Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Ole Miss

2026 season

SEC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Ole Miss's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 11 across 8 systems; best 6, worst 21, so they disagree by 15 places.

Lab EPA
#17
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#6
up 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#13
up 32026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#6
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#9
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#21
up 2 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#7
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#17
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#7 of 138
Schedule strength
#4 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#30 of 138
Game control
#8 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#7 of 138
Offense
#4 of 138
Defense
#25 of 138
Special teams
#55 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Ole Miss · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

6-2 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.142 net EPA/play

#17

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

16.51 points

#6 · Up 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +13.28 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +5.86, schedule #8 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth +19.14 on its own; the preseason prior of +7.45 still carries 22% of the weight, giving +16.51.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Ole Miss · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Louisville
neutral · 2026-09-06 · ID 401856661		+3.00 → +3.000.000.73498.26%+10.310.2480.8521.100
Week 2 · Charlotte
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856676		+32.00 → +32.00-2.500.76378.58%-15.682.533-1.3461.187
Week 3 · LSU
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856688		+8.00 → +8.00-2.500.79378.92%+18.380.4911.6402.131
Week 4 · Florida
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856699		-24.00 → -24.00+2.500.82499.27%+6.82-1.9940.632-1.361
Week 6 · Vanderbilt
away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401856718		+35.00 → +35.00+2.500.890910.01%-4.083.755-0.4093.346
Week 7 · Missouri
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401856721		+28.00 → +28.00-2.500.925910.41%+10.472.6541.0903.743
Week 8 · Texas
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401856732		-7.00 → -7.00+2.500.962210.82%+14.93-0.4871.6151.128
Week 9 · Auburn
home · 2026-10-31 · ID 401856735		+30.00 → +30.00-2.501.000011.24%+4.183.0910.4703.561

Game terms +14.84 points; prior term +1.67 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +16.51 points. The preseason prior is +7.45 with 22.48% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.9 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

17.1 SP+ points

#13 · Up 3 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

13.75 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#21 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 14.60 on 503 plays; defense 0.85 on 466 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Ole Miss 11 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
6-2 · conf 4-2 · home 4-0 · away 1-2 · expected wins 4.9
Polls (Week 10)
Coaches Poll #12 · AP Top 25 #12
CFP latest
#10 · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-4 ATS (+4.7 avg) · 2025: 9-6 ATS (+4.3 avg)
Head coach
Pete Golding · hired 2025-11-30 · 2-1 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #21 (240 pts) · 2025 #16 (252 pts) · 2026 #22 (237 pts)
Returning
50% of production · 68% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing79%85%
Receiving19%29%
Rushing84%84%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back203.500.888517.77
Defensive Line153.530.901213.52
Linebacker73.430.89516.27
Offensive Line123.250.882310.59
Quarterback43.500.87283.49
Receiver133.460.896911.66
Running Back43.750.92303.69
Special Teams33.330.88832.67

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Trinidad Chambliss · QB

CFBD athlete 4911529. Ole Miss (2025–2026); Ferris State (2023–2023)

Passing WEPA0.51731157.8%
Pass 97.0% · Rush 15.6%

1st 55.7% · 2nd 53.8% · 3rd 72.6%

Standard downs 52.1% · Passing downs 72.7%

Not linked
Kewan Lacy · RB

CFBD athlete 5086388. Missouri (2024–2024); Ole Miss (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2898121.5%
Pass 7.6% · Rush 40.9%

1st 22.1% · 2nd 26.4% · 3rd 11.4%

Standard downs 23.8% · Passing downs 16.2%

2024: 4★ · 0.9268
Makhi Frazier · RB

CFBD athlete 5084286. Michigan State (2024–2025); Ole Miss (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1436814.8%
Pass 3.1% · Rush 28.5%

1st 15.4% · 2nd 17.7% · 3rd 8.8%

Standard downs 16.6% · Passing downs 9.6%

2024: 3★ · 0.8475
Trinidad Chambliss · QB

CFBD athlete 4911529. Ole Miss (2025–2026); Ferris State (2023–2023)

