Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Boston College

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Boston College's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 89.5 across 8 systems; best 65, worst 99, so they disagree by 34 places.

Lab EPA
#81
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#94
down 142026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#94
down 162026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#99
down 252026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#85
down 162026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#65
down 11 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#95
down 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#81
down 252026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#64 of 138
Schedule strength
#57 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#4 of 138
Game control
#70 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#95 of 138
Offense
#102 of 138
Defense
#63 of 138
Special teams
#130 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Boston College · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.033 net EPA/play

#81

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-4.76 points

#94 · Down 14 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -3.64 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -1.66, schedule #63 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +1.40. That is worth -5.30 on its own; the preseason prior of -2.92 still carries 23% of the weight, giving -4.76.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Boston College · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Cincinnati
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856777
-19.00 → -19.00+2.500.73498.29%+1.34-1.3680.111-1.257
Week 2 · Rutgers
home · 2026-09-11 · ID 401858214
+7.00 → +7.00-2.500.76378.62%-5.850.388-0.504-0.116
Week 3 · Maine
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858227
+6.00 → +6.00-2.500.79378.96%-25.00 (fixed lower division)0.313-2.239-1.925
Week 4 · Virginia Tech
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858242
-7.00 → -7.00-2.500.82499.31%+2.07-0.8840.193-0.691
Week 5 · SMU
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858246
-9.00 → -9.00+2.500.85729.67%+6.27-0.6290.607-0.022
Week 7 · Pittsburgh
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858267
+6.00 → +6.00-2.500.925910.45%+4.620.3660.4830.848
Week 8 · Georgia Tech
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858273
+22.00 → +22.00+2.500.962210.86%-6.672.660-0.7241.936
Week 9 · Duke
away · 2026-10-31 · ID 401858279
-45.00 → -35.00+2.501.000011.28%+7.01-3.6670.791-2.876

Game terms -4.10 points; prior term -0.66 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -4.76 points. The preseason prior is -2.92 with 22.57% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-4.9 SP+ points

#94 · Down 16 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

0.14 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#65 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -2.72 on 416 plays; defense -2.86 on 429 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Boston College 13 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-4 · conf 2-3 · home 3-1 · away 1-3 · expected wins 3.4
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 5-3 ATS (-2.1 avg) · 2025: 6-6 ATS (-3.0 avg)
Head coach
Bill O'Brien · hired 2024-02-09 · 9-16 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #95 (153 pts) · 2025 #59 (195 pts) · 2026 #53 (204 pts)
Returning
16% of production · 10% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing8%1%
Receiving23%21%
Rushing-62%8%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back193.000.861616.37
Defensive Line143.070.861912.07
Linebacker63.000.85745.14
Offensive Line123.000.859610.32
Quarterback53.000.86384.32
Receiver93.000.86547.79
Running Back53.000.86424.32
Special Teams103.000.85528.55

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Mason McKenzie · QB

CFBD athlete 5307005. Boston College (2026–2026); Saginaw Valley State (2025–2025)

Passing WEPA0.19419762.1%
Pass 94.7% · Rush 39.4%

1st 49.2% · 2nd 70.3% · 3rd 81.2%

Standard downs 52.3% · Passing downs 82.8%

Not linked
Mason McKenzie · QB

CFBD athlete 5307005. Boston College (2026–2026); Saginaw Valley State (2025–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.28410162.1%
Pass 94.7% · Rush 39.4%

1st 49.2% · 2nd 70.3% · 3rd 81.2%

Standard downs 52.3% · Passing downs 82.8%

Not linked
Bo MacCormack III · RB

CFBD athlete 5208592. Boston College (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1646217.3%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 27.1%

1st 20.1% · 2nd 12.0% · 3rd 19.7%

Standard downs 21.9% · Passing downs 8.3%

2025: 3★ · 0.8483
Evan Dickens · RB

CFBD athlete 5076122. Georgia Tech (2023–2024); Boston College (2026–2026); Liberty (2025–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1275016.9%
Pass 8.2% · Rush 24.7%

