Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

New Mexico

2026 season

Mountain West
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

New Mexico's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 33.5 across 8 systems; best 26, worst 46, so they disagree by 20 places.

Lab EPA
#30
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#35
down 82026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#32
up 52026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#37
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#46
down 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#26
down 5 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#45
down 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#29
down 72026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#32 of 138
Schedule strength
#114 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#104 of 138
Game control
#39 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#32 of 138
Offense
#80 of 138
Defense
#14 of 138
Special teams
#35 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

New Mexico · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

7-1 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.097 net EPA/play

#30

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

6.53 points

#35 · Down 8 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +16.54 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -7.88, schedule #129 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -5.74. That is worth +8.66 on its own; the preseason prior of -0.78 still carries 23% of the weight, giving +6.53.

How each game enters this SRS rating

New Mexico · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Central Michigan
home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401864498
+31.00 → +31.00-2.500.73498.29%-8.692.363-0.7211.642
Week 2 · Mercyhurst
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401865252
+63.00 → +35.00-2.500.76378.62%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.801-2.1540.646
Week 3 · Oklahoma
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856690
-8.00 → -8.00+2.500.79378.96%+4.27-0.4930.383-0.110
Week 4 · New Mexico State
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401864579
+24.00 → +24.00+2.500.82499.31%-10.122.466-0.9421.525
Week 5 · UTEP
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401864514
+54.00 → +35.00-2.500.85729.67%-17.243.144-1.6681.476
Week 7 · Hawai'i
away · 2026-10-18 · ID 401864521
+11.00 → +11.00+2.500.925910.45%-7.491.410-0.7830.628
Week 8 · North Dakota State
home · 2026-10-25 · ID 401864527
+5.00 → +5.00-2.500.962210.86%+5.800.2710.6300.901
Week 9 · San José State
away · 2026-10-31 · ID 401864529
+5.00 → +5.00+2.501.000011.28%-7.540.846-0.851-0.004

Game terms +6.70 points; prior term -0.18 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +6.53 points. The preseason prior is -0.78 with 22.57% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.9 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

10.7 SP+ points

#32 · Up 5 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

12.02 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#26 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -0.70 on 380 plays; defense -12.72 on 350 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks New Mexico 5 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
7-1 · conf 4-0 · home 4-0 · away 3-1 · expected wins 6.3
Polls (Week 10)
Coaches Poll #25 · AP Top 25 #22
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 5-2-1 ATS (+10.5 avg) · 2025: 7-6 ATS (+5.2 avg)
Head coach
Jason Eck · hired 2024-12-16 · 9-4 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #201 (10 pts) · 2025 #194 (10 pts) · 2026 #87 (183 pts)
Returning
58% of production · 57% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing74%97%
Receiving43%27%
Rushing71%45%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back63.000.83775.03
Defensive Line82.750.82796.62
Linebacker62.830.83435.01
Offensive Line93.000.83327.50
Quarterback33.000.84422.53
Receiver73.000.85025.95
Running Back13.000.85000.85
Special Teams53.000.84004.20

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Toa Faavae · QB

CFBD athlete 5261479. New Mexico (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.31710434.2%
Pass 72.2% · Rush 17.3%

1st 29.1% · 2nd 36.6% · 3rd 42.0%

Standard downs 28.9% · Passing downs 46.7%

2025: 3★ · 0.8200
Scottre Humphrey · RB

CFBD athlete 5166161. Montana State (2023–2024); New Mexico (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.18810321.7%
Pass 1.3% · Rush 32.0%

1st 24.8% · 2nd 22.4% · 3rd 15.0%

Standard downs 26.1% · Passing downs 11.2%

2023: 3★ · 0.8300
Kiefer Sibley · RB

CFBD athlete 5146726. New Mexico (2026–2026); North Texas (2024–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1897216.2%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 22.0%

1st 16.7% · 2nd 18.6% · 3rd 12.0%

Standard downs 15.3% · Passing downs 18.4%

2024: 3★ · 0.8597
Toa Faavae · QB

CFBD athlete 5261479. New Mexico (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1125734.2%
Pass 72.2% · Rush 17.3%

1st 29.1% · 2nd 36.6% · 3rd 42.0%

Standard downs 28.9% · Passing downs 46.7%

2025: 3★ · 0.8200
Grant Glasgow · PK

CFBD athlete 5122287. Montana (2023–2024); New Mexico (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR-2.84011—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Nicholas Romero · PK

