Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Bowling Green

2026 season

Mid-American
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Bowling Green's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 123 across 8 systems; best 117, worst 129, so they disagree by 12 places.

Lab EPA
#117
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#128
up 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#129
up 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#118
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#129
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#119
up 10 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#127
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#118
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#133 of 138
Schedule strength
#97 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#116 of 138
Game control
#128 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#131 of 138
Offense
#131 of 138
Defense
#107 of 138
Special teams
#128 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Bowling Green · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

2-7 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.121 net EPA/play

#117

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-11.59 points

#128 · Up 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 9 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -7.23 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -6.17, schedule #109 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -4.20. That is worth -13.40 on its own; the preseason prior of -4.55 still carries 21% of the weight, giving -11.59.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Bowling Green · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Tarleton State
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401866410
-7.00 → -7.00-2.500.73497.53%-25.00 (fixed lower division)-0.716-1.884-2.599
Week 2 · Nebraska
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858441
-49.00 → -35.00+2.500.76377.83%+8.75-2.5450.685-1.860
Week 3 · Iowa State
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856798
-48.00 → -35.00+2.500.79378.14%+1.38-2.6450.112-2.533
Week 4 · South Florida
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401862785
-8.00 → -8.00-2.500.82498.46%+3.03-0.8880.256-0.632
Week 5 · Miami (OH)
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401866477
+4.00 → +4.00+2.500.85728.79%-4.690.571-0.4120.159
Week 6 · Sacramento State
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401866436
+28.00 → +28.00-2.500.89099.13%-17.392.329-1.5890.741
Week 7 · Ball State
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401866441
-1.00 → -1.00 (OT)-2.500.92599.49%-12.52-0.332-1.188-1.521
Week 8 · Buffalo
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401866448
-7.00 → -7.00+2.500.96229.87%-9.37-0.444-0.925-1.369
Week 9 · Western Michigan
away · 2026-10-31 · ID 401866452
-13.00 → -13.00+2.501.000010.25%+0.35-1.0770.036-1.041

Game terms -10.65 points; prior term -0.93 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -11.59 points. The preseason prior is -4.55 with 20.51% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.4 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 9 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-18.3 SP+ points

#129 · Up 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-13.76 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#119 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -6.49 on 394 plays; defense 7.27 on 412 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Bowling Green 11 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
2-7 · conf 2-3 · home 1-3 · away 1-4 · expected wins 2.8
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-5 ATS (-2.1 avg) · 2025: 5-7 ATS (-1.8 avg)
Head coach
Eddie George · hired 2025-03-09 · 4-8 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #100 (149 pts) · 2025 #94 (155 pts) · 2026 #75 (188 pts)
Returning
-6% of production · 23% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing940%23%
Receiving3%11%
Rushing0%29%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back123.000.835110.02
Defensive Line183.000.834615.02
Linebacker43.000.84453.38
Offensive Line103.000.82818.28
Quarterback53.000.83814.19
Receiver172.880.837014.23
Running Back53.000.83244.16
Special Teams53.000.81884.09

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Jay Kastantin · QB

CFBD athlete 5385753. Bowling Green (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.26921252.8%
Pass 96.7% · Rush 16.8%

1st 43.6% · 2nd 50.8% · 3rd 75.0%

Standard downs 46.1% · Passing downs 66.7%

Not linked
Austyn Dendy · RB

CFBD athlete 5147347. Missouri (2024–2024); Bowling Green (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0948822.8%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 39.8%

1st 28.0% · 2nd 21.5% · 3rd 12.0%

Standard downs 28.0% · Passing downs 11.5%

2024: 3★ · 0.8739
Nakai Amachree · RB

CFBD athlete 5219017. Bowling Green (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0365716.0%
Pass 10.0% · Rush 22.2%

1st 18.4% · 2nd 19.8% · 3rd 6.9%

Standard downs 17.1% · Passing downs 13.8%

2024: 3★ · 0.8547
Jay Kastantin · QB

CFBD athlete 5385753. Bowling Green (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2434152.8%
Pass 96.7% · Rush 16.8%

1st 43.6% · 2nd 50.8% · 3rd 75.0%

Standard downs 46.1% · Passing downs 66.7%

Not linked
Travis Kenner · PK

CFBD athlete 5177469. Bowling Green (2024–2026)

Kicker PAAR3.39011—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Austin Novosad · QB

CFBD athlete 4912647. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.2%
Pass 17.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.9% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 19.0%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 14.3%

Not linked
Blane Cleaver · TE

CFBD athlete 4879925. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 5.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 3.6%

