Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Situations and tempo

CFBD play-by-play and drives · 2014–2026 · raw PPA

Highlights third downs, net success by half, tempo and offensive half splits. League-wide tables remain unchanged.

2026 regular season through Week 9. Raw PPA; no opponent adjustment.

Compare third-down conversion and distance
Compare net success between halves

PPA by down and distance · 2026

League-wide mean points added per play; stronger shading is further from zero. Success rate in parentheses.

Down1-3 yds4-6 yds7-10 yds11+ yds
10.180 (66%)0.166 (57%)0.031 (45%)0.233 (26%)
2-0.022 (64%)0.151 (51%)0.220 (38%)0.245 (24%)
30.601 (65%)0.475 (44%)0.453 (33%)0.281 (17%)
4-0.150 (66%)-1.054 (43%)-1.526 (34%)-1.470 (23%)

By score state · 2026

Offense isPPASuccessPass rate
Trailing 9+-0.03239%58%
Trailing 1-80.05641%51%
Tied0.11043%47%
Leading 1-80.26145%45%
Leading 9+0.35350%39%

By quarter · 2026

QuarterPPASuccessPass rate
10.19445%47%
20.17244%51%
30.16944%47%
40.08342%45%
Net points per drive by starting field position2026: highlighted solid line · pooled 2014–2026: dashed line
1-10 yards to goal: 3.67 net points, TD 63%, n=7911-20 yards to goal: 4.06 net points, TD 58%, n=15921-30 yards to goal: 4.08 net points, TD 54%, n=25531-40 yards to goal: 3.92 net points, TD 49%, n=35841-50 yards to goal: 3.39 net points, TD 44%, n=56951-60 yards to goal: 2.98 net points, TD 39%, n=89261-70 yards to goal: 2.62 net points, TD 35%, n=173371-80 yards to goal: 2.02 net points, TD 27%, n=583981-90 yards to goal: 1.81 net points, TD 26%, n=148691-100 yards to goal: 1.22 net points, TD 19%, n=7611030507090yards to goal at the start of the drive →
Start (yds to goal)DrivesTDFGTurnoverNet pts / drive
1-107963%24%6%3.67
11-2015958%30%7%4.06
21-3025554%22%16%4.08
31-4035849%21%12%3.92
41-5056944%16%17%3.39
51-6089239%15%18%2.98
61-701,73335%12%17%2.62
71-805,83927%10%20%2.02
81-901,48626%8%18%1.81
91-10076119%6%20%1.22
Success rate by half · 2026138 offenses · first half x, second half y
Air Force: First-half success 50.8%; Second-half success 50.8%; First / second-half plays 244 / 331Akron: First-half success 44.8%; Second-half success 43.0%; First / second-half plays 250 / 265Alabama: First-half success 44.4%; Second-half success 51.7%; First / second-half plays 259 / 238App State: First-half success 39.7%; Second-half success 48.0%; First / second-half plays 272 / 252Arizona: First-half success 53.7%; Second-half success 41.9%; First / second-half plays 287 / 260Arizona State: First-half success 47.0%; Second-half success 39.3%; First / second-half plays 281 / 272Arkansas: First-half success 39.9%; Second-half success 46.2%; First / second-half plays 273 / 273Arkansas State: First-half success 48.0%; Second-half success 49.4%; First / second-half plays 256 / 239Army: First-half success 53.8%; Second-half success 49.0%; First / second-half plays 266 / 249Auburn: First-half success 34.1%; Second-half success 46.6%; First / second-half plays 276 / 279BYU: First-half success 52.5%; Second-half success 44.7%; First / second-half plays 261 / 228Ball State: First-half success 41.9%; Second-half success 39.4%; First / second-half plays 253 / 246Baylor: First-half success 41.6%; Second-half success 37.0%; First / second-half plays 329 / 289Boise State: First-half success 49.7%; Second-half success 45.1%; First / second-half plays 304 / 266Boston College: First-half success 37.7%; Second-half success 47.2%; First / second-half plays 252 / 252Bowling Green: First-half success 38.1%; Second-half success 39.7%; First / second-half plays 260 / 257Buffalo: First-half success 34.8%; Second-half success 37.7%; First / second-half plays 305 / 273California: First-half success 38.4%; Second-half success 37.3%; First / second-half plays 336 / 295Central Michigan: First-half success 42.1%; Second-half success 36.9%; First / second-half plays 228 / 244Charlotte: First-half success 40.2%; Second-half