Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Georgia

2026 season

SEC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Georgia's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 6 across 8 systems; best 1, worst 13, so they disagree by 12 places.

Lab EPA
#13
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#7
no change2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#1
up 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#3
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#4
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#7
down 1 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#5
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#13
down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#6 of 138
Schedule strength
#35 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#18 of 138
Game control
#3 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#2 of 138
Offense
#2 of 138
Defense
#10 of 138
Special teams
#43 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Georgia · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

7-1 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.156 net EPA/play

#13

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

16.36 points

#7 · Rank unchanged since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +19.32 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -0.24, schedule #50 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +2.77. That is worth +19.08 on its own; the preseason prior of +7.15 still carries 23% of the weight, giving +16.36.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Georgia · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Tennessee State
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856658
+60.00 → +35.00-2.500.73498.36%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.717-2.0900.627
Week 2 · Western Kentucky
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856673
+50.00 → +35.00-2.500.76378.69%-9.902.823-0.8601.963
Week 3 · Arkansas
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856686
+28.00 → +28.00+2.500.79379.03%-3.472.754-0.3132.440
Week 4 · Oklahoma
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856700
+28.00 → +28.00-2.500.82499.38%+4.272.3930.4012.793
Week 5 · Vanderbilt
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401856705
+24.00 → +24.00-2.500.85729.75%-4.082.097-0.3981.698
Week 6 · Alabama
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401856712
+3.00 → +3.00+2.500.890910.13%+18.350.5571.8602.417
Week 7 · Auburn
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401856719
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.925910.53%+4.18-0.5790.440-0.139
Week 9 · Florida
neutral · 2026-10-31 · ID 401856734
+19.00 → +19.000.001.000011.38%+6.822.1610.7762.937

Game terms +14.74 points; prior term +1.63 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +16.36 points. The preseason prior is +7.15 with 22.75% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.9 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

28.1 SP+ points

#1 · Up 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

22.83 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#7 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 11.81 on 353 plays; defense -11.02 on 348 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Georgia 6 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
7-1 · conf 5-1 · home 4-1 · away 2-0 · expected wins 6.6
Polls (Week 10)
Coaches Poll #2 · AP Top 25 #2
CFP latest
#2 · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 6-2 ATS (+3.8 avg) · 2025: 6-8 ATS (-0.4 avg)
Head coach
Kirby Smart · hired 2015-12-06 · 36-6 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #1 (317 pts) · 2025 #2 (305 pts) · 2026 #6 (292 pts)
Returning
69% of production · 74% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing100%99%
Receiving35%33%
Rushing99%83%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back194.110.938117.82
Defensive Line234.040.938021.57
Linebacker114.270.944610.39
Offensive Line223.820.917420.18
Quarterback43.500.90123.60
Receiver224.000.934220.55
Running Back73.860.91936.43
Special Teams83.380.86276.90

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Gunner Stockton · QB

CFBD athlete 4685578. Georgia (2022–2026)

Passing WEPA0.53118144.8%
Pass 82.6% · Rush 14.4%

1st 37.7% · 2nd 45.6% · 3rd 62.4%

Standard downs 41.2% · Passing downs 55.6%

2022: 4★ · 0.9506
Dwight Phillips Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5079561. Georgia (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.3055413.5%
Pass 5.8% · Rush 20.8%

1st 18.6% · 2nd 12.5% · 3rd 2.2%

Standard downs 15.0% · Passing downs 8.7%

2024: 4★ · 0.9147
Nate Frazier · RB

CFBD athlete 5084047. Georgia (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2104613.8%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 23.4%

1st 14.8% · 2nd 17.1% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 13.5% · Passing downs 14.9%

2024: 4★ · 0.9777
Gunner Stockton · QB

CFBD athlete 4685578. Georgia (2022–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1724044.8%
Pass 82.6% · Rush 14.4%

1st 37.7% · 2nd 45.6% · 3rd 62.4%

Standard downs 41.2% · Passing downs 55.6%

2022: 4★ · 0.9506
Chauncey Bowens · RB

CFBD athlete 5079335. Georgia (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2053714.5%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 22.0%

