Record
4-5 wins–losses
No rank assigned
Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.
2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00
SP+ workbook recordStanford
2026 season
ACC
2026 preseason report
Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.
What every system says
Stanford's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 118 across 8 systems; best 107, worst 129, so they disagree by 22 places.
- Lab EPA
- #129
- Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- Lab SRS
- #113
- down 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- SP+
- #118
- down 62026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
- Elo
- #126
- up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- FPI
- #108
- down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CORE
- #118
- down 7 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CFBD SRS
- #107
- down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- WEPA
- #129
- up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI context
ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026
Résumé and schedule
Results earned and schedule difficulty
- Strength of record
- #57 of 138
- Schedule strength
- #6 of 138
- Remaining schedule strength
- #61 of 138
- Game control
- #75 of 138
Unit efficiency
Performance by unit
- Overall
- #110 of 138
- Offense
- #94 of 138
- Defense
- #118 of 138
- Special teams
- #70 of 138
Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.
Why the ratings disagree
Stanford · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.
Descriptive EPA
-0.184 net EPA/play
#129
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.
2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge
Lab EPA from CFBD playsLocal predictive SRS
-8.16 points
#113 · Down 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff
2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
This season's 9 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -12.65 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +3.09, schedule #18 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +6.92. That is worth -9.56 on its own; the preseason prior of -2.73 still carries 21% of the weight, giving -8.16.
How each game enters this SRS rating
Stanford · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.
| Game | Raw margin → transformed | Venue adjustment | Recency weight | Fit share | Opponent rating | Margin term | Opponent term | Total term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 · Hawai'i home · 2026-08-29 · ID 401858201 | +10.00 → +10.00 | -2.50 | 0.7349 | 7.56% | -7.49 | 0.567 | -0.566 | 0.001 |
| Week 1 · Miami home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858206 | -39.00 → -35.00 | -2.50 | 0.7349 | 7.56% | +18.22 | -2.834 | 1.377 | -1.457 |
| Week 3 · Duke away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858231 | -28.00 → -28.00 | +2.50 | 0.7937 | 8.16% | +7.01 | -2.081 | 0.572 | -1.509 |
| Week 4 · Georgia Tech home · 2026-09-27 · ID 401858240 | +7.00 → +7.00 | -2.50 | 0.8249 | 8.48% | -6.67 | 0.382 | -0.566 | -0.184 |
| Week 5 · Wake Forest away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401858251 | -54.00 → -35.00 | +2.50 | 0.8572 | 8.82% | +14.40 | -2.865 | 1.269 | -1.596 |
| Week 6 · Notre Dame away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401858257 | -51.00 → -35.00 | +2.50 | 0.8909 | 9.16% | +19.45 | -2.977 | 1.782 | -1.195 |
| Week 7 · Elon home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401858262 | +27.00 → +27.00 | -2.50 | 0.9259 | 9.52% | -25.00 (fixed lower division) | 2.333 | -2.380 | -0.048 |
| Week 8 · NC State home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401858272 | +3.00 → +3.00 | -2.50 | 0.9622 | 9.89% | -0.95 | 0.049 | -0.094 | -0.045 |
| Week 9 · Louisville away · 2026-10-31 · ID 401858283 | -28.00 → -28.00 | +2.50 | 1.0000 | 10.28% | +10.31 | -2.622 | 1.060 | -1.562 |
Game terms -7.59 points; prior term -0.56 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -8.16 points. The preseason prior is -2.73 with 20.57% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.
These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.4 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.
Download fitted terms and source hashesEstimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 9 current games; prior available.
2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00
Lab SRS from CFBD scoresExternal SP+
-13.1 SP+ points
#118 · Down 6 places
2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.
2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00
Bill Connelly SP+ workbookExternal CORE
-13.55 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays
#118 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -1.54 on 399 plays; defense 12.01 on 454 plays.
2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00
CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defenseEPA ranks Stanford 16 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.
Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.
Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidenceProgram context
2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches- Record
- 4-5 · conf 2-4 · home 4-1 · away 0-4 · expected wins 3.2
- Polls (Week 10)
- unranked
- CFP latest
- unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
- CFP final
- not published
- Against the spread
- 2026: 3-6 ATS (-7.7 avg) · 2025: 5-7 ATS (+4.2 avg)
- Head coach
- Tavita Pritchard · hired 2025-11-28 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
- Recruiting classes
- 2024 #30 (217 pts) · 2025 #56 (197 pts) · 2026 #37 (219 pts)
- Returning
- 21% of production · 30% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
Category Production Usage Passing -1% 1% Receiving 31% 32% Rushing 135% 63% Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.
Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.
Recruiting by position group
2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC
| Position group | Commits | Avg. stars | Avg. rating | Total rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive Back | 16 | 3.13 | 0.8625 | 13.80 |
| Defensive Line | 16 | 3.13 | 0.8730 | 13.97 |
| Linebacker | 9 | 3.00 | 0.8560 | 7.70 |
| Offensive Line | 15 | 3.07 | 0.8713 | 13.07 |
| Quarterback | 4 | 3.50 | 0.8934 | 3.57 |
| Receiver | 16 | 3.13 | 0.8728 | 13.97 |
| Running Back | 5 | 3.00 | 0.8746 | 4.37 |
| Special Teams | 10 | 3.10 | 0.8609 | 8.61 |
Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.
Player efficiency and usage
2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTCPassing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions
| Player / history | Metric | Value | Plays / attempts | Overall usage | Usage detail | Recruiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Davis Warren · QBCFBD athlete 4878681. Stanford (2026–2026); Michigan (2022–2025) | Passing WEPA | 0.299 | 287 | 54.7% | Pass 95.7% · Rush 5.4%1st 43.9% · 2nd 58.4% · 3rd 69.4% Standard downs 47.1% · Passing downs 69.8% | Not linked |
Micah Ford · RBCFBD athlete 5143191. Stanford (2024–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.109 | 141 | 31.8% | Pass 11.0% · Rush 60.3%1st 40.5% · 2nd 28.4% · 3rd 21.0% Standard downs 36.3% · Passing downs 22.8% | 2024: 3★ · 0.8719 |
Sedrick Irvin · RBCFBD athlete 4870802. Stanford (2023–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.131 | 43 | 10.1% | Pass 3.7% · Rush 19.1%1st 10.3% · 2nd 9.5% · 3rd 11.3% Standard downs 11.0% · Passing downs 8.4% | 2023: 3★ · 0.8850 |
Emmet Kenney · PKCFBD athlete 4875315. Stanford (2021–2026) | Kicker PAAR | -2.740 | 9 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | Not linked |
Aiden Black · TECFBD athlete 5219250. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.1% | Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.2% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 1.7% | Not linked |
Atticus Joseph · WRCFBD athlete 5294219. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.6% | Pass 6.6% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.0% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 4.8% Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 3.7% | Not linked |
Benjamin Blackburn · TECFBD athlete 5146764. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 7.8% | Pass 14.4% · Rush 0.0%1st 7.3% · 2nd 7.4% · 3rd 10.5% Standard downs 6.8% · Passing downs 9.9% | Not linked |
Caden High · WRCFBD athlete 5231354. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 11.0% | Pass 19.5% · Rush 0.5%1st 6.6% · 2nd 14.8% · 3rd 14.7% Standard downs 10.4% · Passing downs 12.0% | Not linked |
Caleb Hampton · RBCFBD athlete 5156056. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.8% | Pass 1.9% · Rush 9.2%1st 6.1% · 2nd 7.0% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 6.4% · Passing downs 1.9% | Not linked |
Charlie Mirer · QBCFBD athlete 4914482. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.5% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.8%1st 5.0% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 7.1% | Not linked |
Chico Holt · TECFBD athlete 5077804. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.3% | Pass 4.1% · Rush 0.0%1st 2.9% · 2nd 1.7% · 3rd 1.3% Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 2.3% | Not linked |
Chris Davis Jr. · RBCFBD athlete 5079371. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.2% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 7.8%1st 3.6% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 1.8% Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 1.1% | Not linked |
David Pantelis · WRCFBD athlete 4883119. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.7% | Pass 2.5% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Jacob Butler · WRCFBD athlete 5279420. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.4% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 3.1%1st 1.6% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 1.0% · Passing downs 2.3% | Not linked |
Jonanthony Hall · WRCFBD athlete 5208218. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.7% | Pass 8.3% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.8% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 7.3% Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 7.4% | Not linked |