success 36.6%; First / second-half plays 239 / 227Cincinnati: First-half success 45.8%; Second-half success 47.9%; First / second-half plays 262 / 261Clemson: First-half success 36.4%; Second-half success 40.3%; First / second-half plays 308 / 238Coastal Carolina: First-half success 44.2%; Second-half success 37.9%; First / second-half plays 269 / 243Colorado: First-half success 42.5%; Second-half success 38.4%; First / second-half plays 254 / 284Colorado State: First-half success 45.7%; Second-half success 47.1%; First / second-half plays 267 / 261Delaware: First-half success 46.8%; Second-half success 39.8%; First / second-half plays 263 / 256Duke: First-half success 42.6%; Second-half success 41.0%; First / second-half plays 251 / 283East Carolina: First-half success 40.8%; Second-half success 36.8%; First / second-half plays 277 / 253Eastern Michigan: First-half success 41.4%; Second-half success 36.8%; First / second-half plays 319 / 277Florida: First-half success 46.4%; Second-half success 44.7%; First / second-half plays 280 / 275Florida Atlantic: First-half success 49.2%; Second-half success 42.4%; First / second-half plays 327 / 288Florida International: First-half success 41.1%; Second-half success 40.4%; First / second-half plays 258 / 280Florida State: First-half success 45.5%; Second-half success 42.3%; First / second-half plays 266 / 234Fresno State: First-half success 42.7%; Second-half success 39.3%; First / second-half plays 253 / 224Georgia: First-half success 56.5%; Second-half success 48.2%; First / second-half plays 237 / 251Georgia Southern: First-half success 45.0%; Second-half success 42.5%; First / second-half plays 269 / 285Georgia State: First-half success 48.8%; Second-half success 43.3%; First / second-half plays 279 / 261Georgia Tech: First-half success 41.7%; Second-half success 43.3%; First / second-half plays 264 / 240Hawai'i: First-half success 41.4%; Second-half success 42.3%; First / second-half plays 268 / 298Houston: First-half success 55.9%; Second-half success 50.8%; First / second-half plays 304 / 260Illinois: First-half success 47.1%; Second-half success 48.4%; First / second-half plays 246 / 248Indiana: First-half success 44.1%; Second-half success 44.6%; First / second-half plays 281 / 260Iowa: First-half success 48.0%; Second-half success 40.9%; First / second-half plays 281 / 215Iowa State: First-half success 42.0%; Second-half success 37.0%; First / second-half plays 245 / 251Jacksonville State: First-half success 49.3%; Second-half success 48.6%; First / second-half plays 229 / 253James Madison: First-half success 47.3%; Second-half success 44.9%; First / second-half plays 311 / 305Kansas: First-half success 40.8%; Second-half success 46.2%; First / second-half plays 282 / 299Kansas State: First-half success 47.8%; Second-half success 47.6%; First / second-half plays 289 / 269Kennesaw State: First-half success 44.4%; Second-half success 43.8%; First / second-half plays 241 / 265Kent State: First-half success 33.8%; Second-half success 33.6%; First / second-half plays 302 / 253Kentucky: First-half success 48.7%; Second-half success 49.8%; First / second-half plays 238 / 263LSU: First-half success 52.8%; Second-half success 49.8%; First / second-half plays 333 / 297Liberty: First-half success 53.5%; Second-half success 46.1%; First / second-half plays 260 / 241Louisiana: First-half success 41.1%; Second-half success 47.4%; First / second-half plays 265 / 274Louisiana Tech: First-half success 41.9%; Second-half success 40.9%; First / second-half plays 253 / 269Louisville: First-half success 51.4%; Second-half success 49.2%; First / second-half plays 255 / 246Marshall: First-half success 45.8%; Second-half success 41.2%; First / second-half plays 288 / 262Maryland: First-half success 41.0%; Second-half success 41.8%; First / second-half plays 283 / 249Massachusetts: First-half success 41.7%; Second-half success 43.4%; First / second-half