Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Pittsburgh

2026 season

ACC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Pittsburgh's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 45 across 8 systems; best 38, worst 60, so they disagree by 22 places.

Lab EPA
#54
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#45
up 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#38
up 62026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#45
up 72026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#40
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#60
down 8 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#45
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#54
down 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#47 of 138
Schedule strength
#58 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#51 of 138
Game control
#36 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#42 of 138
Offense
#68 of 138
Defense
#34 of 138
Special teams
#26 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Pittsburgh · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

6-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.033 net EPA/play

#54

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

4.62 points

#45 · Up 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 9 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +6.65 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -1.59, schedule #61 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +1.20. That is worth +5.06 on its own; the preseason prior of +2.91 still carries 21% of the weight, giving +4.62.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Pittsburgh · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Miami (OH)
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858207
+45.00 → +35.00-2.500.73497.53%-4.692.449-0.3532.095
Week 2 · UCF
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856790
+5.00 → +5.00-2.500.76377.83%-0.260.196-0.0200.176
Week 3 · Syracuse
home · 2026-09-17 · ID 401858225
+14.00 → +14.00-2.500.79378.14%-0.230.936-0.0190.917
Week 4 · Bucknell
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401858236
+59.00 → +35.00-2.500.82498.46%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.749-2.1140.634
Week 5 · Virginia Tech
away · 2026-10-02 · ID 401858245
+2.00 → +2.00+2.500.85728.79%+2.070.3960.1820.578
Week 6 · North Carolina
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858256
-4.00 → -4.00-2.500.89099.13%+4.39-0.5940.401-0.193
Week 7 · Boston College
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858267
-6.00 → -6.00+2.500.92599.49%-4.76-0.332-0.452-0.784
Week 8 · Miami
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858274
-29.00 → -29.00+2.500.96229.87%+18.22-2.6141.798-0.817
Week 9 · Georgia Tech
home · 2026-10-31 · ID 401858281
+23.00 → +23.00-2.501.000010.25%-6.672.102-0.6841.418

Game terms +4.02 points; prior term +0.60 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +4.62 points. The preseason prior is +2.91 with 20.51% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.4 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 9 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

9.3 SP+ points

#38 · Up 6 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

1.20 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#60 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -4.94 on 496 plays; defense -6.14 on 459 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Pittsburgh 9 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
6-3 · conf 3-3 · home 5-1 · away 1-2 · expected wins 6.6
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 5-4 ATS (+2.8 avg) · 2025: 8-5 ATS (+3.5 avg)
Head coach
Pat Narduzzi · hired 2014-12-16 · 18-20 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #41 (204 pts) · 2025 #51 (199 pts) · 2026 #44 (214 pts)
Returning
40% of production · 51% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing59%68%
Receiving24%26%
Rushing67%53%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back133.080.868811.29
Defensive Line113.000.86939.56
Linebacker123.250.879810.56
Offensive Line163.060.858213.73
Quarterback63.170.85955.16
Receiver133.080.865611.25
Running Back43.250.88053.52
Special Teams132.920.856911.14

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Holden Geriner · QB

CFBD athlete 4714300. Auburn (2022–2024); Pittsburgh (2026–2026); Texas State (2025–2025)

Passing WEPA0.07912532.6%
Pass 55.4% · Rush 7.7%

1st 22.2% · 2nd 41.2% · 3rd 38.6%

Standard downs 25.8% · Passing downs 48.2%

2022: 4★ · 0.9060
Mason Heintschel · QB

CFBD athlete 5208095. Pittsburgh (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.36512350.0%
Pass 83.0% · Rush 15.7%

1st 39.8% · 2nd 60.7% · 3rd 59.7%

Standard downs 41.5% · Passing downs 69.8%

2025: 3★ · 0.8772
Damon Ferguson Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5158978. Pittsburgh (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.18611622.0%
Pass 7.8% · Rush 37.1%

1st 29.6% · 2nd 17.6% · 3rd 13.2%

Standard downs 25.9% · Passing downs 13.2%

2026: 4★ · 0.9224
La'Vell Wright · RB

CFBD athlete 4683234. Kentucky (2021–2023); Western Kentucky (2025–2025); Pittsburgh (2026–2026); Austin Peay (2024–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.1327915.6%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 25.5%