CFBD athlete 5302600. New Mexico (2026–2026); Wagner (2025–2025)

Kicker PAAR-2.7801—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2025: stars unavailable
Bailen George · WR

CFBD athlete 5326947. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.1%
Pass 16.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 5.4% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
Cade Keith · TE

CFBD athlete 5219572. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.5%
Pass 17.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 6.2% · 3rd 5.0%

Standard downs 4.7% · Passing downs 7.2%

Not linked
Cameron Mathews · RB

CFBD athlete 5295363. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.5%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 14.8%

1st 10.1% · 2nd 8.8% · 3rd 10.5%

Standard downs 10.6% · Passing downs 6.0%

Not linked
DJ Darling · WR

CFBD athlete 5282659. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 10.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 1.4% · 3rd 4.6%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 4.6%

Not linked
Darrion Bowers · RB

CFBD athlete 5265474. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.0%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 14.1%

1st 8.1% · 2nd 13.2% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 8.7% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked
Deshaun Buchanan · RB

CFBD athlete 5165109. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 0.8% · Rush 4.3%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Dorian Patterson · WR

CFBD athlete 5323149. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 7.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.5% · 3rd 4.2%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
James Laubstein · QB

CFBD athlete 5228804. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.4%
Pass 0.8% · Rush 7.8%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 3.2% · 3rd 10.4%

Standard downs 6.9% · Passing downs 1.7%

Not linked
Kader Diop · WR

CFBD athlete 5228799. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Luke Moga · QB

CFBD athlete 5122887. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——15.7%
Pass 41.1% · Rush 1.8%

1st 18.2% · 2nd 11.5% · 3rd 19.2%

Standard downs 14.9% · Passing downs 17.6%

Not linked
Massiah Mingo · WR

CFBD athlete 5181311. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 11.5% · Rush 0.5%

1st 4.0% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 1.6%

Standard downs 4.8% · Passing downs 1.1%

Not linked
Miles Williams · WR

CFBD athlete 5084027. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 9.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 1.7% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 3.6%

Not linked
Trey Moore · TE

CFBD athlete 5388850. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 4.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
Tripp Walsh · TE

CFBD athlete 5150694. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 9.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 2.5% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 3.2%

Not linked
Troy Omeire · WR

CFBD athlete 4430827. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.3%
Pass 15.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 8.2% · 3rd 9.6%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 8.8%

Not linked
Zhaiel Smith · WR

CFBD athlete 5296587. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 7.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 1.5% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 1.3% · Passing downs 5.4%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 14 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Bear Tenney · TESacramento State2026-02-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Clay Martineau · LBBoise State2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Deven Dyer · DLWestern New Mexico2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Eric McClain · CBBall State2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Jalen Charles · EDGEMemphis2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Joey Olsen · TEUSC2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ken Meir · IOLTemple2026-01-273★ / 0.8000Immediate
Konner Olson · KWestern Kentucky2026-01-203★ / 0.8000Immediate
Luke Moga · QBOregon2026-01-233★ / 0.8500Immediate
Michael Kern · PCalifornia2026-02-023★ / —Immediate
Nick Romero · KWagner2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Ormanie Arnold · CBCincinnati2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Troy Omeire · WRUNLV2026-01-233★ / 0.8700Immediate
Will Hicks · SHampton2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Outgoing · 14 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aiden Valdez · TENot reported2025-12-283★ / —Immediate
Clint Stephens · SNot reported2026-01-173★ / —Immediate
Cole Welliver · QBNot reported2026-01-173★ / 0.8400Immediate
DJ McKinney · RBTulsa2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Daniel Hughes · PFlorida State2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Dorian Thomas · TECalifornia2026-01-074★ / 0.9000Immediate
Isaiah Blair · WRNot reported2025-12-31— / —Immediate
Landon Williams · EDGEStephen F. Austin2026-02-023★ / —Immediate
Marcus Vinson · TEFlorida Atlantic2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Marko Luera · IOLNot reported2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Max Lantzsch · TENot reported2025-12-31— / —Immediate
Mihalis Santorineos · LBNot reported2026-01-082★ / —Immediate
Travis Gray · OTNot reported2025-12-273★ / —Immediate
Trey Dubuc · LSTexas2026-01-042★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at New Mexico. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Jason Eck · career 9–4 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 23 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Jason Eck · active at capture

