Record
4-4 wins–losses
No rank assigned
Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.
2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00
SP+ workbook recordTroy
2026 season
Sun Belt
2026 preseason report
Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.
What every system says
Troy's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 103 across 8 systems; best 99, worst 110, so they disagree by 11 places.
- Lab EPA
- #99
- Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- Lab SRS
- #109
- up 152026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- SP+
- #107
- up 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
- Elo
- #100
- up 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- FPI
- #101
- up 102026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CORE
- #105
- up 7 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CFBD SRS
- #110
- up 172026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- WEPA
- #101
- up 102026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI context
ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026
Résumé and schedule
Results earned and schedule difficulty
- Strength of record
- #97 of 138
- Schedule strength
- #90 of 138
- Remaining schedule strength
- #99 of 138
- Game control
- #84 of 138
Unit efficiency
Performance by unit
- Overall
- #107 of 138
- Offense
- #104 of 138
- Defense
- #87 of 138
- Special teams
- #112 of 138
Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.
Why the ratings disagree
Troy · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.
Descriptive EPA
-0.070 net EPA/play
#99
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.
2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge
Lab EPA from CFBD playsLocal predictive SRS
-7.14 points
#109 · Up 15 places since the previous CFBD cutoff
2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -1.94 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -6.52, schedule #115 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -4.22. That is worth -8.46 on its own; the preseason prior of -2.59 still carries 22% of the weight, giving -7.14.
How each game enters this SRS rating
Troy · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.
| Game | Raw margin → transformed | Venue adjustment | Recency weight | Fit share | Opponent rating | Margin term | Opponent term | Total term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 · Sam Houston home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401870763 | +3.00 → +3.00 | -2.50 | 0.7349 | 8.26% | -14.73 | 0.041 | -1.217 | -1.175 |
| Week 2 · Alabama State home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401868326 | +17.00 → +17.00 | -2.50 | 0.7637 | 8.58% | -25.00 (fixed lower division) | 1.245 | -2.146 | -0.901 |
| Week 3 · Missouri away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856689 | -10.00 → -10.00 | +2.50 | 0.7937 | 8.92% | +10.47 | -0.669 | 0.934 | 0.265 |
| Week 4 · Utah State away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401860894 | -11.00 → -11.00 | +2.50 | 0.8249 | 9.27% | -5.10 | -0.788 | -0.473 | -1.261 |
| Week 6 · Southern Miss home · 2026-10-07 · ID 401871090 | +21.00 → +21.00 | -2.50 | 0.8909 | 10.01% | -10.17 | 1.853 | -1.019 | 0.834 |
| Week 7 · Louisiana away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401869966 | -27.00 → -27.00 | +2.50 | 0.9259 | 10.41% | +0.30 | -2.550 | 0.031 | -2.519 |
| Week 8 · UL Monroe home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401871094 | -7.00 → -7.00 | -2.50 | 0.9622 | 10.82% | -18.52 | -1.028 | -2.004 | -3.031 |
| Week 9 · James Madison away · 2026-10-29 · ID 401869963 | +3.00 → +1.00 (OT) | +2.50 | 1.0000 | 11.24% | +7.45 | 0.393 | 0.837 | 1.231 |
Game terms -6.56 points; prior term -0.58 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -7.14 points. The preseason prior is -2.59 with 22.48% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.
These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.
Download fitted terms and source hashesEstimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.
2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00
Lab SRS from CFBD scoresExternal SP+
-9.9 SP+ points
#107 · Up 1 place
2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.
2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00
Bill Connelly SP+ workbookExternal CORE
-9.59 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays
#105 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -6.15 on 473 plays; defense 3.45 on 428 plays.
2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00
CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defenseEPA ranks Troy 10 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.
Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.
Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidenceProgram context
2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches- Record
- 4-4 · conf 2-2 · home 3-1 · away 1-3 · expected wins 3.6
- Polls (Week 10)
- unranked
- CFP latest
- unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
- CFP final
- not published
- Against the spread
- 2026: 3-5 ATS (-3.0 avg) · 2025: 10-4 ATS (+2.8 avg)
- Head coach
- Gerad Parker · hired 2023-12-18 · 12-14 over 3 captured seasons
- Recruiting classes
- 2024 #89 (159 pts) · 2025 #82 (165 pts) · 2026 #76 (187 pts)
- Returning
- 35% of production · 57% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
Category Production Usage Passing 103% 96% Receiving 12% 11% Rushing 136% 52% Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.
Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.
Recruiting by position group
2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC
| Position group | Commits | Avg. stars | Avg. rating | Total rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive Back | 12 | 3.00 | 0.8527 | 10.23 |
| Defensive Line | 12 | 3.00 | 0.8503 | 10.20 |
| Linebacker | 5 | 3.00 | 0.8359 | 4.18 |
| Offensive Line | 9 | 3.00 | 0.8393 | 7.55 |
| Quarterback | 3 | 3.00 | 0.8439 | 2.53 |
| Receiver | 8 | 3.00 | 0.8290 | 6.63 |
| Running Back | 2 | 3.00 | 0.8391 | 1.68 |
| Special Teams | 5 | 3.00 | 0.8440 | 4.22 |
Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.
Player efficiency and usage
2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTCPassing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions
| Player / history | Metric | Value | Plays / attempts | Overall usage | Usage detail | Recruiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Will Crowder · QBCFBD athlete 4431633. West Virginia (2021–2022); Troy (2023–2026) | Passing WEPA | 0.234 | 169 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2021: 3★ · 0.8726 |
Gavin Griffin · RBCFBD athlete 5388754. Troy (2026–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.179 | 91 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2026: 3★ · 0.8444 |
Jordan Lovett · RBCFBD athlete 5120317. Troy (2023–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.088 | 68 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2023: stars unavailable |
Jaheim Merriweather · RBCFBD athlete 5086097. Purdue (2024–2025); Troy (2026–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.164 | 60 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2024: 3★ · 0.8747 |
Will Crowder · QBCFBD athlete 4431633. West Virginia (2021–2022); Troy (2023–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.276 | 41 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2021: 3★ · 0.8726 |
Ethan Head · PKCFBD athlete 5219720. West Virginia (2025–2025); Troy (2026–2026); Tulane (2024–2024) | Kicker PAAR | -5.040 | 12 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2024: stars unavailable |
Hayden Wolfe · PKCFBD athlete 5388767. Troy (2026–2026) | Kicker PAAR | -2.410 | 3 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2026: 2★ · 0.7950 |
Transfers
Incoming · 14 reported
| Player | From | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August Salvati · EDGE | San Diego State | 2026-05-02 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Bryce Steele · LB | Boston College | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Darion Rivers · OT | NC State | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Ethan Head · K | West Virginia | 2026-01-11 | — / — | Immediate |
| Jaheim Merriweather · RB | Purdue | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Jalen Ballard · K | Ole Miss | 2026-01-17 | — / — | Immediate |
| Jonathan Pennix · CB | Southern Miss | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Jordon Jones · OT | Ohio | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Kavion Henderson · EDGE | Arkansas | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Knai Cook · S | Charleston Southern | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Luke Petit · IOL | Furman | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Marcus Goree Jr. · CB | Tennessee | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| TJ Lott · WR | Old Dominion | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Ty Clemons · DL | Boston College | 2026-01-23 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
Outgoing · 27 reported
| Player | To | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amare Garrett · CB | Not reported | 2025-12-19 | — / — | Immediate |
| Billy Gilmore · IOL | Not reported | 2025-12-29 | — / — | Immediate |
| Chad Barham · TE | Not reported | 2025-12-31 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| DJ Epps · WR | West Virginia | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| DJ Jackson Jr. · EDGE | Oklahoma State | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Dylan Mann · DL | Delaware | 2026-01-22 | 3★ / 0.8000 | Immediate |
| Jackson Thomas · WR | Not reported | 2025-12-20 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Jaquez White · CB | Virginia Tech | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Kam Weaver · LB | Not reported | 2025-12-27 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Keion Dunlap · S | Not reported | 2025-12-22 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Kyler Gibson · OT | Austin Peay | 2026-01-24 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Malaki Pegues · DL | Tennessee Tech | 2026-02-04 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Malik Ellis · IOL | Nicholls | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Matt Henry · IOL | Not reported | 2026-01-16 | — / — | Immediate |
| Mojo Dortch · WR | Not reported | 2026-01-10 | 4★ / — | Withdrawn |
| Paddy McAteer · K | Indiana | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Paul Bowling · IOL | Florida State | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Roman Mothershed · WR | LSU | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Rondell Carter · S | Not reported | 2025-12-19 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| ShuMond Johnson · EDGE | Not reported | 2025-12-24 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Tae Meadows · RB | Auburn | 2026-01-23 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Trashun Griffin · EDGE | Middle Tennessee | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Tray Taylor · WR | Auburn | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Trent Henry · CB | Not reported | 2026-01-02 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Trey Cooley · RB | Washington | 2026-01-22 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Ui Ale · QB | Not reported | 2026-01-08 | — / — | Immediate |
| Zerian Hudson · IOL | Not reported | 2025-12-24 | 2★ / — | Immediate |
Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.
Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.
Coaching eras
Continuous appointments at Troy. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.
Gerad Parker · career 12–20 across 4 seasons and 2 schools
Tenure timeline · 7 appointments
2024–present · Gerad Parker · active at capture
12–14 · 26 attributed games · 3 seasons
Hired 2023-12-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2023–2023 · Greg Gasparato · interim
0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2023-12-08. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2022–2023 · Jon Sumrall
23–4 · 27 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2021-12-02. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2021–2021 · Brandon Hall
0–1 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2021-11-21. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2019–2021 · Chip Lindsey
15–19 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2019-01-11. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2015–2018 · Neal Brown
35–16 · 51 attributed games · 4 seasons
Hired 2014-11-30. Exact effective dates unavailable.
2001–2014 · Larry Blakeney
86–84 · 170 attributed games · 14 seasons
Hired 1990-12-03. Exact effective dates unavailable.
Season résumé · 2015–2026
Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.
| Season / coach | Record | Conference | Postseason | SP+ | SRS | Recruiting rank | Final poll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · Gerad Parker · incomplete attribution | 0–0 | — | — | -9 | -14.9 | 76 | — |
| 2025 · Gerad Parker | 8–6 | 6–2 | 0–1 | -4.8 | -7.9 | 82 | — |
| 2024 · Gerad Parker | 4–8 | 3–5 | 0–0 | -6.6 | -9.6 | 89 | — |
| 2023 · Jon Sumrall · incomplete attribution | 11–2 | — | — | 9.8 | 8.7 | 94 | — |
| 2023 · Greg Gasparato · incomplete attribution | 0–1 | — | — | 9.8 | 8.7 | 94 | — |
| 2022 · Jon Sumrall | 12–2 | 8–1 | 1–0 | 8.1 | 2.4 | 130 | 19 |
| 2021 · Chip Lindsey · incomplete attribution | 5–6 | — | — | -6.5 | -10.4 | 104 | — |
| 2021 · Brandon Hall · incomplete attribution | 0–1 | — | — | -6.5 | -10.4 | 104 | — |
| 2020 · Chip Lindsey | 5–6 | 3–4 | 0–0 | 2.3 | 4 | 84 | — |
| 2019 · Chip Lindsey | 5–7 | 3–5 | 0–0 | -4.4 | -9.6 | 80 | — |
| 2018 · Neal Brown | 10–3 | 7–1 | 1–0 | 2.6 | -1.4 | 98 | — |
| 2017 · Neal Brown | 11–2 | 7–1 | 1–0 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 96 | — |
| 2016 · Neal Brown | 10–3 | 6–2 | 1–0 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 98 | — |
| 2015 · Neal Brown | 4–8 | 3–5 | 0–0 | -7 | -9.9 | 117 | — |
Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.
CFBD season overview
An accepted season overview is unavailable for this team in 2026.
2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.