Not linked
Brennan Ridley · WR

CFBD athlete 5226453. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.8%
Pass 13.3% · Rush 2.9%

1st 8.5% · 2nd 8.5% · 3rd 6.0%

Standard downs 8.0% · Passing downs 7.5%

Not linked
Carson Lovett · RB

CFBD athlete 5281457. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 5.1%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 6.3%

Not linked
Eli Jacon-Duffy · TE

CFBD athlete 5193300. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.1%
Pass 15.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.9% · 2nd 3.9% · 3rd 15.0%

Standard downs 5.7% · Passing downs 10.1%

Not linked
Isaiah Dawson · WR

CFBD athlete 5226828. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Jeremiah Scoby · TE

CFBD athlete 5207804. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.6%
Pass 18.8% · Rush 0.4%

1st 7.7% · 2nd 7.3% · 3rd 12.1%

Standard downs 8.0% · Passing downs 9.8%

Not linked
Joseph Saffold · WR

CFBD athlete 5326882. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 7.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 8.6%

Standard downs 0.8% · Passing downs 8.9%

Not linked
Ke'Marion Baldwin · RB

CFBD athlete 5121607. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.4%
Pass 0.6% · Rush 10.1%

1st 8.3% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 1.2%

Standard downs 6.6% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Kentrell White · TE

CFBD athlete 5248198. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 1.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Leo Kemp · FB

CFBD athlete 5155089. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.6%
Pass 1.9% · Rush 7.5%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 6.5%

Standard downs 6.0% · Passing downs 1.7%

Not linked
Marceles Carey · RB

CFBD athlete 5385754. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.1%

1st 4.1% · 2nd 7.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 5.8%

Not linked
Nicholas Sowell · WR

CFBD athlete 5231360. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.3% · 2nd 1.7% · 3rd 2.4%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 1.6%

Not linked
Pauly Sadler · WR

CFBD athlete 5302828. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 6.1%

Not linked
Trey Johnson · WR

CFBD athlete 4912186. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 5.9% · Rush 0.5%

1st 1.3% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 3.6%

Not linked
Tristin Blackmon · RB

CFBD athlete 5296304. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.1%

1st 4.1% · 2nd 1.8% · 3rd 6.1%

Standard downs 5.4% · Passing downs 1.9%

Not linked
Winn Sharp · WR

CFBD athlete 5193284. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.6%
Pass 16.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.1% · 2nd 9.4% · 3rd 9.6%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 10.8%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 17 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Armahn Hale · SNew Mexico State2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Austin Novosad · QBOregon2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Drey Braxton · CBNorth Carolina Central2026-01-173★ / 0.8200Immediate
Gabriel Funk · OTApp State2026-01-072★ / —Immediate
Isaiah Dawson · WRRichmond2026-01-12— / —Immediate
JayT Jackson · CBLouisiana Tech2026-06-30— / —Immediate
John Baker IV · EDGEToledo2026-02-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jonathan Goins · LBAlabama A&M2026-02-043★ / 0.8000Immediate
Kade Kostus · DLCentral Michigan2026-03-263★ / —Immediate
Ke'Marion Baldwin · RBCharleston Southern2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Mike Wright III · SFlorida Atlantic2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Nick Sawyer · CBCharleston Southern2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Nick Sowell · WRSouth Carolina State2026-01-173★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ryan Kingston · PSoutheast Missouri State2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Sanders Ellis · LBPurdue2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Selah Brown · DLLouisville2026-01-233★ / 0.8400Immediate
Timothy Taylor Jr. · DLJacksonville State2026-01-173★ / 0.8000Immediate
Outgoing · 27 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Allen Middleton · WRNot reported2025-12-063★ / —Immediate
Arlis Boardingham · TEAuburn2026-01-233★ / 0.8600Immediate
Bam Booker · EDGENot reported2026-01-113★ / —Withdrawn
Caden Marshall · LBSMU2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Caleb Goodloe · WRNot reported2025-12-053★ / —Immediate
Cameron Pettaway · RBIowa State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Collins Acheampong · EDGEUTSA2026-01-233★ / 0.8500Immediate
David Afogho · EDGEWest Virginia2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
DeShaun Lanier · WRGrand Valley State2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Gideon Lampron · LBColorado2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Isaiah Thomison · DLIllinois2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jackson Kleather · KNorthwestern2026-01-102★ / —Immediate
Jacob Harris · TEWisconsin2026-01-033★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jahvion Jarmon · CBAustin Peay2026-01-243★ / —Immediate
Justin Eklund · LBMontana2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Kaderris Roberts · RBDelaware2026-01-183★ / 0.8600Immediate
Keyon Washington · CBIowa State2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Lucian Anderson III · QBSouth Carolina2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
MJ Cannon · CBCincinnati2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
Malik Moses · DLNot reported2026-01-143★ / 0.8200Withdrawn
Mar'Kel Porter · RBNorthwestern2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Myles Bradley · EDGENot reported2026-01-11— / —Withdrawn
Nate Pabst · OTFlorida State2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
RJ Garcia II · WRFlorida Atlantic2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Reis Stocksdale · WRTemple2026-01-08— / —Immediate
TJ Nelson · SNot reported2025-12-082★ / —Immediate
Tyron Steed · CBNot reported2025-12-183★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Bowling Green. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Eddie George · career 4–8 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 14 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Eddie George · active at capture