Rushing WEPA0.4024957.8%
Pass 97.0% · Rush 15.6%

1st 55.7% · 2nd 53.8% · 3rd 72.6%

Standard downs 52.1% · Passing downs 72.7%

Not linked
Lucas Carneiro · PK

CFBD athlete 5092504. Western Kentucky (2022–2024); Ole Miss (2025–2026)

Kicker PAAR8.62015—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Caleb Cunningham · WR

CFBD athlete 5224178. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.1%
Pass 14.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.2% · 2nd 5.7% · 3rd 7.0%

Standard downs 7.1% · Passing downs 7.0%

Not linked
Caleb Odom · TE

CFBD athlete 5079647. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.2%
Pass 15.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.5% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 13.7%

Standard downs 6.6% · Passing downs 12.1%

Not linked
Darrell Gill Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5125819. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 5.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Deuce Alexander · WR

CFBD athlete 5152158. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.8%
Pass 23.7% · Rush 1.1%

1st 15.0% · 2nd 12.1% · 3rd 8.5%

Standard downs 12.9% · Passing downs 12.4%

Not linked
Deuce Knight · QB

CFBD athlete 5141506. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.9%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 10.4%

1st 5.7% · 2nd 9.2% · 3rd 15.6%

Standard downs 8.5% · Passing downs 10.0%

Not linked
Dillon Alfred · WR

CFBD athlete 5141359. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Horatio Fields · WR

CFBD athlete 4711408. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.6%
Pass 12.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.0% · 2nd 6.5% · 3rd 6.6%

Standard downs 6.6% · Passing downs 6.8%

Not linked
JT Lindsey · RB

CFBD athlete 5209688. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.2%
Pass 1.4% · Rush 14.2%

1st 6.9% · 2nd 6.8% · 3rd 5.5%

Standard downs 8.1% · Passing downs 4.6%

Not linked
Johntay Cook II · WR

CFBD athlete 4870656. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 0.5%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 2.2%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 5.7%

Not linked
Joshua Dye · RB

CFBD athlete 5125900. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.6%
Pass 1.3% · Rush 2.1%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 1.9% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Luke Hasz · TE

CFBD athlete 4870797. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.9%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 1.5% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 2.5%

Not linked
Michael Smith · TE

CFBD athlete 5079592. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 3.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 3.1%

Not linked
Samari Reed · WR

CFBD athlete 5149003. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 3.6% · Rush 0.6%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked
Shekai Mills-Knight · RB

CFBD athlete 5214395. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.1%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 24.1%