Values and percentiles
| Metric | Value | Percentile | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense PPA/play | 0.021 | 16th138 teams | higher |
| Offense success rate | 0.384 | 12th138 teams | higher |
| Offense explosiveness | 1.213 | 42nd138 teams | higher |
| Offense pass PPA/play | -0.013 | 7th138 teams | higher |
| Offense rush PPA/play | 0.078 | 44th138 teams | higher |
| Defense PPA/play | 0.030 | 71st138 teams | lower |
| Defense success rate | 0.395 | 62nd138 teams | lower |
| Defense explosiveness | 1.247 | 41st138 teams | lower |
| Defense havoc created | 0.162 | 57th138 teams | higher |
Passing profile
2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPACaptured 2026-11-06. Offense: 100% of 230 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.9 yards (59th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 6.5 per completion. Completion 54.3%, 6.3 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.05.
| Side | Actual | Expected | CPOE (pp) | Qualifying / all attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 55.5% | 60.0% | -4.5 | 182 / 230 |
| Defense allowed | 62.1% | 60.8% | +1.3 | 190 / 248 |
Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.
138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Troy.
Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.
Defense and rushing detail
| Side | Attempts | Charted | ADOT | YAC | Comp % | PPA | CPOE | CPOE att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing offense | 230 | 100% | 8.9 | 6.5 | 54.3% | 0.05 | -4.5 pp | 182 |
| Passing defense | 248 | 99% | 9.0 | 4.4 | 60.5% | 0.07 | +1.3 pp | 190 |
Rushing production
| Side | Attempts | Yards / carry | Success | PPA | Line yards / rush | Second-level yards / rush | Open-field yards / rush | Stuff rate | Power success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 332 | 4.7 | 42.0% | 0.14 | 3.10 | 1.10 | 1.40 | 15.1% | 74.4% |
| Defense allowed | 263 | 4.0 | 40.9% | 0.08 | 2.90 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 15.8% | 80.0% |
Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.
Rushing sample and attribution
| Side | Yards recorded | Individual | Unattributed | Sacks | Kneels | Team rushes | Multiple carriers | Direction located / eligible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 331 / 332 | 329 | 3 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 310 / 312 · 99.4% |
| Defense allowed | 257 / 263 | 253 | 10 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 247 / 247 · 100.0% |
Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.
Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.
Game-by-game passing and rushing
2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -4.5 pp. 6 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.
CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.
Game log and attempt coverage
| Week | Opponent | Pass att | CPOE att | Comp %* | Expected %* | CPOE | ADOT | Pass PPA | Rush att | Rush yds/carry | Rush PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | Sam Houston | 24 | 23 | 47.8% | 52.0% | -4.2 pp | 14.0 | 0.44 | 42 | 4.2 | 0.10 |
| W2 | Alabama State | 29 | 0 | — | — | — | 7.2 | 0.20 | 39 | 5.8 | 0.27 |
| W3 | Missouri | 32 | 32 | 56.3% | 64.4% | -8.2 pp | 7.2 | 0.12 | 40 | 2.4 | -0.03 |
| W4 | Utah State | 50 | 50 | 52.0% | 57.5% | -5.5 pp | 10.8 | -0.23 | 32 | 5.3 | -0.02 |
| W6 | Southern Miss | 21 | 21 | 85.7% | 67.2% | +18.5 pp | 4.9 | 0.92 | 59 | 7.4 | 0.47 |
| W7 | Louisiana | 26 | 25 | 52.0% | 62.2% | -10.2 pp | 6.3 | -0.28 | 28 | 4.5 | -0.06 |
| W8 | UL Monroe | 17 | 0 | — | — | — | 8.1 | -0.15 | 47 | 3.3 | 0.14 |
| W9 | James Madison | 31 | 31 | 48.4% | 59.0% | -10.6 pp | 10.6 | -0.21 | 45 | 3.8 | 0.01 |
*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.
Punting and returns
2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.
Our punts
41 punts · 44.4 gross yards/punt · 39.7 net yards/punt
14 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 1 blocked
Known gross yards: 41/41 punts. Known net yards: 38/41 punts.
Our punt returns
8 returns · 5.3 yards/return · 0 touchdowns
1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked
Known return yards: 7/8 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.
Recent games
| Game | Punts | Gross yd/punt | Net yd/punt | Known net yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 9 · James Madison | 6 | 41.8 | 37.7 | 6/6 |
| Week 8 · UL Monroe | 9 | 41.1 | 39.8 | 8/9 |
| Week 7 · Louisiana | 4 | 53.5 | 53.5 | 2/4 |
| Week 6 · Southern Miss | 1 | 45.0 | 45.0 | 1/1 |
| Week 4 · Utah State | 4 | 43.3 | 37.3 | 4/4 |