Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Georgia Southern

2026 season

Sun Belt
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Georgia Southern's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 77 across 8 systems; best 52, worst 88, so they disagree by 36 places.

Lab EPA
#52
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#75
up 72026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#86
up 82026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#88
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#81
up 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#57
down 1 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#79
up 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#52
up 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#92 of 138
Schedule strength
#95 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#112 of 138
Game control
#71 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#79 of 138
Offense
#51 of 138
Defense
#76 of 138
Special teams
#137 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Georgia Southern · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.034 net EPA/play

#52

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-0.48 points

#75 · Up 7 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +3.40 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -3.06, schedule #77 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -0.40. That is worth +0.34 on its own; the preseason prior of -3.24 still carries 23% of the weight, giving -0.48.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Georgia Southern · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Charleston Southern
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401868170
+31.00 → +31.00-2.500.73498.36%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.382-2.0900.293
Week 2 · Clemson
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401858219
-15.00 → -15.00+2.500.76378.69%+3.46-1.0860.300-0.786
Week 3 · Jacksonville State
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401869948
-4.00 → -4.00+2.500.79379.03%-0.62-0.135-0.056-0.192
Week 4 · Houston
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856806
-14.00 → -14.00-2.500.82499.38%+9.51-1.5480.892-0.656
Week 5 · Coastal Carolina
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401869942
+7.00 → +7.00+2.500.85729.75%-3.750.926-0.3650.561
Week 6 · James Madison
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401869949
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.890910.13%+7.45-0.5570.7550.198
Week 7 · Old Dominion
away · 2026-10-15 · ID 401869950
+8.00 → +8.00+2.500.925910.53%-11.671.106-1.229-0.123
Week 9 · App State
home · 2026-10-31 · ID 401869846
+16.00 → +16.00-2.501.000011.38%-5.001.536-0.5690.967

Game terms +0.26 points; prior term -0.74 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -0.48 points. The preseason prior is -3.24 with 22.75% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-3.2 SP+ points

#86 · Up 8 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

2.15 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#57 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 3.50 on 476 plays; defense 1.35 on 426 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Georgia Southern 23 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-4 · conf 3-1 · home 2-2 · away 2-2 · expected wins 4.6
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 7-1 ATS (+4.3 avg) · 2025: 7-6 ATS (-2.1 avg)
Head coach
Clay Helton · hired 2021-11-02 · 21-18 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #91 (157 pts) · 2025 #80 (165 pts) · 2026 #89 (182 pts)
Returning
6% of production · 21% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing-4%7%
Receiving9%20%
Rushing7%38%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back123.080.849010.19
Defensive Line163.000.836413.38
Linebacker83.000.84256.74
Offensive Line122.920.83129.97
Quarterback43.000.83993.36
Receiver152.930.830712.46
Running Back13.000.87220.87
Special Teams73.000.83605.85

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Max Johnson · QB

CFBD athlete 4685740. LSU (2020–2021); North Carolina (2024–2025); Texas A&M (2022–2023); Georgia Southern (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.36324953.8%
Pass 85.1% · Rush 10.7%

1st 50.2% · 2nd 53.2% · 3rd 60.9%

Standard downs 49.1% · Passing downs 65.4%

2020: 4★ · 0.9091
David Mbadinga · RB

CFBD athlete 5151112. Georgia Southern (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1324212.0%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 22.9%

1st 11.6% · 2nd 12.6% · 3rd 12.6%

Standard downs 13.7% · Passing downs 7.9%

Not linked
Weston Bryan · QB

CFBD athlete 5212641. Georgia Southern (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.359408.6%
Pass 2.7% · Rush 17.8%

1st 7.2% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 15.7%

Standard downs 10.4% · Passing downs 4.3%

2025: 4★ · 0.8911
Tyrese Woodgett · RB

CFBD athlete 5390044. Georgia Southern (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1263515.5%
Pass 5.8% · Rush 29.9%

1st 18.1% · 2nd 15.8% · 3rd 10.9%

Standard downs 17.5% · Passing downs 10.4%

2026: 3★ · 0.8333
Tripp Bryant · PK

CFBD athlete 5238178. Georgia Southern (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR3.25015—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Blake Ford · PK

CFBD athlete 4833237. Arkansas (2022–2023); Arkansas (2025–2025); North Texas (2024–2024); Georgia Southern (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR-5.7403—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Alex Taylor · WR

CFBD athlete 5079736. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.9%
Pass 16.7% · Rush 0.4%