Jordan Onovughe · WRCFBD athlete 5114313. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.4% | Pass 7.9% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.5% · 2nd 4.1% · 3rd 6.3% Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 6.5% | Not linked |
Langdon Horace · WRCFBD athlete 5209298. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.4% | Pass 2.6% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 3.3% Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 2.3% | Not linked |
Liam Thorpe · WRCFBD athlete 5212732. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.2% | Pass 8.3% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.3% · 2nd 7.8% · 3rd 2.1% Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 5.4% | Not linked |
Marcus Brown · WRCFBD athlete 5219242. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.5% | Pass 2.3% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Mike Mitchell Jr. · QBCFBD athlete 5211073. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.5% | Pass 6.9% · Rush 1.0%1st 3.4% · 2nd 3.4% · 3rd 5.4% Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 7.1% | Not linked |
Nico Brown · WRCFBD athlete 5094032. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 9.5% | Pass 17.6% · Rush 0.0%1st 8.6% · 2nd 7.4% · 3rd 10.6% Standard downs 9.2% · Passing downs 10.1% | Not linked |
Tuna Altahir · RBCFBD athlete 4876144. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.9% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 6.7%1st 0.0% · 2nd 8.7% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 3.3% | Not linked |
Tyler Kuo · WRCFBD athlete 5125795. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.4% | Pass 2.7% · Rush 0.0%1st 3.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Zion Robinson · WRCFBD athlete 5217152. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.1% | Pass 7.5% · Rush 0.0%1st 4.3% · 2nd 3.9% · 3rd 3.0% Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 4.2% | Not linked |
Transfers
Incoming · 6 reported
| Player | From | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aidan Kilstrom · IOL | Harvard | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Carter Shaw · WR | UCLA | 2026-01-27 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Dara Adeyemi · OT | Bucknell | 2026-01-19 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Davis Warren · QB | Michigan | 2026-01-08 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Leroy Bryant · CB | Washington | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Nico Brown · WR | Yale | 2026-01-21 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
Outgoing · 12 reported
| Player | To | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJ Hawkins · TE | Rhode Island | 2026-01-21 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Charlie Mirer · QB | Not reported | 2026-02-09 | 3★ / — | Withdrawn |
| Che Ojarikre · S | Duke | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Cole Tabb · RB | Cincinnati | 2026-01-05 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Elijah Brown · QB | Washington | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Emeka Ugorji · OT | Florida | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Jack Leyrer · OT | Auburn | 2026-01-18 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Jason Thompson · WR | Not reported | 2025-12-16 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Myles Jackson · QB | Not reported | 2026-01-05 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Myles Libman · WR | New Mexico State | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Wilfredo Aybar · EDGE | Not reported | 2026-01-20 | 4★ / — | Withdrawn |
| Zak Yamauchi · IOL | BYU | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.
Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.
Coaching eras
Continuous appointments at Stanford. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.
Tavita Pritchard · career 0–0 across 1 seasons and 1 schools
Tenure timeline · 28 appointments
2026–present · Tavita Pritchard · active at capture
0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons
Hired 2025-11-28. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2025–2025 · Frank Reich · interim
4–8 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons
Hired 2025-03-31. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2023–2024 · Troy Taylor
6–18 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons
Hired 2022-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2011–2022 · David Shaw
96–54 · 150 attributed games · 12 seasons
Hired 2011-12-13. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2007–2010 · Jim Harbaugh
29–21 · 50 attributed games · 4 seasons
Hired 2006-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2005–2006 · Walt Harris
6–17 · 23 attributed games · 2 seasons
Hired 2004-12-13. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2002–2004 · Buddy Teevens
10–23 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons
Hired 2002-01-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.
