Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Toledo

2026 season

Mid-American
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Toledo's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 59.5 across 8 systems; best 40, worst 77, so they disagree by 37 places.

Lab EPA
#40
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#64
down 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#62
up 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#57
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#77
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#48
down 3 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#73
down 42026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#40
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#73 of 138
Schedule strength
#135 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#132 of 138
Game control
#100 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#80 of 138
Offense
#76 of 138
Defense
#71 of 138
Special teams
#127 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Toledo · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

6-2 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.074 net EPA/play

#40

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

1.29 points

#64 · Down 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +9.07 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -8.41, schedule #134 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -6.29. That is worth +0.66 on its own; the preseason prior of +3.43 still carries 23% of the weight, giving +1.29.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Toledo · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Michigan State
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401858429
-10.00 → -10.00+2.500.73498.40%-0.59-0.630-0.050-0.679
Week 2 · Central Connecticut
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401866419
+53.00 → +35.00-2.500.76378.72%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.836-2.1810.654
Week 3 · Temple
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401862774
+1.00 → +1.00 (OT)-2.500.79379.07%-6.68-0.136-0.605-0.741
Week 4 · San Diego State
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401860893
+25.00 → +25.00-2.500.82499.42%-5.672.120-0.5341.586
Week 5 · Ball State
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401866431
+15.00 → +15.00+2.500.85729.79%-12.521.714-1.2260.488
Week 6 · Buffalo
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401866437
-15.00 → -15.00-2.500.890910.18%-9.37-1.781-0.954-2.735
Week 7 · Eastern Michigan
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401866444
+20.00 → +20.00+2.500.925910.58%-9.232.380-0.9761.403
Week 8 · Western Michigan
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401866450
+7.00 → +7.00-2.500.962210.99%+0.350.4950.0380.533

Game terms +0.51 points; prior term +0.78 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +1.29 points. The preseason prior is +3.43 with 22.85% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

1.7 SP+ points

#62 · Up 2 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

5.75 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#48 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 2.22 on 471 plays; defense -3.54 on 463 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Toledo 24 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
7-2 · conf 4-1 · home 4-1 · away 3-1 · expected wins 6.7
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-4-1 ATS (-1.2 avg) · 2025: 10-3 ATS (+5.6 avg)
Head coach
Mike Jacobs · hired 2025-12-10 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
Recruiting classes
2024 #66 (179 pts) · 2025 #73 (176 pts) · 2026 #121 (163 pts)
Returning
66% of production · 56% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing99%86%
Receiving58%61%
Rushing26%26%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back123.000.845310.14
Defensive Line132.920.838710.90
Linebacker63.000.84575.07
Offensive Line133.000.842310.95
Quarterback33.000.84182.53
Receiver113.000.84899.34
Running Back33.000.84862.55
Special Teams73.000.83485.84

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
John Alan Richter · QB

CFBD athlete 5082330. Toledo (2022–2026)

Passing WEPA0.39325146.5%
Pass 97.6% · Rush 4.4%

1st 38.5% · 2nd 47.8% · 3rd 61.3%

Standard downs 41.0% · Passing downs 59.4%

2022: 3★ · 0.8100
CJ Miller · RB

CFBD athlete 5092811. Mercer (2022–2022); Mercer (2024–2025); Toledo (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.28710523.1%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 39.2%

1st 26.5% · 2nd 26.3% · 3rd 13.7%

Standard downs 25.6% · Passing downs 17.2%

2022: stars unavailable
Connor Walendzak · RB

CFBD athlete 5078063. Toledo (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.2647318.2%
Pass 6.6% · Rush 29.1%

1st 21.0% · 2nd 12.7% · 3rd 18.6%

Standard downs 20.2% · Passing downs 13.3%

2023: 3★ · 0.8170
Autavius Ison · RB

CFBD athlete 5164730. Charleston Southern (2023–2024); Mercer (2025–2025); Toledo (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0786113.6%
Pass 2.1% · Rush 23.7%