1st 20.8% · 2nd 19.2% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 20.8% · Passing downs 8.3%

2023: 3★ · 0.8539
Luca Lombardo · PK

CFBD athlete 5165482. Boston College (2023–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.0608—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Anthony Ferrucci · RB

CFBD athlete 5160640. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 4.1% · Rush 1.4%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 9.1%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 5.7%

Not linked
Brady Clough · TE

CFBD athlete 5222676. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 11.6% · Rush 1.1%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 10.3%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 9.7%

Not linked
Bryce Lewis · TE

CFBD athlete 5158490. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Cameron Kossmann · TE

CFBD athlete 5261457. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Danny Edgehille · TE

CFBD athlete 5222675. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 3.2% · 3rd 1.3%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Dawson Pough · WR

CFBD athlete 5214566. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 10.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.5% · 2nd 7.0% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 8.4%

Not linked
Femi Babalola · QB

CFBD athlete 5276589. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.5%
Pass 19.4% · Rush 3.6%

1st 8.3% · 2nd 10.5% · 3rd 15.4%

Standard downs 5.4% · Passing downs 20.8%

Not linked
Grayson Wilson · QB

CFBD athlete 5142236. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.5%
Pass 16.1% · Rush 7.1%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 15.8% · 3rd 15.4%

Standard downs 5.4% · Passing downs 20.8%

Not linked
Jackson Wade · WR

CFBD athlete 5151897. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 2.6%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Jaedn Skeete · WR

CFBD athlete 4871001. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 10.1% · Rush 0.6%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 6.8% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 7.0%

Not linked
Javarius Green · WR

CFBD athlete 5146747. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.4%
Pass 20.9% · Rush 0.7%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 11.5% · 3rd 17.8%

Standard downs 4.8% · Passing downs 18.9%

Not linked
John Montague · WR

CFBD athlete 5222689. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 9.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 2.8% · 3rd 8.0%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 5.4%

Not linked
Kaelan Chudzinski · TE

CFBD athlete 5250264. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.2%
Pass 16.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.2% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 15.4%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 16.7%

Not linked
Landon Wright · WR

CFBD athlete 5144853. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 7.5% · Rush 0.9%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 5.7% · 3rd 1.3%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Mekhi Dodd · RB

CFBD athlete 5211163. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.0%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 10.1%

1st 12.5% · 2nd 3.8% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 9.1% · Passing downs 1.4%

Not linked
Nedrick Boldin Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5203610. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 4.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.7% · 2nd 1.9% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 0.4% · Passing downs 4.6%

Not linked
Nolan Ray · RB

CFBD athlete 4921316. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 1.4% · Rush 6.1%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 4.8% · Passing downs 2.1%

Not linked
Reed Swanson · WR

CFBD athlete 5152600. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 9.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 4.5% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Zeke Moore · TE