plays 252 / 212Memphis: First-half success 53.2%; Second-half success 49.6%; First / second-half plays 284 / 349Miami (FL): First-half success 57.7%; Second-half success 48.0%; First / second-half plays 286 / 256Miami (OH): First-half success 48.7%; Second-half success 34.2%; First / second-half plays 236 / 225Michigan: First-half success 42.1%; Second-half success 41.9%; First / second-half plays 247 / 234Michigan State: First-half success 43.8%; Second-half success 41.3%; First / second-half plays 242 / 252Middle Tennessee: First-half success 42.7%; Second-half success 38.2%; First / second-half plays 260 / 238Minnesota: First-half success 40.8%; Second-half success 38.2%; First / second-half plays 240 / 246Mississippi State: First-half success 46.1%; Second-half success 43.3%; First / second-half plays 280 / 268Missouri: First-half success 42.7%; Second-half success 39.4%; First / second-half plays 293 / 249Missouri State: First-half success 43.2%; Second-half success 39.5%; First / second-half plays 266 / 228NC State: First-half success 46.4%; Second-half success 45.7%; First / second-half plays 267 / 282Navy: First-half success 46.9%; Second-half success 49.1%; First / second-half plays 279 / 234Nebraska: First-half success 47.1%; Second-half success 42.5%; First / second-half plays 312 / 261Nevada: First-half success 38.3%; Second-half success 42.2%; First / second-half plays 256 / 249New Mexico: First-half success 46.0%; Second-half success 39.0%; First / second-half plays 263 / 236New Mexico State: First-half success 36.5%; Second-half success 45.8%; First / second-half plays 263 / 238North Carolina: First-half success 48.9%; Second-half success 47.4%; First / second-half plays 239 / 230North Dakota State: First-half success 43.8%; Second-half success 36.4%; First / second-half plays 331 / 250North Texas: First-half success 51.1%; Second-half success 49.3%; First / second-half plays 272 / 298Northern Illinois: First-half success 40.5%; Second-half success 40.2%; First / second-half plays 247 / 249Northwestern: First-half success 48.6%; Second-half success 48.5%; First / second-half plays 251 / 266Notre Dame: First-half success 50.8%; Second-half success 51.7%; First / second-half plays 244 / 294Ohio: First-half success 50.0%; Second-half success 45.0%; First / second-half plays 262 / 231Ohio State: First-half success 52.0%; Second-half success 45.9%; First / second-half plays 304 / 253Oklahoma: First-half success 38.4%; Second-half success 39.7%; First / second-half plays 255 / 262Oklahoma State: First-half success 53.8%; Second-half success 50.3%; First / second-half plays 266 / 312Old Dominion: First-half success 33.9%; Second-half success 30.6%; First / second-half plays 307 / 255Ole Miss: First-half success 50.3%; Second-half success 50.9%; First / second-half plays 296 / 271Oregon: First-half success 38.6%; Second-half success 47.4%; First / second-half plays 267 / 285Oregon State: First-half success 51.3%; Second-half success 48.0%; First / second-half plays 314 / 273Penn State: First-half success 41.4%; Second-half success 43.8%; First / second-half plays 273 / 267Pittsburgh: First-half success 46.3%; Second-half success 44.2%; First / second-half plays 328 / 312Purdue: First-half success 47.1%; Second-half success 40.5%; First / second-half plays 261 / 247Rice: First-half success 40.0%; Second-half success 44.0%; First / second-half plays 260 / 234Rutgers: First-half success 42.2%; Second-half success 44.7%; First / second-half plays 251 / 253SMU: First-half success 50.4%; Second-half success 48.3%; First / second-half plays 278 / 263Sacramento State: First-half success 33.7%; Second-half success 44.8%; First / second-half plays 291 / 288Sam Houston: First-half success 36.2%; Second-half success 40.2%; First / second-half plays 246 / 254San Diego State: First-half success 38.1%; Second-half success 38.0%; First / second-half plays 278 / 271San José State: First-half success 