Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Florida State

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Florida State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 55 across 8 systems; best 41, worst 77, so they disagree by 36 places.

Lab EPA
#64
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#50
down 132026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#50
up 42026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#53
down 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#41
down 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#77
up 4 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#57
down 132026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#64
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#74 of 138
Schedule strength
#12 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#58 of 138
Game control
#38 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#48 of 138
Offense
#19 of 138
Defense
#93 of 138
Special teams
#78 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Florida State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

3-5 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.004 net EPA/play

#64

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

4.01 points

#50 · Down 13 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +1.46 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +3.12, schedule #17 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +7.03. That is worth +4.58 on its own; the preseason prior of +2.07 still carries 23% of the weight, giving +4.01.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Florida State · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · New Mexico State
home · 2026-08-29 · ID 401864570
+17.00 → +17.00-2.500.73498.39%-10.121.216-0.8480.368
Week 1 · SMU
home · 2026-09-07 · ID 401858212
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.73498.39%+6.27-0.4610.5260.065
Week 3 · Alabama
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856685
-14.00 → -14.00+2.500.79379.06%+18.35-1.0421.6620.621
Week 4 · Central Arkansas
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858237
+27.00 → +27.00-2.500.82499.41%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.306-2.353-0.047
Week 5 · Virginia
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858253
+31.00 → +31.00-2.500.85729.78%+0.542.7880.0532.841
Week 6 · Louisville
away · 2026-10-09 · ID 401858254
-24.00 → -24.00+2.500.890910.17%+10.31-2.1861.048-1.138
Week 7 · Miami
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858263
-8.00 → -1.00 (OT)+2.500.925910.57%+18.220.1581.9262.084
Week 9 · Clemson
home · 2026-10-31 · ID 401858280
-12.00 → -12.00-2.501.000011.41%+3.46-1.6550.394-1.260

Game terms +3.53 points; prior term +0.47 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +4.01 points. The preseason prior is +2.07 with 22.83% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

4.8 SP+ points

#50 · Up 4 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-2.66 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#77 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 5.49 on 439 plays; defense 8.15 on 448 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Florida State 14 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
3-5 · conf 1-4 · home 3-2 · away 0-3 · expected wins 3.5
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-4-1 ATS (-2.9 avg) · 2025: 5-7 ATS (-0.8 avg)
Head coach
Mike Norvell · hired 2019-12-07 · 20-18 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #12 (272 pts) · 2025 #19 (244 pts) · 2026 #16 (252 pts)
Returning
40% of production · 31% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing13%6%
Receiving65%55%
Rushing28%33%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back133.620.909811.83
Defensive Line173.590.899215.29
Linebacker103.200.88148.81
Offensive Line163.310.878514.06
Quarterback63.670.89785.39
Receiver163.690.907014.51
Running Back44.000.92753.71
Special Teams113.640.88769.76

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Ashton Daniels · QB

CFBD athlete 4838679. Auburn (2025–2025); Stanford (2022–2024); Florida State (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.43722057.5%
Pass 96.2% · Rush 25.4%

1st 51.3% · 2nd 54.5% · 3rd 76.8%

Standard downs 52.8% · Passing downs 69.1%

2022: 3★ · 0.8600
Ousmane Kromah · RB

CFBD athlete 5141560. Florida State (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.09810327.1%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 44.9%

1st 31.9% · 2nd 26.7% · 3rd 15.7%

Standard downs 31.0% · Passing downs 17.6%

2025: 4★ · 0.9622
Ashton Daniels · QB

CFBD athlete 4838679. Auburn (2025–2025); Stanford (2022–2024); Florida State (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.5457857.5%
Pass 96.2% · Rush 25.4%

1st 51.3% · 2nd 54.5% · 3rd 76.8%

Standard downs 52.8% · Passing downs 69.1%

2022: 3★ · 0.8600
Tre Wisner · RB

CFBD athlete 4871076. Florida State (2026–2026); Texas (2023–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.0574315.7%
Pass 9.6% · Rush 22.1%