    9–4 · 13 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2024–2024 · Bronco Mendenhall

    5–7 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2023-12-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2020–2023 · Danny Gonzales

    11–32 · 43 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2020-01-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2012–2019 · Bob Davie

    35–64 · 99 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Hired 2011-11-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2011–2011 · George Barlow

    1–7 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2011-11-25. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2009–2011 · Mike Locksley

    2–26 · 28 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2008-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1998–2008 · Rocky Long

    65–69 · 134 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1992–1997 · Dennis Franchione

    33–36 · 69 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1987–1991 · Mike Sheppard

    9–50 · 59 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1983–1986 · Joe Lee Dunn

    17–30 · 47 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1980–1982 · Joe Morrison

    18–15–1 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1974–1979 · Bill Mondt

    32–36–1 · 69 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1968–1973 · Rudy Feldman

    24–37–2 · 63 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1960–1967 · Bill Weeks

    40–41–1 · 82 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1958–1959 · Marv Levy

    14–6 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1956–1957 · Dick Clausen

    8–12 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1953–1955 · Robert Titchenal

    12–16–1 · 29 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1950–1952 · Dudley DeGroot

    13–17 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1947–1949 · Berl Huffman

    8–22–1 · 31 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1944–1946 · Willis Barnes

    12–13–3 · 28 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1942–1942 · Willis Barnes

    4–5–2 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1937–1941 · Ted Shipkey

    30–17–2 · 49 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1934–1936 · Gwinn Henry

    16–12 · 28 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Jason Eck · incomplete attribution0–0——10.68.187—
2025 · Jason Eck9–46–20–10.9-0.2194—
2024 · Bronco Mendenhall5–73–40–0-14.8-12.4201—
2023 · Danny Gonzales4–82–60–0-16.5-11.1128—
2022 · Danny Gonzales2–100–80–0-26.9-19.199—
2021 · Danny Gonzales3–91–70–0-18.6-15.194—
2020 · Danny Gonzales2–52–50–0-15-11.1106—
2019 · Bob Davie2–100–80–0-17-17.6119—
2018 · Bob Davie3–91–70–0-9.5-15.4124—
2017 · Bob Davie3–91–70–0-12.4-16.2118—
2016 · Bob Davie9–46–21–0-5.1-5.383—
2015 · Bob Davie7–65–30–1-8.7-10.5116—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:06:38 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play80 / 13842.32 / 13899.3
Success rate81 / 13841.61 / 138100.0
Explosiveness69 / 13850.4134 / 1382.9
Standard-down success71 / 13848.92 / 13899.3
Passing-down success102 / 13826.3T23 / 13883.6
Pass PPA120 / 13813.18 / 13894.9
Rush PPA27 / 13881.06 / 13896.4
Pass explosiveness59 / 13857.7110 / 13820.4
Rush explosiveness16 / 13889.1132 / 1384.4
Line yards116 / 13816.12 / 13899.3
Second-level yards59 / 13857.726 / 13881.8
Open-field yards39 / 13872.340 / 13871.5
Stuff rate32 / 13877.42 / 13899.3
Power successT18 / 13887.21 / 138100.0
HavocT34 / 13875.21 / 138100.0
Front-seven havocT53 / 13861.72 / 13899.3
DB havocT18 / 13886.9T22 / 13883.9
Points / opportunity76 / 13845.32 / 13899.3
Average field position1 / 138100.031 / 13878.1
Field-position expected points1 / 138100.029 / 13879.6