CFBD athlete 5077304. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.3% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 3.0%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 26 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Alex DeGrieck · EDGEHarvard2026-02-083★ / 0.8300Immediate
Anthony Palano · LBWashington State2026-01-052★ / —Immediate
Bodie Kahoun · LBNotre Dame2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Bryce LaFollette · PTowson2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Cameron Kossmann · TEFlorida2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Chandler Jordan · SGeorgia State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Christian Hudson · DLColorado2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Demetrius Ballard · EDGEBuffalo2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Evan Dickens · RBLiberty2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Grayson Wilson · QBArkansas2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jackson Wade · WRFlorida2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jani Norwood · OTNorth Carolina2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Javarius Green · WRNorth Carolina2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Justin Medlock · LBSMU2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
KJ Sampson · DLFlorida State2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kameron Howard · SAlabama2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kris Jones · LBGeorgia2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Kristian Phillips · IOLMichigan State2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Landon Wright · WRWashington State2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Mason McKenzie · QBSaginaw Valley State2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Nolan Ray · RBMaryland2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Owen Snively · IOLEastern Michigan2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Reed Swanson · WRColgate2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Reggie Jackson · OTJacksonville State2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Trevon Humphrey · OTNorth Carolina Central2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Veguer Jean-Jumeau · OTTennessee State2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 30 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Alex Broome · RBAbilene Christian2026-09-083★ / —Immediate
Amari Jackson · CBMaryland2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ashton McShane · CBLiberty2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Bryce Steele · LBTroy2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Cedric Lott Jr. · WRIncarnate Word2026-01-123★ / —Immediate
Datrell Jones · RBHoly Cross2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Daveon Crouch · LBKansas2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Dylan Lonergan · QBRutgers2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Edwin Kolenge · EDGEVanderbilt2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Eryx Daugherty · IOLLouisville2026-01-063★ / 0.8800Immediate
Ismael Zamor · WRThe Citadel2026-09-083★ / —Immediate
Jack Funke · IOLBryant2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Jadon Lafontant · IOLRhode Island2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Jason Hewlett Jr. · LBNot reported2025-12-023★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jayden Fry · EDGESam Houston2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jaylen Blackwell · LBFlorida A&M2026-09-082★ / —Immediate
Matt Ragan · TEUConn2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Nate Johnson · WRNot reported2025-12-083★ / —Immediate
Omar Thornton · SMiami2026-01-114★ / 0.9200Immediate
Omarion Davis · SPenn State2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Owen Stoudmire · DLNebraska2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Reed Harris · WRArizona State2026-01-084★ / 0.9400Immediate
Ryan Mickow · OTTulane2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Semaj Fleming · WRApp State2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Shaker Reisig · QBTexas State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Sterling Sanders · DLUAB2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Stevie Amar Jr. · TEUCLA2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Turbo Richard · RBIndiana2026-01-043★ / 0.8800Immediate
Ty Clemons · DLTroy2026-01-233★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ty Lockwood · TEArkansas2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Boston College. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Bill O'Brien · career 24–25 across 5 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 23 appointments
  1. 2024–present · Bill O'Brien · active at capture

    9–16 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2024-02-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2020–2023 · Jeff Hafley

    22–26 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2019-12-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2013–2019 · Steve Addazio

    44–44 · 88 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2009–2012 · Frank Spaziani

    21–29 · 50 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2009-01-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2007–2008 · Jeff Jagodzinski

    20–8 · 28 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2006-12-19. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2006–2006 · Frank Spaziani · interim

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 0 seasons

    Hired 2006-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1997–2006 · Tom O'Brien

    75–45 · 120 attributed games · 10 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1994–1996 · Dan Henning

    16–19–1 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1991–1993 · Tom Coughlin

    21–13–1 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1981–1990 · Jack Bicknell

    59–55–1 · 115 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1978–1980 · Ed Chlebek

    12–21 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1968–1977 · Joseph Yukica

    68–37 · 105 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1962–1967 · Jim Miller

    34–24 · 58 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1960–1961 · Ernest Hefferle

    7–12–1 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1951–1959 · Mike Holovak

    49–29–3 · 81 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1946–1950 · Denny Myers

    20–22–4 · 46 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1944–1945 · Moody Sarno

    7–7 · 14 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1941–1942 · Denny Myers

    15–5 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1939–1940 · Frank Leahy

    20–2 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1937–1938 · Gilmour Dobie

    10–5–3 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1919–1919 · Frank Cavanaugh

    5–3 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1902–1902 · Arthur White

    0–7–1 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1901–1901 · John Dunlop