1st 9.6% · 2nd 10.6% · 3rd 9.6%

Standard downs 9.1% · Passing downs 11.7%

Not linked
Andre Greene Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 4685364. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.2%
Pass 12.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 10.6% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 6.2% · Passing downs 9.9%

Not linked
Ashton Hollins · WR

CFBD athlete 4869962. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.5%
Pass 13.3% · Rush 0.9%

1st 10.7% · 2nd 7.5% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 9.5% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Cam'Ron King · WR

CFBD athlete 5219035. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 2.2%

Not linked
JP Mikhael · TE

CFBD athlete 5119658. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 3.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.4% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 3.2%

Standard downs 0.9% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
JQ Crosby · TE

CFBD athlete 5303242. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jamarian Samuel · RB

CFBD athlete 5151111. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.7%
Pass 3.7% · Rush 11.3%

1st 8.3% · 2nd 6.6% · 3rd 2.8%

Standard downs 6.7% · Passing downs 6.5%

Not linked
Jeremiah Ware · WR

CFBD athlete 5223093. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 8.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 5.8%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 6.4%

Not linked
Josh Dallas · WR

CFBD athlete 4838527. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.8%
Pass 17.3% · Rush 1.8%

1st 11.2% · 2nd 9.0% · 3rd 12.2%

Standard downs 9.4% · Passing downs 14.2%

Not linked
King Phillips · WR

CFBD athlete 5390043. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 6.9%

Standard downs 0.9% · Passing downs 6.1%

Not linked
River Helms · TE

CFBD athlete 4698179. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.9%
Pass 11.6% · Rush 0.4%

1st 6.0% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 9.6%

Standard downs 6.2% · Passing downs 8.6%

Not linked
Taeo Todd · RB

CFBD athlete 5155780. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.0%
Pass 2.7% · Rush 11.1%

1st 6.4% · 2nd 8.0% · 3rd 2.6%

Standard downs 6.2% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Taylor Bradshaw · WR

CFBD athlete 5123988. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 6.0% · Rush 2.6%

1st 3.8% · 2nd 7.1% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 7.4%

Not linked
Terrance Gibbs · RB

CFBD athlete 4685348. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.8%
Pass 8.7% · Rush 16.7%

1st 13.6% · 2nd 10.5% · 3rd 7.9%

Standard downs 11.9% · Passing downs 11.3%

Not linked
Turner Helton · QB

CFBD athlete 4912238. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——25.3%
Pass 42.0% · Rush 3.1%

1st 22.5% · 2nd 29.6% · 3rd 26.9%

Standard downs 20.0% · Passing downs 38.6%

Not linked
Ty Cummings · RB

CFBD athlete 5291806. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.5%
Pass 0.7% · Rush 8.0%

1st 5.0% · 2nd 2.7% · 3rd 2.3%

Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 1.6%

Not linked
Zay Hilliard · WR

CFBD athlete 5303239. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 4.4%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 17 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aaron Sears · CBStephen F. Austin2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Aidan McCowan · CBNicholls2026-01-283★ / 0.8200Immediate
Alex Taylor · WRNorth Carolina2026-01-183★ / 0.8600Immediate
Andre Greene Jr. · WRVirginia2026-01-153★ / 0.8400Immediate
Anthony Bynum · EDGEMiddle Tennessee2026-01-123★ / 0.8300Immediate
Ashton Hollins · WRIllinois2026-01-143★ / 0.8200Immediate
Blake Ford · KArkansas2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Cam King · WRAuburn2026-01-123★ / 0.8300Immediate
Gregory Delaine Jr. · CBSyracuse2026-01-153★ / 0.8300Immediate
Josh Raymond · IOLFlorida State2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kam Mikell · WRColorado2026-01-203★ / 0.8600Immediate
King Phillips · WRTexas A&M-Kingsville2026-01-273★ / 0.8400Immediate
Max Johnson · QBNorth Carolina2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Mo Clipper Jr. · IOLCharlotte2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Noah Mangham · CBAbilene Christian2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Noble Johnson · WRArizona State2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Rashon Myles Jr. · LBAbilene Christian2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Outgoing · 18 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Amari Wilson · EDGESouthern Miss2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ayden Jackson · SSouth Florida2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Branden Palmer · EDGENot reported2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Brian Green Jr. · WRNot reported2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Caleb Cook · IOLSouth Florida2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Carmelo Mays · WRNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Chandler Strong · IOLNorth Texas2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Da'Shawn Davis · DLNot reported2026-01-033★ / —Immediate
Davion Rhodes · EDGENorth Texas2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Devan Lowe · DLMemphis2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Dylan Gary · WRKennesaw State2026-01-223★ / 0.8400Immediate
J'Shawn Anderson · RBNot reported2026-01-03— / —Immediate
JC French IV · QBCincinnati2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Johnnie Brown III · IOLLouisville2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
KD Dorsey · ATHNot reported2026-01-022★ / —Immediate
MJ Stroud · EDGENot reported2026-01-143★ / —Withdrawn
Robert Wright Jr. · OTMichigan State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyler Budge · QBRhode Island2026-01-122★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Georgia Southern. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Clay Helton · career 73–49 across 13 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 5 appointments
  1. 2022–present · Clay Helton · active at capture