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Toa Faavae · QBUsage 34.2% · Avg PPA 0.056 · Total 9.836
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0569.83634.2%
Pass0.09110.32572.2%
Rush0.1217.15717.3%
1st down-0.341-23.17929.1%
2nd down0.0875.13336.6%
3rd down0.43318.16842.0%
Standard downs-0.032-3.37628.9%
Passing downs0.18613.21146.7%
Scottre Humphrey · RBUsage 21.7% · Avg PPA 0.158 · Total 17.588
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.15817.58821.7%
Pass0.6771.3541.3%
Rush0.14916.23432.0%
1st down0.0693.99324.8%
2nd down0.1384.98122.4%
3rd down0.67010.04515.0%
Standard downs0.21620.27126.1%
Passing downs-0.158-2.68311.2%
Kiefer Sibley · RBUsage 16.2% · Avg PPA 0.215 · Total 17.821
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.21517.82116.2%
Pass0.3732.9855.1%
Rush0.19814.83722.0%
1st down0.1847.18116.7%
2nd down0.2918.72418.6%
3rd down-0.124-1.48212.0%
Standard downs0.1307.13815.3%
Passing downs0.38210.68318.4%
Luke Moga · QBUsage 15.7% · Avg PPA 0.114 · Total 4.786
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1144.78615.7%
Pass0.1295.03841.1%
Rush-0.084-0.2521.8%
1st down0.0070.14518.2%
2nd down0.0420.42111.5%
3rd down0.4224.22019.2%
Standard downs0.0180.52414.9%
Passing downs0.3284.26117.6%
Cameron Mathews · RBUsage 9.5% · Avg PPA 0.208 · Total 4.168
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2084.1689.5%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.2084.16814.8%
1st down0.2132.13410.1%
2nd down0.1490.8948.8%
3rd down0.2851.14010.5%
Standard downs0.0741.26610.6%
Passing downs0.9672.9026.0%
Darrion Bowers · RBUsage 9.0% · Avg PPA 0.045 · Total 0.848
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0450.8489.0%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.0450.84814.1%
1st down-0.206-1.6518.1%
2nd down0.1531.37513.2%
3rd down0.5621.1245.3%
Standard downs0.2263.1668.7%
Passing downs-0.464-2.31810.0%
Cade Keith · TEUsage 5.5% · Avg PPA 0.743 · Total 20.797
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.74320.7975.5%
Pass0.74320.79717.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6548.4985.6%
2nd down0.5004.9956.2%
3rd down1.4617.3045.0%
Standard downs0.70511.9814.7%
Passing downs0.8018.8167.2%
James Laubstein · QBUsage 5.4% · Avg PPA 0.690 · Total 14.495
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.69014.4955.4%
Pass-0.403-0.4030.8%
Rush0.74514.8987.8%
1st down0.1220.3671.7%
2nd down0.8123.2473.2%
3rd down1.49511.95610.4%
Standard downs0.69613.2176.9%
Passing downs0.6391.2781.7%
Troy Omeire · WRUsage 5.3% · Avg PPA 0.355 · Total 4.968
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3554.9685.3%
Pass0.3554.96815.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.166-0.3321.7%
2nd down0.8956.2688.2%
3rd down-0.194-0.9689.6%
Standard downs0.8045.6293.8%
Passing downs-0.094-0.6618.8%
Bailen George · WRUsage 5.1% · Avg PPA 0.644 · Total 14.812
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.64414.8125.1%
Pass0.64414.81216.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.213-2.3435.4%
2nd down0.9864.9313.5%
3rd down1.5039.0156.7%
Standard downs0.4167.0715.4%
Passing downs1.2907.7424.4%
Massiah Mingo · WRUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA 0.451 · Total 5.409
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4515.4093.8%
Pass0.4995.48711.5%
Rush-0.079-0.0790.5%
1st down0.1731.0374.0%
2nd down0.2611.0444.0%
3rd down1.6421.6421.6%
Standard downs0.4875.3564.8%
Passing downs0.0530.0531.1%
DJ Darling · WRUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 0.307 · Total 4.599
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3074.5993.3%
Pass0.3074.59910.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5625.0544.3%
2nd down-0.713-1.4261.4%
3rd down0.2430.9714.6%
Standard downs0.5625.0542.8%
Passing downs-0.076-0.4554.6%
Deshaun Buchanan · RBUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.638 · Total 7.653
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6387.6533.2%
Pass0.9660.9660.8%
Rush0.6086.6864.3%
1st down0.5954.1684.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.6973.4856.8%
Standard downs0.5954.1682.7%
Passing downs0.6973.4854.3%
Tripp Walsh · TEUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.595 · Total 2.381
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5952.3813.0%
Pass0.5952.3819.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2450.4913.1%
2nd down-0.292-0.2922.5%
3rd down2.1822.1824.3%
Standard downs0.8912.6733.0%
Passing downs-0.292-0.2923.2%
Miles Williams · WRUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA -0.084 · Total -0.920
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.084-0.9202.9%
Pass-0.084-0.9209.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.363-1.8172.9%
2nd down0.5691.1391.7%
3rd down-0.851-2.5544.0%
Standard downs-0.266-1.8652.7%
Passing downs0.2360.9453.6%
Zhaiel Smith · WRUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 0.974 · Total 4.872
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9744.8722.4%
Pass0.9744.8727.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3310.6632.1%
2nd down0.1430.1431.5%
3rd down2.0334.0675.3%
Standard downs0.3310.6631.3%
Passing downs1.4034.2105.4%
Dorian Patterson · WRUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA -0.199 · Total -1.192
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.199-1.1922.3%
Pass-0.199-1.1927.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.071-0.1421.6%
2nd down-0.144-0.2882.5%
3rd down-0.381-0.7634.2%
Standard downs-0.081-0.3262.1%
Passing downs-0.433-0.8672.9%
Kader Diop · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -0.298 · Total -0.298
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.298-0.2981.6%
Pass-0.298-0.2985.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.298-0.2983.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.298-0.2982.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Trey Moore · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 2.319 · Total 2.319
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.3192.3191.5%
Pass2.3192.3194.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down2.3192.3198.3%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs2.3192.3196.7%
Where New Mexico sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.106 (42nd percentile; 138 teams)42ndOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.418 (42nd percentile; 138 teams)42ndOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.239 (50th percentile; 138 teams)50thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.024 (13th percentile; 138 teams)13thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.179 (81st percentile; 138 teams)81stDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.161 (99th percentile; 138 teams)99thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.309 (100th percentile; 138 teams)100thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.417 (3rd percentile; 138 teams)3rdDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.255 (100th percentile; 138 teams)100th
Values and percentiles
New Mexico metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.10642nd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.41842nd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.23950th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.02413th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.17981st138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.16199th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.309100th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.4173rd138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.255100th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 144 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.9 yards (79th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.1 per completion. Completion 57.6%, 8.2 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.20.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense61.5%59.1%+2.4122 / 144
Defense allowed57.7%58.6%-0.8194 / 224