37.5%; Second-half success 38.6%; First / second-half plays 277 / 293South Alabama: First-half success 46.4%; Second-half success 40.7%; First / second-half plays 289 / 285South Carolina: First-half success 46.8%; Second-half success 45.3%; First / second-half plays 310 / 254South Florida: First-half success 43.8%; Second-half success 47.5%; First / second-half plays 224 / 244Southern Miss: First-half success 40.1%; Second-half success 44.6%; First / second-half plays 294 / 260Stanford: First-half success 39.7%; Second-half success 36.7%; First / second-half plays 310 / 275Syracuse: First-half success 46.0%; Second-half success 41.2%; First / second-half plays 296 / 323TCU: First-half success 47.6%; Second-half success 39.3%; First / second-half plays 269 / 262Temple: First-half success 47.3%; Second-half success 39.1%; First / second-half plays 245 / 210Tennessee: First-half success 43.6%; Second-half success 48.8%; First / second-half plays 307 / 248Texas: First-half success 45.2%; Second-half success 40.6%; First / second-half plays 261 / 261Texas A&M: First-half success 44.6%; Second-half success 42.8%; First / second-half plays 280 / 262Texas State: First-half success 51.8%; Second-half success 47.1%; First / second-half plays 297 / 293Texas Tech: First-half success 49.6%; Second-half success 46.2%; First / second-half plays 278 / 262Toledo: First-half success 46.0%; Second-half success 43.8%; First / second-half plays 272 / 292Troy: First-half success 41.7%; Second-half success 36.1%; First / second-half plays 302 / 249Tulane: First-half success 39.6%; Second-half success 32.0%; First / second-half plays 250 / 225Tulsa: First-half success 38.1%; Second-half success 43.5%; First / second-half plays 265 / 246UAB: First-half success 41.2%; Second-half success 39.7%; First / second-half plays 262 / 257UCF: First-half success 45.6%; Second-half success 39.4%; First / second-half plays 248 / 254UCLA: First-half success 45.7%; Second-half success 48.2%; First / second-half plays 291 / 247UConn: First-half success 47.3%; Second-half success 42.6%; First / second-half plays 298 / 211UL Monroe: First-half success 39.0%; Second-half success 43.4%; First / second-half plays 231 / 295UNLV: First-half success 42.6%; Second-half success 37.8%; First / second-half plays 279 / 241USC: First-half success 52.0%; Second-half success 48.6%; First / second-half plays 321 / 288UTEP: First-half success 32.8%; Second-half success 38.0%; First / second-half plays 201 / 255UTSA: First-half success 49.6%; Second-half success 45.8%; First / second-half plays 270 / 264Utah: First-half success 55.0%; Second-half success 46.8%; First / second-half plays 289 / 269Utah State: First-half success 33.1%; Second-half success 41.8%; First / second-half plays 242 / 263Vanderbilt: First-half success 40.5%; Second-half success 43.9%; First / second-half plays 264 / 230Virginia: First-half success 45.2%; Second-half success 40.1%; First / second-half plays 283 / 319Virginia Tech: First-half success 49.0%; Second-half success 40.6%; First / second-half plays 306 / 271Wake Forest: First-half success 52.8%; Second-half success 44.9%; First / second-half plays 263 / 254Washington: First-half success 45.1%; Second-half success 38.4%; First / second-half plays 268 / 237Washington State: First-half success 40.5%; Second-half success 33.9%; First / second-half plays 289 / 301West Virginia: First-half success 47.1%; Second-half success 40.6%; First / second-half plays 291 / 303Western Kentucky: First-half success 42.9%; Second-half success 34.7%; First / second-half plays 303 / 277Western Michigan: First-half success 36.3%; Second-half success 46.0%; First / second-half plays 248 / 287Wisconsin: First-half success 40.3%; Second-half success 39.5%; First / second-half plays 233 / 223Wyoming: First-half success 45.0%; Second-half success 46.5%; First / second-half plays 238 / 213first-half success rate →second-half success rate →

