Where CORE and the lab disagree most The teams whose CORE rank is furthest from the lab's own rank, only where both ratings stop at the same week. If a team shows up here, check its schedule and its offense/defense split: who it played, and which side of the ball is driving the gap. A gap is a prompt to look closer, not proof that either rating is wrong. It can also come from which plays and games each system counts.
Ranked within the teams both systems rated, average ties (a .5 is a tie), against the reference board frozen when the comparison ran. They can differ from this board's rank and from today's lab rankings. Gap = how many places higher (+) or lower (−) CORE ranks the team than the lab does; for defense, higher means better.
Lab EPA · overall CORE vs lab opponent-adjusted EPA, both through regular Week 8 (inclusive), frozen when the comparison ran · 138 teams compared.
Team CORE Lab EPA Gap Army #103 #64 −39 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 372 qualifying offensive plays and 320 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -1.92 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Michigan State #63 #98 +35 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 472 qualifying offensive plays and 501 defensive plays.
8 completed FBS games; 0 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 11.29 (8 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Iowa #49 #72 +23 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 324 qualifying offensive plays and 331 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 1.77 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Colorado State #130 #108 −22 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 351 qualifying offensive plays and 346 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 2.27 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
North Texas #44 #22 −22 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 359 qualifying offensive plays and 352 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 1.79 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
3 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Buffalo #122 #101 −21 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 385 qualifying offensive plays and 368 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 2 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -4.33 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Iowa State #73 #94 +21 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 347 qualifying offensive plays and 339 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 5.66 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Miami (OH) #71 #92 +21 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 388 qualifying offensive plays and 433 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -7.25 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Missouri #10 #30 +20 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 373 qualifying offensive plays and 380 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 3.64 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Clemson #67 #86 +19 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 362 qualifying offensive plays and 383 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 5.06 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Lab EPA · offense CORE vs lab opponent-adjusted EPA, both through regular Week 8 (inclusive), frozen when the comparison ran · 138 teams compared.
Team CORE Lab EPA Gap Iowa #61 #104 +43 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 324 qualifying offensive plays and 331 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 1.77 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
UCF #98 #63 −35 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 376 qualifying offensive plays and 416 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 8.74 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
0 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Southern Miss #104 #129 +25 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 360 qualifying offensive plays and 437 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -2.15 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Tulsa #77 #52 −25 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 433 qualifying offensive plays and 494 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -4.24 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Michigan State #88 #110 +22 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 472 qualifying offensive plays and 501 defensive plays.
8 completed FBS games; 0 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 11.29 (8 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Buffalo #118 #97 −21 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 385 qualifying offensive plays and 368 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 2 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -4.33 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Delaware #82 #103 +21 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 331 qualifying offensive plays and 346 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -6.12 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Oregon #119 #98 −21 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 399 qualifying offensive plays and 417 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 11.58 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
0 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
San José State #116 #95 −21 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 419 qualifying offensive plays and 484 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -7.32 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
0 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Akron #113 #93 −20 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 389 qualifying offensive plays and 396 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -5.12 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
3 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Lab EPA · defense CORE vs lab opponent-adjusted EPA, both through regular Week 8 (inclusive), frozen when the comparison ran · 138 teams compared.
Team CORE Lab EPA Gap North Texas #114 #71 −43 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 359 qualifying offensive plays and 352 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 1.79 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
3 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Michigan State #40 #72 +32 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 472 qualifying offensive plays and 501 defensive plays.
8 completed FBS games; 0 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 11.29 (8 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Georgia State #97 #67 −30 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 354 qualifying offensive plays and 354 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -8.23 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Boise State #73 #47 −26 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 393 qualifying offensive plays and 332 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 0.66 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Virginia #86 #60 −26 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 417 qualifying offensive plays and 388 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -4.33 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
3 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Arizona State #46 #70 +24 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 348 qualifying offensive plays and 383 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 0.98 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
3 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Iowa State #60 #82 +22 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 347 qualifying offensive plays and 339 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 5.66 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
East Carolina #38 #59 +21 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 380 qualifying offensive plays and 398 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -0.73 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Clemson #17 #37 +20 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 362 qualifying offensive plays and 383 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 5.06 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Kent State #90 #110 +20 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 364 qualifying offensive plays and 358 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -1.05 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
4 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Lab SRS · overall CORE vs lab SRS, both through regular Week 8 (inclusive), frozen when the comparison ran · 138 teams compared. SRS also carries part of last season's rating, even at a matched cutoff.
Team CORE Lab SRS Gap Army #103 #48 −55 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 372 qualifying offensive plays and 320 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -1.92 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
West Virginia #120 #71 −49 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 531 qualifying offensive plays and 479 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 3.21 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
0 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Florida State #81 #37 −44 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 379 qualifying offensive plays and 372 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 7.30 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Utah State #66 #109 +43 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 333 qualifying offensive plays and 406 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 3.03 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Illinois #90 #49 −41 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 366 qualifying offensive plays and 370 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 5.11 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Texas A&M #74 #34 −40 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 420 qualifying offensive plays and 344 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 7.16 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
4 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
UAB #77 #117 +40 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 370 qualifying offensive plays and 383 defensive plays.