1st 16.9% · 2nd 9.4% · 3rd 10.7%

Standard downs 14.8% · Passing downs 7.9%

Not linked
Traylon Ray · WR

CFBD athlete 4870912. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 9.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.8% · 2nd 3.5% · 3rd 8.5%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 7.5%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 28 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Blake Purchase · EDGEOregon2026-01-164★ / 0.9300Immediate
Brady Prieskorn · TEMichigan2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cameron Miller · WRKentucky2026-01-123★ / 0.8700Immediate
Carius Curne · OTLSU2026-01-064★ / 0.9400Immediate
Darrell Gill Jr. · WRSyracuse2026-01-134★ / 0.9400Immediate
Deuce Knight · QBAuburn2026-01-114★ / 0.9400Immediate
Edwin Joseph · SFlorida State2026-01-104★ / 0.9200Immediate
Enoch Wangoy · OTFlorida2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Horatio Fields · WRAuburn2026-01-294★ / 0.9000Immediate
Isaiah Spencer · WRVirginia Tech2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
JT Lindsey · RBLSU2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jay Crawford · CBAuburn2026-01-034★ / 0.9300Immediate
Jehiem Oatis · DLColorado2026-01-063★ / 0.8700Immediate
Joenel Aguero · SGeorgia2026-01-103★ / 0.8800Immediate
Johntay Cook II · WRSyracuse2026-01-173★ / 0.8800Immediate
Jonathan Maldonado · EDGENevada2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jordan Renaud · EDGEAlabama2026-01-134★ / 0.9200Immediate
Joshua Dye · RBSouthern Utah2026-01-183★ / 0.8200Immediate
Keaton Thomas · LBBaylor2026-01-033★ / 0.8700Immediate
Luke Ferrelli · LBCalifornia2026-01-214★ / 0.9000Immediate
Makhi Frazier · RBMichigan State2026-01-193★ / 0.8800Immediate
Michai Boireau · DLFlorida2026-01-064★ / 0.9200Immediate
Sharif Denson · CBFlorida2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
Tah'j Butler · LBGeorgia Tech2026-01-163★ / 0.8700Immediate
Tommy Kinsler IV · OTMiami2026-01-213★ / 0.8600Immediate
Tony Mitchell · SMississippi State2026-01-203★ / 0.8400Immediate
Troy Everett · IOLOklahoma2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Walker Howard · QBLouisiana2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Outgoing · 27 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Anthony Robinson III · SNot reported2026-01-153★ / —Withdrawn
Austin Simmons · QBMissouri2026-01-064★ / 0.9300Immediate
Braden Waterman · QBNot reported2026-01-15— / —Immediate
Cayden Lee · WRMissouri2026-01-174★ / 0.9000Immediate
Chris Graves Jr. · CBMissouri2026-01-203★ / 0.8800Immediate
Corey Amos · EDGEGrambling2026-01-203★ / —Immediate
Da'Shawn Womack · EDGEAuburn2026-01-154★ / 0.9200Immediate
Dae'Quan Wright · TELSU2026-08-204★ / —Immediate
DeeJay Holmes Jr. · EDGENot reported2026-01-133★ / —Immediate
Delano Townsend · IOLNot reported2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Devin Harper · IOLLSU2026-01-164★ / 0.9200Immediate
Domonique Thomas · RBNot reported2026-01-02— / —Immediate
Ethan Fields · IOLAlabama2026-01-173★ / 0.8700Immediate
Jaden Yates · LBHouston2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jalen Ballard · KTroy2026-01-17— / —Immediate
Jeffery Rush · EDGESouthern Miss2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jude Foster · IOLLiberty2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Mike Baker · KUConn2026-01-18— / —Immediate
PJ Wilkins · IOLWisconsin2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Princewill Umanmielen · EDGELSU2026-01-155★ / 0.9800Immediate
Ricky Fletcher · CBCalifornia2026-01-183★ / 0.8800Immediate
TJ Banks · SLouisville2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
TJ Dottery · LBLSU2026-01-154★ / 0.9100Immediate
TJ Hedrick · OTAuburn2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Trey Hall · RBOld Dominion2026-01-173★ / 0.8400Immediate
Winston Watkins · WRLSU2026-01-124★ / 0.9100Immediate
Zxavian Harris · DLLSU2026-08-194★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Ole Miss. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Pete Golding · career 2–1 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 30 appointments

  1. 2025–present · Pete Golding · active at capture

    2–1 · 3 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2025-11-30. Effective dates: 2025-12-20 to unknown.

  2. 2020–2025 · Lane Kiffin

    55–19 · 74 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2019-12-07. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-12-20.

  3. 2017–2019 · Matt Luke

    15–21 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2017-07-20. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2012–2016 · Hugh Freeze

    39–25 · 64 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2011-12-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2008–2011 · Houston Nutt

    24–26 · 50 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2007-11-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2005–2007 · Ed Orgeron

    10–25 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2004-12-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1998–2004 · David Cutcliffe

    44–29 · 73 attributed games · 7 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1995–1998 · Tommy Tuberville

    25–20 · 45 attributed games · 4 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1994–1994 · Joe Lee Dunn

    4–7 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1983–1993 · Billy Brewer

    66–57–3 · 126 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1978–1982 · Steve Sloan

    20–34–1 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1974–1977 · Ken Cooper

    19–25 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1973–1973 · John Vaught