1st 14.2% · 2nd 13.0% · 3rd 18.9%

Standard downs 16.0% · Passing downs 9.6%

2024: 4★ · 0.9174
Bo Walker · RB

CFBD athlete 5172095. Georgia (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.121328.3%
Pass 2.7% · Rush 13.6%

1st 10.1% · 2nd 8.1% · 3rd 3.2%

Standard downs 9.2% · Passing downs 5.6%

2025: 4★ · 0.9021
Peyton Woodring · PK

CFBD athlete 5077226. Georgia (2023–2026)

Kicker PAAR1.56012—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2023: 3★ · 0.8333
CJ Wiley · WR

CFBD athlete 5141749. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Colton Heinrich · TE

CFBD athlete 5130409. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Craig Dandridge · WR

CFBD athlete 5263766. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 12.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 12.9%

Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 9.5%

Not linked
Dallas Dickerson · WR

CFBD athlete 5273767. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Elyiss Williams · TE

CFBD athlete 5141756. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 0.8% · 3rd 1.5%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 2.0%

Not linked
Ethan Barbour · TE

CFBD athlete 5141371. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 1.0%

Not linked
Hezekiah Millender · QB

CFBD athlete 5229348. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 1.7% · Rush 4.9%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 10.5%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 7.4%

Not linked
Isiah Canion · WR

CFBD athlete 5132253. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 8.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jaden Reddell · TE

CFBD athlete 5218582. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 8.1% · Rush 1.5%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 6.5%

Not linked
Jae Lamar · RB

CFBD athlete 5244758. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 9.8%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 5.1% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jeremy Bell · WR

CFBD athlete 5150831. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 1.5%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.0% · Passing downs 3.6%

Not linked
Kaiden Prothro · TE

CFBD athlete 5182804. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Landon Roldan · WR

CFBD athlete 5215017. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 3.5% · Rush 1.8%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 1.3%

Standard downs 2.6% · Passing downs 1.9%

Not linked
Lawson Luckie · TE

CFBD athlete 4870874. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 6.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.4% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 5.7%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
London Humphreys · WR

CFBD athlete 5078453. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.0%
Pass 10.8% · Rush 0.5%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 3.9%

Standard downs 5.7% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Nick Peal · RB

CFBD athlete 5446770. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 11.6%

1st 6.6% · 2nd 6.6% · 3rd 8.1%

Standard downs 7.4% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Ryan Montgomery · QB

CFBD athlete 5141602. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 8.6% · Rush 1.6%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 5.1% · 3rd 10.5%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 3.7%

Not linked
Ryan Mosley · WR

CFBD athlete 5212652. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Ryan Puglisi · QB

CFBD athlete 5079679. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.0%
Pass 17.3% · Rush 1.6%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 10.0% · 3rd 12.3%

Standard downs 7.7% · Passing downs 13.0%

Not linked
Sacovie White · WR

CFBD athlete 5105269. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 8.5% · Rush 0.8%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 9.7%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Talyn Taylor · WR

CFBD athlete 5141671. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.8%
Pass 13.5% · Rush 1.3%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 7.2% · 3rd 9.8%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked
Thomas Blackshear · WR

CFBD athlete 5149473. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.6%
Pass 12.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 12.5%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 12.1%