    27–25 · 52 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2021-11-02. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2021–2021 · Kevin Whitley

    2–6 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2021-09-26. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2017–2021 · Chad Lunsford

    28–21 · 49 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-11-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2016–2017 · Tyson Summers

    5–13 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2015-12-21. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2014–2015 · Willie Fritz

    18–7 · 25 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2014-01-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Clay Helton · incomplete attribution0–0——-2.5-3.789—
2025 · Clay Helton7–64–41–0-9.4-8.680—
2024 · Clay Helton8–56–20–1-1.7-2.591—
2023 · Clay Helton6–73–50–1-5.2-8.6101—
2022 · Clay Helton6–73–50–1-6.4-4.8110—
2021 · Chad Lunsford · incomplete attribution1–3——-15.3-14.992—
2021 · Kevin Whitley · incomplete attribution2–6——-15.3-14.992—
2020 · Chad Lunsford8–54–41–00.21.298—
2019 · Chad Lunsford7–65–30–1-4.5-1121—
2018 · Chad Lunsford10–36–21–0-2.4-0.490—
2017 · Chad Lunsford · incomplete attribution2–4——-15.8-17.4106—
2017 · Tyson Summers · incomplete attribution0–6——-15.8-17.4106—
2016 · Tyson Summers5–74–40–0-3.9-7.877—
2015 · Willie Fritz9–46–21–07.3485—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:06:46 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play62 / 13855.545 / 13867.9
Success rate57 / 13859.135 / 13875.2
Explosiveness108 / 13821.929 / 13879.6
Standard-down success78 / 13843.826 / 13881.8
Passing-down success44 / 13868.662 / 13855.5
Pass PPA49 / 13865.099 / 13828.5
Rush PPA112 / 13819.024 / 13883.2
Pass explosiveness123 / 13810.9116 / 13816.1
Rush explosiveness121 / 13812.42 / 13899.3
Line yards99 / 13828.543 / 13869.3
Second-level yards100 / 13827.777 / 13844.5
Open-field yards96 / 13830.724 / 13883.2
Stuff rate76 / 13845.320 / 13886.1
Power success94 / 13832.1T19 / 13886.5
HavocT58 / 13858.013 / 13891.2
Front-seven havocT42 / 13869.310 / 13893.4
DB havocT85 / 13837.2T54 / 13859.9
Points / opportunity88 / 13836.551 / 13863.5
Average field positionT107 / 13821.9T63 / 13851.8
Field-position expected points118 / 13814.676 / 13845.3