    5–3 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1971–1972 · Billy Kinard

    15–7 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1947–1970 · John Vaught

    185–58–12 · 255 attributed games · 24 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1946–1946 · Red Drew

    2–7 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1944–1945 · Harry Mehre

    6–11 · 17 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1938–1942 · Harry Mehre

    33–15–1 · 49 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1933–1937 · Ed Walker

    28–21–6 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1925–1929 · Homer Hazel

    21–22–3 · 46 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1922–1923 · Roland Cowell

    8–11–1 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1921–1921 · R.L. Sullivan

    3–6 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1919–1919 · R.L. Sullivan

    4–4 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1915–1916 · Fred Robbins

    5–12 · 17 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  25. 1912–1912 · Leo DeTray

    4–3 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  26. 1909–1911 · N.P. Stauffer

    17–7–2 · 26 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  27. 1908–1908 · Frank Kyle

    3–5 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  28. 1907–1907 · Frank Mason

    0–6 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  29. 1906–1906 · T.S. Hammond

    4–2 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  30. 1904–1904 · M.H. Harvey

    4–3 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Pete Golding · incomplete attribution0–0——17.117.422—
2025 · Lane Kiffin11–17–10–02415.8163
2025 · Pete Golding2–10–02–12415.8163
2024 · Lane Kiffin10–35–31–027.919.22111
2023 · Lane Kiffin11–26–21–018.414239
2022 · Lane Kiffin8–54–40–116.29.723—
2021 · Lane Kiffin10–36–20–114.812.41811
2020 · Lane Kiffin5–54–51–04.86.134—
2019 · Matt Luke4–82–60–02.96.522—
2018 · Matt Luke5–71–70–09.83.532—
2017 · Matt Luke6–63–50–011.61.631—
2016 · Hugh Freeze5–72–60–012.46.15—
2015 · Hugh Freeze10–36–21–02718.11710
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:05:07 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play24 / 13883.287 / 13837.2
Success rate13 / 13891.274 / 13846.7
Explosiveness104 / 13824.894 / 13832.1
Standard-down success21 / 13885.456 / 13859.9
Passing-down success8 / 13894.9108 / 13821.9
Pass PPA27 / 13881.077 / 13844.5
Rush PPA19 / 13886.985 / 13838.7
Pass explosiveness117 / 13815.3109 / 13821.2
Rush explosiveness77 / 13844.577 / 13844.5
Line yards43 / 13869.340 / 13871.5
Second-level yards42 / 13870.146 / 13867.2
Open-field yards104 / 13824.8T79 / 13842.7
Stuff rate59 / 13857.716 / 13889.1
Power successT77 / 13843.884 / 13839.4
HavocT34 / 13875.240 / 13871.5
Front-seven havoc12 / 13892.0T40 / 13870.1
DB havocT110 / 13818.2T44 / 13866.8
Points / opportunity5 / 13897.164 / 13854.0
Average field positionT96 / 13829.6T86 / 13837.6
Field-position expected pointsT100 / 13827.4T90 / 13834.7

