Wake Forest Demon Deacons Football · 2026 Season Preview

Wake Forest Demon Deacons

A data-backed preview built from the committed 2026 preseason SP+ snapshot, the CFBD schedule, and Bill Connelly's extracted conference preview tables. Every projection traces to a stored payload.

2026 SP+
#58
+3.6 overall · 15th of 18 in the ACC
Projection
6.0
Expected wins across 12 games
Most Likely
6-6
26.7% of outcomes
Off / Def
83/31
National ranks · Connelly model: 6.2 avg wins

Executive read

Wake Forest Demon Deacons enters 2026 rated 15th in the ACC (#58 nationally). The profile is a strong defense (#31) paired with a below average offense (#83). Schedule math puts the season at 6.0 expected wins, against Connelly's independent 6.2. 3 games project as clear underdog spots (Miami, Louisville, SMU). The season turns on 5 close games: NC State, California, Virginia, Georgia Tech, Duke.

Page 2 · Team Quality

What the Ratings Say

Overall SP+
#58
+3.6 rating
Offense
#83
24.2 pts/gm · below average
Defense
#31
20.7 allowed · strong
Special teams
#78
+0.0 value

Unit ranks, 1–138 national

Offense#83
Defense#31
Special teams#78

Bars run left (worst) to right (best): a longer bar is a better national rank. Special-teams ratings are volatile year to year.

2025 resultRecordConfSP+ rank OffDefST
Where they finished9-4 4-4 #52 #71 #34 #76

Sideline

Jake Dickert — year 2, 9-4 career.

OC: returning
DC: returning

Defense ranked 9th in success rate allowed and yards per play; carried inefficient offense

Returning production

53% overall, ranked #62 nationally.

Offense 45% · Defense 61%

125 returning starts, 17 redshirt freshmen.

Two models, one slate. This report's schedule math projects 6.03 wins; Connelly's published model projects 6.2 (3.6 in conference) with a strength-of-schedule rank of #58. His model gives 66.5% odds of six-plus wins and 0.2% of eleven-plus. Two independent methods landing close together is corroboration, not confirmation — they share SP+ as an input.
Page 3 · Schedule Math

Game-by-Game Projection

WeekDateOpponentOpp SP+ Proj marginWin %Tier
Wk 12026-09-03vs Akron#127 / -19.5+25.696%Should win
Wk 22026-09-12@ Purdue#82 / -2.9+4.062%Lean win
Wk 32026-09-18vs Miami#8 / +21.0-14.913%Upset needed
Wk 42026-09-26@ Louisville#27 / +11.0-9.922%Upset needed
Wk 52026-10-03vs Stanford#75 / -1.9+8.073%Lean win
Wk 62026-10-10@ NC State#48 / +4.9-3.838%Lean loss
Wk 72026-10-17@ California#56 / +3.7-2.642%Lean loss
Wk 92026-10-31vs Virginia#40 / +6.6-0.548%Swing
Wk 102026-11-07vs MerrimackFCS+31.198%Should win
Wk 112026-11-14@ SMU#28 / +10.9-9.823%Upset needed
Wk 122026-11-21@ Georgia Tech#43 / +6.0-4.935%Lean loss
Wk 132026-11-28vs Duke#44 / +5.7+0.451%Swing

Opening third

1.94

expected wins across 4 games
Akron, Purdue, Miami, Louisville

Middle third

2.02

expected wins across 4 games
Stanford, NC State, California, Virginia

Closing third

2.07

expected wins across 4 games
Merrimack, SMU, Georgia Tech, Duke

How to read the margin column. It is the SP+ rating gap plus home field, in points — a positive number means the model favors Wake Forest. Win percentage is that margin mapped through a logistic calibrated so a seven-point favorite wins about 70% of the time.
Page 4 · Outlook

Season Distribution

Expected wins
6.03
across 12 games
Bowl odds
64%
six or more wins
Total mass
100%
distribution sums to 100%
Conference
ACC
18 teams rated

Win-total probability

2 wins0.5%
3 wins3.2%
4 wins11.0%
5 wins21.6%
6 wins26.7%
7 wins21.3%
8 wins11.1%
9 wins3.7%
10 wins0.8%

Exact Poisson-binomial over the projected game probabilities. Bars are scaled to the most likely outcome, and the percentages are absolute.

Quarterback

Gio Lopez

transfer (South Alabama/North Carolina) limited sample

Former South Alabama star and UNC bust; will likely take over; all-or-nothing offense

Program context

Def Rank Success · 9
Defense ranked 9th in both success rate allowed and yards per play

One Score Record · 4-1
Went 4-1 in one-score finishes despite inefficient offense and negative turnover margin

Page 5 · Conference & Method

Where They Sit in the ACC

#TeamSP+ rankRatingOff DefRet prodRet rank
1Notre Dame#3+25.8#3#972%#1
2Miami#8+21.0#12#749%#78
3Clemson#23+12.8#48#1653%#60
4Louisville#27+11.0#36#2653%#59
5SMU#28+10.9#25#3262%#22
6Virginia Tech#32+9.4#34#3869%#4
7Florida State#35+8.8#45#3057%#48
8Virginia#40+6.6#63#2759%#36
9Pittsburgh#41+6.5#40#5358%#41
10Georgia Tech#43+6.0#53#5149%#79
11Duke#44+5.7#19#8149%#77
12NC State#48+4.9#35#6454%#58
13North Carolina#54+3.8#80#3544%#103
14California#56+3.7#50#6258%#43
15Wake Forest#58+3.6#83#3153%#62
16Syracuse#69-0.7#85#5962%#27
17Boston College#74-1.5#67#8050%#74
18Stanford#75-1.9#97#5560%#33

Method & Provenance

Sp 2026. Committed preseason SP+ snapshot data/external/cfbd_2026/sp_plus_2026.csv via cfb_model_lab.preseason.load_sp_plus; CFBD /ratings/sp returns zero rows for 2026.

Schedule. data/external/cfbd_2026/schedule_2026.csv (CFBD /games snapshot, regular season only).

Connelly. Bill Connelly ESPN+ 2026 conference previews extracted to data/external/connelly_*_2026/.

Projection Method. SP+ differential plus 2.5-point home field, mapped to win probability by a logistic with scale 8.0 (illustrative scale; not validated for this SP+ snapshot). Win distribution is an exact Poisson-binomial assuming independent games. Not a betting model and not the repo's StackedEnsemble forecast.

Lower Division. FCS/lower-division opponents absent from the FBS SP+ table are assigned a -25.0 rating placeholder.

Not betting advice. No market lines were pulled for this report and no edge is claimed. These are schedule-strength projections from public preseason ratings. If a real market exists, price it independently.