Sacramento State Hornets Football · 2026 Season Preview

Sacramento State Hornets

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#130
-22.7 overall · 11th of 13 in the MAC
Projection
3.8
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
4-8
27.5% of outcomes
Off / Def
127/131
National ranks · Connelly model: 4.3 avg wins

Executive read

Sacramento State Hornets enters 2026 rated 11th in the MAC (#130 nationally). The profile is a poor defense (#131) paired with a poor offense (#127). Schedule math puts the season at 3.8 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 4.3. 7 games project as clear underdog spots (Eastern Michigan, Fresno State, North Dakota State, Bowling Green, Toledo, Central Michigan, Hawai'i). The season turns on 3 close games: Ohio, Ball State, Kent State.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#130
-22.7 rating
Offense
#127
15.1 pts/gm · poor
Defense
#131
37.9 allowed · poor
Special teams
#76
+0.0 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#127
Defense#131
Special teams#76

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

Sideline

Alonzo Carter — year 1, N/A (new hire) career.

OC: NEW
DC: NEW

Celebrated California assistant with great dance moves; Marion left for Colorado OC; basically 4 total starters return 1 on offense

Returning production

32% overall, ranked #131 nationally.

Offense 21% · Defense 42%

0 returning starts, 13 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 3.77 wins; Connelly's published model projects 4.3 (3.0 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #135. His model gives 18.3% odds of six-plus wins and 0.0% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-08-29@ Eastern Michigan#121 / -15.0-10.222%Upset needed
Wk 12026-09-06vs Mississippi Valley StateFCS+4.865%Lean win
Wk 22026-09-13@ Fresno State#78 / -2.3-22.95%Upset needed
Wk 32026-09-20vs North Dakota State#72 / -1.4-18.89%Upset needed
Wk 42026-09-26vs Massachusetts#137 / -30.9+10.779%Lean win
Wk 62026-10-10@ Bowling Green#115 / -13.3-11.918%Upset needed
Wk 72026-10-17vs Ohio#117 / -13.6-6.630%Lean loss
Wk 82026-10-24@ Ball State#134 / -25.2+0.050%Swing
Wk 92026-10-31vs Kent State#128 / -20.1-0.150%Swing
Wk 102026-11-04vs Toledo#108 / -11.5-8.725%Upset needed
Wk 112026-11-11@ Central Michigan#113 / -12.4-12.817%Upset needed
Wk 132026-11-28@ Hawai'i#84 / -3.9-21.37%Upset needed

Opening third

1.00

expected wins across 4 games
Eastern Michigan, Mississippi Valley State, Fresno State, North Dakota State

Middle third

1.78

expected wins across 4 games
Massachusetts, Bowling Green, Ohio, Ball State

Closing third

0.98

expected wins across 4 games
Kent State, Toledo, Central Michigan, Hawai'i

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors Sacramento State. Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
3.77
across 12 games
Bowl odds
11%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
MAC
13 teams rated

Win-total probability

0 wins0.4%
1 wins3.8%
2 wins13.8%
3 wins25.4%
4 wins27.5%
5 wins18.4%
6 wins8.0%
7 wins2.2%
8 wins0.4%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Carson Conklin

transfer (Fresno State) limited sample

Freshman star at Sac State then 2025 backup at Fresno State; returns to Sac State; only 1 offensive starter returns

Program context

Marion Departure
Marion left for Colorado OC (Sean Lewis parallel); 4 total starters return 1 on offense; 130th SP+ equivalent last FCS season

Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the MAC

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1Miami (OH)#81-2.9#111#4849%#84
2Western Michigan#95-7.2#112#6851%#72
3Toledo#108-11.5#121#8433%#130
4Buffalo#110-11.9#126#8530%#135
5Central Michigan#113-12.4#116#9246%#100
6Bowling Green#115-13.3#128#8835%#124
7Ohio#117-13.6#134#7233%#129
8Eastern Michigan#121-15.0#115#11262%#24
9Akron#127-19.5#135#10640%#115
10Kent State#128-20.1#125#12748%#87
11Sacramento State#130-22.7#127#13132%#131
12Ball State#134-25.2#136#12836%#123
13Massachusetts#137-30.9#138#13646%#96

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (illustrative scale; not validated for this SP+ snapshot). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.