1st 13.4% · 2nd 16.6% · 3rd 9.7%

Standard downs 15.1% · Passing downs 9.9%

Not linked
Reice Griffith · PK

CFBD athlete 5153413. Mercer (2023–2025); Toledo (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR-3.02012—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Adjatay Dabbs · WR

CFBD athlete 5153399. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——11.2%
Pass 24.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.9% · 2nd 11.2% · 3rd 13.7%

Standard downs 10.2% · Passing downs 13.5%

Not linked
Anthony Simpson · WR

CFBD athlete 4712328. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Bryson Hammer · WR

CFBD athlete 5162858. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.0%
Pass 13.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.7% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 9.1%

Standard downs 5.8% · Passing downs 6.6%

Not linked
Cooper Rusk · WR

CFBD athlete 5109511. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 6.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Corey Smith · RB

CFBD athlete 5079699. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.2%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 15.6%

1st 5.6% · 2nd 13.6% · 3rd 13.3%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 20.0%

Not linked
Dane Nauman · RB

CFBD athlete 5220125. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.2%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 6.7%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Daryl Barnett Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5230932. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 9.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 8.3%

Not linked
Jacob Newell · TE

CFBD athlete 4882061. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.7% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 9.5%

Standard downs 2.9% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Kadale Williams · RB

CFBD athlete 5211771. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.2%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.0%

Not linked
Khamoni Robinson · QB

CFBD athlete 5394415. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 9.4% · Rush 4.3%

1st 6.0% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 9.7%

Standard downs 5.7% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Noah Sanders · RB

CFBD athlete 5211696. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.0%
Pass 1.2% · Rush 7.5%

1st 6.9% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 2.3%

Standard downs 5.5% · Passing downs 3.7%

Not linked
Peyton Strickland · TE

CFBD athlete 5083458. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.6%
Pass 11.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.5% · 2nd 9.1% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 3.7%

Not linked
Rico Bond · WR

CFBD athlete 5225646. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 10.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 4.6% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Sam Lee · TE

CFBD athlete 5220133. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 9.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.1% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 5.0%

Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 4.6%

Not linked
Seth Elchert · WR

CFBD athlete 5209951. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 3.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Tanner Rubinstein · FB

CFBD athlete 5304415. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.3%
Pass 5.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Tashi Braceful · WR

CFBD athlete 5084698. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 3.9% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Terrell Crosby Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 4812374. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.8%
Pass 13.4% · Rush 1.1%

1st 6.1% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 6.9%

Standard downs 6.3% · Passing downs 7.8%

Not linked
Walter Moses · QB

CFBD athlete 5200190. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 1.9% · Rush 3.2%