6 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -1.96 (6 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
1 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Virginia #97 #57 −40 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 417 qualifying offensive plays and 388 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -4.33 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
3 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Texas #40 #9 −31 Inspect the difference CORE profile: defense-led; 442 qualifying offensive plays and 436 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 0 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: 10.51 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Memphis #28 #58 +30 Inspect the difference CORE profile: offense-led; 448 qualifying offensive plays and 432 defensive plays.
7 completed FBS games; 1 lower-division games excluded by CORE. Mean opponent CORE: -2.13 (7 rated opponents; higher means tougher).
2 FBS games decided by more than 22 points. This is a blowout proxy, not a count of garbage-time plays.
Possible context for the gap, not proven causes.
Descriptive context, not proven causes. Opponent strength uses this CORE snapshot. Games decided by more than 22 points are a blowout proxy, not identified garbage-time plays. CORE excludes lower-division games; raw season PPA may include them. Missing opponent ratings remain excluded.
Not shown, SP+: Cutoff unknown: SP+ workbook week labels do not certify an inclusive data cutoff, so no CORE rank gap is shown for it. What CORE is and isn't CORE is CFBD's rating, built in two stages. First, each play's predicted points added (PPA) is compared with what an average team would expect in the same situation, such as down, distance and field position; team identity plays no part in that step. Second, offense and defense are fitted together across the whole schedule, so each team is measured against the opponents it actually faced, and thin samples are pulled toward average. That pull is why early-season values sit near 0, and they are still uncertain.
It counts only pass and rush plays from completed FBS-vs-FBS games. Overtime, garbage time, games against FCS teams and special teams are all left out.
Offense and defense are points per 100 qualifying plays, measured from the average of the teams CORE rated (0). Offense: higher is better. Defense: points allowed above average, so lower is better. Overall is offense minus defense, net points across 100 offensive and 100 defensive plays.
What it isn't: not a forecast, a point spread, a win probability or a résumé ranking. CORE publishes no rank; positions on this page are our own sort by overall. Its scale is not comparable to our EPA, our SRS or SP+, so don't subtract one from another. It is an outside research rating shown for comparison only: it is never blended into the lab's ratings or picks, and this site never turns two teams' CORE numbers into a matchup line.
CFBD's CORE methodology Board data (core.json)
CORE capture history 2026 · 42 verified observations; 13 captured before their declared target kickoff with an earlier, verified schedule and FBS roster. 29 are descriptive only or have unverified target timing. 1 CORE captures and 0 raw-PPA captures were refused.
These are the observations actually retained, not reconstructed historical week queries. Repeated cutoffs preserve later restatements. Model versions remain separate; a change across versions is not a like-for-like change in team strength. This explorer does not score the frozen prospective study or create forecasts.
Observation eligibilityVerified before target kickoff All retained observations CORE snapshot2026-10-27 11:01:58 UTC · regular W8 · core-v1 2026-10-26 11:02:36 UTC · regular W8 · core-v1 2026-10-26 03:58:46 UTC · regular W8 · core-v1 2026-10-20 11:11:04 UTC · regular W7 · core-v1 2026-10-13 11:06:31 UTC · regular W6 · core-v1 2026-10-06 11:06:16 UTC · regular W5 · core-v1 2026-10-05 11:05:35 UTC · regular W5 · core-v1 2026-10-04 19:34:19 UTC · regular W5 · core-v1 2026-10-01 11:04:14 UTC · regular W4 · core-v1 2026-09-30 11:04:15 UTC · regular W4 · core-v1 2026-09-28 18:03:08 UTC · regular W4 · core-v1 2026-09-28 11:01:43 UTC · regular W4 · core-v1 2026-09-24 16:09:28 UTC · regular W3 · core-preseason-v1
Through regular Week 8 · model core-v1 · captured 2026-10-27 11:01:58 UTC · 138 provider-rated teams. Timing status: Before target kickoff (verified). Declared target: regular Week 9, first FBS kickoff 2026-10-27 23:00:00 UTC.