1st 17.3% · 2nd 12.4% · 3rd 15.9%

Standard downs 18.2% · Passing downs 10.1%

2021: 3★ · 0.8630
Ja'Kyrian Turner · RB

CFBD athlete 5141677. Pittsburgh (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1283118.7%
Pass 9.8% · Rush 30.6%

1st 22.0% · 2nd 17.1% · 3rd 17.1%

Standard downs 20.3% · Passing downs 15.6%

2025: 3★ · 0.8550
Antonio Chadha · PK

CFBD athlete 5092428. Western Kentucky (2023–2023); Rutgers (2022–2022); Pittsburgh (2026–2026); Western Illinois (2024–2025)

Kicker PAAR7.91013—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Benny Haselrig · WR

CFBD athlete 5154315. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.2%
Pass 2.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Bryan Hamilton · WR

CFBD athlete 5271365. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 3.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.5% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Bryce Yates · WR

CFBD athlete 5210164. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.7%
Pass 7.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 3.6% · 3rd 5.0%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Cam Sapp · WR

CFBD athlete 5141640. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Carson Kent · TE

CFBD athlete 5083135. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.6%
Pass 13.2% · Rush 0.3%

1st 4.1% · 2nd 10.4% · 3rd 5.8%

Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 8.8%

Not linked
Cataurus Hicks · WR

CFBD athlete 5102556. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.3%
Pass 18.8% · Rush 0.3%

1st 9.2% · 2nd 9.0% · 3rd 10.7%

Standard downs 7.8% · Passing downs 12.7%

Not linked
Censere Lee · WR

CFBD athlete 5089539. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 12.2% · Rush 0.3%

1st 5.1% · 2nd 5.4% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 7.4%

Not linked
Corey Dailey · QB

CFBD athlete 5207640. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.1%
Pass 23.9% · Rush 2.0%

1st 10.9% · 2nd 16.8% · 3rd 13.5%

Standard downs 12.1% · Passing downs 15.5%

Not linked
Demetrice McCray · WR

CFBD athlete 5281153. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 1.3%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Dylan Wester · WR

CFBD athlete 5271371. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 3.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 1.8% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Elijah Lagg · TE

CFBD athlete 5296040. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 6.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Jaylin Brown · RB

CFBD athlete 5198312. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 1.8% · Rush 7.9%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 3.7%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 1.2%

Not linked
Justin Cook · RB

CFBD athlete 5296232. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 1.1% · Rush 6.6%

1st 4.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.6%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Malik Knight · WR

CFBD athlete 5089549. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.4%
Pass 13.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 6.0%

Standard downs 5.6% · Passing downs 8.2%

Not linked
Synkwan Smith · RB

CFBD athlete 5216547. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.0%
Pass 2.0% · Rush 29.0%

1st 12.5% · 2nd 11.1% · 3rd 14.3%

Standard downs 11.9% · Passing downs 12.5%

Not linked
Tony Kinsler · WR

CFBD athlete 5212611. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 5.6% · Rush 0.7%

1st 2.2% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 2.8%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 5.1%

Not linked
Truitt Brown · TE

CFBD athlete 5228043. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.2%
Pass 2.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Tyreek Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 5196024. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 1.6%