    1–8 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Bill O'Brien · incomplete attribution0–0——-3.2-4.753—
2025 · Bill O'Brien2–101–70–0-8.5-5.459—
2024 · Bill O'Brien7–64–40–11.26.195—
2023 · Jeff Hafley7–63–51–0-5.9-4.861—
2022 · Jeff Hafley3–92–60–0-14.9-10.240—
2021 · Jeff Hafley6–62–60–00.90.936—
2020 · Jeff Hafley6–55–50–00.9—63—
2019 · Steve Addazio · incomplete attribution6–6——-5.7-2.963—
2018 · Steve Addazio7–54–40–02.45.371—
2017 · Steve Addazio7–64–40–14.611.267—
2016 · Steve Addazio7–62–61–0-1.6-2.478—
2015 · Steve Addazio3–90–80–04.7-0.160—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:06:42 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play124 / 13810.250 / 13864.2
Success rateT93 / 13832.561 / 13856.2
Explosiveness91 / 13834.353 / 13862.0
Standard-down success68 / 13851.149 / 13865.0
Passing-down success121 / 13812.486 / 13838.0
Pass PPA109 / 13821.274 / 13846.7
Rush PPA108 / 13821.968 / 13851.1
Pass explosiveness15 / 13889.853 / 13862.0
Rush explosiveness89 / 13835.870 / 13849.6
Line yards75 / 13846.057 / 13859.1
Second-level yards4 / 13897.880 / 13842.3
Open-field yards55 / 13860.670 / 13849.6
Stuff rate133 / 1383.645 / 13867.9
Power success117 / 13815.3T91 / 13832.8
Havoc126 / 1388.8T42 / 13869.3
Front-seven havocT133 / 1383.324 / 13883.2
DB havocT40 / 13870.1T98 / 13827.4
Points / opportunity122 / 13811.780 / 13842.3
Average field positionT71 / 13847.1130 / 1385.8
Field-position expected pointsT66 / 13852.2128 / 1387.3