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Max Johnson · QBUsage 53.8% · Avg PPA 0.210 · Total 63.955
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.21063.95553.8%
Pass0.28379.13585.1%
Rush-0.443-10.63110.7%
1st down-0.005-0.57450.2%
2nd down0.25024.95453.2%
3rd down0.56739.66160.9%
Standard downs0.15330.45349.1%
Passing downs0.31633.50265.4%
Turner Helton · QBUsage 25.3% · Avg PPA 0.390 · Total 15.221
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.39015.22125.3%
Pass0.37413.85442.0%
Rush0.6841.3673.1%
1st down-0.086-1.36922.5%
2nd down0.76012.16029.6%
3rd down0.6334.43126.9%
Standard downs-0.045-0.99420.0%
Passing downs0.95416.21538.6%
Tyrese Woodgett · RBUsage 15.5% · Avg PPA -0.099 · Total -4.337
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.099-4.33715.5%
Pass-0.389-3.4995.8%
Rush-0.024-0.83829.9%
1st down0.0481.11518.1%
2nd down-0.498-7.46615.8%
3rd down0.3362.01410.9%
Standard downs-0.134-4.81117.5%
Passing downs0.0590.47410.4%
David Mbadinga · RBUsage 12.0% · Avg PPA 0.221 · Total 13.014
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.22113.01412.0%
Pass0.6049.0665.2%
Rush0.0903.94822.9%
1st down0.0781.95911.6%
2nd down0.2204.40612.6%
3rd down0.3915.07812.6%
Standard downs0.1567.49513.7%
Passing downs0.5025.5197.9%
Terrance Gibbs · RBUsage 11.8% · Avg PPA 0.206 · Total 5.363
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2065.36311.8%
Pass0.3413.7518.7%
Rush0.1071.61216.7%
1st down0.2653.71013.6%
2nd down0.4113.29210.5%
3rd down0.8342.5017.9%
Standard downs0.1693.21111.9%
Passing downs0.3072.15211.3%
Josh Dallas · WRUsage 10.8% · Avg PPA 0.375 · Total 22.888
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.37522.88810.8%
Pass0.40623.12517.3%
Rush-0.059-0.2371.8%
1st down0.0401.10911.2%
2nd down0.1302.2189.0%
3rd down1.11115.54812.2%
Standard downs0.0993.7439.4%
Passing downs0.83219.14414.2%
Alex Taylor · WRUsage 9.9% · Avg PPA 0.388 · Total 21.749
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.38821.7499.9%
Pass0.41622.85716.7%
Rush-1.108-1.1080.4%
1st down0.2385.7029.6%
2nd down0.4789.56910.6%
3rd down0.2412.6519.6%
Standard downs0.41215.2289.1%
Passing downs0.3436.52111.7%
Weston Bryan · QBUsage 8.6% · Avg PPA 0.288 · Total 14.126
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.28814.1268.6%
Pass-0.395-3.5572.7%
Rush0.44217.68317.8%
1st down0.0540.9777.2%
2nd down0.1551.7065.9%
3rd down0.5179.30815.7%
Standard downs0.36315.23710.4%
Passing downs-0.159-1.1114.3%
Ashton Hollins · WRUsage 8.5% · Avg PPA 0.060 · Total 1.437
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0601.4378.5%
Pass0.2856.55513.3%
Rush-5.118-5.1180.9%
1st down-0.082-1.06910.7%
2nd down0.3102.1717.5%
3rd down0.0840.3356.7%
Standard downs0.0300.5779.5%
Passing downs0.1720.8605.9%
Andre Greene Jr. · WRUsage 7.2% · Avg PPA -0.194 · Total -7.948
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.194-7.9487.2%
Pass-0.194-7.94812.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0550.7745.6%
2nd down0.0901.79310.6%
3rd down-0.462-2.3124.3%
Standard downs-0.111-2.7666.2%
Passing downs-0.324-5.1829.9%
River Helms · TEUsage 6.9% · Avg PPA 0.711 · Total 27.734
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.71127.7346.9%
Pass0.83631.76011.6%
Rush-4.026-4.0260.4%
1st down0.3304.9436.0%
2nd down0.7938.7225.9%
3rd down0.7668.4259.6%
Standard downs0.54113.5216.2%
Passing downs1.01514.2138.6%
Jamarian Samuel · RBUsage 6.7% · Avg PPA -0.233 · Total -5.586
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.233-5.5866.7%
Pass-0.690-5.5173.7%
Rush-0.004-0.06911.3%
1st down-0.128-1.6678.3%
2nd down0.1311.0476.6%
3rd down-0.768-1.5372.8%
Standard downs-0.191-3.2436.7%
Passing downs-0.335-2.3436.5%
Taeo Todd · RBUsage 6.0% · Avg PPA 0.112 · Total 3.818
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1123.8186.0%
Pass0.6786.1002.7%
Rush-0.091-2.28211.1%
1st down-0.112-1.7996.4%
2nd down0.4656.9708.0%
3rd down-0.451-1.3532.6%
Standard downs0.0521.2936.2%
Passing downs0.2812.5255.6%
Jeremiah Ware · WRUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA 0.907 · Total 20.868
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.90720.8684.7%
Pass0.90720.8688.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.041-0.2883.3%
2nd down0.4224.2256.3%
3rd down2.82216.9325.8%
Standard downs0.2703.7864.0%
Passing downs1.89817.0836.4%
Taylor Bradshaw · WRUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA 0.304 · Total 3.949
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3043.9494.5%
Pass0.6096.0916.0%
Rush-0.714-2.1422.6%
1st down0.0600.3023.8%
2nd down0.6674.6677.1%
3rd down-1.020-1.0201.9%
Standard downs-0.272-1.9033.3%
Passing downs0.9755.8527.4%
Ty Cummings · RBUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA 0.258 · Total 2.068
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2582.0683.5%
Pass0.0870.0870.7%
Rush0.2831.9808.0%
1st down0.1250.6245.0%
2nd down1.1392.2782.7%
3rd down-0.834-0.8342.3%
Standard downs0.3522.4674.3%
Passing downs-0.399-0.3991.6%
Zay Hilliard · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.076 · Total 0.531
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0760.5313.2%
Pass0.0760.5315.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2620.7873.1%
2nd down0.4640.9292.9%
3rd down-0.593-1.1854.4%
Standard downs0.3431.7163.1%
Passing downs-0.593-1.1853.4%
Cam'Ron King · WRUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA -0.050 · Total -0.199
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.050-0.1992.5%
Pass-0.050-0.1994.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0092.0192.8%
2nd down1.2901.2902.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.1033.3092.7%
Passing downs-3.508-3.5082.2%
King Phillips · WRUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA -0.183 · Total -0.550
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.183-0.5502.1%
Pass-0.183-0.5504.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.351-0.3511.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.100-0.1996.9%
Standard downs-0.351-0.3510.9%
Passing downs-0.100-0.1996.1%
JP Mikhael · TEUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA -0.362 · Total -1.087
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.362-1.0871.9%
Pass-0.362-1.0873.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.863-0.8631.4%
2nd down0.4350.4352.0%
3rd down-0.660-0.6603.2%
Standard downs-0.863-0.8630.9%
Passing downs-0.112-0.2254.3%
JQ Crosby · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.452 · Total -0.452
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.452-0.4521.5%
Pass-0.452-0.4522.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.452-0.4523.1%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.452-0.4522.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Georgia Southern sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.142 (55th percentile; 138 teams)55thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.434 (59th percentile; 138 teams)59thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.169 (22nd percentile; 138 teams)22ndOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.279 (65th percentile; 138 teams)65thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.011 (19th percentile; 138 teams)19thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.034 (68th percentile; 138 teams)68thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.377 (75th percentile; 138 teams)75thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.153 (79th percentile; 138 teams)79thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.196 (91st percentile; 138 teams)91st
Values and percentiles
Georgia Southern metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.14255th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.43459th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.16922nd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.27965th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.01119th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.03468th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.37775th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.15379th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.19691st138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 327 attempts charted. Average depth of target 6.9 yards (6th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.1 per completion. Completion 68.5%, 7.0 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.27.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense67.9%63.8%+4.1277 / 327
Defense allowed62.0%59.5%+2.5192 / 225