1st 5.2% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 16 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Alex Sanford Jr. · LBPurdue2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Carson Kent · TEOklahoma2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
DeMarco Ward · LBMemphis2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Elijah Lagg · TEUAB2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Eliyt Nairne · DLTulane2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Gabe Russo · PIdaho State2026-01-092★ / —Immediate
Holden Geriner · QBTexas State2026-01-163★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jeremiah Warren · DLIllinois2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Justin Schmidt · LSPurdue2026-01-092★ / —Immediate
Kanye Thompson · CBSlippery Rock2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Keylen Davis · IOLAkron2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
La'Vell Wright · RBWestern Kentucky2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Malik Knight · WRWestern Carolina2026-01-073★ / 0.8300Immediate
Netinho Olivieri · OTPennsylvania2026-01-043★ / 0.8300Immediate
Raion Strader · CBAuburn2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Sam Hunsaker · KNorthern Arizona2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Outgoing · 21 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Caleb Holmes · IOLJacksonville State2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cole Gonzales · QBCharlotte2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Davion Pritchard · CBKent State2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Derrick Davis Jr. · RBNot reported2026-01-034★ / —Immediate
Eli Holstein · QBVirginia2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Francis Brewu · DLNotre Dame2026-01-134★ / 0.9400Immediate
Henry Searcy · LSCharlotte2026-01-123★ / 0.8000Immediate
Jackson Brown · IOLUNLV2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jahsear Whittington · DLNebraska2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jesse Anderson · SKentucky2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Juelz Goff · RBBoise State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kenny Johnson · WRTexas Tech2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Lyndon Cooper · IOLVanderbilt2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Malachi Thomas · TELSU2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Maverick Gracio · EDGEBall State2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Rasheem Biles · LBTexas2026-01-114★ / 0.9300Immediate
Sam Carpenter · KSam Houston2026-01-15— / —Immediate
Shawn Lee Jr. · CBNot reported2026-01-024★ / 0.9000Immediate
Tai Ray · OTWestern Kentucky2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Trey Butkowski · KMichigan2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Zion Fowler-El · WRWagner2026-01-233★ / 0.8400Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Pittsburgh. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Pat Narduzzi · career 80–61 across 12 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 31 appointments
  1. 2015–present · Pat Narduzzi · active at capture

    80–61 · 141 attributed games · 12 seasons

    Hired 2014-12-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2012–2014 · Paul Chryst

    19–19 · 38 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-22. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2011–2011 · Todd Graham

    6–6 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2011-01-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2010–2010 · Phil Bennett · interim

    1–0 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2011-01-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2005–2010 · Dave Wannstedt

    42–31 · 73 attributed games · 6 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2004-12-23. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1997–2004 · Walt Harris

    52–44 · 96 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1993–1996 · Johnny Majors

    12–32 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1992–1992 · Sal Sunseri

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1990–1992 · Paul Hackett

    12–20–1 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1986–1989 · Mike Gottfried

    26–17–2 · 45 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1982–1985 · Foge Fazio

    25–18–3 · 46 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1977–1981 · Jackie Sherrill

    50–9–1 · 60 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1973–1976 · Johnny Majors

    33–13–1 · 47 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1969–1972 · Carl DePasqua

    13–29 · 42 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1966–1968 · Dave Hart

    3–27 · 30 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1955–1965 · John Michelosen

    56–49–7 · 112 attributed games · 11 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1954–1954 · Thomas Hamilton

    4–2 · 6 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1952–1954 · Red Dawson

    9–11–1 · 21 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1951–1951 · Thomas Hamilton

    3–7 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1950–1950 · Len Casanova

    1–8 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1947–1949 · Walter Milligan

    13–14 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1946–1946 · Wesley Fesler

    3–5–1 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  23. 1943–1945 · Clark Shaughnessy

    10–17 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  24. 1939–1942 · Charles Bowser

    14–20–1 · 35 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  25. 1924–1938 · Jock Sutherland

    111–20–12 · 143 attributed games · 15 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  26. 1915–1923 · Pop Warner

    60–12–4 · 76 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  27. 1913–1914 · Joseph Duff

    14–3–1 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  28. 1908–1912 · Joseph Thompson

    30–14–2 · 46 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  29. 1907–1907 · John Moorhead

    8–2 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  30. 1906–1906 · Edgar Wingard

    6–4 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  31. 1905–1905 · Arthur Mosse