1st 1.5% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 33 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adjatay Dabbs · WRMercer2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ahmad Carwise · IOLGardner-Webb2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Andrew Zock · EDGEMercer2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Anthony Simpson · WRMichigan2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Armorion Smith · SMichigan State2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Autavius Ison · RBMercer2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Ben Sahakian · EDGECornell2026-01-213★ / 0.8300Immediate
CJ Miller · RBMercer2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Caden Camese · DLMercer2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Cam Jones · CBHoly Cross2026-01-153★ / 0.8300Immediate
Corey Smith · RBPenn State2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Dominic Johnson · IOLGeorgia State2026-01-143★ / 0.8200Immediate
Donovan Watkins · CBMercer2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Dylan Senda · OTAuburn2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Ethan Malafa · TEButler2026-01-08— / —Immediate
Ezra Odinjor · EDGEUAB2026-01-233★ / 0.8400Immediate
Israel Petite · CBRobert Morris2026-01-112★ / —Immediate
Jake Newell · TEAkron2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
KJ Thomas · CBMercer2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kaleb Hutchinson · SMercer2026-01-063★ / 0.8300Immediate
Kalvin Gilbert Jr. · WRSoutheast Missouri State2026-01-113★ / 0.8200Immediate
Kari Jackson · LBPenn State2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Khamoni Robinson · QBNot reported2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
LaDavion Osborn · CBNorthern Colorado2026-01-273★ / 0.8500Immediate
Luke Rector · IOLGardner-Webb2026-01-093★ / 0.8400Immediate
Markus Meincke · PMercer2026-01-15— / —Immediate
Max Allen · LSMercer2026-01-17— / —Immediate
Mo Conteh · CBOhio Dominican2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Nick Thomas · OTRhode Island2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Reice Griffith · KMercer2026-01-17— / —Immediate
Rico Bond · WRLindenwood2026-01-213★ / 0.8600Immediate
Tucker Kelleher · TEBYU2026-03-123★ / 0.8500Immediate
Zach Johnson · EDGEUAB2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Outgoing · 38 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Amare Snowden · CBSyracuse2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Anthony Boswell · IOLHouston2026-01-073★ / 0.8800Immediate
Avery Dunn · EDGEUConn2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Braden Awls · SIowa State2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Braedyn Moore · SNot reported2026-01-084★ / —Immediate
CC Ezirim · TEWestern Kentucky2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Carlos Hazelwood · DLMichigan State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Chamberlain Campbell · EDGEUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8400Immediate
Chris D'Appolonia · LBSyracuse2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cole Rhett · OTBaylor2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
DJ Kelly · CBJames Madison2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Dominic Rivera · OTUConn2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Dylan Cunanan · KTexas State2026-01-20— / —Immediate
Esean Carter · DLNot reported2025-12-273★ / 0.8600Immediate
Hudson Miller · LBPurdue2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Isiah Switzer · IOLUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8400Immediate
James Roe · LSWisconsin2026-01-133★ / 0.8000Immediate
Javon Brown · WRUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jayden Price · SUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jediyah Willoughby · WRUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8200Immediate
John Baker IV · EDGEBowling Green2026-02-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Julian Allen · WRUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8200Immediate
K'Von Sherman · LBUConn2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kalieb Osborne · QBUConn2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Kamren Flowers · WRUConn2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Kenji Christian · RBNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Maddox Marcotte · IOLNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Malachi Davis · EDGERutgers2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Owen Gibbs · LBNot reported2026-01-02— / —Immediate
Raphael Greene-Nyarko · IOLUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8500Immediate
Rickey Williams · LBUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8500Immediate
Robert Hammond III · KKansas State2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Ryder Treadway · WRUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8500Immediate
Sean Persson · TEUAB2026-01-143★ / 0.8200Immediate
Stephen Gales · OTNot reported2026-01-303★ / 0.8500Withdrawn
Terrence Moore · IOLUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8600Immediate
Tyler McKinstry · CBUConn2026-01-243★ / 0.8200Immediate
Zy'marion Lang · WRUConn2026-01-063★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Toledo. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Mike Jacobs · career 0–0 across 1 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 13 appointments
  1. 2026–present · Mike Jacobs · active at capture

    0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2025–2025 · Robert Weiner · interim

    0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2025-12-07. Effective dates: 2025-12-23 to unknown.

  3. 2015–2025 · Jason Candle

    81–44 · 125 attributed games · 11 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2015-12-02. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-12-23.

  4. 2011–2015 · Matt Campbell

    35–15 · 50 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2011-12-09. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2009–2010 · Tim Beckman

    13–12 · 25 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2008-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2001–2008 · Tom Amstutz

    58–41 · 99 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Hired 2000-12-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1991–2000 · Gary Pinkel

    73–37–3 · 113 attributed games · 10 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1990–1990 · Nick Saban

    9–2 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1982–1989 · Dan Simrell

    49–38–2 · 89 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1977–1981 · Chuck Stobart

    24–31–1 · 56 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1971–1976 · Jack Murphy

    35–32 · 67 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1963–1970 · Frank Lauterbur

    48–32–2 · 82 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1962–1962 · Clive Rush

