Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

NC State

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

NC State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 76.5 across 8 systems; best 66, worst 106, so they disagree by 40 places.

Lab EPA
#106
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#79
up 72026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#67
up 72026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#66
up 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#66
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#94
up 13 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#74
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#105
up 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#82 of 138
Schedule strength
#75 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#52 of 138
Game control
#54 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#65 of 138
Offense
#47 of 138
Defense
#84 of 138
Special teams
#37 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

NC State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.081 net EPA/play

#106

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-0.95 points

#79 · Up 7 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +1.08 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -2.99, schedule #76 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -0.22. That is worth -1.91 on its own; the preseason prior of +2.33 still carries 23% of the weight, giving -0.95.

How each game enters this SRS rating

NC State · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Virginia
away · 2026-08-29 · ID 401858202
-26.00 → -26.00+2.500.73498.32%+0.54-1.9560.045-1.911
Week 2 · Richmond
home · 2026-09-11 · ID 401858222
+73.00 → +35.00-2.500.76378.65%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.812-2.1630.649
Week 3 · Vanderbilt
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856695
-4.00 → -4.00+2.500.79378.99%-4.08-0.135-0.367-0.502
Week 4 · App State
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401864572
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.82499.34%-5.000.701-0.4670.233
Week 5 · Louisville
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858248
+3.00 → +3.00-2.500.85729.71%+10.310.0491.0011.050
Week 6 · Wake Forest
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858260
-24.00 → -24.00-2.500.890910.09%+14.40-2.6741.453-1.221
Week 8 · Stanford
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858272
-3.00 → -3.00+2.500.962210.90%-8.16-0.055-0.889-0.943
Week 9 · California
home · 2026-10-31 · ID 401858277
+21.00 → +21.00-2.501.000011.33%-8.192.096-0.9271.168

Game terms -1.48 points; prior term +0.53 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -0.95 points. The preseason prior is +2.33 with 22.66% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

0.7 SP+ points

#67 · Up 7 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-8.11 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#94 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -0.41 on 445 plays; defense 7.69 on 437 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks NC State 27 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-4 · conf 2-3 · home 4-1 · away 0-3 · expected wins 4.6
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-5 ATS (+0.1 avg) · 2025: 7-6 ATS (+0.9 avg)
Head coach
Dave Doeren · hired 2012-12-01 · 23-16 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #27 (225 pts) · 2025 #34 (214 pts) · 2026 #49 (210 pts)
Returning
60% of production · 62% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing93%97%
Receiving26%28%
Rushing101%55%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back143.070.875212.25
Defensive Line133.000.864011.23
Linebacker113.090.86749.54
Offensive Line143.140.872212.21
Quarterback43.250.87233.49
Receiver163.310.881814.11
Running Back73.000.87196.10
Special Teams73.430.87726.14

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
CJ Bailey · QB

CFBD athlete 5079301. NC State (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.38224554.5%
Pass 94.1% · Rush 18.0%

1st 46.2% · 2nd 58.0% · 3rd 66.1%

Standard downs 43.8% · Passing downs 77.8%

2024: 4★ · 0.8933
Davion Gause · RB

CFBD athlete 5079468. NC State (2026–2026); North Carolina (2024–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.0058021.6%
Pass 11.2% · Rush 32.4%

1st 26.6% · 2nd 22.6% · 3rd 10.5%

Standard downs 23.3% · Passing downs 17.8%

2024: 3★ · 0.8875
Jayden Scott · RB

CFBD athlete 5126513. NC State (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1205217.2%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 31.2%

1st 25.0% · 2nd 15.1% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 21.0% · Passing downs 8.7%

2024: 3★ · 0.8834
CJ Bailey · QB

CFBD athlete 5079301. NC State (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0724654.5%
Pass 94.1% · Rush 18.0%

1st 46.2% · 2nd 58.0% · 3rd 66.1%

Standard downs 43.8% · Passing downs 77.8%

2024: 4★ · 0.8933
Will Wilson · QB

CFBD athlete 5148611. NC State (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2803910.2%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 15.5%

1st 6.8% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 19.5%

Standard downs 13.0% · Passing downs 4.0%

2025: 3★ · 0.8811
Kanoah Vinesett · PK

CFBD athlete 5081852. NC State (2022–2026)

Kicker PAAR3.9209—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Amiri Acker · WR