    10–2 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Pat Narduzzi · incomplete attribution0–0——9.45.744—
2025 · Pat Narduzzi8–56–20–18.41051—
2024 · Pat Narduzzi7–63–50–14.94.541—
2023 · Pat Narduzzi3–92–60–0-7.3-3.351—
2022 · Pat Narduzzi9–45–31–08.66.37622
2021 · Pat Narduzzi11–38–10–117.610.82613
2020 · Pat Narduzzi6–55–50–06—44—
2019 · Pat Narduzzi8–54–41–04.1-0.558—
2018 · Pat Narduzzi7–76–30–12.75.847—
2017 · Pat Narduzzi5–73–50–063.937—
2016 · Pat Narduzzi8–55–30–113.110.630—
2015 · Pat Narduzzi8–56–20–111.18.946—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:05:33 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play58 / 13858.429 / 13879.6
Success rate52 / 13862.85 / 13897.1
Explosiveness106 / 13823.4137 / 1380.7
Standard-down success52 / 13862.83 / 13898.5
Passing-down success52 / 13862.837 / 13873.7
Pass PPA51 / 13863.576 / 13845.3
Rush PPA88 / 13836.58 / 13894.9
Pass explosiveness54 / 13861.3134 / 1382.9
Rush explosiveness132 / 1384.4112 / 13819.0
Line yards33 / 13876.63 / 13898.5
Second-level yards48 / 13865.717 / 13888.3
Open-field yards106 / 13823.446 / 13867.2
Stuff rate33 / 13876.64 / 13897.8
Power successT89 / 13835.4T24 / 13882.8
Havoc15 / 13889.8T26 / 13881.4
Front-seven havocT15 / 13889.422 / 13884.7
DB havocT63 / 13854.0T66 / 13851.1
Points / opportunity78 / 13843.836 / 13874.5
Average field positionT28 / 13879.2T56 / 13859.1
Field-position expected points21 / 13885.469 / 13850.4