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Trinidad Chambliss · QBUsage 57.8% · Avg PPA 0.319 · Total 108.068
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.319108.06857.8%
Pass0.347102.23597.0%
Rush0.41617.07115.6%
1st down0.10215.44755.7%
2nd down0.47650.94053.8%
3rd down0.60146.25672.6%
Standard downs0.21547.82352.1%
Passing downs0.51560.24572.7%
Kewan Lacy · RBUsage 21.5% · Avg PPA 0.161 · Total 15.137
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.16115.13721.5%
Pass-0.316-5.6967.6%
Rush0.27420.83340.9%
1st down-0.101-4.55022.1%
2nd down0.33913.21926.4%
3rd down0.5484.93611.4%
Standard downs0.1238.97123.8%
Passing downs0.2946.16616.2%
Makhi Frazier · RBUsage 14.8% · Avg PPA 0.048 · Total 3.630
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0483.63014.8%
Pass-0.246-1.9683.1%
Rush0.0825.59828.5%
1st down0.0592.19115.4%
2nd down-0.026-0.80017.7%
3rd down0.2802.2398.8%
Standard downs0.0120.76716.6%
Passing downs0.2202.8639.6%
Shekai Mills-Knight · RBUsage 13.1% · Avg PPA 0.329 · Total 6.582
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3296.58213.1%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.3296.58224.1%
1st down0.1351.62316.9%
2nd down0.5122.5609.4%
3rd down0.8002.39910.7%
Standard downs0.3035.14414.8%
Passing downs0.4791.4387.9%
Deuce Alexander · WRUsage 12.8% · Avg PPA 0.487 · Total 36.559
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.48736.55912.8%
Pass0.50035.99223.7%
Rush0.1890.5671.1%
1st down0.33913.91715.0%
2nd down0.58914.14212.1%
3rd down0.5795.2098.5%
Standard downs0.46625.64512.9%
Passing downs0.54610.91412.4%
Deuce Knight · QBUsage 8.9% · Avg PPA 0.099 · Total 1.889
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0991.8898.9%
Pass0.2851.9967.1%
Rush0.3403.73510.4%
1st down0.2631.5775.7%
2nd down-0.160-1.1219.2%
3rd down1.1045.51915.6%
Standard downs0.1512.1208.5%
Passing downs-0.046-0.23110.0%
Caleb Odom · TEUsage 8.2% · Avg PPA 0.457 · Total 19.642
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.45719.6428.2%
Pass0.45719.64215.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1713.0707.5%
2nd down0.4374.8106.3%
3rd down0.84011.76113.7%
Standard downs0.2586.4426.6%
Passing downs0.73313.20012.1%
JT Lindsey · RBUsage 7.2% · Avg PPA -0.182 · Total -5.627
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.182-5.6277.2%
Pass-0.157-0.4721.4%
Rush-0.184-5.15414.2%
1st down-0.133-1.8616.9%
2nd down-0.196-1.9576.8%
3rd down0.0070.0305.5%
Standard downs-0.195-5.0778.1%
Passing downs-0.110-0.5494.6%
Caleb Cunningham · WRUsage 7.1% · Avg PPA 0.752 · Total 18.796
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.75218.7967.1%
Pass0.75218.79614.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2783.8988.2%
2nd down0.7044.9285.7%
3rd down2.4939.9707.0%
Standard downs0.3656.9347.1%
Passing downs1.97711.8627.0%
Horatio Fields · WRUsage 6.6% · Avg PPA 0.656 · Total 25.600
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.65625.6006.6%
Pass0.65625.60012.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.64412.2277.0%
2nd down0.81910.6416.5%
3rd down0.3902.7326.6%
Standard downs0.51314.3676.6%
Passing downs1.02111.2336.8%
Traylon Ray · WRUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.808 · Total 23.426
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.80823.4264.9%
Pass0.80823.4269.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1722.2374.8%
2nd down1.0707.4873.5%
3rd down1.52213.7028.5%
Standard downs0.3015.1154.0%
Passing downs1.52618.3117.5%
Darrell Gill Jr. · WRUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA -0.020 · Total -0.040
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.020-0.0403.3%
Pass-0.020-0.0405.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.3521.3522.9%
2nd down-1.392-1.3924.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.020-0.0404.1%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Johntay Cook II · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.266 · Total 3.994
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2663.9943.0%
Pass0.3394.7485.2%
Rush-0.754-0.7540.5%
1st down0.1570.6271.7%
2nd down0.4934.4415.4%
3rd down-0.537-1.0752.2%
Standard downs-0.189-1.3251.9%
Passing downs0.6655.3195.7%
Luke Hasz · TEUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA 0.316 · Total 5.364
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3165.3642.9%
Pass0.3165.3645.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.066-0.6633.7%
2nd down1.0783.2341.5%
3rd down0.6982.7923.8%
Standard downs0.2222.8853.1%
Passing downs0.6202.4792.5%
Michael Smith · TEUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.291 · Total -3.487
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.291-3.4872.0%
Pass-0.291-3.4873.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.841-5.0482.2%
2nd down0.2731.0922.0%
3rd down0.2350.4701.9%
Standard downs-0.388-2.7141.6%
Passing downs-0.154-0.7723.1%
Samari Reed · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA 0.402 · Total 2.814
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4022.8142.0%
Pass0.4552.7293.6%
Rush0.0860.0860.6%
1st down0.5151.5441.8%
2nd down0.3171.2703.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.4442.2201.9%
Passing downs0.2970.5942.3%
Dillon Alfred · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 1.416 · Total 1.416
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.4161.4161.6%
Pass1.4161.4162.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.4161.4162.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.4161.4162.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Joshua Dye · RBUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA 0.324 · Total 1.620
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3241.6201.6%
Pass0.2860.5711.3%
Rush0.3501.0492.1%
1st down0.4221.2662.2%
2nd down0.1770.3541.9%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.3241.6202.2%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Ole Miss sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.233 (83rd percentile; 138 teams)83rdOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.496 (91st percentile; 138 teams)91stOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.176 (25th percentile; 138 teams)25thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.339 (81st percentile; 138 teams)81stOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.201 (87th percentile; 138 teams)87thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.109 (37th percentile; 138 teams)37thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.410 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.272 (32nd percentile; 138 teams)32ndDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.174 (72nd percentile; 138 teams)72nd
Values and percentiles
Ole Miss metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.23383rd138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.49691st138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.17625th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.33981st138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.20187th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.10937th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.41047th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.27232nd138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.17472nd138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 306 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.7 yards (51st percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.1 per completion. Completion 63.1%, 7.4 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.31.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense62.8%60.5%+2.3301 / 306
Defense allowed61.9%61.2%+0.7257 / 261