    4–8 · 12 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2025-03-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2019–2024 · Scot Loeffler

    27–41 · 68 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2018-11-28. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2018–2018 · Carl Pelini

    2–3 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2018-10-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2016–2018 · Mike Jinks

    7–24 · 31 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2015-12-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2014–2015 · Dino Babers

    18–9 · 27 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2013-12-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2009–2013 · Dave Clawson

    32–32 · 64 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2008-12-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2003–2008 · Gregg Brandon

    44–30 · 74 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2002-12-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 2001–2002 · Urban Meyer

    17–6 · 23 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2000-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1991–2000 · Gary Blackney

    60–50–2 · 112 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1986–1990 · Moe Ankney

    20–31–3 · 54 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1977–1985 · Dennis Stolz

    56–45–1 · 102 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1968–1976 · Don Nehlen

    53–35–4 · 92 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1965–1967 · Bob Gibson

    19–9 · 28 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1962–1964 · Doyt Perry

    24–4–1 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Eddie George · incomplete attribution0–0——-17.9-1575—
2025 · Eddie George4–82–60–0-12.6-14.494—
2024 · Scot Loeffler7–66–20–1-1.8-1.9100—
2023 · Scot Loeffler7–65–30–1-7.8-3.8119—
2022 · Scot Loeffler6–75–30–1-18.1-14.3109—
2021 · Scot Loeffler4–82–60–0-12.4-17.7103—
2020 · Scot Loeffler0–50–50–0-26.2—85—
2019 · Scot Loeffler3–92–60–0-27.5-28.5129—
2018 · Mike Jinks · incomplete attribution1–6——-22-2191—
2018 · Carl Pelini · incomplete attribution2–3——-22-2191—
2017 · Mike Jinks2–102–60–0-10-14.381—
2016 · Mike Jinks4–83–50–0-6.6-12.7111—
2015 · Dino Babers · incomplete attribution10–3——7.58.5104—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:07:19 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play125 / 1389.5102 / 13826.3
Success rate113 / 13818.2119 / 13813.9
Explosiveness127 / 1388.083 / 13840.1
Standard-down success93 / 13832.8114 / 13817.5
Passing-down success129 / 1386.685 / 13838.7
Pass PPA82 / 13840.991 / 13834.3
Rush PPA130 / 1385.8107 / 13822.6
Pass explosiveness83 / 13840.140 / 13871.5
Rush explosiveness128 / 1387.3127 / 1388.0
Line yards122 / 13811.7126 / 1388.8
Second-level yards137 / 1380.7124 / 13810.2
Open-field yards131 / 1385.1136 / 1381.5
Stuff rate106 / 13823.490 / 13835.0
Power successT34 / 13875.268 / 13851.1
HavocT132 / 1384.0114 / 13817.5
Front-seven havoc131 / 1385.1T53 / 13861.7
DB havocT85 / 13837.2T136 / 1381.1
Points / opportunity131 / 1385.188 / 13836.5
Average field positionT102 / 13825.9T93 / 13832.1
Field-position expected points104 / 13824.8T104 / 13824.5