CFBD athlete 5290566. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.7%

Not linked
Ashton Locklear · WR

CFBD athlete 5081845. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 2.8% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 0.9% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Chance Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 5079661. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 8.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 5.1%

Not linked
Darius Johnson · RB

CFBD athlete 5159453. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.7%
Pass 1.5% · Rush 6.2%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 2.4%

Standard downs 5.1% · Passing downs 0.8%

Not linked
Davion Dozier · WR

CFBD athlete 5080819. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 1.2% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 5.2%

Not linked
Deandre Desinor · RB

CFBD athlete 5141409. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 2.6%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Dylan McCoy · RB

CFBD athlete 5176079. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 9.9%

1st 6.6% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 2.5%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 2.0%

Not linked
Hunter Provience · TE

CFBD athlete 5172608. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 5.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Isiah Jones · RB

CFBD athlete 5147510. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.0%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 5.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jonathan Paylor · RB

CFBD athlete 5079659. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.8%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.7%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Joshisa Trader · WR

CFBD athlete 5079745. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.6%
Pass 16.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.7% · 2nd 8.4% · 3rd 9.2%

Standard downs 6.0% · Passing downs 11.3%

Not linked
Keenan Jackson · WR

CFBD athlete 5079524. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.2%
Pass 16.7% · Rush 0.4%

1st 6.8% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 11.0%

Standard downs 6.5% · Passing downs 11.9%

Not linked
Noah Moss · RB

CFBD athlete 5291741. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.3%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Preston Douglas · TE

CFBD athlete 5215337. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 12.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.4% · 2nd 7.2% · 3rd 8.5%

Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 7.4%

Not linked
Tex Vaughn · TE

CFBD athlete 5378098. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 7.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 2.4% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
Tyran Warren · WR

CFBD athlete 5160003. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 7.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Vander Ploog · TE

CFBD athlete 5201877. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 10.5%

Not linked
Victor Snow · WR

CFBD athlete 5084967. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 11.2% · Rush 0.4%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 11.4%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 20 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Chance Robinson · WRMiami2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Da'Kaari Nelson · LBPenn State2026-01-173★ / 0.8600Immediate
Daniel Cruz · IOLTexas2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Davion Dozier · WRApp State2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Davion Gause · RBNorth Carolina2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Harvey Dyson · EDGETulane2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Hunter Provience · TEMontana State2026-01-103★ / 0.8900Immediate
Jackson Waller · PSMU2026-01-06— / —Immediate
Jai'Lun Hampton · OTUT Martin2026-02-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jimarion McCrimon · OTEast Carolina2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Joshisa Trader · WRMiami2026-01-233★ / 0.8800Immediate
KaTron Evans · DLMarshall2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
King Mack · SPenn State2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Ondre Evans · CBGeorgia2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Popo Aguirre · LBMiami2026-01-253★ / 0.8900Immediate
Tad Hudson · QBCoastal Carolina2026-02-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ty White · CBNorth Carolina2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Tyran Warren · WRAlcorn State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Vander Ploog · TEOregon2026-01-203★ / 0.8600Immediate
Victor Snow · WRBuffalo2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Outgoing · 22 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Brock Stukes · IOLSam Houston2026-01-12— / —Immediate
Christian Zachary · WRSam Houston2026-02-033★ / —Immediate
Daemon Fagan · SNot reported2026-01-024★ / —Immediate
Darion Rivers · OTTroy2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Elijah Groves · LBSam Houston2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Hollywood Smothers · RBTexas2026-01-114★ / 0.9400Immediate
Jacarrius Peak · OTSouth Carolina2026-01-094★ / 0.9400Immediate
Jivan Baly · CBOld Dominion2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Josh Alexander-Felton · DLNot reported2025-12-123★ / —Immediate
Joshua Ofor · LBArkansas State2026-01-183★ / 0.8600Immediate
Justin Terrell · DLSam Houston2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kelvon McBride · LBMarshall2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Kenny Soares Jr. · LBMichigan State2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Lex Thomas · QBNot reported2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Noah Rogers · WRAlabama2026-01-124★ / 0.9300Immediate
Odera Orizu · EDGEUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8000Immediate
Tank Boston · WRCharlotte2026-01-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Terrell Anderson · WRUSC2026-01-054★ / 0.9400Immediate
Terrente Hinton · SMarshall2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Terris Dudley · LBUConn2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Val Erickson · OTLiberty2026-01-043★ / —Immediate
Zack Myers · SNot reported2026-01-024★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at NC State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Dave Doeren · career 118–74 across 16 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 24 appointments
  1. 2013–present · Dave Doeren · active at capture