Hover, tap, or focus a point for its name and values. Use arrow keys to move between points; Enter or Space keeps details open, Escape closes them.

Largest second-half swings, 2026
Team1st half2nd halfChange
Miami (OH) · Mid-American48.7%34.2%-14.5 pts
Auburn · SEC34.1%46.6%+12.5 pts
Arizona · Big 1253.7%41.9%-11.7 pts
Sacramento State · Mid-American33.7%44.8%+11.1 pts
Western Michigan · Mid-American36.3%46.0%+9.7 pts
Miami · ACC57.7%48.0%-9.6 pts
Boston College · ACC37.7%47.2%+9.5 pts
New Mexico State · Conference USA36.5%45.8%+9.3 pts
Oregon · Big Ten38.6%47.4%+8.8 pts
Utah State · Pac-1233.1%41.8%+8.8 pts
Tempo · seconds per play vs plays per game · 2026138 FBS offenses
Baylor: Seconds / play 20.2; Scrimmage plays / game 77.3; Games 8Auburn: Seconds / play 20.3; Scrimmage plays / game 69.4; Games 8West Virginia: Seconds / play 20.4; Scrimmage plays / game 74.3; Games 8Florida Atlantic: Seconds / play 20.7; Scrimmage plays / game 76.9; Games 8Ole Miss: Seconds / play 21.1; Scrimmage plays / game 70.9; Games 8Southern Miss: Seconds / play 21.1; Scrimmage plays / game 69.3; Games 8San Diego State: Seconds / play 21.2; Scrimmage plays / game 61.0; Games 9San José State: Seconds / play 21.9; Scrimmage plays / game 63.7; Games 9Kennesaw State: Seconds / play 22.0; Scrimmage plays / game 63.3; Games 8Mississippi State: Seconds / play 22.1; Scrimmage plays / game 68.5; Games 8Clemson: Seconds / play 22.2; Scrimmage plays / game 68.3; Games 8Oregon: Seconds / play 22.4; Scrimmage plays / game 69.0; Games 8Texas Tech: Seconds / play 22.4; Scrimmage plays / game 67.5; Games 8Oklahoma State: Seconds / play 22.4; Scrimmage plays / game 72.3; Games 8Stanford: Seconds / play 22.6; Scrimmage plays / game 65.0; Games 9Memphis: Seconds / play 22.6; Scrimmage plays / game 70.6; Games 9South Carolina: Seconds / play 22.6; Scrimmage plays / game 71.3; Games 8Western Kentucky: Seconds / play 22.7; Scrimmage plays / game 72.5; Games 8Tulsa: Seconds / play 22.7; Scrimmage plays / game 64.6; Games 8Tulane: Seconds / play 22.8; Scrimmage plays / game 60.1; Games 8Old Dominion: Seconds / play 22.8; Scrimmage plays / game 62.4; Games 9Texas State: Seconds / play 22.8; Scrimmage plays / game 73.8; Games 8Syracuse: Seconds / play 22.9; Scrimmage plays / game 79.0; Games 8Georgia Tech: Seconds / play 22.9; Scrimmage plays / game 63.0; Games 8California: Seconds / play 23.0; Scrimmage plays / game 70.1; Games 9LSU: Seconds / play 23.0; Scrimmage plays / game 79.0; Games 8App State: Seconds / play 23.1; Scrimmage plays / game 65.8; Games 8Hawai'i: Seconds / play 23.2; Scrimmage plays / game 70.8; Games 8SMU: Seconds / play 23.2; Scrimmage plays / game 67.6; Games 8Colorado: Seconds / play 23.3; Scrimmage plays / game 67.9; Games 8Missouri State: Seconds / play 23.4; Scrimmage plays / game 61.8; Games 8UL Monroe: Seconds / play 23.4; Scrimmage plays / game 65.8; Games 8Toledo: Seconds / play 23.5; Scrimmage plays / game 70.8; Games 8Virginia Tech: Seconds / play 23.6; Scrimmage plays / game 72.1; Games 8UNLV: Seconds / play 23.7; Scrimmage plays / game 65.0; Games 8Utah State: Seconds / play 23.7; Scrimmage plays / game 63.1; Games 8Washington: Seconds / play 23.8; Scrimmage plays / game 63.1; Games 8Kansas: Seconds / play 23.8; Scrimmage plays / game 72.6; Games 8Washington State: Seconds / play 23.8; Scrimmage plays / game 65.6; Games 9Maryland: Seconds / play 23.8; Scrimmage