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Jay Kastantin · QBUsage 52.8% · Avg PPA 0.137 · Total 38.639
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.13738.63952.8%
Pass0.20046.35196.7%
Rush0.1969.20116.8%
1st down0.0292.95843.6%
2nd down0.13812.44850.8%
3rd down0.35831.16075.0%
Standard downs0.12520.94446.1%
Passing downs0.15317.69566.7%
Austyn Dendy · RBUsage 22.8% · Avg PPA -0.160 · Total -17.273
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.160-17.27322.8%
Pass-0.251-1.7603.4%
Rush-0.158-15.80939.8%
1st down-0.226-13.10828.0%
2nd down0.0100.35721.5%
3rd down0.3664.39312.0%
Standard downs-0.167-15.21028.0%
Passing downs-0.121-2.06311.5%
Nakai Amachree · RBUsage 16.0% · Avg PPA -0.081 · Total -6.956
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.081-6.95616.0%
Pass0.2576.17210.0%
Rush-0.212-13.12822.2%
1st down-0.145-6.22018.4%
2nd down-0.023-0.80319.8%
3rd down0.0080.0676.9%
Standard downs-0.141-8.72217.1%
Passing downs0.0741.76613.8%
Jeremiah Scoby · TEUsage 8.6% · Avg PPA 0.165 · Total 7.576
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1657.5768.6%
Pass0.1868.39218.8%
Rush-0.816-0.8160.4%
1st down0.2484.4607.7%
2nd down0.0881.1497.3%
3rd down0.4376.11712.1%
Standard downs0.1815.2438.0%
Passing downs0.1372.3339.8%
Brennan Ridley · WRUsage 7.8% · Avg PPA 0.238 · Total 9.997
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2389.9977.8%
Pass0.45614.59513.3%
Rush0.1281.0262.9%
1st down0.2304.6058.5%
2nd down0.2543.8048.5%
3rd down0.2271.5876.0%
Standard downs0.2447.0868.0%
Passing downs0.2242.9117.5%
Winn Sharp · WRUsage 7.6% · Avg PPA 0.648 · Total 23.982
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.64823.9827.6%
Pass0.64823.98216.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1321.4485.1%
2nd down0.88913.3329.4%
3rd down1.08310.8299.6%
Standard downs0.2975.9366.1%
Passing downs1.06218.04610.8%
Eli Jacon-Duffy · TEUsage 7.1% · Avg PPA 0.658 · Total 22.375
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.65822.3757.1%
Pass0.65822.37515.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3664.3935.9%
2nd down0.6003.6023.9%
3rd down0.89914.37915.0%
Standard downs0.60710.9345.7%
Passing downs0.71511.44110.1%
Austin Novosad · QBUsage 6.2% · Avg PPA -0.431 · Total -3.020
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.431-3.0206.2%
Pass-0.431-3.02017.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.703-0.7031.9%
2nd down-0.136-0.2735.3%
3rd down-0.511-2.04519.0%
Standard downs-0.929-1.8582.6%
Passing downs-0.232-1.16214.3%
Ke'Marion Baldwin · RBUsage 5.4% · Avg PPA -0.081 · Total -1.621
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.081-1.6215.4%
Pass-1.159-1.1590.6%
Rush-0.024-0.46210.1%
1st down-0.007-0.0948.3%
2nd down-0.240-1.4375.0%
3rd down-0.090-0.0901.2%
Standard downs0.1051.6786.6%
Passing downs-0.825-3.2983.1%
Leo Kemp · FBUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA 0.520 · Total 8.313
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5208.3134.6%
Pass1.6494.9461.9%
Rush0.2593.3677.5%
1st down0.9185.5063.9%
2nd down-0.525-2.1013.5%
3rd down0.6163.0816.5%
Standard downs0.6298.8086.0%
Passing downs-0.247-0.4951.7%
Marceles Carey · RBUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA -0.776 · Total -5.432
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.776-5.4324.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.776-5.4327.1%
1st down-0.800-2.4004.1%
2nd down-0.758-3.0327.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.817-3.2683.6%
Passing downs-0.721-2.1645.8%
Tristin Blackmon · RBUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.262 · Total 1.831
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2621.8314.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.2621.8317.1%
1st down-0.216-0.6494.1%
2nd down-0.104-0.1041.8%
3rd down0.3680.7366.1%
Standard downs0.3231.9365.4%
Passing downs-0.104-0.1041.9%
Carson Lovett · RBUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA -0.085 · Total -0.171
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.085-0.1713.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.085-0.1715.1%
1st down-0.251-0.2513.4%
2nd down0.0810.0814.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.251-0.2512.3%
Passing downs0.0810.0816.3%
Joseph Saffold · WRUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 1.057 · Total 6.339
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0576.3393.3%
Pass1.0576.3397.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.313-0.3131.2%
2nd down0.1260.2523.3%
3rd down2.1336.4008.6%
Standard downs-0.313-0.3130.8%
Passing downs1.3306.6528.9%
Trey Johnson · WRUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA -0.315 · Total -3.155
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.315-3.1552.9%
Pass-0.252-2.2655.9%
Rush-0.889-0.8890.5%
1st down-0.883-1.7671.3%
2nd down-0.884-2.6512.6%
3rd down0.2531.2636.8%
Standard downs0.3862.3172.5%
Passing downs-1.368-5.4723.6%
Blane Cleaver · TEUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA 0.426 · Total 1.705
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4261.7052.2%
Pass0.4261.7055.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7530.7531.2%
2nd down0.3180.9534.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.4230.8451.6%
Passing downs0.4300.8603.6%
Pauly Sadler · WRUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA -0.337 · Total -0.674
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.337-0.6741.8%
Pass-0.337-0.6743.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.238-0.2382.9%
3rd down-0.436-0.4364.5%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.337-0.6746.1%
Nicholas Sowell · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -0.152 · Total -0.456
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.152-0.4561.7%
Pass-0.152-0.4563.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6620.6621.3%
2nd down-0.550-0.5501.7%
3rd down-0.567-0.5672.4%
Standard downs0.0470.0951.7%
Passing downs-0.550-0.5501.6%
Isaiah Dawson · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 3.037 · Total 3.037
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall3.0373.0371.6%
Pass3.0373.0373.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down3.0373.0376.7%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs3.0373.0375.6%
Kentrell White · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 1.000 · Total 3.000
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0003.0001.6%
Pass1.2362.4722.5%
Rush0.5280.5281.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.5280.5281.6%
3rd down1.2362.4724.8%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs1.0003.0004.5%
Where Bowling Green sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: -0.003 (9th percentile; 138 teams)9thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.388 (18th percentile; 138 teams)18thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.114 (8th percentile; 138 teams)8thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.177 (41st percentile; 138 teams)41stOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.060 (6th percentile; 138 teams)6thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.137 (26th percentile; 138 teams)26thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.449 (14th percentile; 138 teams)14thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.249 (40th percentile; 138 teams)40thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.135 (18th percentile; 138 teams)18th
Values and percentiles
Bowling Green metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play-0.0039th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.38818th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.1148th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.17741st138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.0606th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.13726th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.44914th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.24940th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.13518th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 100% of 234 attempts charted. Average depth of target 6.4 yards (2nd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.6 per completion. Completion 65.8%, 6.7 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.17.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense62.0%65.1%-3.1184 / 234
Defense allowed67.8%61.0%+6.8146 / 200