Not linked
Tyler Williams · WR

CFBD athlete 5297763. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 10.5%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 7.4%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 9 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Amaris Williams · EDGEAuburn2026-01-084★ / 0.9400Immediate
Braylon Conley · CBUSC2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Bryson Beaver · QBOregon2026-01-154★ / 0.9100Immediate
Dante Dowdell · RBKentucky2026-01-124★ / 0.9000Immediate
Gentry Williams · CBOklahoma2026-01-133★ / 0.8700Immediate
Isiah Canion · WRGeorgia Tech2026-01-084★ / 0.9400Immediate
Ja'Marley Riddle · SEast Carolina2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Khalil Barnes · SClemson2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
TyQuez Richardson · OTAlabama A&M2026-01-163★ / 0.8700Immediate
Outgoing · 17 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adrian Maddox · SKansas State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Bo Hughley · OTColorado2026-01-123★ / 0.8800Immediate
Daniel Harris · CBCalifornia2026-01-163★ / 0.8800Immediate
Dominick Kelly · CBOhio State2026-01-144★ / 0.9000Immediate
Elo Modozie · EDGEPurdue2026-01-194★ / 0.9000Immediate
JaCorey Thomas · SWest Virginia2026-09-044★ / —Immediate
Jaden Harris · SKansas2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jamal Meriweather · OTMiami2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Joenel Aguero · SOle Miss2026-01-103★ / 0.8800Immediate
Jordan Thomas · DLSouth Carolina2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
Kelton Smith Jr. · IOLGeorgia State2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kris Jones · LBBoston College2026-01-103★ / 0.8700Immediate
Maurice Gleaton Jr. · WRArkansas2026-06-013★ / —Immediate
Nyier Daniels · OTNot reported2026-01-024★ / —Immediate
Ondre Evans · CBNC State2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Pearce Spurlin III · TEColorado State2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Rod Robinson II · RBUAB2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Georgia. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Kirby Smart · career 117–21 across 11 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 20 appointments
  1. 2016–present · Kirby Smart · active at capture

    117–21 · 138 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Hired 2015-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2001–2015 · Mark Richt

    145–51 · 196 attributed games · 15 seasons

    Hired 2000-12-26. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 1996–2000 · Jim Donnan

    40–19 · 59 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 1989–1995 · Ray Goff

    46–34–1 · 81 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1964–1988 · Vince Dooley

    201–77–10 · 288 attributed games · 25 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1961–1963 · Johnny Griffith

    10–16–4 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1939–1960 · Wallace Butts

    140–86–9 · 235 attributed games · 22 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1938–1938 · Joel Hunt

    5–4–1 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1928–1937 · Harry Mehre

    59–34–6 · 99 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1923–1927 · George Woodruff

    30–16–1 · 47 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1920–1922 · Herman Stegeman

    20–6–3 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1919–1919 · W.A. Cunningham

    4–2–3 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1910–1916 · W.A. Cunningham

    39–16–6 · 61 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1909–1909 · James Coulter

    1–4–2 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1908–1908 · Branch Bocock

    5–2–1 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1906–1907 · W.S. Whitney

    6–7–2 · 15 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1905–1905 · Marvin Dickinson

    1–5 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1904–1904 · Charles Barnard

    1–5 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1903–1903 · Marvin Dickinson

    3–4 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1902–1902 · Billy Reynolds

    4–2–1 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Kirby Smart · incomplete attribution0–0——26.520.86—
2025 · Kirby Smart12–27–10–124.11626
2024 · Kirby Smart11–37–20–124.316.316
2023 · Kirby Smart13–18–11–031.220.724
2022 · Kirby Smart15–09–02–035.32731
2021 · Kirby Smart14–18–12–03227.931
2020 · Kirby Smart8–27–21–019.118.917
2019 · Kirby Smart12–27–21–026.821.724
2018 · Kirby Smart11–37–20–132.926.31—
2017 · Kirby Smart13–28–21–126.72732
2016 · Kirby Smart8–54–41–09.34.76—
2015 · Mark Richt · incomplete attribution9–3——16.810.36—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:07:34 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play10 / 13893.428 / 13880.3
Success rate3 / 13898.516 / 13889.1
Explosiveness105 / 13824.189 / 13835.8
Standard-down success2 / 13899.332 / 13877.4
Passing-down success20 / 13886.17 / 13895.6
Pass PPA6 / 13896.450 / 13864.2
Rush PPA20 / 13886.13 / 13898.5
Pass explosiveness84 / 13839.494 / 13832.1
Rush explosiveness102 / 13826.318 / 13887.6
Line yards9 / 13894.29 / 13894.2
Second-level yards13 / 13891.28 / 13894.9
Open-field yards7 / 13895.654 / 13861.3
Stuff rate8 / 13894.955 / 13860.6
Power successT20 / 13885.462 / 13855.5
HavocT22 / 13883.916 / 13889.1
Front-seven havocT26 / 13881.4T14 / 13889.8
DB havocT40 / 13870.1T50 / 13863.1
Points / opportunity3 / 13898.512 / 13892.0
Average field positionT24 / 13882.8T52 / 13862.4
Field-position expected points22 / 13884.739 / 13872.3