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Mason McKenzie · QBUsage 62.1% · Avg PPA 0.135 · Total 43.935
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.13543.93562.1%
Pass0.10221.68094.7%
Rush0.27430.13739.4%
1st down0.0000.01449.2%
2nd down0.14717.10470.3%
3rd down0.53744.04481.2%
Standard downs0.13925.72052.3%
Passing downs0.13018.21582.8%
Bo MacCormack III · RBUsage 17.3% · Avg PPA 0.006 · Total 0.419
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0060.41917.3%
Pass-0.125-1.5026.9%
Rush0.0341.92127.1%
1st down0.1364.88820.1%
2nd down-0.041-0.61512.0%
3rd down0.1582.37419.7%
Standard downs0.0331.93521.9%
Passing downs-0.138-1.5168.3%
Evan Dickens · RBUsage 16.9% · Avg PPA 0.023 · Total 1.793
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0231.79316.9%
Pass0.2083.3328.2%
Rush-0.025-1.53824.7%
1st down0.1617.08220.8%
2nd down-0.123-3.44919.2%
3rd down0.2801.1204.5%
Standard downs0.0241.56220.8%
Passing downs0.0190.2328.3%
Femi Babalola · QBUsage 11.5% · Avg PPA -0.094 · Total -0.661
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.094-0.66111.5%
Pass0.3011.80719.4%
Rush-2.468-2.4683.6%
1st down0.9091.8188.3%
2nd down-0.352-0.70410.5%
3rd down0.3460.69215.4%
Standard downs0.9091.8185.4%
Passing downs-0.496-2.47920.8%
Grayson Wilson · QBUsage 11.5% · Avg PPA -1.499 · Total -10.491
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.499-10.49111.5%
Pass-1.279-6.39616.1%
Rush-2.048-4.0957.1%
1st down-0.877-0.8774.2%
2nd down-0.488-1.46415.8%
3rd down-2.374-4.74815.4%
Standard downs-0.405-0.8095.4%
Passing downs-1.936-9.68220.8%
Javarius Green · WRUsage 9.4% · Avg PPA 0.389 · Total 19.056
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.38919.0569.4%
Pass0.40919.23620.9%
Rush-0.090-0.1800.7%
1st down0.4294.7224.7%
2nd down0.0100.18711.5%
3rd down0.70712.72817.8%
Standard downs0.3776.4024.8%
Passing downs0.39512.65518.9%
Kaelan Chudzinski · TEUsage 8.2% · Avg PPA -1.394 · Total -6.970
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.394-6.9708.2%
Pass-1.394-6.97016.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.5081.5084.2%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.591-1.18315.4%
Standard downs1.5081.5082.7%
Passing downs-2.119-8.47816.7%
Mekhi Dodd · RBUsage 7.0% · Avg PPA -0.114 · Total -2.056
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.114-2.0567.0%
Pass-0.432-1.2963.0%
Rush-0.051-0.76010.1%
1st down-0.159-2.38112.5%
2nd down0.1080.3253.8%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.092-1.5649.1%
Passing downs-0.491-0.4911.4%
Brady Clough · TEUsage 6.1% · Avg PPA -0.243 · Total -2.915
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.243-2.9156.1%
Pass0.3093.39511.6%
Rush-6.311-6.3111.1%
1st down-1.411-5.6454.7%
2nd down-0.277-1.1086.3%
3rd down0.9603.83910.3%
Standard downs-0.710-3.5494.0%
Passing downs0.0910.6349.7%
Jaedn Skeete · WRUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.180 · Total 2.880
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1802.8804.9%
Pass0.1862.79510.1%
Rush0.0850.0850.6%
1st down-0.048-0.2904.3%
2nd down0.6174.3216.8%
3rd down-0.384-1.1524.5%
Standard downs0.0360.2913.8%
Passing downs0.3242.5897.0%
Reed Swanson · WRUsage 4.4% · Avg PPA -0.104 · Total -0.627
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.104-0.6274.4%
Pass-0.104-0.6279.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.606-1.2133.2%
2nd down-0.702-1.4034.5%
3rd down0.9941.9897.7%
Standard downs0.2360.9454.5%
Passing downs-0.786-1.5724.2%
Dawson Pough · WRUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.591 · Total 11.238
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.59111.2384.2%
Pass0.59111.23810.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7172.1511.5%
2nd down0.2692.6897.0%
3rd down1.0676.3996.8%
Standard downs0.3382.3682.3%
Passing downs0.7398.8708.4%
Nolan Ray · RBUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA -0.479 · Total -3.834
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.479-3.8344.2%
Pass-0.101-0.1011.4%
Rush-0.533-3.7336.1%
1st down0.0090.0364.3%
2nd down-0.052-0.1033.3%
3rd down0.4610.4612.9%
Standard downs-0.533-3.7334.8%
Passing downs-0.101-0.1012.1%
John Montague · WRUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 1.225 · Total 22.055
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.22522.0553.9%
Pass1.22522.0559.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.3299.3063.4%
2nd down-0.004-0.0142.8%
3rd down1.82312.7638.0%
Standard downs1.49114.9063.2%
Passing downs0.8947.1495.4%
Landon Wright · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.834 · Total 11.678
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.83411.6783.6%
Pass1.00012.0057.5%
Rush-0.164-0.3270.9%
1st down0.3562.1363.4%
2nd down1.49410.4575.7%
3rd down-0.915-0.9151.3%
Standard downs0.6505.8513.3%
Passing downs1.1655.8274.2%
Anthony Ferrucci · RBUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 0.207 · Total 0.621
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2070.6212.3%
Pass0.3460.6924.1%
Rush-0.071-0.0711.4%
1st down-0.071-0.0711.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.3460.6929.1%
Standard downs-0.071-0.0711.1%
Passing downs0.3460.6925.7%
Danny Edgehille · TEUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 0.228 · Total 2.049
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2282.0492.3%
Pass0.2282.0495.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.455-1.3651.7%
2nd down0.1100.4403.2%
3rd down-0.115-0.1151.3%
Standard downs-0.108-0.5401.9%
Passing downs0.6472.5893.1%
Zeke Moore · TEUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 0.112 · Total 1.004
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1121.0042.3%
Pass0.1121.0045.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3071.2302.3%
2nd down-0.045-0.2264.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.3171.5861.9%
Passing downs-0.145-0.5823.0%
Jackson Wade · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.660 · Total -2.640
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.660-2.6402.0%
Pass-0.660-2.6404.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down2.3092.3091.2%
2nd down-0.694-0.6941.6%
3rd down-0.073-0.0732.6%
Standard downs-0.937-1.8731.6%
Passing downs-0.383-0.7672.7%
Nedrick Boldin Jr. · WRUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA 1.345 · Total 8.072
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.3458.0721.8%
Pass1.3458.0724.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.586-0.5860.7%
2nd down0.9881.9761.9%
3rd down2.2276.6824.8%
Standard downs-0.586-0.5860.4%
Passing downs1.7328.6584.6%
Bryce Lewis · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -1.130 · Total -1.130
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.130-1.1301.6%
Pass-1.130-1.1304.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.130-1.1303.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.130-1.1302.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Cameron Kossmann · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -2.362 · Total -4.724
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-2.362-4.7241.6%
Pass-2.362-4.7243.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.491-0.4912.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-2.362-4.7242.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Boston College sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: -0.003 (10th percentile; 138 teams)10thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.407 (32nd percentile; 138 teams)32ndOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.202 (34th percentile; 138 teams)34thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.075 (21st percentile; 138 teams)21stOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.016 (22nd percentile; 138 teams)22ndDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.042 (64th percentile; 138 teams)64thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.402 (56th percentile; 138 teams)56thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.194 (62nd percentile; 138 teams)62ndDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.171 (69th percentile; 138 teams)69th
Values and percentiles
Boston College metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play-0.00310th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.40732nd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.20234th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.07521st138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.01622nd138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.04264th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.40256th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.19462nd138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.17169th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 100% of 212 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.0 yards (27th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.6 per completion. Completion 57.1%, 7.1 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.13.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense56.1%62.0%-5.9189 / 212
Defense allowed63.8%61.5%+2.3188 / 222