    95–70 · 165 attributed games · 14 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2007–2012 · Tom O'Brien

    40–35 · 75 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2006-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2000–2006 · Chuck Amato

    49–37 · 86 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 1999-11-24. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 1993–1999 · Mike O'Cain

    41–40 · 81 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1986–1992 · Dick Sheridan

    52–29–3 · 84 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1983–1985 · Tom Reed

    9–24 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1980–1982 · Monte Kiffin

    16–17 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1976–1979 · Bo Rein

    27–18–1 · 46 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1972–1975 · Lou Holtz

    33–12–3 · 48 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1971–1971 · Al Michaels

    3–8 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1954–1970 · Earle Edwards

    77–88–8 · 173 attributed games · 17 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1952–1953 · Horace Hendrickson

    4–16 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1944–1951 · Beattie Feathers

    37–38–3 · 78 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1940–1940 · Doc Newton

    3–6 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1934–1936 · Hunk Anderson

    11–17–1 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1930–1930 · John Van Liew

    2–8 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1925–1929 · Gus Tebell

    21–25–2 · 48 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1921–1923 · Harry Hartsell

    10–16–3 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1919–1920 · William Fetzer

    14–5 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1918–1918 · Tal Stafford

    1–3 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1917–1917 · Harry Hartsell

    6–2–1 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1914–1915 · Jack Hegarty

    5–6–2 · 13 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1908–1908 · Mickey Whitehurst

    6–1 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1904–1904 · W.S. Keinholz

    3–1–2 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Dave Doeren · incomplete attribution0–0——-1-2.149—
2025 · Dave Doeren8–54–41–04.8734—
2024 · Dave Doeren6–73–50–13.9-2.127—
2023 · Dave Doeren9–46–20–17.474321
2022 · Dave Doeren8–54–40–16.85.564—
2021 · Dave Doeren9–36–20–016.113.53420
2020 · Dave Doeren8–47–30–10—41—
2019 · Dave Doeren4–81–70–0-6.3-1231—
2018 · Dave Doeren9–45–30–19.47.926—
2017 · Dave Doeren9–46–21–012.913.75323
2016 · Dave Doeren7–63–51–09.47.650—
2015 · Dave Doeren7–63–50–19.66.731—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:05:04 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play40 / 13871.5101 / 13827.0
Success rate38 / 13873.073 / 13847.4
Explosiveness82 / 13840.9110 / 13820.4
Standard-down success44 / 13868.671 / 13848.9
Passing-down success27 / 13881.068 / 13851.1
Pass PPA31 / 13878.1111 / 13819.7
Rush PPA71 / 13848.964 / 13854.0
Pass explosiveness67 / 13851.870 / 13849.6
Rush explosiveness100 / 13827.7101 / 13827.0
Line yards73 / 13847.449 / 13865.0
Second-level yards123 / 13810.985 / 13838.7
Open-field yards64 / 13854.093 / 13832.8
Stuff rate41 / 13870.822 / 13884.7
Power success30 / 13878.888 / 13836.5
HavocT48 / 13864.6T98 / 13828.8
Front-seven havocT36 / 13874.1T115 / 13815.7
DB havocT66 / 13850.0T44 / 13866.8
Points / opportunity32 / 13877.4110 / 13820.4
Average field positionT93 / 13832.148 / 13865.7
Field-position expected points88 / 13836.546 / 13867.2