1st 15.6% · 2nd 20.0% · 3rd 10.6%

Standard downs 15.7% · Passing downs 15.5%

2023: 3★ · 0.8869
Gabe Panikowski · PK

CFBD athlete 5083549. Sacramento State (2022–2022); Florida State (2026–2026); Oklahoma State (2025–2025); Idaho State (2024–2024)

Kicker PAAR5.5307—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: stars unavailable
Amari Thomas · RB

CFBD athlete 5372196. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 4.3%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 6.9% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 9.1%

Not linked
Chase Loftin · TE

CFBD athlete 5164345. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 1.2% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Desirrio Riles · TE

CFBD athlete 5160086. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 5.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.1% · 2nd 1.9% · 3rd 1.7%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 3.2%

Not linked
Duce Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 4870922. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.8%
Pass 19.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.6% · 2nd 7.8% · 3rd 13.1%

Standard downs 8.4% · Passing downs 10.1%

Not linked
Greyson Labiad · TE

CFBD athlete 5294076. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 2.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jasen Lopez · WR

CFBD athlete 5222974. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 8.0% · Rush 0.6%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Jayvan Boggs · WR

CFBD athlete 5164350. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.8%
Pass 14.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.2% · 2nd 6.2% · 3rd 9.4%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 10.9%

Not linked
Kevin Sperry · QB

CFBD athlete 5141661. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.7%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 1.1%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 8.6%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Landen Thomas · TE

CFBD athlete 5079738. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 5.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 2.8%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
Micahi Danzy · WR

CFBD athlete 5088153. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.3%
Pass 12.8% · Rush 1.1%

1st 7.1% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 6.1%

Standard downs 7.5% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Samuel Singleton · RB

CFBD athlete 4870955. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——14.5%
Pass 10.7% · Rush 18.0%

1st 11.8% · 2nd 20.0% · 3rd 14.3%

Standard downs 12.9% · Passing downs 18.0%

Not linked
Teriq Mallory · WR

CFBD athlete 5209709. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 5.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 20.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 22 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Ashton Daniels · QBAuburn2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Bradyn Joiner · IOLPurdue2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
CJ Richard Jr. · SIllinois State2026-01-113★ / 0.8700Immediate
Carter Jula · PUNLV2026-01-19— / —Immediate
Chimdia Nwaiwu · OTStephen F. Austin2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Chris Jones · LBSouthern Miss2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Conor McAneney · KQuincy2026-01-163★ / 0.8000Immediate
Daniel Hughes · PNew Mexico2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Dean DeNobile · QBLafayette2026-01-163★ / 0.8300Immediate
Desirrio Riles · TEEast Carolina2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Gabe Panikowski · KOklahoma State2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Gemari Sands · RBFlorida Atlantic2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jordan Sanders · DLTexas State2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Karson Hobbs · CBNotre Dame2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Ma'Khi Jones · SDuke2026-01-123★ / 0.8700Immediate
Mikai Gbayor · LBNorth Carolina2026-01-154★ / 0.9100Immediate
Nate Pabst · OTBowling Green2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Nehemiah Chandler · CBSouth Alabama2026-01-033★ / 0.8600Immediate
Paul Bowling · IOLTroy2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Quintrevion Wisner · RBTexas2026-01-054★ / 0.9300Immediate
Rylan Kennedy · EDGETexas A&M2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
Xavier Chaplin · OTAuburn2026-01-094★ / 0.9200Immediate
Outgoing · 44 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Amaree Williams · EDGEMississippi State2026-01-093★ / 0.8800Immediate
Ashlynd Barker · SNot reported2025-12-284★ / 0.9300Immediate
Brock Glenn · QBWestern Kentucky2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Brunno Reus · KMissouri2026-01-133★ / 0.8000Immediate
Cai Bates · CBWisconsin2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Camdon Frier · WRTarleton State2026-02-043★ / 0.8400Immediate
Darryll Desir · EDGENot reported2026-01-164★ / 0.9400Withdrawn
Earl Little Jr. · SOhio State2026-01-114★ / 0.9300Immediate
Edwin Joseph · SOle Miss2026-01-104★ / 0.9200Immediate
Elijah Moore · WRSyracuse2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Gav Holman · LBMississippi State2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Gavin Sawchuk · RBNorthwestern2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ja'Bril Rawls · CBNot reported2025-12-164★ / 0.9400Immediate
Ja'Elyne Matthews · OTMississippi State2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jaden Jones · EDGEMissouri2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jake Weinberg · KMiami2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
James Williams · EDGEOklahoma State2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jamorie Flagg · DLFlorida International2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jayden Parrish · LBMemphis2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jaylen King · QBMercer2026-02-043★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jaylin Lucas · RBTulane2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jayson Jenkins · EDGEMississippi State2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jayvan Boggs · WRNot reported2025-12-273★ / 0.8900Immediate
Josh Raymond · IOLGeorgia Southern2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Justin Cryer · LBTexas2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
KJ Sampson · DLBoston College2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kam Davis · RBLiberty2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kevin Wynn · DLNot reported2026-01-144★ / —Withdrawn
L A Jessie Harrold · EDGEUCF2026-01-133★ / 0.8700Immediate
Landen Thomas · TENot reported2025-12-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Lawayne McCoy · WRLouisville2026-01-114★ / 0.9200Immediate
Lucas Simmons · OTWisconsin2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Luke Douglas · TEApp State2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Mac Chiumento · PTexas2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Manasse Itete · IOLArkansas State2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Mandrell Desir · EDGENot reported2026-01-164★ / 0.9600Withdrawn
Mario Nash Jr. · OTMississippi State2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Omar Graham Jr. · LBNot reported2025-12-164★ / 0.9100Immediate
Randy Pittman Jr. · TESMU2026-01-113★ / 0.8800Immediate
Shamar Arnoux · CBAuburn2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Thomas Castellanos · QBTexas Tech2026-08-213★ / —Immediate
Tye Hylton · OTLouisiana Tech2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyeland Coleman · DLArkansas State2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Willy Suarez · WRIndiana State2026-01-08— / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Florida State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Mike Norvell · career 76–50 across 11 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 13 appointments
  1. 2020–present · Mike Norvell · active at capture