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Ole Miss.

Target mix by zone, Ole Miss offense
Short left30% · 89Short middle23% · 66Short right35% · 103Deep left3% · 10Deep middle3% · 10Deep right5% · 15

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Ole Miss passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense30699%8.74.163.1%0.31+2.3 pp301
Passing defense26199%8.36.162.5%0.23+0.7 pp257

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2684.751.4%0.243.301.100.9015.1%73.6%
Defense allowed2984.143.5%0.123.001.001.2021.0%75.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense263 / 26825995340258 / 259 · 99.6%
Defense allowed296 / 298291716360275 / 276 · 99.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +2.3 pp. 8 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-14.01.216.5W1W1 vs Louisville: -11.5 ppW2W2 vs Charlotte: +15.7 ppW3W3 vs LSU: +7.4 ppW4W4 vs Florida: +16.5 ppW6W6 vs Vanderbilt: +8.8 ppW7W7 vs Missouri: -0.8 ppW8W8 vs Texas: -14.0 ppW9W9 vs Auburn: +2.7 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Louisville373253.1%64.6%-11.5 pp6.10.46413.70.12
W2Charlotte343479.4%63.7%+15.7 pp6.00.36245.30.49
W3LSU484868.8%61.4%+7.4 pp8.50.36252.50.35
W4Florida343473.5%57.1%+16.5 pp11.50.35274.70.11
W6Vanderbilt303066.7%57.9%+8.8 pp10.20.47355.30.24
W7Missouri363655.6%56.4%-0.8 pp10.90.33387.00.45
W8Texas525248.1%62.1%-14.0 pp8.6-0.00294.4-0.04
W9Auburn353562.9%60.2%+2.7 pp8.10.26494.40.25

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

26 punts · 45.8 gross yards/punt · 42.2 net yards/punt

5 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 26/26 punts. Known net yards: 20/26 punts.

Our punt returns

5 returns · 9.0 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 5/5 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Auburn144.0—0/1
Week 8 · Texas743.339.45/7
Week 7 · Missouri443.040.73/4
Week 6 · Vanderbilt449.846.84/4
Week 4 · Florida353.740.52/3
Team style
Rating history