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

CJ Bailey · QBUsage 54.5% · Avg PPA 0.294 · Total 89.690
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.29489.69054.5%
Pass0.36792.81094.1%
Rush-0.019-0.95618.0%
1st down-0.003-0.30546.2%
2nd down0.20020.99758.0%
3rd down1.00278.17866.1%
Standard downs0.06811.39843.8%
Passing downs0.57178.29277.8%
Davion Gause · RBUsage 21.6% · Avg PPA 0.072 · Total 7.906
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0727.90621.6%
Pass0.3669.89011.2%
Rush-0.024-1.98432.4%
1st down-0.106-6.44426.6%
2nd down0.1525.61422.6%
3rd down0.6296.91810.5%
Standard downs-0.008-0.68123.3%
Passing downs0.3078.58817.8%
Jayden Scott · RBUsage 17.2% · Avg PPA 0.102 · Total 6.400
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1026.40017.2%
Pass-0.224-0.6731.8%
Rush0.1297.62831.2%
1st down0.1837.50325.0%
2nd down-0.160-2.87715.1%
3rd down0.4431.7735.3%
Standard downs0.1447.61521.0%
Passing downs-0.122-1.2158.7%
Will Wilson · QBUsage 10.2% · Avg PPA 0.394 · Total 22.481
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.39422.48110.2%
Pass-0.054-0.7535.2%
Rush0.54023.23415.5%
1st down0.0460.7856.8%
2nd down0.3915.4737.7%
3rd down0.52212.01419.5%
Standard downs0.42221.11213.0%
Passing downs0.1961.3694.0%
Keenan Jackson · WRUsage 8.2% · Avg PPA 0.734 · Total 33.782
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.73433.7828.2%
Pass0.85838.61016.7%
Rush-4.828-4.8280.4%
1st down0.0000.0046.8%
2nd down1.05514.7667.7%
3rd down1.60620.87411.0%
Standard downs0.0751.8856.5%
Passing downs1.51931.89811.9%
Joshisa Trader · WRUsage 7.6% · Avg PPA 0.602 · Total 16.865
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.60216.8657.6%
Pass0.53414.43016.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0500.5476.7%
2nd down0.8718.7118.4%
3rd down1.0877.6079.2%
Standard downs0.4787.1646.0%
Passing downs0.7469.70111.3%
Preston Douglas · TEUsage 6.1% · Avg PPA 0.658 · Total 22.383
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.65822.3836.1%
Pass0.65822.38312.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7498.2394.4%
2nd down0.0610.7947.2%
3rd down1.33513.3508.5%
Standard downs0.47710.0205.5%
Passing downs0.95112.3647.4%
Victor Snow · WRUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 0.208 · Total 6.455
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2086.4555.5%
Pass0.2266.78011.2%
Rush-0.325-0.3250.4%
1st down-0.010-0.1034.0%
2nd down0.2522.7726.1%
3rd down0.6805.4446.8%
Standard downs0.1832.0082.9%
Passing downs0.2224.44711.4%
Dylan McCoy · RBUsage 5.1% · Avg PPA 0.287 · Total 2.874
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2872.8745.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.2872.8749.9%
1st down-0.035-0.2096.6%
2nd down1.0133.0384.7%
3rd down0.0450.0452.5%
Standard downs0.3142.8296.1%
Passing downs0.0450.0452.0%
Isiah Jones · RBUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.383 · Total 1.149
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3831.1494.2%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.3831.1497.0%
1st down0.1060.1062.7%
2nd down-0.614-0.6144.5%
3rd down1.6581.6588.3%
Standard downs0.3831.1495.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Chance Robinson · WRUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 0.530 · Total 10.599
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.53010.5993.9%
Pass0.53010.5998.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0730.6583.9%
2nd down0.1000.5973.7%
3rd down1.8699.3434.8%
Standard downs0.4205.0403.4%
Passing downs0.6955.5585.1%
Vander Ploog · TEUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 1.791 · Total 3.581
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.7913.5813.9%
Pass1.7913.5817.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.083-0.0835.9%
3rd down3.6643.6647.7%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs1.7913.58110.5%
Deandre Desinor · RBUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA 0.924 · Total 11.086
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.92411.0863.8%
Pass1.32010.5625.1%
Rush0.1310.5232.6%
1st down1.0155.0773.5%
2nd down-0.198-0.7914.0%
3rd down2.2676.8004.5%
Standard downs0.5724.5803.6%
Passing downs1.6266.5064.3%
Darius Johnson · RBUsage 3.7% · Avg PPA 0.036 · Total 0.537
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0360.5373.7%
Pass0.0630.1881.5%
Rush0.0290.3496.2%
1st down-0.125-0.8723.9%
2nd down0.1560.9364.5%
3rd down0.2360.4732.4%
Standard downs-0.020-0.2775.1%
Passing downs0.8140.8140.8%
Tyran Warren · WRUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.045 · Total 0.773
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0450.7733.4%
Pass0.0450.7737.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5003.5023.2%
2nd down-0.068-0.5404.9%
3rd down-1.094-2.1891.9%
Standard downs0.0931.0263.3%
Passing downs-0.042-0.2533.8%
Davion Dozier · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA -0.067 · Total -0.536
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.067-0.5363.0%
Pass-0.067-0.5366.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.050-0.2013.3%
2nd down1.4771.4771.2%
3rd down-0.604-1.8135.3%
Standard downs-0.050-0.2012.1%
Passing downs-0.084-0.3365.2%
Tex Vaughn · TEUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA -0.442 · Total -1.767
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.442-1.7673.0%
Pass-0.442-1.7677.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.576-1.1523.0%
2nd down0.3680.3682.4%
3rd down-0.983-0.9833.7%
Standard downs-0.576-1.1521.9%
Passing downs-0.308-0.6156.7%
Jonathan Paylor · RBUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA 1.012 · Total 2.023
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0122.0232.8%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush1.0122.0234.7%
1st down1.0122.0235.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.0122.0233.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Hunter Provience · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.580 · Total 7.545
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5807.5452.6%
Pass0.5807.5455.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5802.3211.8%
2nd down0.2011.2083.7%
3rd down1.3394.0162.9%
Standard downs0.4293.4342.3%
Passing downs0.8224.1113.3%
Ashton Locklear · WRUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA -0.707 · Total -4.949
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.707-4.9492.1%
Pass-0.707-4.9494.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.321-0.9642.8%
3rd down1.4142.8282.7%
Standard downs-0.079-0.1590.9%
Passing downs-0.958-4.7904.8%
Amiri Acker · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.877 · Total 1.755
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8771.7551.5%
Pass0.8771.7552.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-1.000-1.0002.2%
3rd down2.7542.7544.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.8771.7555.7%
Noah Moss · RBUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.347 · Total 0.347
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3470.3471.4%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.3470.3472.3%
1st down0.3470.3472.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.3470.3471.8%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where NC State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.197 (72nd percentile; 138 teams)72ndOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.459 (73rd percentile; 138 teams)73rdOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.213 (41st percentile; 138 teams)41stOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.332 (78th percentile; 138 teams)78thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.089 (49th percentile; 138 teams)49thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.136 (27th percentile; 138 teams)27thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.410 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.303 (20th percentile; 138 teams)20thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.144 (29th percentile; 138 teams)29th
Values and percentiles
NC State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.19772nd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.45973rd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.21341st138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.33278th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.08949th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.13627th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.41047th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.30320th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.14429th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 260 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.9 yards (59th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.4 per completion. Completion 64.2%, 7.7 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.39.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense63.5%60.6%+3.0233 / 260
Defense allowed66.8%60.7%+6.2226 / 256