1995–2001 · Tyrone Willingham
44–36–1 · 81 attributed games · 7 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1992–1994 · Bill Walsh
17–17–1 · 35 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1989–1991 · Dennis Green
16–18 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1984–1988 · Jack Elway
25–29–2 · 56 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1980–1983 · Paul Wiggin
16–28 · 44 attributed games · 4 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1979–1979 · Ron Dowhower
5–5–1 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1977–1978 · Bill Walsh
17–7 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1972–1976 · Jack Christiansen
30–22–3 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1963–1971 · John Ralston
55–36–3 · 94 attributed games · 9 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1958–1962 · Jack Curtice
14–36 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1951–1957 · Chuck Taylor
40–29–2 · 71 attributed games · 7 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1946–1950 · Marchy Schwartz
22–24–4 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1942–1942 · Marchy Schwartz
6–4 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1940–1941 · Clark Shaughnessy
16–3 · 19 attributed games · 2 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1933–1939 · Tiny Thornhill
35–25–7 · 67 attributed games · 7 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1924–1932 · Pop Warner
71–17–8 · 96 attributed games · 9 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1922–1923 · Andrew Kerr
11–7 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1921–1921 · Conrad Van Gent
4–2–2 · 8 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1920–1920 · Walter Powell
4–3 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1919–1919 · Bob Evans
4–3 · 7 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1918–1918 · A.H. Badenoch
0–4 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
Season résumé · 2015–2026
Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.
| Season / coach | Record | Conference | Postseason | SP+ | SRS | Recruiting rank | Final poll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · Tavita Pritchard · incomplete attribution | 0–0 | — | — | -11.2 | -8.8 | 37 | — |
| 2025 · Frank Reich | 4–8 | 3–5 | 0–0 | -11.8 | -4.1 | 56 | — |
| 2024 · Troy Taylor | 3–9 | 2–6 | 0–0 | -8.2 | -5.7 | 30 | — |
| 2023 · Troy Taylor | 3–9 | 2–7 | 0–0 | -11.9 | -5.5 | 46 | — |
| 2022 · David Shaw | 3–9 | 1–8 | 0–0 | -7.2 | -5.1 | 19 | — |
| 2021 · David Shaw | 3–9 | 2–7 | 0–0 | -10.2 | -2.7 | 51 | — |
| 2020 · David Shaw | 4–2 | 4–2 | 0–0 | 1.6 | — | 21 | — |
| 2019 · David Shaw | 4–8 | 3–6 | 0–0 | -4.7 | -1.9 | 21 | — |
| 2018 · David Shaw | 9–4 | 6–3 | 1–0 | 13 | 8.3 | 40 | — |
| 2017 · David Shaw | 9–5 | 7–3 | 0–1 | 15.8 | 12.5 | 14 | 20 |
| 2016 · David Shaw | 10–3 | 6–3 | 1–0 | 16.4 | 12.7 | 16 | 12 |
| 2015 · David Shaw | 12–2 | 9–1 | 1–0 | 22.8 | 20.6 | 24 | 3 |
Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.
CFBD season overview
2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.
Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data
Stat rankings
CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:05:11 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.