Full selected CORE board ConferenceAll conferences ACC American Athletic Big 12 Big Ten Conference USA FBS Independents Mid-American Mountain West Pac-12 SEC Sun Belt Offense vs defense 138 rated teams · up and right are better -20 -10 0 10 20 -20 -10 0 10 20 rated-team average rated-team average Defense-led · 32 Good on both sides · 39 Below average on both · 35 Offense-led · 32 Notre Dame: Overall · net points +34.44; Offense · points / 100 plays +17.78; Defense · points / 100 plays -16.66; Qualifying offense / defense plays 373 / 301 LSU: Overall · net points +27.29; Offense · points / 100 plays +10.76; Defense · points / 100 plays -16.53; Qualifying offense / defense plays 438 / 336 Indiana: Overall · net points +26.14; Offense · points / 100 plays +9.04; Defense · points / 100 plays -17.10; Qualifying offense / defense plays 374 / 413 Alabama: Overall · net points +25.96; Offense · points / 100 plays +13.66; Defense · points / 100 plays -12.31; Qualifying offense / defense plays 451 / 460 Ohio State: Overall · net points +22.95; Offense · points / 100 plays +10.89; Defense · points / 100 plays -12.06; Qualifying offense / defense plays 421 / 365 Georgia: Overall · net points +22.47; Offense · points / 100 plays +14.52; Defense · points / 100 plays -7.95; Qualifying offense / defense plays 296 / 299 UCLA: Overall · net points +21.95; Offense · points / 100 plays +3.56; Defense · points / 100 plays -18.39; Qualifying offense / defense plays 456 / 405 Arizona: Overall · net points +21.54; Offense · points / 100 plays +11.56; Defense · points / 100 plays -9.98; Qualifying offense / defense plays 351 / 375 Utah: Overall · net points +20.37; Offense · points / 100 plays +12.20; Defense · points / 100 plays -8.17; Qualifying offense / defense plays 366 / 322 Missouri: Overall · net points +19.05; Offense · points / 100 plays +4.68; Defense · points / 100 plays -14.37; Qualifying offense / defense plays 373 / 380 Wisconsin: Overall · net points +18.78; Offense · points / 100 plays +0.92; Defense · points / 100 plays -17.86; Qualifying offense / defense plays 331 / 378 Miami (FL): Overall · net points +18.76; Offense · points / 100 plays +14.01; Defense · points / 100 plays -4.74; Qualifying offense / defense plays 343 / 271 Boise State: Overall · net points +18.60; Offense · points / 100 plays +18.78; Defense · points / 100 plays +0.18; Qualifying offense / defense plays 393 / 332 BYU: Overall · net points +18.09; Offense · points / 100 plays +11.07; Defense · points / 100 plays -7.02; Qualifying offense / defense plays 344 / 366 Wake Forest: Overall · net points +17.09; Offense · points / 100 plays +8.51; Defense · points / 100 plays -8.58; Qualifying offense / defense plays 380 / 381 Northwestern: Overall · net points +16.91; Offense · points / 100 plays +13.73; Defense · points / 100 plays -3.18; Qualifying offense / defense plays 354 / 339 Liberty: Overall · net points +15.46; Offense · points / 100 plays +7.84; Defense · points / 100 plays -7.62; Qualifying offense / defense plays 333 / 292 Texas Tech: Overall · net points +14.99; Offense · points / 100 plays +5.00; Defense · points / 100 plays -10.00; Qualifying offense / defense plays 373 / 386 Nebraska: Overall · net points +14.56; Offense · points / 100 plays +6.24; Defense · points / 100 plays -8.32; Qualifying offense / defense plays 400 / 318 Tennessee: Overall · net points +14.17; Offense · points / 100 plays +0.46; Defense · points / 100 plays -13.71; Qualifying offense / defense plays 469 / 405 New Mexico: Overall · net points +13.71; Offense · points / 100 plays +0.83; Defense · points / 100 plays -12.88; Qualifying offense / defense plays 323 / 294 Oklahoma: Overall · net points +13.57; Offense · points / 100 plays -2.74; Defense · points / 100 plays -16.31; Qualifying offense / defense plays 402 / 366 Ole Miss: Overall · net points +13.12; Offense · points / 100 plays +14.21; Defense · points / 100 plays +1.09; Qualifying offense / defense plays 432 / 411 Kentucky: Overall · net points +12.93; Offense · points / 100 plays +5.23; Defense · points / 100 plays -7.70; Qualifying offense / defense plays 426 / 448 Houston: Overall · net points +11.46; Offense · points / 100 plays +12.14; Defense · points / 100 plays +0.67; Qualifying offense / defense plays 493 / 413 Michigan: Overall · net points +11.06; Offense · points / 100 plays -1.94; Defense · points / 100 plays -13.00; Qualifying offense / defense plays 397 / 407 Oklahoma State: Overall · net points +10.76; Offense · points / 100 plays +8.93; Defense · points / 100 plays -1.84; Qualifying offense / defense plays 420 / 406 Memphis: Overall · net points +10.59; Offense · points / 100 plays +9.77; Defense · points / 100 plays -0.82; Qualifying offense / defense plays 448 / 432 Mississippi State: Overall · net points +10.43; Offense · points / 100 plays +11.15; Defense · points / 100 plays +0.72; Qualifying offense / defense plays 404 / 421 Louisville: Overall · net points +10.28; Offense · points / 100 plays +10.05; Defense · points / 100 plays -0.23; Qualifying offense / defense plays 368 / 455 USC: Overall · net points +9.69; Offense · points / 100 plays +15.23; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.55; Qualifying offense / defense plays 512 / 416 Oregon State: Overall · net points +9.48; Offense · points / 100 plays +7.86; Defense · points / 100 plays -1.62; Qualifying offense / defense plays 373 / 336 Duke: Overall · net points +9.03; Offense · points / 100 plays +0.63; Defense · points / 100 plays -8.40; Qualifying offense / defense plays 392 / 363 Florida: Overall · net points +8.67; Offense · points / 100 plays +7.78; Defense · points / 100 plays -0.89; Qualifying offense / defense plays 374 / 351 James Madison: Overall · net points +8.26; Offense · points / 100 plays +6.42; Defense · points / 100 plays -1.83; Qualifying offense / defense plays 474 / 472 TCU: Overall · net points +8.26; Offense · points / 100 plays -8.48; Defense · points / 100 plays -16.74; Qualifying offense / defense plays 405 / 366 Baylor: Overall · net points +8.25; Offense · points / 100 plays +1.24; Defense · points / 100 plays -7.01; Qualifying offense / defense plays 447 / 435 South Carolina: Overall · net points +7.87; Offense · points / 100 plays +6.65; Defense · points / 100 plays -1.22; Qualifying offense / defense plays 372 / 347 Louisiana Tech: Overall · net points +7.50; Offense · points / 100 plays +0.29; Defense · points / 100 plays -7.21; Qualifying offense / defense plays 373 / 341 Texas: Overall · net points +7.36; Offense · points / 100 plays -5.03; Defense · points / 100 plays -12.40; Qualifying offense / defense plays 442 / 436 Oregon: Overall · net points +7.06; Offense · points / 100 plays -9.42; Defense · points / 100 plays -16.47; Qualifying offense / defense plays 399 / 417 North Dakota State: Overall · net points +6.79; Offense · points / 100 plays -3.47; Defense · points / 100 plays -10.26; Qualifying offense / defense plays 422 / 381 SMU: Overall · net points +6.12; Offense · points / 100 plays +5.33; Defense · points / 100 plays -0.79; Qualifying offense / defense plays 409 / 360 North Texas: Overall · net points +5.86; Offense · points / 100 plays +14.01; Defense · points / 100 plays +8.16; Qualifying offense / defense plays 359 / 352 Toledo: Overall · net points +5.83; Offense · points / 100 plays +2.20; Defense · points / 100 plays -3.62; Qualifying offense / defense plays 471 / 463 Fresno State: Overall · net points +5.02; Offense · points / 100 plays +2.56; Defense · points / 100 plays -2.46; Qualifying offense / defense plays 382 / 396 Penn State: Overall · net points +4.99; Offense · points / 100 plays +2.52; Defense · points / 100 plays -2.47; Qualifying offense / defense plays 393 / 360 Washington: Overall · net points +4.75; Offense · points / 100 plays +1.40; Defense · points / 100 plays -3.34; Qualifying offense / defense plays 361 / 358 Iowa: Overall · net points +4.18; Offense · points / 100 plays +1.33; Defense · points / 100 plays -2.86; Qualifying offense / defense plays 324 / 331 UConn: Overall · net points +3.20; Offense · points / 100 plays +6.44; Defense · points / 100 plays +3.24; Qualifying offense / defense plays 361 / 370 Auburn: Overall · net points +2.74; Offense · points / 100 plays +0.95; Defense · points / 100 plays -1.79; Qualifying offense / defense plays 450 / 485 Pittsburgh: Overall · net points +2.73; Offense · points / 100 plays -0.27; Defense · points / 100 plays -3.01; Qualifying offense / defense plays 414 / 407 UCF: Overall · net points +2.71; Offense · points / 100 plays -5.06; Defense · points / 100 plays -7.78; Qualifying offense / defense plays 376 / 416 Boston College: Overall · net points +2.67; Offense · points / 100 plays -2.82; Defense · points / 100 plays -5.49; Qualifying offense / defense plays 383 / 388 Cincinnati: Overall · net points +2.42; Offense · points / 100 plays +7.61; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.19; Qualifying offense / defense plays 372 / 409 Georgia Southern: Overall · net points +2.31; Offense · points / 100 plays +3.16; Defense · points / 100 plays +0.85; Qualifying offense / defense plays 397 / 384 Louisiana: Overall · net points +2.24; Offense · points / 