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is New Mexico.

Target mix by zone, New Mexico offense
Short left34% · 47Short middle19% · 26Short right31% · 42Deep left8% · 11Deep middle4% · 5Deep right4% · 6

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
New Mexico passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense14499%9.96.157.6%0.20+2.4 pp122
Passing defense22499%9.84.656.7%-0.04-0.8 pp194

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense3574.844.2%0.213.201.101.4012.7%80.6%
Defense allowed2482.729.9%-0.072.200.900.9027.6%38.9%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense347 / 3573332418790330 / 330 · 100.0%
Defense allowed242 / 2482371123340221 / 221 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +2.4 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-19.40.320.0W1W1 vs Central Michigan: +6.4 ppW2W3W3 vs Oklahoma: -19.4 ppW4W4 vs New Mexico State: +2.2 ppW5W5 vs UTEP: +20.0 ppW7W7 vs Hawai'i: +4.2 ppW8W8 vs North Dakota State: -6.9 ppW9W9 vs San José State: +3.9 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Central Michigan252568.0%61.6%+6.4 pp7.50.23434.70.34
W2Mercyhurst190———19.40.30525.50.34
W3Oklahoma191942.1%61.5%-19.4 pp7.70.07381.8-0.08
W4New Mexico State171656.3%54.0%+2.2 pp8.40.54475.50.40
W5UTEP242373.9%53.9%+20.0 pp10.20.71425.50.22
W7Hawai'i111154.5%50.3%+4.2 pp14.60.34484.90.11
W8North Dakota State141457.1%64.0%-6.9 pp6.8-0.10444.30.15
W9San José State151471.4%67.5%+3.9 pp4.7-0.76435.30.10

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

30 punts · 42.1 gross yards/punt · 37.1 net yards/punt

10 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 30/30 punts. Known net yards: 27/30 punts.

Our punt returns

13 returns · 17.6 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 13/13 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · San José State235.535.52/2
Week 8 · North Dakota State645.831.85/6
Week 7 · Hawai'i442.540.54/4
Week 5 · UTEP166.0—0/1
Week 4 · New Mexico State338.338.33/3
Team style
Rating history