    3–6 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Mike Jacobs · incomplete attribution0–0——1.80.1121—
2025 · Jason Candle8–46–20–066.273—
2025 · Robert Weiner0–10–00–166.273—
2024 · Jason Candle8–54–41–0-2.5-266—
2023 · Jason Candle11–38–10–13.70.8102—
2022 · Jason Candle9–56–31–0-3.7-3.492—
2021 · Jason Candle7–65–30–16.90.467—
2020 · Jason Candle4–24–20–0-3.6—69—
2019 · Jason Candle6–63–50–0-13.7-16.273—
2018 · Jason Candle7–65–30–12-1.667—
2017 · Jason Candle11–38–10–16.63.878—
2016 · Jason Candle9–46–20–112.3588—
2015 · Matt Campbell · incomplete attribution9–2——7.710.284—
2015 · Jason Candle · incomplete attribution1–0——7.710.284—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-26 16:44:27 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play26 / 13881.825 / 13882.5
Success rate49 / 13865.04 / 13897.8
Explosiveness15 / 13889.8132 / 1384.4
Standard-down success45 / 13867.94 / 13897.8
Passing-down success71 / 13848.922 / 13884.7
Pass PPA19 / 13886.951 / 13863.5
Rush PPA77 / 13844.520 / 13886.1
Pass explosiveness24 / 13883.288 / 13836.5
Rush explosiveness44 / 13868.6131 / 1385.1
Line yards44 / 13868.626 / 13881.8
Second-level yards58 / 13858.416 / 13889.1
Open-field yards72 / 13848.272 / 13848.2
Stuff rate52 / 13862.825 / 13882.5
Power success115 / 13816.83 / 13898.5
HavocT34 / 13875.2T62 / 13855.1
Front-seven havoc30 / 13878.8T63 / 13852.9
DB havocT48 / 13864.6T50 / 13863.1
Points / opportunity56 / 13859.9T44 / 13867.9
Average field positionT24 / 13882.8T91 / 13833.9
Field-position expected points25 / 13882.5T85 / 13838.0