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Gunner Stockton · QBUsage 44.8% · Avg PPA 0.375 · Total 84.781
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.37584.78144.8%
Pass0.50693.66882.6%
Rush0.1174.44114.4%
1st down0.0898.28837.7%
2nd down0.37927.65645.6%
3rd down0.80946.94062.4%
Standard downs0.33852.75441.2%
Passing downs0.45832.02755.6%
Chauncey Bowens · RBUsage 14.5% · Avg PPA 0.315 · Total 14.194
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.31514.19414.5%
Pass1.19711.9657.1%
Rush0.0642.22922.0%
1st down0.2936.43914.2%
2nd down0.3043.95113.0%
3rd down0.3803.80418.9%
Standard downs0.2047.74316.0%
Passing downs0.9226.4519.6%
Nate Frazier · RBUsage 13.8% · Avg PPA 0.303 · Total 16.358
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.30316.35813.8%
Pass-0.119-0.8314.0%
Rush0.36617.18823.4%
1st down0.2246.49614.8%
2nd down0.3878.12917.1%
3rd down-0.006-0.0184.5%
Standard downs0.34914.32913.5%
Passing downs0.1562.02914.9%
Dwight Phillips Jr. · RBUsage 13.5% · Avg PPA 0.363 · Total 24.676
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.36324.67613.5%
Pass0.6258.1275.8%
Rush0.30116.54820.8%
1st down0.37517.25618.6%
2nd down0.2705.40012.5%
3rd down1.0102.0202.2%
Standard downs0.37521.36515.0%
Passing downs0.3013.3108.7%
Ryan Puglisi · QBUsage 9.0% · Avg PPA 0.560 · Total 19.045
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.56019.0459.0%
Pass0.49315.28317.3%
Rush1.2543.7621.6%
1st down0.2443.4117.4%
2nd down1.04012.47810.0%
3rd down0.3943.15612.3%
Standard downs0.4409.6707.7%
Passing downs0.7819.37513.0%
Bo Walker · RBUsage 8.3% · Avg PPA -0.068 · Total -2.845
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.068-2.8458.3%
Pass-0.379-2.2762.7%
Rush-0.016-0.56913.6%
1st down0.0591.48110.1%
2nd down-0.043-0.5638.1%
3rd down1.3754.1253.2%
Standard downs-0.040-1.3989.2%
Passing downs-0.207-1.4475.6%
Nick Peal · RBUsage 6.8% · Avg PPA 0.191 · Total 2.488
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1912.4886.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.1912.48811.6%
1st down0.2101.2636.6%
2nd down-0.092-0.3686.6%
3rd down0.5311.5938.1%
Standard downs0.2642.6397.4%
Passing downs-0.050-0.1515.6%
Talyn Taylor · WRUsage 6.8% · Avg PPA 0.492 · Total 14.756
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.49214.7566.8%
Pass0.78721.25913.5%
Rush-2.168-6.5031.3%
1st down-0.184-2.2065.6%
2nd down0.8088.0837.2%
3rd down1.1108.8799.8%
Standard downs0.1562.9615.8%
Passing downs1.07211.79510.0%
Thomas Blackshear · WRUsage 5.6% · Avg PPA 0.021 · Total 0.301
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0210.3015.6%
Pass0.0210.30112.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.285-1.4264.0%
2nd down-0.042-0.1705.0%
3rd down0.3791.89612.5%
Standard downs-0.077-0.5413.7%
Passing downs0.1200.84212.1%
Craig Dandridge · WRUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 0.764 · Total 21.389
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.76421.3895.5%
Pass0.76421.38912.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8329.1524.5%
2nd down0.0760.3783.1%
3rd down0.98811.85912.9%
Standard downs1.05416.8624.2%
Passing downs0.3774.5279.5%
London Humphreys · WRUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA 0.748 · Total 14.221
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.74814.2215.0%
Pass0.73613.24810.8%
Rush0.9730.9730.5%
1st down0.7458.1956.1%
2nd down0.6813.4034.2%
3rd down0.8742.6233.9%
Standard downs0.95115.2215.7%
Passing downs-0.333-1.0003.1%
Jae Lamar · RBUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.149 · Total 0.891
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1490.8914.9%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.1490.8919.8%
1st down0.7922.3774.7%
2nd down-0.567-1.1345.1%
3rd down-0.351-0.3515.3%
Standard downs0.1490.8916.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Ryan Montgomery · QBUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA -0.144 · Total -0.864
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.144-0.8644.9%
Pass-0.191-0.9548.6%
Rush0.0890.0891.6%
1st down0.1930.3873.1%
2nd down-0.799-1.5985.1%
3rd down0.1730.34710.5%
Standard downs-0.456-2.2815.2%
Passing downs1.4161.4163.7%
Jaden Reddell · TEUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.755 · Total 12.083
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.75512.0834.2%
Pass0.6778.8078.1%
Rush1.0923.2761.5%
1st down0.4053.2394.3%
2nd down1.5509.3015.0%
3rd down-0.228-0.4572.9%
Standard downs0.4404.3993.5%
Passing downs1.2817.6846.5%
Sacovie White · WRUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.631 · Total 13.248
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.63113.2484.2%
Pass0.68413.0018.5%
Rush0.1230.2470.8%
1st down0.5503.3022.4%
2nd down0.4432.2133.1%
3rd down0.7316.5809.7%
Standard downs0.6719.3893.7%
Passing downs0.5513.8595.6%
Isiah Canion · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.092 · Total 0.459
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0920.4594.1%
Pass0.0920.4598.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3211.2856.3%
2nd down-0.826-0.8262.6%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0920.4595.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Hezekiah Millender · QBUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 0.838 · Total 3.351
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8383.3513.3%
Pass0.5950.5951.7%
Rush0.9192.7564.9%
1st down0.5950.5951.6%
2nd down0.1030.1032.6%
3rd down1.3262.65310.5%
Standard downs0.3490.6982.1%
Passing downs1.3262.6537.4%
Tyler Williams · WRUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 0.373 · Total 1.493