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Mason Heintschel · QBUsage 50.0% · Avg PPA 0.421 · Total 74.523
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.42174.52350.0%
Pass0.45769.02383.0%
Rush0.2125.50015.7%
1st down0.28418.15239.8%
2nd down0.24417.30160.7%
3rd down0.98839.50559.7%
Standard downs0.29930.81541.5%
Passing downs0.59143.70869.8%
Holden Geriner · QBUsage 32.6% · Avg PPA 0.016 · Total 2.318
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0162.31832.6%
Pass0.0334.33455.4%
Rush-0.126-2.0177.7%
1st down0.0100.45722.2%
2nd down0.25115.83341.2%
3rd down0.2899.23738.6%
Standard downs-0.048-3.93725.8%
Passing downs0.0936.25548.2%
Damon Ferguson Jr. · RBUsage 22.0% · Avg PPA 0.078 · Total 11.222
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.07811.22222.0%
Pass-0.131-3.2837.8%
Rush0.12214.50537.1%
1st down0.0413.58229.6%
2nd down0.2168.44217.6%
3rd down0.1101.75713.2%
Standard downs0.0607.06025.9%
Passing downs0.1544.16213.2%
Ja'Kyrian Turner · RBUsage 18.7% · Avg PPA 0.116 · Total 4.854
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1164.85418.7%
Pass0.5286.3409.8%
Rush-0.050-1.48630.6%
1st down0.0461.00922.0%
2nd down0.1411.83917.1%
3rd down0.2872.00617.1%
Standard downs0.0511.52820.3%
Passing downs0.2773.32615.6%
La'Vell Wright · RBUsage 15.6% · Avg PPA 0.068 · Total 6.062
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0686.06215.6%
Pass0.0961.4445.6%
Rush0.0624.61825.5%
1st down0.0903.97617.3%
2nd down-0.175-4.20712.4%
3rd down0.3345.67115.9%
Standard downs0.0755.26418.2%
Passing downs0.0420.79810.1%
Corey Dailey · QBUsage 13.1% · Avg PPA 0.189 · Total 7.374
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1897.37413.1%
Pass0.37612.79223.9%
Rush0.5031.5102.0%
1st down0.5848.75710.9%
2nd down0.2464.18516.8%
3rd down-0.795-5.56813.5%
Standard downs0.50913.22412.1%
Passing downs-0.450-5.84915.5%
Synkwan Smith · RBUsage 12.0% · Avg PPA 0.085 · Total 0.854
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0850.85412.0%
Pass1.1491.1492.0%
Rush-0.033-0.29529.0%
1st down0.1620.81112.5%
2nd down0.1270.38011.1%
3rd down-0.169-0.33814.3%
Standard downs0.0040.02911.9%
Passing downs0.4120.82512.5%
Cataurus Hicks · WRUsage 9.3% · Avg PPA 0.510 · Total 31.100
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.51031.1009.3%
Pass0.58635.14218.8%
Rush-4.042-4.0420.3%
1st down0.52714.2419.2%
2nd down0.61512.3039.0%
3rd down0.6718.72110.7%
Standard downs0.30810.7917.8%
Passing downs0.78120.30812.7%
Carson Kent · TEUsage 6.6% · Avg PPA 0.542 · Total 23.293
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.54223.2936.6%
Pass0.50321.12313.2%
Rush2.1702.1700.3%
1st down0.5236.2754.1%
2nd down0.1523.50610.4%
3rd down1.62011.3425.8%
Standard downs0.55813.9515.5%
Passing downs0.5199.3428.8%
Malik Knight · WRUsage 6.4% · Avg PPA 0.317 · Total 9.193
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3179.1936.4%
Pass0.3179.19313.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.169-2.0246.1%
2nd down0.7839.3927.7%
3rd down0.3651.8256.0%
Standard downs-0.037-0.6315.6%
Passing downs0.8199.8248.2%
Censere Lee · WRUsage 6.1% · Avg PPA 0.297 · Total 11.863
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.29711.8636.1%
Pass0.31912.44712.2%
Rush-0.584-0.5840.3%
1st down0.1382.0655.1%
2nd down-0.030-0.3615.4%
3rd down1.36413.6398.3%
Standard downs0.2245.5905.5%
Passing downs0.4186.2737.4%
Jaylin Brown · RBUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA -0.172 · Total -2.408
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.172-2.4084.5%
Pass0.4021.2051.8%
Rush-0.328-3.6137.9%
1st down-0.053-0.4255.6%
2nd down0.8842.6532.9%
3rd down-0.200-0.4013.7%
Standard downs-0.309-4.0215.8%
Passing downs1.6131.6131.2%
Justin Cook · RBUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA -0.039 · Total -0.546
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.039-0.5463.8%
Pass-1.715-3.4301.1%
Rush0.2402.8846.6%
1st down-0.072-0.5754.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.7973.9847.6%
Standard downs0.1431.4283.9%
Passing downs-0.494-1.9753.5%
Tyreek Robinson · WRUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA 1.041 · Total 6.244
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0416.2443.8%
Pass1.3356.6775.2%
Rush-0.434-0.4341.6%
1st down1.2054.8205.2%
2nd down0.7121.4243.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.2616.3064.1%
Passing downs-0.062-0.0622.7%
Bryce Yates · WRUsage 3.7% · Avg PPA 0.578 · Total 13.877
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.57813.8773.7%
Pass0.57813.8777.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6305.0422.7%
2nd down0.9047.2333.6%
3rd down1.6389.8285.0%
Standard downs0.3615.0523.1%
Passing downs0.8838.8264.9%
Elijah Lagg · TEUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.519 · Total 5.190
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5195.1903.4%
Pass0.5195.1906.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5882.3523.0%
2nd down0.4732.8386.1%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1761.0592.8%
Passing downs1.0334.1315.0%
Demetrice McCray · WRUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA 0.750 · Total 7.498
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7507.4983.2%
Pass0.8897.1095.2%
Rush0.1950.3891.3%
1st down0.5372.1472.7%
2nd down0.9164.5794.9%
3rd down0.7720.7721.9%
Standard downs0.7507.4984.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Tony Kinsler · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA 0.042 · Total 0.749
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0420.7493.0%
Pass-0.044-0.7035.6%
Rush0.7261.4520.7%
1st down0.2431.4562.2%
2nd down0.0300.2704.5%
3rd down-0.326-0.9782.8%
Standard downs0.1831.6502.2%
Passing downs-0.100-0.9015.1%
Bryan Hamilton · WRUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 1.867 · Total 3.734
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.8673.7342.4%
Pass1.8673.7343.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.969-0.9692.5%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.8673.7343.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Cam Sapp · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 4.078 · Total 4.078
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall4.0784.0781.7%
Pass4.0784.0782.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down4.0784.0784.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs4.0784.0782.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Dylan Wester · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA 0.727 · Total 2.181
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7272.1811.7%
Pass0.7272.1813.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1450.2902.4%
2nd down1.8901.8901.8%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.7272.1812.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Benny Haselrig · WRUsage 1.2% · Avg PPA -1.055 · Total -1.055
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.055-1.0551.2%
Pass-1.055-1.0552.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-1.055-1.0557.1%
Standard downs-1.055-1.0551.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Truitt Brown · TEUsage 1.2% · Avg PPA -0.694 · Total -0.694
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.694-0.6941.2%
Pass-0.694-0.6942.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.694-0.6943.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.694-0.6941.5%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Pittsburgh sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.146 (58th percentile; 138 teams)58thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.444 (63rd percentile; 138 teams)63rdOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.173 (23rd percentile; 138 teams)23rdOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.267 (64th percentile; 138 teams)64thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.056 (36th percentile; 138 teams)36thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.005 (80th percentile; 138 teams)80thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.330 (97th percentile; 138 teams)97thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.506 (1st percentile; 138 teams)1stDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.184 (81st percentile; 138 teams)81st
Values and percentiles
Pittsburgh metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.14658th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.44463rd138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.17323rd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.26764th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.05636th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.00580th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.33097th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.5061st138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.18481st138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 98% of 317 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.2 yards (67th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.6 per completion. Completion 60.9%, 7.9 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.28.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense57.4%60.8%-3.5258 / 317
Defense allowed64.2%62.0%+2.2271 / 304