    38–34 · 72 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 2019-12-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2019–2019 · Odell Haggins

    2–2 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2018–2019 · Willie Taggart

    9–12 · 21 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-12-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2017–2017 · Odell Haggins

    2–0 · 2 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2010–2017 · Jimbo Fisher

    83–23 · 106 attributed games · 8 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2010-01-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1976–2009 · Bobby Bowden

    315–98–4 · 417 attributed games · 34 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1974–1975 · Darrell Mudra

    4–18 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1971–1973 · Larry Jones

    15–19 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1960–1970 · Bill Peterson

    62–42–11 · 115 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1959–1959 · Perry Moss

    4–6 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1953–1958 · Thomas Nugent

    34–28–1 · 63 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1948–1952 · Don Veller

    31–12–1 · 44 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1947–1947 · Ed Williamson

    0–5 · 5 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Mike Norvell · incomplete attribution0–0——4.96.716—
2025 · Mike Norvell5–72–60–07.28.419—
2024 · Mike Norvell2–101–70–0-3.2-6.712—
2023 · Mike Norvell13–19–00–119.419.6196
2022 · Mike Norvell10–35–31–013.214.12011
2021 · Mike Norvell5–74–50–07.6422—
2020 · Mike Norvell3–62–60–0-4.9—22—
2019 · Odell Haggins · incomplete attribution2–2——1.80.219—
2019 · Willie Taggart · incomplete attribution4–5——1.80.219—
2018 · Willie Taggart5–73–50–01.4-2.811—
2017 · Jimbo Fisher · incomplete attribution5–6——22.810.16—
2017 · Odell Haggins · incomplete attribution2–0——22.810.16—
2016 · Jimbo Fisher10–35–31–02417.538
2015 · Jimbo Fisher10–36–20–123.215.8314
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:06:52 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play49 / 13865.0113 / 13818.2
Success rate59 / 13857.777 / 13844.5
Explosiveness7 / 13895.6123 / 13810.9
Standard-down success101 / 13827.089 / 13835.8
Passing-down success18 / 13887.663 / 13854.7
Pass PPA48 / 13865.797 / 13829.9
Rush PPA30 / 13878.8105 / 13824.1
Pass explosiveness3 / 13898.5106 / 13823.4
Rush explosiveness55 / 13860.6118 / 13814.6
Line yards18 / 13887.6104 / 13824.8
Second-level yards41 / 13870.871 / 13848.9
Open-field yards62 / 13855.5129 / 1386.6
Stuff rate17 / 13888.389 / 13835.8
Power success110 / 13820.4T77 / 13844.2
HavocT75 / 13845.6T89 / 13835.0
Front-seven havocT63 / 13851.8T72 / 13846.0
DB havocT85 / 13837.2T83 / 13838.7
Points / opportunity37 / 13873.757 / 13859.1
Average field positionT104 / 13824.5T63 / 13851.8
Field-position expected points107 / 13822.671 / 13848.9