100 plays -5.52; Defense · points / 100 plays -7.75; Qualifying offense / defense plays 449 / 426 Air Force: Overall · net points +1.86; Offense · points / 100 plays +6.87; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.01; Qualifying offense / defense plays 420 / 316 Kansas: Overall · net points +1.71; Offense · points / 100 plays -0.64; Defense · points / 100 plays -2.35; Qualifying offense / defense plays 397 / 383 Navy: Overall · net points +1.48; Offense · points / 100 plays +1.87; Defense · points / 100 plays +0.39; Qualifying offense / defense plays 366 / 380 North Carolina: Overall · net points +1.48; Offense · points / 100 plays +0.84; Defense · points / 100 plays -0.64; Qualifying offense / defense plays 352 / 439 Texas State: Overall · net points +1.47; Offense · points / 100 plays +8.79; Defense · points / 100 plays +7.32; Qualifying offense / defense plays 410 / 372 Michigan State: Overall · net points +1.35; Offense · points / 100 plays -3.25; Defense · points / 100 plays -4.59; Qualifying offense / defense plays 472 / 501 Georgia State: Overall · net points +1.15; Offense · points / 100 plays +6.56; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.42; Qualifying offense / defense plays 354 / 354 Tulsa: Overall · net points +1.11; Offense · points / 100 plays -0.86; Defense · points / 100 plays -1.97; Qualifying offense / defense plays 433 / 494 Utah State: Overall · net points +0.88; Offense · points / 100 plays -10.23; Defense · points / 100 plays -11.12; Qualifying offense / defense plays 333 / 406 Clemson: Overall · net points +0.75; Offense · points / 100 plays -10.08; Defense · points / 100 plays -10.83; Qualifying offense / defense plays 362 / 383 Ohio: Overall · net points +0.48; Offense · points / 100 plays +3.67; Defense · points / 100 plays +3.20; Qualifying offense / defense plays 372 / 387 Virginia Tech: Overall · net points -0.29; Offense · points / 100 plays +1.70; Defense · points / 100 plays +1.99; Qualifying offense / defense plays 481 / 402 UTSA: Overall · net points -0.39; Offense · points / 100 plays +4.30; Defense · points / 100 plays +4.69; Qualifying offense / defense plays 469 / 461 Miami (OH): Overall · net points -0.47; Offense · points / 100 plays -0.23; Defense · points / 100 plays +0.24; Qualifying offense / defense plays 388 / 433 East Carolina: Overall · net points -0.84; Offense · points / 100 plays -6.03; Defense · points / 100 plays -5.19; Qualifying offense / defense plays 380 / 398 Iowa State: Overall · net points -0.97; Offense · points / 100 plays -2.78; Defense · points / 100 plays -1.81; Qualifying offense / defense plays 347 / 339 Texas A&M: Overall · net points -1.03; Offense · points / 100 plays -4.54; Defense · points / 100 plays -3.50; Qualifying offense / defense plays 420 / 344 South Florida: Overall · net points -1.84; Offense · points / 100 plays -10.47; Defense · points / 100 plays -8.63; Qualifying offense / defense plays 343 / 386 Tulane: Overall · net points -2.88; Offense · points / 100 plays -5.61; Defense · points / 100 plays -2.73; Qualifying offense / defense plays 406 / 486 UAB: Overall · net points -3.18; Offense · points / 100 plays -7.42; Defense · points / 100 plays -4.24; Qualifying offense / defense plays 370 / 383 UNLV: Overall · net points -3.51; Offense · points / 100 plays -4.09; Defense · points / 100 plays -0.59; Qualifying offense / defense plays 439 / 442 Western Michigan: Overall · net points -3.62; Offense · points / 100 plays -1.99; Defense · points / 100 plays +1.63; Qualifying offense / defense plays 393 / 437 Jacksonville State: Overall · net points -3.67; Offense · points / 100 plays +1.94; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.62; Qualifying offense / defense plays 346 / 379 Florida State: Overall · net points -3.77; Offense · points / 100 plays +4.44; Defense · points / 100 plays +8.21; Qualifying offense / defense plays 379 / 372 Colorado: Overall · net points -4.24; Offense · points / 100 plays -11.48; Defense · points / 100 plays -7.24; Qualifying offense / defense plays 385 / 387 Minnesota: Overall · net points -4.40; Offense · points / 100 plays -9.75; Defense · points / 100 plays -5.35; Qualifying offense / defense plays 336 / 330 Nevada: Overall · net points -4.46; Offense · points / 100 plays -4.34; Defense · points / 100 plays +0.13; Qualifying offense / defense plays 362 / 375 Kansas State: Overall · net points -4.73; Offense · points / 100 plays +0.55; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.28; Qualifying offense / defense plays 393 / 342 Vanderbilt: Overall · net points -4.74; Offense · points / 100 