plays / game 66.5; Games 8Tennessee: Seconds / play 23.9; Scrimmage plays / game 69.4; Games 8Missouri: Seconds / play 23.9; Scrimmage plays / game 67.8; Games 8North Texas: Seconds / play 23.9; Scrimmage plays / game 71.8; Games 8UConn: Seconds / play 23.9; Scrimmage plays / game 63.9; Games 8Florida State: Seconds / play 23.9; Scrimmage plays / game 63.3; Games 8Oregon State: Seconds / play 24.1; Scrimmage plays / game 73.4; Games 8Buffalo: Seconds / play 24.1; Scrimmage plays / game 72.8; Games 8Delaware: Seconds / play 24.1; Scrimmage plays / game 64.9; Games 8James Madison: Seconds / play 24.3; Scrimmage plays / game 69.3; Games 9Akron: Seconds / play 24.3; Scrimmage plays / game 64.4; Games 8East Carolina: Seconds / play 24.3; Scrimmage plays / game 67.1; Games 8New Mexico State: Seconds / play 24.3; Scrimmage plays / game 62.6; Games 8Pittsburgh: Seconds / play 24.3; Scrimmage plays / game 71.1; Games 9Colorado State: Seconds / play 24.4; Scrimmage plays / game 66.0; Games 8NC State: Seconds / play 24.4; Scrimmage plays / game 68.6; Games 8Wake Forest: Seconds / play 24.4; Scrimmage plays / game 65.9; Games 8Oklahoma: Seconds / play 24.5; Scrimmage plays / game 64.6; Games 8Coastal Carolina: Seconds / play 24.5; Scrimmage plays / game 64.0; Games 8Nevada: Seconds / play 24.6; Scrimmage plays / game 63.9; Games 8UCF: Seconds / play 24.6; Scrimmage plays / game 63.8; Games 8Arkansas: Seconds / play 24.6; Scrimmage plays / game 68.3; Games 8UTSA: Seconds / play 24.7; Scrimmage plays / game 66.8; Games 8Eastern Michigan: Seconds / play 24.8; Scrimmage plays / game 66.2; Games 9Georgia State: Seconds / play 24.9; Scrimmage plays / game 67.5; Games 8Florida: Seconds / play 25.1; Scrimmage plays / game 69.4; Games 8Arizona State: Seconds / play 25.2; Scrimmage plays / game 69.1; Games 8Middle Tennessee: Seconds / play 25.2; Scrimmage plays / game 62.3; Games 8Charlotte: Seconds / play 25.2; Scrimmage plays / game 59.8; Games 8Sacramento State: Seconds / play 25.2; Scrimmage plays / game 64.3; Games 9Houston: Seconds / play 25.3; Scrimmage plays / game 70.5; Games 8TCU: Seconds / play 25.3; Scrimmage plays / game 66.4; Games 8Cincinnati: Seconds / play 25.3; Scrimmage plays / game 65.4; Games 8UTEP: Seconds / play 25.4; Scrimmage plays / game 57.0; Games 8South Alabama: Seconds / play 25.4; Scrimmage plays / game 71.8; Games 8Vanderbilt: Seconds / play 25.5; Scrimmage plays / game 61.8; Games 8Kent State: Seconds / play 25.5; Scrimmage plays / game 61.7; Games 9Ball State: Seconds / play 25.5; Scrimmage plays / game 63.3; Games 8Iowa State: Seconds / play 25.5; Scrimmage plays / game 62.0; Games 8Virginia: Seconds / play 25.5; Scrimmage plays / game 66.9; Games 9Marshall: Seconds / play 25.6; Scrimmage plays / game 68.8; Games 8Iowa: Seconds / play 25.6; Scrimmage plays / game 62.0; Games 8Arizona: Seconds / play 25.7; Scrimmage plays / game 68.4; Games 8Nebraska: Seconds / play 25.8; Scrimmage plays / game 71.6; Games 8Sam Houston: Seconds / play 25.8; Scrimmage plays / game 62.5; Games 8North Carolina: Seconds / play 25.8; Scrimmage plays / game 59.4; Games 8Northern Illinois: Seconds / play 25.8; Scrimmage plays / game 62.0; Games 8Duke: Seconds / play 25.8; Scrimmage plays / game 66.8; Games 8Massachusetts: Seconds / play 25.8; Scrimmage plays / game 58.5; Games 8USC: Seconds / play 25.8; Scrimmage plays / game 67.7; Games 9Troy: Seconds / play 25.9; Scrimmage plays / game 69.6; Games 8Texas A&M: Seconds / play 26.0; Scrimmage plays / game 67.8; Games 8Kentucky: Seconds / play 26.0; Scrimmage plays / game 63.8; Games 8Purdue: Seconds / play 26.2; Scrimmage plays / game 65.1; Games 8Louisville: Seconds / play 26.2; Scrimmage plays / game 62.6; Games 8Alabama: Seconds / play 26.3; Scrimmage plays / game 62.1; Games 8Rice: Seconds / play 26.3; Scrimmage plays / game 61.8; Games 8Rutgers: Seconds / play 26.3; Scrimmage plays / game 63.0; Games 8Kansas State: Seconds / play 26.3; Scrimmage plays / game 70.5; Games 8Miami (OH): Seconds / play 26.5; Scrimmage plays / game 57.6; Games 8Miami (FL): Seconds / play 26.5; Scrimmage plays / game 68.4; Games 8Jacksonville State: Seconds / play 26.5; Scrimmage plays / game 61.3; Games 8North Dakota State: Seconds / play 26.5; Scrimmage plays / game 64.6; Games 9Illinois: Seconds / play 26.6; Scrimmage plays / game 61.9; Games 8Texas: Seconds / play 26.6; Scrimmage plays / game 65.3; Games 8UAB: Seconds / play 26.6; Scrimmage plays / game 65.6; Games 8UCLA: Seconds / play 26.7; Scrimmage plays / game 67.3; Games 8Michigan: Seconds / play 26.8; Scrimmage plays / game 61.0; Games 8Navy: Seconds / play 26.8; Scrimmage plays / game 64.1; Games 8Boston College: Seconds / play 26.8; Scrimmage plays / game 63.0; Games 8Georgia Southern: Seconds / play 26.9; Scrimmage plays / game 69.3; Games 8Utah: Seconds / play 26.9; Scrimmage plays / game 69.8; Games 8Central Michigan: Seconds / play 26.9; Scrimmage plays / game 59.0; Games 8Indiana: Seconds / play 26.9; Scrimmage plays / game 60.4; Games 9Louisiana Tech: Seconds / play 26.9; Scrimmage plays / game 65.3; Games 8BYU: Seconds / play 27.1; Scrimmage plays / game 62.1; Games 8Northwestern: Seconds / play 27.1; Scrimmage plays / game 64.6; Games 8Fresno State: Seconds / play 27.3; Scrimmage plays / game 59.6; Games 8Louisiana: Seconds / play 27.4; Scrimmage plays / game 67.4; Games 8Minnesota: Seconds / play 27.5; Scrimmage plays / game 61.5; Games 8Florida International: Seconds / play 27.6; Scrimmage plays / game 67.3; Games 8Notre Dame: Seconds / play 27.7; Scrimmage plays / game 67.3; Games 8Arkansas State: Seconds / play 27.7; Scrimmage plays / game 61.9; Games 8Temple: Seconds / play 27.7; Scrimmage plays / game 57.1; Games 8Wisconsin: Seconds / play 27.7; Scrimmage plays / game 57.0; Games 8Georgia: Seconds / play 28.1; Scrimmage plays / game 61.0; Games 8Western Michigan: Seconds / play 28.2; Scrimmage plays / game 59.4; Games 9Ohio State: Seconds / play 28.3; Scrimmage plays / game 69.6; Games 8Bowling Green: Seconds / play 28.7; Scrimmage plays / game 57.9; Games 9Boise State: Seconds / play 28.8; Scrimmage plays / game 71.3; Games 8Michigan State: Seconds / play 28.8; Scrimmage plays / game 62.4; Games 8New Mexico: Seconds / play 28.8; Scrimmage plays / game 62.4; Games 8Wyoming: Seconds / play 29.2; Scrimmage plays / game 57.0; Games 8Liberty: Seconds / play 29.4; Scrimmage plays / game 62.6; Games 8Air Force: Seconds / play 29.5; Scrimmage plays / game 73.1; Games 8Penn State: Seconds / play 29.7; Scrimmage plays / game 67.5; Games 8Ohio: Seconds / play 29.9; Scrimmage plays / game 62.4; Games 8South Florida: Seconds / play 30.1; Scrimmage plays / game 58.5; Games 8Army: Seconds / play 30.1; Scrimmage plays / game 64.4; Games 8seconds per play → (slower)scrimmage plays per game →

