Tulane Green Wave Football · 2026 Season Preview

Tulane Green Wave

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#87
-5.5 overall · 7th of 15 in the American
Projection
6.6
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
7-5
26.4% of outcomes
Off / Def
99/86
National ranks · Connelly model: 6.5 avg wins

Executive read

Tulane Green Wave enters 2026 rated 7th in the American (#87 nationally). The profile is a below average defense (#86) paired with a below average offense (#99). Schedule math puts the season at 6.6 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 6.5. 2 games project as clear underdog spots (Duke, Kansas State). The season turns on 4 close games: Army, Memphis, UTSA, South Florida.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#87
-5.5 rating
Offense
#99
22.2 pts/gm · below average
Defense
#86
28.3 allowed · below average
Special teams
#14
+0.6 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#99
Defense#86
Special teams#14

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

2025 resultRecordConfSP+ rank OffDefST
Where they finished11-3 8-1 #45 #35 #71 #14

Sideline

Will Hall — year 1, N/A (new hire) career.

OC: NEW
DC: NEW

Hall hire called uninspiring; Tulane stunk for most of 20-year window; regression monster expected; only 6 starters return

Returning production

40% overall, ranked #117 nationally.

Offense 28% · Defense 52%

78 returning starts, 13 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 6.58 wins; Connelly's published model projects 6.5 (4.6 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #94. His model gives 75.7% odds of six-plus wins and 0.3% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-09-05@ Duke#44 / +5.7-13.715%Upset needed
Wk 22026-09-12vs South Alabama#116 / -13.3+10.378%Lean win
Wk 32026-09-19@ Kansas State#29 / +10.4-18.49%Upset needed
Wk 42026-09-26vs Southern Miss#131 / -23.3+20.393%Should win
Wk 62026-10-10@ Army#83 / -3.0-5.035%Lean loss
Wk 72026-10-16vs Memphis#70 / -1.1-1.944%Lean loss
Wk 82026-10-24vs UTSA#73 / -1.5-1.545%Swing
Wk 92026-10-30@ Charlotte#138 / -32.4+24.495%Should win
Wk 102026-11-07vs Tulsa#96 / -7.6+4.664%Lean win
Wk 112026-11-14@ Rice#120 / -14.7+6.770%Lean win
Wk 122026-11-21vs North Texas#109 / -11.8+8.875%Lean win
Wk 132026-11-27@ South Florida#80 / -2.8-5.234%Lean loss

Opening third

1.95

expected wins across 4 games
Duke, South Alabama, Kansas State, Southern Miss

Middle third

2.20

expected wins across 4 games
Army, Memphis, UTSA, Charlotte

Closing third

2.43

expected wins across 4 games
Tulsa, Rice, North Texas, South Florida

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors Tulane. Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
6.58
across 12 games
Bowl odds
78%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
American
15 teams rated

Win-total probability

3 wins1.3%
4 wins5.7%
5 wins15.2%
6 wins25.2%
7 wins26.4%
8 wins17.4%
9 wins7.0%
10 wins1.6%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Kadin Semonza vs Zeon Chriss-Gremillion

battle (returner vs Houston/Louisiana transfer) limited sample

Semonza junior returner; Chriss-Gremillion from Houston/Louisiana; capable QB should engineer points with strong skill corps

Program context

Regression Risk
SP+ adjustment for coaching changes; Tulane stunk for most of 20-year window; even 45th was above average; regression monster mean

One Score Record · 5-0
5-0 in one-score games in 2025; 3 losses by combined 88 points; overachieved vs SP+

Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the American

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1Navy#63+1.1#58#7747%#93
2Memphis#70-1.1#56#9542%#111
3UTSA#73-1.5#47#10254%#57
4East Carolina#76-2.0#84#7142%#110
5South Florida#80-2.8#59#9841%#113
6Army#83-3.0#81#8250%#75
7Tulane#87-5.5#99#8640%#117
8Florida Atlantic#94-7.1#60#12064%#19
9Tulsa#96-7.6#91#10362%#23
10Temple#102-8.7#74#11753%#64
11UConn#107-11.2#107#10831%#134
12North Texas#109-11.8#89#12332%#132
13Rice#120-14.7#119#11039%#120
14UAB#124-18.1#108#13235%#125
15Charlotte#138-32.4#137#13843%#107

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (illustrative scale; not validated for this SP+ snapshot). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.