Team statistics
Raw CFBD statistics · 2026
2026 is a partial regular season through provider Week 9. PPA values are raw, before opponent adjustment.
Offense PPA/play vs Defense PPA/play quadrant scatter
Team style
2026 · Through provider Week 9, captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:07:26 CST. CFBD advanced season statistics. Raw PPA, success rates and line yards; no opponent adjustment.
Success rate is CFBD's share of plays that succeeded. Standard downs are first down, second-and-7 or shorter, and third/fourth-and-4 or shorter. All others are passing downs. Line yards weight rushing gains; PPA measures expected points added. These stats do not identify coaching or blocking causes.
Compare offense and defense line yards
offense
Higher is better on both axes: upper right.
138/138 teams plotted · 0 missing · 0 sparse or unknown samples
138/138 teams plotted · 0 missing · 0 sparse or unknown samples
defense
Lower allowed is better on both axes: lower left.
138/138 teams plotted · 0 missing · 0 sparse or unknown samples
138/138 teams plotted · 0 missing · 0 sparse or unknown samples
The highlight team is the highlighted point; the compare team is the larger plain point. Hollow points have fewer than 50 estimated plays on either axis, or unknown coverage. This is a display flag, not a reliability threshold. Counts estimate provider plays × split rate, rounded; they are not audited play counts. Values remain visible.
Team rankings by Offense PPA/play
2026 · Through provider Week 9 · National FBS population: 138 numeric teams. Higher values are better. This is display order; ties retain published source order. Search keeps these positions; missing values are unranked.
| # | Team | Conf | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miami | ACC | 0.39 | 0.05 | 0.52 | 0.39 | 1.31 | 1.28 |
| 2 | Wake Forest | ACC | 0.36 | 0.02 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 1.32 | 1.05 |
| 3 | Notre Dame | FBS Independents | 0.35 | -0.01 | 0.51 | 0.37 | 1.18 | 1.17 |
| 4 | Louisville | ACC | 0.33 | 0.06 | 0.50 | 0.39 | 1.40 | 1.28 |
| 5 | North Texas | American Athletic | 0.32 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 1.35 | 1.29 |
| 6 | Houston | Big 12 | 0.32 | 0.15 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 1.12 | 1.28 |
| 7 | Northwestern | Big Ten | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 1.33 | 1.19 |
| 8 | Army | American Athletic | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 1.14 | 1.32 |
| 9 | Boise State | Pac-12 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 1.27 | 1.58 |
| 10 | Georgia | SEC | 0.30 | -0.01 | 0.52 | 0.35 | 1.18 | 1.26 |
| 11 | Oregon State | Pac-12 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.49 | 0.40 | 1.27 | 1.20 |
| 12 | Indiana | Big Ten | 0.28 | -0.06 | 0.45 | 0.31 | 1.36 | 1.38 |
| 13 | LSU | SEC | 0.27 | -0.07 | 0.51 | 0.34 | 1.20 | 1.19 |
| 14 | Ohio State | Big Ten | 0.26 | -0.06 | 0.48 | 0.35 | 1.28 | 1.24 |
| 15 | Utah | Big 12 | 0.25 | -0.03 | 0.50 | 0.35 | 1.27 | 1.38 |
| 16 | Cincinnati | Big 12 | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 1.40 | 1.22 |
| 17 | SMU | ACC | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 1.26 | 1.25 |
| 18 | Alabama | SEC | 0.25 | -0.04 | 0.47 | 0.37 | 1.30 | 1.29 |
| 19 | Oklahoma State | Big 12 | 0.24 | 0.12 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 1.18 | 1.29 |
| 20 | Texas State | Pac-12 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 1.29 | 1.24 |
| 21 | UConn | FBS Independents | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 1.39 | 1.14 |
| 22 | USC | Big Ten | 0.24 | 0.13 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 1.20 | 1.25 |
| 23 | Duke | ACC | 0.24 | -0.06 | 0.42 | 0.38 | 1.34 | 1.09 |
| 24 | Ole Miss | SEC | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 1.18 | 1.27 |
| 25 | Memphis | American Athletic | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.50 | 0.38 | 1.22 | 1.35 |
Top 25 of 138. Click a column header to rank by it.