Hover, tap, or focus a point for its name and values. Use arrow keys to move between points; Enter or Space keeps details open, Escape closes them.

Fastest and slowest offenses, 2026
Teams / playplays / game
Baylor · Big 1220.277.3
Auburn · SEC20.369.4
West Virginia · Big 1220.474.3
Florida Atlantic · American Athletic20.776.9
Ole Miss · SEC21.170.9
Air Force · Mountain West29.573.1
Penn State · Big Ten29.767.5
Ohio · Mid-American29.962.4
South Florida · American Athletic30.158.5
Army · American Athletic30.164.4
Field-goal expected points by yards to goalCFBD capture 2026-09-22
1231020304050yards to goal (attempt distance = yards to goal + 17) →

Expected points of a field-goal attempt from each yards-to-goal (make probability times three), as published by CFBD; distance is yards to goal plus 17. Expected points fall below 1.5 at 32 yards to goal and below 1.0 at 39.

Values by distance
Field-goal expected points at ten-yard steps
Yards to goalDistanceExpected points
0172.85
10272.65
20372.25
30471.64
40570.82
50670.00
60770.00
70870.00
80970.00
901070.00
Method

Source: starter_pack/data/plays/<season>/regular_*_plays.csv and drives/drives_<season>.csv. FBS offenses, regular season; plays with a PPA value and a down 1-4.

Success: gain >= 50% of distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th. PPA: CFBD predicted points added per play, provider raw values; no opponent adjustment.

Seconds per play: mean clock difference between consecutive plays in a drive, 0-120 s, same period. Net points per drive: offense points on the drive minus points the defense scored on it. Cells with fewer than 25 plays or drives are omitted.

These are league and team descriptions, not model inputs.