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3731.4933.3%
Pass0.3731.4936.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.863-0.8631.6%
2nd down1.0191.0192.6%
3rd down0.6691.33710.5%
Standard downs0.0780.1562.1%
Passing downs0.6691.3377.4%
Lawson Luckie · TEUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA 1.122 · Total 14.592
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.12214.5922.9%
Pass1.12214.5926.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7202.1601.4%
2nd down0.9014.5063.5%
3rd down1.5857.9265.7%
Standard downs0.8807.0422.4%
Passing downs1.5107.5504.4%
Landon Roldan · WRUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA 0.777 · Total 8.548
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7778.5482.5%
Pass0.6774.7403.5%
Rush0.9523.8081.8%
1st down0.9265.5582.8%
2nd down0.0720.2902.9%
3rd down2.6992.6991.3%
Standard downs0.8507.6512.6%
Passing downs0.4480.8971.9%
Elyiss Williams · TEUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 0.559 · Total 5.029
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5595.0292.4%
Pass0.5595.0295.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8515.1073.2%
2nd down1.9001.9000.8%
3rd down1.3021.3021.5%
Standard downs1.0017.0072.6%
Passing downs-0.989-1.9792.0%
Ethan Barbour · TEUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA 0.364 · Total 2.915
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3642.9152.2%
Pass0.3642.9154.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4432.2132.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.021-0.0422.9%
Standard downs0.5043.5262.6%
Passing downs-0.611-0.6111.0%
CJ Wiley · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.386 · Total -0.772
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.386-0.7721.6%
Pass-0.386-0.7723.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2980.2981.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-1.070-1.0705.3%
Standard downs-0.386-0.7722.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Colton Heinrich · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -1.392 · Total -1.392
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.392-1.3921.6%
Pass-1.392-1.3923.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-1.392-1.3925.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.392-1.3922.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Dallas Dickerson · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 0.595 · Total 0.595
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5950.5951.6%
Pass0.5950.5953.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5950.5952.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5950.5952.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jeremy Bell · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 1.952 · Total 3.904
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.9523.9041.6%
Pass2.0602.0601.8%
Rush1.8451.8451.5%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down1.9523.9045.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs2.0602.0601.0%
Passing downs1.8451.8453.6%
Kaiden Prothro · TEUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 0.817 · Total 1.633
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8171.6331.6%
Pass0.8171.6333.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down2.5692.5691.6%
2nd down-0.935-0.9352.6%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.8171.6332.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Ryan Mosley · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.663 · Total -0.663
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.663-0.6631.6%
Pass-0.663-0.6634.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.663-0.6635.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.663-0.6632.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Georgia sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.300 (93rd percentile; 138 teams)93rdOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.517 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.175 (24th percentile; 138 teams)24thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.489 (96th percentile; 138 teams)96thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.197 (86th percentile; 138 teams)86thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.010 (80th percentile; 138 teams)80thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.352 (89th percentile; 138 teams)89thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.258 (36th percentile; 138 teams)36thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.194 (89th percentile; 138 teams)89th
Values and percentiles
Georgia metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.30093rd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.51799th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.17524th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.48996th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.19786th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.01080th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.35289th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.25836th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.19489th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 219 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.2 yards (33rd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 7.7 per completion. Completion 69.9%, 9.2 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.45.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense68.8%62.6%+6.2186 / 219
Defense allowed61.9%64.2%-2.3226 / 256