plays -4.19; Defense · points / 100 plays +0.54; Qualifying offense / defense plays 385 / 436 Syracuse: Overall · net points -5.31; Offense · points / 100 plays -7.18; Defense · points / 100 plays -1.87; Qualifying offense / defense plays 468 / 371 Arizona State: Overall · net points -5.49; Offense · points / 100 plays -8.53; Defense · points / 100 plays -3.04; Qualifying offense / defense plays 348 / 383 Wyoming: Overall · net points -5.58; Offense · points / 100 plays +1.34; Defense · points / 100 plays +6.92; Qualifying offense / defense plays 378 / 467 Illinois: Overall · net points -6.09; Offense · points / 100 plays +9.94; Defense · points / 100 plays +16.03; Qualifying offense / defense plays 366 / 370 Purdue: Overall · net points -6.54; Offense · points / 100 plays +7.44; Defense · points / 100 plays +13.98; Qualifying offense / defense plays 354 / 334 Middle Tennessee: Overall · net points -6.66; Offense · points / 100 plays -0.24; Defense · points / 100 plays +6.42; Qualifying offense / defense plays 348 / 365 Maryland: Overall · net points -6.67; Offense · points / 100 plays -5.64; Defense · points / 100 plays +1.04; Qualifying offense / defense plays 343 / 372 Temple: Overall · net points -6.84; Offense · points / 100 plays +3.37; Defense · points / 100 plays +10.21; Qualifying offense / defense plays 337 / 395 Arkansas State: Overall · net points -7.12; Offense · points / 100 plays +3.49; Defense · points / 100 plays +10.61; Qualifying offense / defense plays 435 / 430 San José State: Overall · net points -7.33; Offense · points / 100 plays -9.19; Defense · points / 100 plays -1.86; Qualifying offense / defense plays 419 / 484 Virginia: Overall · net points -7.35; Offense · points / 100 plays -4.62; Defense · points / 100 plays +2.73; Qualifying offense / defense plays 417 / 388 Florida International: Overall · net points -8.13; Offense · points / 100 plays -11.11; Defense · points / 100 plays -2.99; Qualifying offense / defense plays 426 / 368 South Alabama: Overall · net points -8.27; Offense · points / 100 plays +4.91; Defense · points / 100 plays +13.18; Qualifying offense / defense plays 393 / 368 Arkansas: Overall · net points -8.43; Offense · points / 100 plays -2.58; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.85; Qualifying offense / defense plays 321 / 304 Florida Atlantic: Overall · net points -8.56; Offense · points / 100 plays +2.65; Defense · points / 100 plays +11.21; Qualifying offense / defense plays 386 / 315 Massachusetts: Overall · net points -8.92; Offense · points / 100 plays -6.63; Defense · points / 100 plays +2.28; Qualifying offense / defense plays 334 / 350 Army: Overall · net points -8.95; Offense · points / 100 plays +12.41; Defense · points / 100 plays +21.36; Qualifying offense / defense plays 372 / 320 Marshall: Overall · net points -9.34; Offense · points / 100 plays -1.31; Defense · points / 100 plays +8.03; Qualifying offense / defense plays 384 / 373 San Diego State: Overall · net points -9.48; Offense · points / 100 plays -10.22; Defense · points / 100 plays -0.74; Qualifying offense / defense plays 383 / 481 Rutgers: Overall · net points -9.84; Offense · points / 100 plays +0.12; Defense · points / 100 plays +9.95; Qualifying offense / defense plays 351 / 360 NC State: Overall · net points -9.91; Offense · points / 100 plays +1.40; Defense · points / 100 plays +11.31; Qualifying offense / defense plays 381 / 366 New Mexico State: Overall · net points -9.95; Offense · points / 100 plays -10.00; Defense · points / 100 plays -0.04; Qualifying offense / defense plays 365 / 378 App State: Overall · net points -10.20; Offense · points / 100 plays -4.55; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.65; Qualifying offense / defense plays 410 / 419 Georgia Tech: Overall · net points -10.30; Offense · points / 100 plays +3.44; Defense · points / 100 plays +13.74; Qualifying offense / defense plays 367 / 414 Stanford: Overall · net points -10.68; Offense · points / 100 plays -0.56; Defense · points / 100 plays +10.13; Qualifying offense / defense plays 353 / 396 Troy: Overall · net points -11.07; Offense · points / 100 plays -4.08; Defense · points / 100 plays +6.99; Qualifying offense / defense plays 405 / 359 Rice: Overall · net points -11.91; Offense · points / 100 plays -7.34; Defense · points / 100 plays +4.57; Qualifying offense / defense plays 392 / 447 Ball State: Overall · net points -11.99; Offense · points / 100 plays -1.72; Defense · points / 100 plays +10.27; Qualifying offense / defense plays 364 / 412 Coastal Carolina: Overall · net points -12.19; Offense · points / 100 plays -2.98; Defense · points / 100 plays +9.21; Qualifying offense / defense plays 376 / 409 Delaware: Overall · net points -12.34; Offense · points / 100 plays -2.54; Defense · points / 100 plays +9.80; Qualifying offense / defense plays 331 / 346 Southern Miss: Overall · net points -12.44; Offense · points / 100 plays -6.11; Defense · points / 100 plays +6.33; Qualifying offense / defense plays 360 / 437 Central Michigan: Overall · net points -12.83; Offense · points / 100 plays -5.83; Defense · points / 100 plays +7.00; Qualifying offense / defense plays 321 / 364 Hawai'i: Overall · net points -13.30; Offense · points / 100 plays -6.53; Defense · points / 100 plays +6.77; Qualifying offense / defense plays 550 / 475 West Virginia: Overall · net points -14.10; Offense · points / 100 plays +2.81; Defense · points / 100 plays +16.91; Qualifying offense / defense plays 531 / 479 Western Kentucky: Overall · net points -14.33; Offense · points / 100 plays -11.96; Defense · points / 100 plays +2.37; Qualifying offense / defense plays 368 / 298 Buffalo: Overall · net points -14.62; Offense · points / 100 plays -9.30; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.32; Qualifying offense / defense plays 385 / 368 Kennesaw State: Overall · net points -14.80; Offense · points / 100 plays -9.25; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.56; Qualifying offense / defense plays 333 / 379 Old Dominion: Overall · net points -15.67; Offense · points / 100 plays -22.83; Defense · points / 100 plays -7.17; Qualifying offense / defense plays 365 / 429 Kent State: Overall · net points -15.73; Offense · points / 100 plays -12.47; Defense · points / 100 plays +3.26; Qualifying offense / defense plays 364 / 358 Washington State: Overall · net points -15.94; Offense · points / 100 plays -18.56; Defense · points / 100 plays -2.62; Qualifying offense / defense plays 436 / 457 Charlotte: Overall · net points -15.98; Offense · points / 100 plays -10.08; Defense · points / 100 plays +5.91; Qualifying offense / defense plays 274 / 352 Eastern Michigan: Overall · net points -16.02; Offense · points / 100 plays -9.73; Defense · points / 100 plays +6.29; Qualifying offense / defense plays 493 / 473 Bowling Green: Overall · net points -16.11; Offense · points / 100 plays -6.15; Defense · points / 100 plays +9.96; Qualifying offense / defense plays 334 / 355 Colorado State: Overall · net points -16.86; Offense · points / 100 plays +7.27; Defense · points / 100 plays +24.13; Qualifying offense / defense plays 351 / 346 Sam Houston: Overall · net points -18.52; Offense · points / 100 plays -15.33; Defense · points / 100 plays +3.19; Qualifying offense / defense plays 340 / 375 UL Monroe: Overall · net points -19.14; Offense · points / 100 plays -12.09; Defense · points / 100 plays +7.05; Qualifying offense / defense plays 307 / 376 California: Overall · net points -19.17; Offense · points / 100 plays -10.54; Defense · points / 100 plays +8.63; Qualifying offense / defense plays 451 / 410 Missouri State: Overall · net points -21.22; Offense · points / 100 plays -7.07; Defense · points / 100 plays +14.16; Qualifying offense / defense plays 335 / 412 Akron: Overall · net points -21.23; Offense · points / 100 plays -7.76; Defense · points / 100 plays +13.47; Qualifying offense / defense plays 389 / 396 Northern Illinois: Overall · net points -22.75; Offense · points / 100 plays -7.38; Defense · points / 100 plays +15.37; Qualifying offense / defense plays 286 / 341 UTEP: Overall · net points -26.58; Offense · points / 100 plays -11.12; Defense · points / 100 plays +15.45; Qualifying offense / defense plays 268 / 315 Sacramento State: Overall · net points -29.37; Offense · points / 100 plays -19.41; Defense · points / 100 plays +9.96; Qualifying offense / defense plays 330 / 360 Offense: better → Defense: better (lower) →
Hover, tap, or focus a point for its name and values. Use arrow keys to move between points; Enter or Space keeps details open, Escape closes them.
Good on both sides: 39 Defense-led: 32 Offense-led: 32 Below average on both: 35
Each dot is a team. Right means a better offense; up means a better defense, because CORE's defense number is points allowed, so lower is better and the axis is flipped. The dashed lines are 0, the average of the teams CORE rated.
Every rated team 138 of 138 teams · sorted by Overall. Click a column to sort; click it again to reverse.
Overall is offense minus defense. Position is our own sort by overall, with tied teams sharing the better position; CORE publishes no rank. Plays are the qualifying plays CORE counted on each side.