| Statistic | Offense rank / population | Percentile | Defense rank / population | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPA / play | 91 / 138 | 34.3 | 138 / 138 | 0.0 |
| Success rate | 123 / 138 | 10.9 | 133 / 138 | 3.6 |
| Explosiveness | 36 / 138 | 74.5 | 119 / 138 | 13.9 |
| Standard-down success | 94 / 138 | 32.1 | 131 / 138 | 5.1 |
| Passing-down success | 135 / 138 | 2.2 | 135 / 138 | 2.2 |
| Pass PPA | 85 / 138 | 38.7 | 134 / 138 | 2.9 |
| Rush PPA | 114 / 138 | 17.5 | 137 / 138 | 0.7 |
| Pass explosiveness | 50 / 138 | 64.2 | 74 / 138 | 46.7 |
| Rush explosiveness | 86 / 138 | 38.0 | 133 / 138 | 3.6 |
| Line yards | 102 / 138 | 26.3 | 133 / 138 | 3.6 |
| Second-level yards | 131 / 138 | 5.1 | 132 / 138 | 4.4 |
| Open-field yards | 110 / 138 | 20.4 | 132 / 138 | 4.4 |
| Stuff rate | 70 / 138 | 49.6 | 111 / 138 | 19.7 |
| Power success | 3 / 138 | 98.5 | 126 / 138 | 8.8 |
| Havoc | T29 / 138 | 78.1 | 133 / 138 | 3.6 |
| Front-seven havoc | T22 / 138 | 84.3 | T132 / 138 | 4.0 |
| DB havoc | T66 / 138 | 50.0 | T116 / 138 | 15.3 |
| Points / opportunity | 92 / 138 | 33.6 | 138 / 138 | 0.0 |
| Average field position | 137 / 138 | 0.7 | 114 / 138 | 17.5 |
| Field-position expected points | 136 / 138 | 1.5 | 117 / 138 | 15.3 |
Player PPA and usage
Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.
Davis Warren · QBUsage 54.7% · Avg PPA 0.192 · Total 63.039
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.192 | 63.039 | 54.7% |
| Pass | 0.211 | 65.946 | 95.7% |
| Rush | -0.097 | -1.359 | 5.4% |
| 1st down | 0.165 | 18.957 | 43.9% |
| 2nd down | 0.325 | 36.057 | 58.4% |
| 3rd down | 0.218 | 18.742 | 69.4% |
| Standard downs | 0.164 | 30.901 | 47.1% |
| Passing downs | 0.228 | 32.138 | 69.8% |
Micah Ford · RBUsage 31.8% · Avg PPA 0.154 · Total 29.400
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.154 | 29.400 | 31.8% |
| Pass | 0.270 | 9.722 | 11.0% |
| Rush | 0.127 | 19.678 | 60.3% |
| 1st down | 0.021 | 2.236 | 40.5% |
| 2nd down | 0.105 | 5.685 | 28.4% |
| 3rd down | 0.522 | 13.575 | 21.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.190 | 27.593 | 36.3% |
| Passing downs | 0.039 | 1.807 | 22.8% |
Caden High · WRUsage 11.0% · Avg PPA 0.266 · Total 15.407
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.266 | 15.407 | 11.0% |
| Pass | 0.300 | 17.113 | 19.5% |
| Rush | -1.706 | -1.706 | 0.5% |
| 1st down | 0.701 | 10.519 | 6.6% |
| 2nd down | 0.087 | 2.174 | 14.8% |
| 3rd down | 0.488 | 7.801 | 14.7% |
| Standard downs | 0.319 | 11.493 | 10.4% |
| Passing downs | 0.178 | 3.914 | 12.0% |
Sedrick Irvin · RBUsage 10.1% · Avg PPA 0.203 · Total 12.392
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.203 | 12.392 | 10.1% |
| Pass | 0.696 | 8.357 | 3.7% |
| Rush | 0.082 | 4.036 | 19.1% |
| 1st down | 0.000 | 0.010 | 10.3% |
| 2nd down | 0.033 | 0.603 | 9.5% |
| 3rd down | 0.495 | 6.936 | 11.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.226 | 9.951 | 11.0% |
| Passing downs | 0.144 | 2.441 | 8.4% |
Nico Brown · WRUsage 9.5% · Avg PPA 0.552 · Total 24.270
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.552 | 24.270 | 9.5% |
| Pass | 0.552 | 24.270 | 17.6% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.107 | 1.827 | 8.6% |
| 2nd down | 0.850 | 9.350 | 7.4% |
| 3rd down | 0.205 | 2.049 | 10.6% |
| Standard downs | 0.507 | 14.187 | 9.2% |
| Passing downs | 0.630 | 10.083 | 10.1% |
Benjamin Blackburn · TEUsage 7.8% · Avg PPA 0.099 · Total 4.674
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.099 | 4.674 | 7.8% |
| Pass | 0.099 | 4.674 | 14.4% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.039 | 0.737 | 7.3% |
| 2nd down | 0.399 | 5.592 | 7.4% |
| 3rd down | 0.192 | 2.500 | 10.5% |
| Standard downs | -0.045 | -1.221 | 6.8% |
| Passing downs | 0.295 | 5.896 | 9.9% |
Caleb Hampton · RBUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA -0.214 · Total -4.714
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.214 | -4.714 | 4.8% |
| Pass | -0.621 | -3.106 | 1.9% |
| Rush | -0.095 | -1.608 | 9.2% |
| 1st down | -0.165 | -1.977 | 6.1% |