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Ashton Daniels · QBUsage 57.5% · Avg PPA 0.308 · Total 92.056
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.30892.05657.5%
Pass0.31771.28396.2%
Rush0.61042.11425.4%
1st down0.0232.77251.3%
2nd down0.52147.37654.5%
3rd down0.57943.99676.8%
Standard downs0.08216.11052.8%
Passing downs0.73775.94769.1%
Ousmane Kromah · RBUsage 27.1% · Avg PPA 0.043 · Total 5.320
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0435.32027.1%
Pass0.1371.7876.5%
Rush0.0323.53344.9%
1st down0.0231.50831.9%
2nd down0.2439.46526.7%
3rd down0.7049.86115.7%
Standard downs-0.075-7.59431.0%
Passing downs0.56112.91417.6%
Tre Wisner · RBUsage 15.7% · Avg PPA 0.110 · Total 7.784
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1107.78415.7%
Pass0.63712.7489.6%
Rush-0.097-4.96422.1%
1st down-0.257-8.47815.6%
2nd down0.44812.98620.0%
3rd down0.3643.27610.6%
Standard downs-0.109-5.58415.7%
Passing downs0.66813.36815.5%
Samuel Singleton · RBUsage 14.5% · Avg PPA 0.483 · Total 13.997
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.48313.99714.5%
Pass1.48913.40010.7%
Rush0.0300.59718.0%
1st down-0.344-3.44511.8%
2nd down0.1161.50220.0%
3rd down2.65715.93914.3%
Standard downs0.0751.35512.9%
Passing downs1.14912.64218.0%
Duce Robinson · WRUsage 8.8% · Avg PPA 0.419 · Total 19.273
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.41919.2738.8%
Pass0.41919.27319.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2464.4347.6%
2nd down0.7539.7867.8%
3rd down0.4756.17613.1%
Standard downs0.1765.4698.4%
Passing downs0.92013.80410.1%
Jayvan Boggs · WRUsage 6.8% · Avg PPA 0.848 · Total 26.302
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.84826.3026.8%
Pass0.84826.30214.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1852.4006.2%
2nd down1.75615.8036.2%
3rd down0.6305.0379.4%
Standard downs0.2644.4845.2%
Passing downs1.55821.81910.9%
Micahi Danzy · WRUsage 6.3% · Avg PPA 0.690 · Total 22.775
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.69022.7756.3%
Pass0.70421.12512.8%
Rush0.5501.6511.1%
1st down0.97416.5597.1%
2nd down-0.144-1.2995.4%
3rd down0.9385.6306.1%
Standard downs0.72920.4157.5%
Passing downs0.4722.3603.4%
Amari Thomas · RBUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA 0.234 · Total 1.872
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2341.8724.5%
Pass0.7002.8015.2%
Rush-0.232-0.9294.3%
1st down0.1530.6134.3%
2nd down0.3151.2596.9%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1530.6133.0%
Passing downs0.3151.2599.1%
Jasen Lopez · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.213 · Total 2.766
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2132.7664.1%
Pass0.2222.6688.0%
Rush0.0980.0980.6%
1st down0.1110.6653.9%
2nd down0.3381.0132.9%
3rd down1.7605.2795.3%
Standard downs-0.073-0.7324.3%
Passing downs1.1663.4983.4%
Kevin Sperry · QBUsage 3.7% · Avg PPA -0.219 · Total -1.534
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.219-1.5343.7%
Pass-0.229-1.3736.5%
Rush-0.161-0.1611.1%
1st down-1.530-3.0612.2%
2nd down-0.230-0.4603.3%
3rd down0.6631.9888.6%
Standard downs-0.375-1.8773.7%
Passing downs0.1720.3433.5%
Desirrio Riles · TEUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA 0.208 · Total 1.868
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2081.8682.8%
Pass0.2081.8685.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4112.4664.1%
2nd down-0.194-0.3881.9%
3rd down-0.210-0.2101.7%
Standard downs0.4112.4662.7%
Passing downs-0.199-0.5983.2%
Landen Thomas · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.202 · Total 1.816
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2021.8162.6%
Pass0.2021.8165.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.048-0.1432.1%
2nd down-0.105-0.4183.7%
3rd down1.1892.3772.8%
Standard downs0.2601.5592.5%
Passing downs0.0860.2582.9%
Teriq Mallory · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.470 · Total -0.470
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.470-0.4702.0%
Pass-0.470-0.4705.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.470-0.47020.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.470-0.4707.7%
Chase Loftin · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.855 · Total 3.419
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8553.4191.5%
Pass0.8553.4192.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.347-0.3471.2%
3rd down1.2553.7665.6%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.8553.4194.9%
Greyson Labiad · TEUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.413 · Total -0.413
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.413-0.4131.3%
Pass-0.413-0.4132.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.413-0.4134.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.413-0.4131.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Florida State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.180 (65th percentile; 138 teams)65thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.431 (58th percentile; 138 teams)58thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.383 (96th percentile; 138 teams)96thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.280 (66th percentile; 138 teams)66thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.174 (79th percentile; 138 teams)79thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.161 (18th percentile; 138 teams)18thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.412 (45th percentile; 138 teams)45thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.347 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.148 (35th percentile; 138 teams)35th
Values and percentiles
Florida State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.18065th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.43158th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.38396th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.28066th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.17479th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.16118th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.41245th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.34711th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.14835th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 90% of 219 attempts charted. Average depth of target 10.4 yards (87th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 8.1 per completion. Completion 59.4%, 9.1 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.33.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense59.1%59.2%-0.1176 / 219
Defense allowed61.1%60.5%+0.6185 / 254