Raw PPA and CORE: different scales Compare teamAir Force Akron Alabama App State Arizona Arizona State Arkansas Arkansas State Army Auburn Ball State Baylor Boise State Boston College Bowling Green Buffalo BYU California Central Michigan Charlotte Cincinnati Clemson Coastal Carolina Colorado Colorado State Delaware Duke East Carolina Eastern Michigan Florida Florida Atlantic Florida International Florida State Fresno State Georgia Georgia Southern Georgia State Georgia Tech Hawai'i Houston Illinois Indiana Iowa Iowa State Jacksonville State James Madison Kansas Kansas State Kennesaw State Kent State Kentucky Liberty Louisiana Louisiana Tech Louisville LSU Marshall Maryland Massachusetts Memphis Miami Miami (OH) Michigan Michigan State Middle Tennessee Minnesota Mississippi State Missouri Missouri State Navy NC State Nebraska Nevada New Mexico New Mexico State North Carolina North Dakota State North Texas Northern Illinois Northwestern Notre Dame Ohio Ohio State Oklahoma Oklahoma State Old Dominion Ole Miss Oregon Oregon State Penn State Pittsburgh Purdue Rice Rutgers Sacramento State Sam Houston San Diego State San José State SMU South Alabama South Carolina South Florida Southern Miss Stanford Syracuse TCU Temple Tennessee Texas Texas A&M Texas State Texas Tech Toledo Troy Tulane Tulsa UAB UCF UCLA UConn UL Monroe UNLV USC Utah Utah State UTEP UTSA Vanderbilt Virginia Virginia Tech Wake Forest Washington Washington State West Virginia Western Kentucky Western Michigan Wisconsin Wyoming CORE: points per 100 qualifying plays, adjusted for game situation and opponents; only FBS pass/rush plays, excluding overtime and garbage time. Raw PPA: provider PPA per play, cumulative provider Weeks 1–8, no season-type filter, garbage time included. Equal week labels do not make their play populations or units equal. Do not subtract or blend these values.
Raw source captured 2026-10-27 01:39:26 UTC, no later than this CORE observation. 138 matched teams out of 138 CORE and 138 raw-PPA teams, using the existing CORE alias/key contract. Missing metrics stay unavailable.
Team CORE offense / defense CORE overall CORE plays offense / defense Raw offense PPA/play Raw defense PPA/play Michigan -1.94 / -13.00 11.06 397 / 407 0.047 -0.106
Selected team through retained captures Michigan · 13 observations in this eligibility view. Each row retains its model version, population and acquisition time; no values are filled across missing snapshots.
Captured UTC Through week / model Timing Population CORE overall Qualifying offense / defense plays 2026-09-24 16:09:28 UTC regular 3 · core-preseason-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 12.46 163 / 161 2026-09-28 11:01:43 UTC regular 4 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 12.71 230 / 219 2026-09-28 18:03:08 UTC regular 4 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 12.71 230 / 219 2026-09-30 11:04:15 UTC regular 4 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 12.71 230 / 219 2026-10-01 11:04:14 UTC regular 4 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 12.71 230 / 219 2026-10-04 19:34:19 UTC regular 5 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 8.34 279 / 284 2026-10-05 11:05:35 UTC regular 5 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 8.34 279 / 284 2026-10-06 11:06:16 UTC regular 5 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 8.34 279 / 284 2026-10-13 11:06:31 UTC regular 6 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 8.84 279 / 284 2026-10-20 11:11:04 UTC regular 7 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 10.09 331 / 356 2026-10-26 03:58:46 UTC regular 8 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 11.06 397 / 407 2026-10-26 11:02:36 UTC regular 8 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 11.06 397 / 407 2026-10-27 11:01:58 UTC regular 8 · core-v1 Before target kickoff (verified) 138 11.06 397 / 407
Source receipts and timing evidence CORE: data/external/cfbd_extended_ratings/2026/20261027T110121353940Z · acquired 2026-10-27T11:01:58.572543+00:00 · response SHA-256 d733155f9a4b9cb73b0d3db34bc24f434db2fac645e226aa4b543db6686ec92a · manifest SHA-256 d5fb1d0db626aa28028386978bc93c5eb1cb5495fcbe6e5cff37e72289c2aee6
Raw PPA: data/external/cfbd_advanced/2026/20261027T013926886830Z · acquired 2026-10-27T01:39:26.886830+00:00 · response SHA-256 76903a3885081c6ba1c9b91713d26a2ba2496a0f0f667e9359d510f23b41d703 · manifest SHA-256 b70742d8bc1972b038dc5c013062a88a9b4deb855912c4a7730a535a1d0b506d
Target schedule: data/external/cfbd_results/2026/20261027T013803804610Z · acquired 2026-10-27T01:38:03.804610+00:00 · response SHA-256 c0746502cc0f5692a13b8dbc105ff4b6babf3463ad1d1b302c95e34914a25b4b · manifest SHA-256 629b63b3ec5bab7f0903eec32803bc06d02b96d1192e60723044e407e0a0d977
Target FBS roster SHA-256 15611e4d36965423f96b01f58fbe1ea9de04f88c2909a490ddbfcab4511ea2c2
Download capture history and provenance