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

John Alan Richter · QBUsage 47.9% · Avg PPA 0.351 · Total 96.438
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.35196.43847.9%
Pass0.416109.01697.4%
Rush-0.968-12.5784.4%
1st down0.36037.09039.2%
2nd down0.41538.97251.4%
3rd down0.62442.40062.4%
Standard downs0.22037.56142.3%
Passing downs0.56658.87761.2%
CJ Miller · RBUsage 21.3% · Avg PPA 0.213 · Total 26.009
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.21326.00921.3%
Pass-0.010-0.1385.2%
Rush0.24226.14736.4%
1st down0.0986.47925.1%
2nd down0.37015.92323.5%
3rd down0.2773.60711.9%
Standard downs0.17917.04123.5%
Passing downs0.3328.96815.9%
Connor Walendzak · RBUsage 18.2% · Avg PPA 0.144 · Total 12.688
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.14412.68818.2%
Pass0.0010.0156.6%
Rush0.17412.67229.1%
1st down0.2099.61821.0%
2nd down0.2815.34612.7%
3rd down0.57810.40218.6%
Standard downs0.0412.79820.2%
Passing downs0.5219.89013.3%
Autavius Ison · RBUsage 12.5% · Avg PPA -0.058 · Total -4.151
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.058-4.15112.5%
Pass-0.107-0.6422.2%
Rush-0.053-3.50922.2%
1st down0.1043.33412.2%
2nd down-0.296-8.27615.3%
3rd down0.2822.8229.2%
Standard downs-0.020-1.15514.1%
Passing downs-0.200-2.9958.8%
Adjatay Dabbs · WRUsage 11.7% · Avg PPA 0.654 · Total 43.796
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.65443.79611.7%
Pass0.65443.79624.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3287.5468.7%
2nd down1.09023.98312.0%
3rd down1.11018.86915.6%
Standard downs0.40317.34610.6%
Passing downs1.10226.45014.1%
Corey Smith · RBUsage 9.2% · Avg PPA 0.236 · Total 1.653
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2361.6539.2%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.2361.65315.6%
1st down-0.563-1.1255.6%
2nd down0.1720.51513.6%
3rd down1.1322.26413.3%
Standard downs-0.563-1.1253.9%
Passing downs0.5562.77920.0%
Terrell Crosby Jr. · WRUsage 6.8% · Avg PPA 0.101 · Total 3.626
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1013.6266.8%
Pass0.31310.32013.4%
Rush-2.231-6.6941.1%
1st down0.1031.5456.1%
2nd down-0.115-1.4987.7%
3rd down0.3532.4726.9%
Standard downs-0.098-2.3546.3%
Passing downs0.4985.9807.8%
Khamoni Robinson · QBUsage 6.1% · Avg PPA 0.713 · Total 6.417
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7136.4176.1%
Pass-0.303-1.5169.4%
Rush1.9837.9334.3%
1st down-0.156-0.6246.0%
2nd down0.0590.1194.5%
3rd down2.3086.9239.7%
Standard downs-0.084-0.5055.7%
Passing downs2.3086.9237.1%
Bryson Hammer · WRUsage 5.8% · Avg PPA 0.938 · Total 28.137
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.93828.1375.8%
Pass0.93828.13712.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.32817.2615.5%
2nd down1.1299.0364.8%
3rd down1.43710.0587.4%
Standard downs0.60712.7415.7%
Passing downs1.71115.3966.2%
Peyton Strickland · TEUsage 5.6% · Avg PPA 0.195 · Total 0.974
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1950.9745.6%
Pass0.1950.97411.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.177-0.3544.5%
2nd down0.4431.3289.1%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1160.4656.3%
Passing downs0.5090.5093.7%
Noah Sanders · RBUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA -0.017 · Total -0.185
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.017-0.1855.0%
Pass0.7080.7081.2%
Rush-0.089-0.8937.5%
1st down-0.153-1.0716.9%
2nd down-0.193-0.5794.5%
3rd down1.4651.4652.3%
Standard downs0.0170.1555.5%
Passing downs-0.170-0.3403.7%
Rico Bond · WRUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.460 · Total 9.209
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4609.2094.9%
Pass0.4609.20910.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4864.8635.4%
2nd down0.1200.4823.1%
3rd down0.6443.8657.1%
Standard downs0.5366.9704.6%
Passing downs0.3202.2395.3%
Daryl Barnett Jr. · WRUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA 0.713 · Total 19.264
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.71319.2644.7%
Pass0.71319.26410.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3373.3683.8%
2nd down0.92911.1436.6%
3rd down0.9514.7544.6%
Standard downs0.3974.7683.0%
Passing downs0.96614.4968.8%
Sam Lee · TEUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.363 · Total 8.345
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3638.3454.3%
Pass0.3638.3459.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9159.1494.1%
2nd down0.4373.0594.2%
3rd down0.0860.4295.0%
Standard downs0.3685.8894.2%
Passing downs0.3512.4564.6%
Cooper Rusk · WRUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 2.214 · Total 8.855
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall2.2148.8552.7%
Pass2.2148.8556.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.356-0.7122.9%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down4.2074.2073.6%
Standard downs1.5494.6482.7%
Passing downs4.2074.2072.7%
Walter Moses · QBUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.399 · Total 1.595
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3991.5952.7%
Pass5.3605.3601.9%
Rush-1.255-3.7653.2%
1st down-0.428-0.4281.5%
2nd down0.0290.0292.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs2.4664.9321.9%
Passing downs-1.669-3.3374.8%
Tashi Braceful · WRUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.075 · Total 0.151
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0750.1512.6%
Pass0.0750.1516.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0421.0422.8%
2nd down-0.892-0.8924.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0750.1513.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Tanner Rubinstein · FBUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 1.085 · Total 2.169
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0852.1692.3%
Pass1.0852.1695.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.456-0.4563.7%
3rd down2.6252.6255.6%
Standard downs1.0852.1693.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jacob Newell · TEUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA 0.289 · Total 2.022
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2892.0222.2%
Pass0.2892.0224.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9811.9621.4%
2nd down-0.721-0.7211.0%
3rd down0.1950.7806.8%
Standard downs0.7303.6492.2%
Passing downs-0.814-1.6282.2%
Anthony Simpson · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 0.273 · Total 0.273
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2730.2731.3%
Pass0.2730.2733.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2730.2732.8%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.2730.2732.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Dane Nauman · RBUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 0.461 · Total 0.461
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4610.4611.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.4610.4612.2%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.4610.4616.7%
Standard downs0.4610.4612.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Kadale Williams · RBUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.216 · Total -0.216
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.216-0.2161.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.216-0.2162.2%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.216-0.2164.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.216-0.2164.0%
Seth Elchert · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -1.143 · Total -1.143
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.143-1.1431.3%
Pass-1.143-1.1433.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.143-1.1432.8%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.143-1.1432.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Toledo sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.230 (81st percentile; 138 teams)81stOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.446 (65th percentile; 138 teams)65thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.341 (90th percentile; 138 teams)90thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.394 (87th percentile; 138 teams)87thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.081 (45th percentile; 138 teams)45thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.028 (82nd percentile; 138 teams)82ndDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.329 (98th percentile; 138 teams)98thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.388 (4th percentile; 138 teams)4thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.161 (55th percentile; 138 teams)55th
Values and percentiles
Toledo metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.23081st138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.44665th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.34190th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.39487th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.08145th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.02882nd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.32998th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.3884th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.16155th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 98% of 286 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.1 yards (65th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.1 per completion. Completion 64.7%, 8.3 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.35.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense66.8%60.3%+6.5232 / 286
Defense allowed55.8%59.3%-3.5231 / 298