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Pittsburgh.

Target mix by zone, Pittsburgh offense
Short left25% · 77Short middle23% · 70Short right37% · 112Deep left6% · 19Deep middle1% · 4Deep right7% · 22

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Pittsburgh passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense31798%9.25.660.9%0.28-3.5 pp258
Passing defense30498%8.15.463.2%0.26+2.2 pp271

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense3314.646.7%0.103.301.200.9013.3%70.0%
Defense allowed2722.431.3%-0.112.100.800.6024.3%63.6%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense324 / 331317149570314 / 315 · 99.7%
Defense allowed264 / 2722324022671242 / 243 · 99.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -3.5 pp. 8 of 9 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-19.2-1.316.7W1W1 vs Miami (OH): +16.7 ppW2W2 vs UCF: +1.1 ppW3W3 vs Syracuse: -17.5 ppW4W5W5 vs Virginia Tech: -3.7 ppW6W6 vs North Carolina: -2.7 ppW7W7 vs Boston College: -13.9 ppW8W8 vs Miami: -0.2 ppW9W9 vs Georgia Tech: -19.2 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Miami (OH)454276.2%59.5%+16.7 pp10.50.76315.40.10
W2UCF292962.1%61.0%+1.1 pp8.20.33432.4-0.17
W3Syracuse232343.5%61.0%-17.5 pp8.3-0.23376.60.48
W4Bucknell530———8.70.78306.60.22
W5Virginia Tech303060.0%63.7%-3.7 pp7.80.25303.60.13
W6North Carolina444461.4%64.1%-2.7 pp7.7-0.13413.7-0.06
W7Boston College252544.0%57.9%-13.9 pp11.40.08395.00.10
W8Miami353259.4%59.6%-0.2 pp10.50.41253.1-0.03
W9Georgia Tech333339.4%58.6%-19.2 pp10.4-0.25555.10.14

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

36 punts · 43.6 gross yards/punt · 41.3 net yards/punt

9 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 36/36 punts. Known net yards: 31/36 punts.

Our punt returns

20 returns · 8.1 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 20/20 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Georgia Tech547.035.03/5
Week 8 · Miami644.339.76/6
Week 7 · Boston College148.070.01/1
Week 6 · North Carolina334.336.52/3
Week 5 · Virginia Tech646.851.05/6
Team style
Rating history