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Georgia.

Target mix by zone, Georgia offense
Short left32% · 69Short middle12% · 26Short right38% · 82Deep left5% · 11Deep middle5% · 11Deep right7% · 14

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Georgia passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense21999%8.27.769.9%0.45+6.2 pp186
Passing defense25698%7.14.561.3%0.21-2.3 pp226

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2735.952.8%0.273.601.302.009.8%80.5%
Defense allowed2553.033.6%-0.062.600.700.7018.3%75.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense271 / 27325914910100252 / 254 · 99.2%
Defense allowed246 / 2552451025010224 / 229 · 97.8%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +6.2 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-8.97.323.6W1W2W2 vs Western Kentucky: -1.1 ppW3W3 vs Arkansas: +16.5 ppW4W4 vs Oklahoma: -2.8 ppW5W5 vs Vanderbilt: +13.4 ppW6W6 vs Alabama: +23.6 ppW7W7 vs Auburn: +4.5 ppW9W9 vs Florida: -8.9 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Tennessee State320———7.10.662710.10.77
W2Western Kentucky252564.0%65.2%-1.1 pp6.50.81356.80.35
W3Arkansas212181.0%64.5%+16.5 pp5.90.78426.00.47
W4Oklahoma272653.8%56.7%-2.8 pp12.40.04265.0-0.10
W5Vanderbilt323278.1%64.7%+13.4 pp7.00.75345.20.22
W6Alabama222281.8%58.3%+23.6 pp9.90.60395.40.17
W7Auburn373767.6%63.0%+4.5 pp9.00.31284.00.12
W9Florida232356.5%65.4%-8.9 pp7.8-0.45425.20.16

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

22 punts · 46.5 gross yards/punt · 38.9 net yards/punt

6 inside the 20 · 6 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 22/22 punts. Known net yards: 20/22 punts.

Our punt returns

16 returns · 8.9 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

4 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 16/16 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Florida349.038.73/3
Week 7 · Auburn336.342.02/3
Week 6 · Alabama246.036.02/2
Week 5 · Vanderbilt244.040.01/2
Week 4 · Oklahoma550.042.05/5
Team style
Rating history