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Boston College.

Target mix by zone, Boston College offense
Short left26% · 52Short middle21% · 41Short right37% · 74Deep left4% · 8Deep middle5% · 10Deep right8% · 15

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Boston College passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense212100%8.06.657.1%0.13-5.9 pp189
Passing defense22299%7.95.464.9%0.14+2.3 pp188

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2994.450.6%0.103.201.401.4018.5%64.1%
Defense allowed3034.041.2%0.072.901.001.1018.1%75.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense291 / 299280192310110265 / 265 · 100.0%
Defense allowed296 / 303252511610100276 / 277 · 99.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -5.9 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-22.2-8.06.2W1W1 vs Cincinnati: -7.2 ppW2W2 vs Rutgers: -0.1 ppW3W4W4 vs Virginia Tech: -22.2 ppW5W5 vs SMU: -2.0 ppW7W7 vs Pittsburgh: +6.2 ppW8W8 vs Georgia Tech: -3.2 ppW9W9 vs Duke: -15.9 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Cincinnati353452.9%60.1%-7.2 pp8.2-0.04374.30.25
W2Rutgers292962.1%62.2%-0.1 pp9.30.16324.50.06
W3Maine210———7.00.18394.8-0.08
W4Virginia Tech232347.8%70.0%-22.2 pp3.9-0.01384.00.13
W5SMU323262.5%64.5%-2.0 pp6.60.20333.50.27
W7Pittsburgh282860.7%54.6%+6.2 pp13.40.61402.5-0.16
W8Georgia Tech171752.9%56.1%-3.2 pp11.60.23478.50.60
W9Duke272650.0%65.9%-15.9 pp4.5-0.25331.8-0.49

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

32 punts · 39.9 gross yards/punt · 30.4 net yards/punt

1 inside the 20 · 5 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 32/32 punts. Known net yards: 25/32 punts.

Our punt returns

5 returns · 1.6 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 5/5 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Duke642.834.34/6
Week 8 · Georgia Tech238.533.01/2
Week 7 · Pittsburgh225.020.52/2
Week 5 · SMU436.832.03/4
Week 4 · Virginia Tech941.328.88/9
Team style
Rating history