35 offenses are above the median on explosiveness and below it on success: big plays without down-to-down efficiency. 34 are above both medians, 35 efficient but not explosive, 34 below both. The highlighted dots are the boom-or-bust offenses.
| Offense PPA/play | Offense success rate | Offense explosiveness | Offense line yards | Offense havoc allowed | Offense PPO | Defense PPA/play | Defense success rate | Defense explosiveness | Defense line yards | Defense havoc created | Defense PPO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense PPA/play | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.20 | 0.61 | -0.74 | 0.83 | -0.17 | -0.19 | 0.19 | -0.28 | 0.21 | -0.17 |
| Offense success rate | 0.88 | 1.00 | -0.14 | 0.65 | -0.70 | 0.76 | -0.13 | -0.19 | 0.18 | -0.26 | 0.17 | -0.09 |
| Offense explosiveness | 0.20 | -0.14 | 1.00 | -0.10 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.10 | -0.07 | -0.00 | 0.02 |
| Offense line yards | 0.61 | 0.65 | -0.10 | 1.00 | -0.62 | 0.49 | -0.02 | -0.04 | 0.10 | -0.02 | -0.02 | -0.08 |
| Offense havoc allowed | -0.74 | -0.70 | 0.08 | -0.62 | 1.00 | -0.66 | 0.11 | 0.12 | -0.14 | 0.19 | -0.11 | 0.08 |
| Offense PPO | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.08 | 0.49 | -0.66 | 1.00 | -0.16 | -0.18 | 0.16 | -0.25 | 0.22 | -0.18 |
| Defense PPA/play | -0.17 | -0.13 | 0.08 | -0.02 | 0.11 | -0.16 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.21 | 0.61 | -0.72 | 0.82 |
| Defense success rate | -0.19 | -0.19 | 0.08 | -0.04 | 0.12 | -0.18 | 0.86 | 1.00 | -0.15 | 0.68 | -0.71 | 0.72 |
| Defense explosiveness | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.10 | -0.14 | 0.16 | 0.21 | -0.15 | 1.00 | -0.17 | 0.04 | 0.20 |
| Defense line yards | -0.28 | -0.26 | -0.07 | -0.02 | 0.19 | -0.25 | 0.61 | 0.68 | -0.17 | 1.00 | -0.68 | 0.48 |
| Defense havoc created | 0.21 | 0.17 | -0.00 | -0.02 | -0.11 | 0.22 | -0.72 | -0.71 | 0.04 | -0.68 | 1.00 | -0.60 |
| Defense PPO | -0.17 | -0.09 | 0.02 | -0.08 | 0.08 | -0.18 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.20 | 0.48 | -0.60 | 1.00 |
Highlighted cells are positive correlations and gray cells negative; the stronger the shading, the stronger the correlation. Raw season values across FBS teams; correlation across teams is not causation within one.
Method
PPA is points added per play before opponent adjustment. Lower defense values mean fewer points allowed.
Line yards versus highlight yards · adjusted percentiles
2026 · CFBD opponent-adjusted rushing metrics. Line yards describe weighted initial production; highlight yards describe production beyond the line-yards component. These team metrics do not isolate line or runner skill or establish a cause.
Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:03:22 CST · included-game cutoff, source update time and model version unavailable. Capture is not a through-week boundary. Derived values and receipt · CFBD definitions.
Axes are percentiles (0–100), not yards per carry. Both metrics use the same captured, paired FBS population on each side. Direction-aware midpoint-position percentiles within same-capture FBS teams having both metrics on each side. Ties share midpoint; higher percentile is favorable on both axes. Raw adjusted values stay private. Rushing opportunities and source numerator totals are unavailable; small samples cannot be identified. Raw season-statistic line yards above use a separate basis.
138 paired teams of 138 FBS teams · 0 missing pairs. Upper right is favorable on both sides; defense percentiles reward lower allowed values.
Hover, tap, or focus a point for its name and values. Use arrow keys to move between points; Enter or Space keeps details open, Escape closes them.
All adjusted rushing percentiles
Capture 20261106T120115459089Z · source SHA-256 d5400a3e706bffe47ce55e213ade43b9853b4b3ce9657dc6321efb2f7af79a47. Model: provider WEPA adjustment; exact version not supplied. No production forecast inputs.