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is NC State.

Target mix by zone, NC State offense
Short left23% · 59Short middle22% · 57Short right40% · 102Deep left4% · 11Deep middle3% · 7Deep right7% · 18

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
NC State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense26099%8.95.464.2%0.39+3.0 pp233
Passing defense25699%9.04.262.9%0.31+6.2 pp226

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2944.447.1%0.153.000.901.3014.5%78.7%
Defense allowed2474.442.1%0.122.901.101.4019.7%76.5%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense286 / 2942811313550276 / 276 · 100.0%
Defense allowed244 / 2472371012670227 / 228 · 99.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +3.0 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-7.91.811.5W1W1 vs Virginia: -7.9 ppW2W3W3 vs Vanderbilt: +9.7 ppW4W4 vs App State: +11.5 ppW5W5 vs Louisville: +3.4 ppW6W6 vs Wake Forest: +8.3 ppW8W8 vs Stanford: -4.0 ppW9W9 vs California: -7.4 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Virginia272755.6%63.4%-7.9 pp8.3-0.32243.2-0.22
W2Richmond250———10.20.93459.70.74
W3Vanderbilt383868.4%58.8%+9.7 pp9.80.16404.20.14
W4App State333271.9%60.4%+11.5 pp7.00.33464.50.29
W5Louisville414161.0%57.6%+3.4 pp10.50.78432.8-0.10
W6Wake Forest404072.5%64.3%+8.3 pp6.30.22231.7-0.28
W8Stanford313056.7%60.7%-4.0 pp9.10.67333.80.15
W9California252552.0%59.4%-7.4 pp10.80.34403.4-0.00

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

32 punts · 42.8 gross yards/punt · 41.5 net yards/punt

12 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 32/32 punts. Known net yards: 32/32 punts.

Our punt returns

13 returns · 10.5 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

2 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 13/13 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · California646.344.36/6
Week 8 · Stanford541.041.05/5
Week 6 · Wake Forest445.043.04/4
Week 5 · Louisville336.336.33/3
Week 4 · App State342.742.73/3
Team style
Rating history