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Toledo.

Target mix by zone, Toledo offense
Short left32% · 88Short middle23% · 64Short right29% · 80Deep left7% · 19Deep middle4% · 11Deep right5% · 15

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Toledo passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense28698%9.16.164.7%0.35+6.5 pp232
Passing defense298100%8.94.454.7%0.17-3.5 pp231

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense3504.942.5%0.123.301.101.2014.1%65.1%
Defense allowed3193.329.1%-0.032.700.801.1021.1%50.0%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense344 / 350337139770328 / 334 · 98.2%
Defense allowed318 / 319315427330289 / 289 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +6.5 pp. 7 of 9 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-6.14.615.2W1W1 vs Michigan State: -4.3 ppW2W3W3 vs Temple: +10.6 ppW4W4 vs San Diego State: +15.2 ppW5W5 vs Ball State: -6.1 ppW6W6 vs Buffalo: -0.2 ppW7W7 vs Eastern Michigan: +14.2 ppW8W8 vs Western Michigan: +12.9 ppW10

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Michigan State212055.0%59.3%-4.3 pp10.60.40203.90.05
W2Central Connecticut320———12.60.36455.80.33
W3Temple515070.0%59.4%+10.6 pp7.50.43254.30.30
W4San Diego State222272.7%57.5%+15.2 pp11.40.87484.3-0.14
W5Ball State353452.9%59.0%-6.1 pp8.30.09516.90.32
W6Buffalo363562.9%63.1%-0.2 pp7.00.16264.1-0.01
W7Eastern Michigan303080.0%65.8%+14.2 pp5.30.77404.8-0.13
W8Western Michigan414170.7%57.9%+12.9 pp10.20.41474.20.20
W10Sacramento State180———12.9-0.44484.70.13

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

31 punts · 42.1 gross yards/punt · 38.8 net yards/punt

9 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 31/31 punts. Known net yards: 26/31 punts.

Our punt returns

8 returns · 7.9 yards/return · 1 touchdowns

0 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 8/8 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 10 · Sacramento State644.837.84/6
Week 8 · Western Michigan337.330.73/3
Week 7 · Eastern Michigan441.539.33/4
Week 6 · Buffalo643.543.25/6
Week 5 · Ball State337.338.52/3
Team style
Rating history