across 4 games
Massachusetts, Boston College, USC, Howard

Middle third

0.96

expected wins across 4 games
Indiana, Maryland, Northwestern, Michigan

Closing third

1.55

expected wins across 4 games
Wisconsin, Nebraska, Penn State, Michigan State

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors Rutgers. Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
5.18
across 12 games
Bowl odds
40%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
Big Ten
18 teams rated

Win-total probability

2 wins1.7%
3 wins9.0%
4 wins21.3%
5 wins28.2%
6 wins23.0%
7 wins11.9%
8 wins3.9%
9 wins0.8%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Dylan Lonergan vs AJ Surace

battle (BC transfer vs sophomore) limited sample

Lonergan reasonably known entity; Surace has more upside; whoever wins has easy job: hand to Raymond throw to Duff

Program context

Def Sp Plus · 95
Plummeted to 95th in defensive SP+; 131st in success rate allowed; 136th (dead last) in yds per successful play

Def Returners · 2
Only 2 of 17 defenders with 100+ snaps return; combined for only 2 TFLs last season; total teardown

Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the Big Ten

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1Ohio State#1+31.8#2#160%#31
2Oregon#2+28.3#1#366%#12
3Indiana#5+24.5#9#656%#52
4USC#13+16.8#6#2965%#14
5Michigan#14+16.1#20#1363%#20
6Penn State#17+15.7#14#2352%#67
7Washington#21+14.5#22#1965%#16
8Iowa#22+13.6#38#1744%#104
9Illinois#33+9.3#28#4450%#76
10Nebraska#37+7.7#49#3969%#3
11Minnesota#45+5.2#71#2468%#8
12UCLA#46+5.1#52#5467%#10
13Northwestern#49+4.6#78#2857%#44
14Maryland#55+3.8#65#4371%#2
15Wisconsin#61+1.8#106#2259%#35
16Rutgers#62+1.8#37#9047%#92
17Michigan State#67+0.4#61#6946%#97
18Purdue#82-2.9#86#7958%#40

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (illustrative scale; not validated for this SP+ snapshot). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.