| 2nd down | -0.274 | -2.737 | 7.0% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -0.192 | -3.643 | 6.4% |
| Passing downs | -0.357 | -1.070 | 1.9% |
Jonanthony Hall · WRUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA 0.565 · Total 15.832
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.565 | 15.832 | 4.7% |
| Pass | 0.538 | 14.526 | 8.3% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.098 | 0.980 | 3.8% |
| 2nd down | 0.749 | 6.742 | 4.7% |
| 3rd down | 0.901 | 8.110 | 7.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.209 | 2.716 | 3.3% |
| Passing downs | 0.874 | 13.116 | 7.4% |
Charlie Mirer · QBUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA -0.763 · Total -1.526
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.763 | -1.526 | 4.5% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | 0.605 | 0.605 | 4.8% |
| 1st down | 0.605 | 0.605 | 5.0% |
| 2nd down | -2.131 | -2.131 | 7.7% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.605 | 0.605 | 3.3% |
| Passing downs | -2.131 | -2.131 | 7.1% |
Mike Mitchell Jr. · QBUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA -0.481 · Total -5.770
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.481 | -5.770 | 4.5% |
| Pass | -0.512 | -5.634 | 6.9% |
| Rush | -0.137 | -0.137 | 1.0% |
| 1st down | -0.176 | -0.704 | 3.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.605 | 1.814 | 3.4% |
| 3rd down | 0.442 | 1.325 | 5.4% |
| Standard downs | -0.130 | -0.652 | 2.9% |
| Passing downs | -0.731 | -5.118 | 7.1% |
Jordan Onovughe · WRUsage 4.4% · Avg PPA 0.544 · Total 10.888
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.544 | 10.888 | 4.4% |
| Pass | 0.544 | 10.888 | 7.9% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.794 | 5.560 | 3.5% |
| 2nd down | 0.240 | 1.438 | 4.1% |
| 3rd down | 0.023 | 0.141 | 6.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.682 | 6.822 | 3.3% |
| Passing downs | 0.407 | 4.066 | 6.5% |
Liam Thorpe · WRUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA 0.099 · Total 0.892
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.099 | 0.892 | 4.2% |
| Pass | 0.099 | 0.892 | 8.3% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.338 | 1.013 | 3.3% |
| 2nd down | 0.022 | 0.108 | 7.8% |
| 3rd down | -0.228 | -0.228 | 2.1% |
| Standard downs | -0.194 | -0.969 | 3.5% |
| Passing downs | 0.465 | 1.861 | 5.4% |
Zion Robinson · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA -0.283 · Total -5.669
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.283 | -5.669 | 4.1% |
| Pass | -0.283 | -5.669 | 7.5% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.122 | 1.097 | 4.3% |
| 2nd down | 0.232 | 1.392 | 3.9% |
| 3rd down | -0.053 | -0.158 | 3.0% |
| Standard downs | -0.386 | -5.021 | 4.1% |
| Passing downs | -0.093 | -0.648 | 4.2% |
Atticus Joseph · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.645 · Total 9.036
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.645 | 9.036 | 3.6% |
| Pass | 0.645 | 9.036 | 6.6% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.180 | 0.898 | 3.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.726 | 3.632 | 4.1% |
| 3rd down | 1.126 | 4.506 | 4.8% |
| Standard downs | 0.888 | 7.989 | 3.6% |
| Passing downs | 0.209 | 1.047 | 3.7% |
Chris Davis Jr. · RBUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA -0.109 · Total -0.869
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.109 | -0.869 | 3.2% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | -0.109 | -0.869 | 7.8% |
| 1st down | -0.193 | -0.771 | 3.6% |
| 2nd down | -0.473 | -1.418 | 3.7% |
| 3rd down | 1.320 | 1.320 | 1.8% |
| Standard downs | -0.129 | -0.903 | 4.3% |
| Passing downs | 0.034 | 0.034 | 1.1% |
Tuna Altahir · RBUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA -0.052 · Total -0.103
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.052 | -0.103 | 2.9% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | -0.052 | -0.103 | 6.7% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.052 | -0.103 | 8.7% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.011 | 0.011 | 2.5% |
| Passing downs | -0.115 | -0.115 | 3.3% |