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Bowling Green.

Target mix by zone, Bowling Green offense
Short left28% · 63Short middle22% · 50Short right43% · 97Deep left2% · 4Deep middle3% · 6Deep right2% · 4

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Bowling Green passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense234100%6.45.665.8%0.17-3.1 pp184
Passing defense200100%8.35.764.5%0.35+6.8 pp146

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2953.437.2%-0.062.700.700.5018.8%77.8%
Defense allowed3475.648.8%0.243.401.202.2015.0%71.4%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense284 / 2952821316220277 / 277 · 100.0%
Defense allowed339 / 3473212621560319 / 320 · 99.7%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -3.1 pp. 7 of 9 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-23.0-8.85.3W1W2W2 vs Nebraska: -11.3 ppW3W3 vs Iowa State: -23.0 ppW4W4 vs South Florida: -3.4 ppW5W5 vs Miami (OH): +1.1 ppW6W7W7 vs Ball State: +5.3 ppW8W8 vs Buffalo: +4.7 ppW9W9 vs Western Michigan: -2.5 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Tarleton State300———7.20.56362.9-0.64
W2Nebraska161662.5%73.8%-11.3 pp2.10.01313.2-0.04
W3Iowa State222240.9%63.9%-23.0 pp8.1-0.28303.1-0.05
W4South Florida282857.1%60.6%-3.4 pp8.60.06332.6-0.33
W5Miami (OH)373666.7%65.6%+1.1 pp5.00.31232.5-0.06
W6Sacramento State180———7.90.12415.30.29
W7Ball State242470.8%65.5%+5.3 pp5.70.46352.70.07
W8Buffalo272669.2%64.5%+4.7 pp6.90.35363.40.02
W9Western Michigan323262.5%65.0%-2.5 pp5.9-0.20304.30.19

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

45 punts · 39.4 gross yards/punt · 32.4 net yards/punt

7 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 45/45 punts. Known net yards: 32/45 punts.

Our punt returns

3 returns · 5.7 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 3/3 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Western Michigan742.140.84/7
Week 8 · Buffalo439.044.02/4
Week 7 · Ball State436.332.02/4
Week 6 · Sacramento State228.528.52/2
Week 5 · Miami (OH)338.323.52/3
Team style
Rating history