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Florida State.

Target mix by zone, Florida State offense
Short left19% · 35Short middle29% · 54Short right34% · 62Deep left7% · 13Deep middle2% · 4Deep right9% · 17

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Florida State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense21990%10.48.159.4%0.33-0.1 pp176
Passing defense25485%8.75.361.8%0.34+0.6 pp185

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2914.446.2%0.203.401.101.0011.7%65.6%
Defense allowed3034.842.4%0.163.301.001.8014.0%71.9%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense285 / 2912791219660225 / 266 · 84.6%
Defense allowed300 / 303287162111110240 / 271 · 88.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -0.1 pp. 6 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-5.20.56.2W1W1W1 vs New Mexico State: -0.6 ppW3W3 vs Alabama: +5.3 ppW4W5W5 vs Virginia: -1.8 ppW6W6 vs Louisville: -5.2 ppW7W7 vs Miami: -4.5 ppW9W9 vs Clemson: +6.2 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1SMU230————0.36443.00.07
W1New Mexico State272763.0%63.5%-0.6 pp6.30.27395.60.46
W3Alabama292958.6%53.3%+5.3 pp14.70.31352.70.16
W4Central Arkansas200———9.50.61286.40.43
W5Virginia191963.2%65.0%-1.8 pp8.40.28466.10.53
W6Louisville383855.3%60.4%-5.2 pp8.2-0.00384.20.24
W7Miami303053.3%57.8%-4.5 pp12.70.63343.8-0.35
W9Clemson333363.6%57.4%+6.2 pp11.90.33273.4-0.07

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

30 punts · 41.9 gross yards/punt · 38.7 net yards/punt

5 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 30/30 punts. Known net yards: 21/30 punts.

Our punt returns

13 returns · 10.1 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 13/13 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Clemson531.836.33/5
Week 7 · Miami443.338.52/4
Week 6 · Louisville540.033.04/5
Week 5 · Virginia547.235.33/5
Week 4 · Central Arkansas149.0—0/1
Team style
Rating history