Chico Holt · TEUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA -0.138 · Total -1.243
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.138 | -1.243 | 2.3% |
| Pass | -0.138 | -1.243 | 4.1% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.576 | -2.878 | 2.9% |
| 2nd down | 0.793 | 1.587 | 1.7% |
| 3rd down | 1.690 | 1.690 | 1.3% |
| Standard downs | -0.222 | -1.334 | 2.3% |
| Passing downs | 0.030 | 0.091 | 2.3% |
Aiden Black · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 0.948 · Total 3.791
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.948 | 3.791 | 2.1% |
| Pass | 0.948 | 3.791 | 4.3% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 6.078 | 6.078 | 1.2% |
| 2nd down | -0.762 | -2.287 | 5.6% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 1.480 | 4.440 | 2.3% |
| Passing downs | -0.649 | -0.649 | 1.7% |
David Pantelis · WRUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -1.169 · Total -1.169
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -1.169 | -1.169 | 1.7% |
| Pass | -1.169 | -1.169 | 2.5% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | -1.169 | -1.169 | 5.3% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -1.169 | -1.169 | 2.7% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Marcus Brown · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.514 · Total 0.514
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.514 | 0.514 | 1.5% |
| Pass | 0.514 | 0.514 | 2.3% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.514 | 0.514 | 4.8% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.514 | 0.514 | 2.4% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Jacob Butler · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -1.233 · Total -2.467
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -1.233 | -2.467 | 1.4% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | -1.233 | -2.467 | 3.1% |
| 1st down | -1.836 | -1.836 | 1.6% |
| 2nd down | -0.631 | -0.631 | 2.0% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -1.836 | -1.836 | 1.0% |
| Passing downs | -0.631 | -0.631 | 2.3% |
Langdon Horace · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.579 · Total 1.157
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.579 | 1.157 | 1.4% |
| Pass | 0.579 | 1.157 | 2.6% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 1.381 | 1.381 | 1.6% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | -0.224 | -0.224 | 3.3% |
| Standard downs | 1.381 | 1.381 | 1.1% |
| Passing downs | -0.224 | -0.224 | 2.3% |
Tyler Kuo · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.462 · Total -0.462
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.462 | -0.462 | 1.4% |
| Pass | -0.462 | -0.462 | 2.7% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.462 | -0.462 | 3.7% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -0.462 | -0.462 | 2.5% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.
Values and percentiles
| Metric | Value | Percentile | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense PPA/play | 0.090 | 34th138 teams | higher |
| Offense success rate | 0.379 | 11th138 teams | higher |
| Offense explosiveness | 1.296 | 74th138 teams | higher |
| Offense pass PPA/play | 0.171 | 39th138 teams | higher |
| Offense rush PPA/play | 0.008 | 18th138 teams | higher |
| Defense PPA/play | 0.329 | 0th138 teams | lower |
| Defense success rate | 0.488 | 4th138 teams | lower |
| Defense explosiveness | 1.335 | 14th138 teams | lower |
| Defense havoc created | 0.114 | 4th138 teams | higher |
Passing profile
2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPACaptured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 319 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.9 yards (59th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.9 per completion. Completion 60.2%, 7.0 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.24.
| Side | Actual | Expected | CPOE (pp) | Qualifying / all attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 58.3% | 60.9% | -2.6 | 276 / 319 |
| Defense allowed | 66.9% | 60.9% | +6.0 | 260 / 294 |
Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.
