UL Monroe Warhawks Football · 2026 Season Preview

UL Monroe Warhawks

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#132
-24.3 overall · 13th of 14 in the Sun Belt
Projection
2.5
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
2-10
30.8% of outcomes
Off / Def
130/130
National ranks · Connelly model: 2.6 avg wins

Executive read

UL Monroe Warhawks enters 2026 rated 13th in the Sun Belt (#132 nationally). The profile is a poor defense (#130) paired with a poor offense (#130). Schedule math puts the season at 2.5 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 2.6. 10 games project as clear underdog spots (Mississippi State, UAB, Florida Atlantic, South Alabama, Louisiana Tech, Troy, Arkansas State, Louisiana, App State, Marshall). The season turns on 2 close games: SE Louisiana, Southern Miss.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#132
-24.3 rating
Offense
#130
14.3 pts/gm · poor
Defense
#130
37.9 allowed · poor
Special teams
#138
-0.7 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#130
Defense#130
Special teams#138

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

2025 resultRecordConfSP+ rank OffDefST
Where they finished3-9 1-7 #131 #127 #123 #136

Sideline

Bryant Vincent — year 3, 8-16 career.

OC: returning
DC: returning

Vincent 8-16 in 2 seasons; Hardy jumped to Missouri; gravity is ruthless in Monroe; lost 8 straight after 3-1 start

Returning production

51% overall, ranked #68 nationally.

Offense 63% · Defense 40%

95 returning starts, 4 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 2.46 wins; Connelly's published model projects 2.6 (1.7 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #130. His model gives 2.2% odds of six-plus wins and 0.0% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-09-05@ Mississippi State#52 / +3.9-30.72%Upset needed
Wk 22026-09-12@ UAB#124 / -18.1-8.725%Upset needed
Wk 32026-09-19vs SE LouisianaFCS+3.260%Swing
Wk 42026-09-26vs Florida Atlantic#94 / -7.1-14.714%Upset needed
Wk 52026-10-03@ South Alabama#116 / -13.3-13.516%Upset needed
Wk 72026-10-17vs Louisiana Tech#100 / -8.3-13.516%Upset needed
Wk 82026-10-24@ Troy#90 / -6.0-20.87%Upset needed
Wk 92026-10-31vs Southern Miss#131 / -23.3+1.555%Swing
Wk 102026-11-07@ Arkansas State#101 / -8.5-18.39%Upset needed
Wk 112026-11-13vs Louisiana#104 / -9.1-12.717%Upset needed
Wk 122026-11-21@ App State#111 / -12.1-14.714%Upset needed
Wk 132026-11-28vs Marshall#92 / -6.4-15.413%Upset needed

Opening third

1.01

expected wins across 4 games
Mississippi State, UAB, SE Louisiana, Florida Atlantic

Middle third

0.93

expected wins across 4 games
South Alabama, Louisiana Tech, Troy, Southern Miss

Closing third

0.53

expected wins across 4 games
Arkansas State, Louisiana, App State, Marshall

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors UL Monroe. Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
2.46
across 12 games
Bowl odds
1%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
Sun Belt
14 teams rated

Win-total probability

0 wins4.3%
1 wins18.5%
2 wins30.8%
3 wins26.7%
4 wins13.9%
5 wins4.7%
6 wins1.1%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Aidan Armenta

returning starter limited sample

Returning with 3 of top 4 targets; RB corps completely wiped out again; Chaney Jr and Roland brought in

Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the Sun Belt

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1James Madison#77-2.1#76#7530%#136
2Old Dominion#88-5.8#109#6340%#114
3Troy#90-6.0#90#9439%#119
4Marshall#92-6.4#54#12448%#88
5Louisiana Tech#100-8.3#98#9956%#53
6Arkansas State#101-8.5#88#11149%#82
7Georgia Southern#103-8.9#92#10943%#108
8Louisiana#104-9.1#72#11649%#81
9App State#111-12.1#102#11534%#127
10South Alabama#116-13.3#95#12544%#105
11Coastal Carolina#119-13.8#103#11842%#112
12Southern Miss#131-23.3#123#13322%#138
13UL Monroe#132-24.3#130#13051%#68
14Georgia State#133-25.1#120#13738%#121

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (illustrative scale; not validated for this SP+ snapshot). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.