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Georgia Southern.

Target mix by zone, Georgia Southern offense
Short left43% · 137Short middle16% · 50Short right32% · 102Deep left4% · 13Deep middle1% · 3Deep right4% · 14

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Georgia Southern passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense32799%6.95.168.5%0.27+4.1 pp277
Passing defense22598%9.65.258.2%0.29+2.5 pp192

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2314.241.8%0.072.901.001.0016.4%69.0%
Defense allowed2683.240.2%-0.012.701.000.6020.5%64.3%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense227 / 231221107440214 / 220 · 97.3%
Defense allowed257 / 2682491921580237 / 239 · 99.2%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +4.1 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-5.73.011.6W1W2W2 vs Clemson: -5.7 ppW3W3 vs Jacksonville State: +2.7 ppW4W4 vs Houston: +8.4 ppW5W5 vs Coastal Carolina: -2.3 ppW6W6 vs James Madison: +2.0 ppW7W7 vs Old Dominion: +10.3 ppW9W9 vs App State: +11.6 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Charleston Southern470———6.30.25315.10.09
W2Clemson484856.3%61.9%-5.7 pp8.9-0.04181.2-0.13
W3Jacksonville State333369.7%67.0%+2.7 pp4.50.07394.70.24
W4Houston393868.4%60.0%+8.4 pp9.40.61253.2-0.17
W5Coastal Carolina312958.6%60.9%-2.3 pp9.50.38266.40.16
W6James Madison404065.0%62.9%+2.0 pp7.40.31255.00.01
W7Old Dominion414178.0%67.7%+10.3 pp4.10.32353.90.15
W9App State484877.1%65.5%+11.6 pp5.60.33323.20.03

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

32 punts · 42.2 gross yards/punt · 32.2 net yards/punt

6 inside the 20 · 4 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 32/32 punts. Known net yards: 27/32 punts.

Our punt returns

16 returns · 6.6 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

3 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 16/16 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · App State236.5—0/2
Week 7 · Old Dominion344.027.01/3
Week 6 · James Madison238.038.02/2
Week 5 · Coastal Carolina443.820.54/4
Week 4 · Houston241.042.02/2
Team style
Rating history