138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Stanford.
Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.
Defense and rushing detail
| Side | Attempts | Charted | ADOT | YAC | Comp % | PPA | CPOE | CPOE att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing offense | 319 | 99% | 8.9 | 4.9 | 60.2% | 0.24 | -2.6 pp | 276 |
| Passing defense | 294 | 98% | 8.5 | 5.7 | 63.9% | 0.42 | +6.0 pp | 260 |
Rushing production
| Side | Attempts | Yards / carry | Success | PPA | Line yards / rush | Second-level yards / rush | Open-field yards / rush | Stuff rate | Power success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 271 | 3.7 | 39.6% | 0.09 | 3.10 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 14.8% | 87.5% |
| Defense allowed | 316 | 5.8 | 54.0% | 0.37 | 3.40 | 1.30 | 1.80 | 13.6% | 82.1% |
Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.
Rushing sample and attribution
| Side | Yards recorded | Individual | Unattributed | Sacks | Kneels | Team rushes | Multiple carriers | Direction located / eligible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 269 / 271 | 262 | 9 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 249 / 250 · 99.6% |
| Defense allowed | 308 / 316 | 300 | 16 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 297 / 302 · 98.3% |
Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.
Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.
Game-by-game passing and rushing
2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -2.6 pp. 8 of 9 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.
CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.
Game log and attempt coverage
| Week | Opponent | Pass att | CPOE att | Comp %* | Expected %* | CPOE | ADOT | Pass PPA | Rush att | Rush yds/carry | Rush PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | Hawai'i | 34 | 33 | 63.6% | 59.1% | +4.6 pp | 9.4 | 0.38 | 37 | 4.7 | 0.22 |
| W1 | Miami | 42 | 42 | 52.4% | 58.5% | -6.1 pp | 11.1 | 0.09 | 23 | 3.4 | -0.08 |
| W3 | Duke | 36 | 36 | 55.6% | 65.8% | -10.2 pp | 6.9 | -0.10 | 22 | 3.3 | 0.01 |
| W4 | Georgia Tech | 36 | 35 | 60.0% | 54.5% | +5.5 pp | 11.7 | 0.85 | 36 | 2.8 | -0.14 |
| W5 | Wake Forest | 33 | 33 | 63.6% | 68.2% | -4.5 pp | 4.9 | 0.03 | 34 | 1.4 | -0.11 |
| W6 | Notre Dame | 23 | 23 | 52.2% | 64.5% | -12.3 pp | 7.6 | -0.08 | 21 | 2.8 | -0.16 |
| W7 | Elon | 41 | 0 | — | — | — | 7.9 | 0.34 | 34 | 6.9 | 0.59 |
| W8 | NC State | 37 | 37 | 59.5% | 56.8% | +2.6 pp | 10.4 | 0.52 | 33 | 5.3 | 0.32 |
| W9 | Louisville | 37 | 37 | 59.5% | 61.9% | -2.4 pp | 9.6 | 0.04 | 31 | 2.6 | -0.01 |
*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.
Punting and returns
2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.
Our punts
47 punts · 42.6 gross yards/punt · 39.4 net yards/punt
6 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 1 blocked
Known gross yards: 47/47 punts. Known net yards: 37/47 punts.
Our punt returns
9 returns · 10.7 yards/return · 0 touchdowns
0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked
Known return yards: 9/9 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.
Recent games
| Game | Punts | Gross yd/punt | Net yd/punt | Known net yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 9 · Louisville | 4 | 43.0 | 31.7 | 3/4 |
| Week 8 · NC State | 3 | 42.3 | 46.0 | 2/3 |
| Week 7 · Elon | 4 | 38.3 | 41.0 | 3/4 |
| Week 6 · Notre Dame | 8 | 47.5 | 37.8 | 5/8 |
| Week 5 · Wake Forest | 6 | 41.8 | 41.8 | 6/6 |