Record
8-0 wins–losses
No rank assigned
Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.
2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00
SP+ workbook recordUtah
2026 season
Big 12
2026 preseason report
Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.
What every system says
Utah's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 9.5 across 8 systems; best 3, worst 12, so they disagree by 9 places.
- Lab EPA
- #12
- Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- Lab SRS
- #8
- up 22026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- SP+
- #9
- up 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
- Elo
- #10
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- FPI
- #10
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CORE
- #8
- up 1 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CFBD SRS
- #3
- up 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- WEPA
- #12
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI context
ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026
Résumé and schedule
Results earned and schedule difficulty
- Strength of record
- #5 of 138
- Schedule strength
- #83 of 138
- Remaining schedule strength
- #34 of 138
- Game control
- #5 of 138
Unit efficiency
Performance by unit
- Overall
- #9 of 138
- Offense
- #12 of 138
- Defense
- #19 of 138
- Special teams
- #59 of 138
Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.
Why the ratings disagree
Utah · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.
Descriptive EPA
0.169 net EPA/play
#12
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.
2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge
Lab EPA from CFBD playsLocal predictive SRS
14.99 points
#8 · Up 2 places since the previous CFBD cutoff
2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +19.55 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -2.46, schedule #72 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average +0.23. That is worth +17.09 on its own; the preseason prior of +7.75 still carries 22% of the weight, giving +14.99.
How each game enters this SRS rating
Utah · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.
| Game | Raw margin → transformed | Venue adjustment | Recency weight | Fit share | Opponent rating | Margin term | Opponent term | Total term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 · Idaho home · 2026-09-04 · ID 401856768 | +52.00 → +35.00 | -2.50 | 0.7349 | 8.26% | -25.00 (fixed lower division) | 2.685 | -2.065 | 0.620 |
| Week 2 · Arkansas home · 2026-09-13 · ID 401856670 | +33.00 → +33.00 | -2.50 | 0.7637 | 8.58% | -3.47 | 2.618 | -0.298 | 2.320 |
| Week 3 · Utah State home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856801 | +33.00 → +33.00 | -2.50 | 0.7937 | 8.92% | -5.10 | 2.721 | -0.455 | 2.266 |
| Week 4 · Iowa State away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856816 | +14.00 → +14.00 | +2.50 | 0.8249 | 9.27% | +1.38 | 1.530 | 0.128 | 1.658 |
| Week 6 · Kansas home · 2026-10-11 · ID 401856827 | +17.00 → +17.00 | -2.50 | 0.8909 | 10.01% | +1.60 | 1.452 | 0.160 | 1.612 |
| Week 7 · Colorado away · 2026-10-18 · ID 401856833 | +3.00 → +3.00 | +2.50 | 0.9259 | 10.41% | -5.30 | 0.572 | -0.551 | 0.021 |
| Week 8 · Houston home · 2026-10-25 · ID 401856837 | +8.00 → +8.00 | -2.50 | 0.9622 | 10.82% | +9.51 | 0.595 | 1.028 | 1.623 |
| Week 9 · Cincinnati away · 2026-10-31 · ID 401856848 | +24.00 → +24.00 | +2.50 | 1.0000 | 11.24% | +1.34 | 2.979 | 0.150 | 3.129 |
Game terms +13.25 points; prior term +1.74 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +14.99 points. The preseason prior is +7.75 with 22.48% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.
These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.
Download fitted terms and source hashesEstimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.
2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00
Lab SRS from CFBD scoresExternal SP+
19.9 SP+ points
#9 · Up 1 place
2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.
2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00
Bill Connelly SP+ workbookExternal CORE
22.14 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays
#8 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 14.27 on 405 plays; defense -7.86 on 358 plays.
2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00
CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defenseEPA ranks Utah 4 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.
Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.
Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidenceProgram context
2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches- Record
- 8-0 · conf 5-0 · home 5-0 · away 3-0 · expected wins 7.2
- Polls (Week 10)
- Coaches Poll #4 · AP Top 25 #3
- CFP latest
- #3 · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
- CFP final
- not published
- Against the spread
- 2026: 7-1 ATS (+6.8 avg) · 2025: 9-4 ATS (+8.5 avg)
- Head coach
- Morgan Scalley · hired 2025-12-13 · 1-0 over 2 captured seasons
- Recruiting classes
- 2024 #59 (185 pts) · 2025 #40 (208 pts) · 2026 #27 (227 pts)
- Returning
- 68% of production · 72% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
Category Production Usage Passing 97% 99% Receiving 29% 33% Rushing 83% 77% Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.
Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.
Recruiting by position group
2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC
| Position group | Commits | Avg. stars | Avg. rating | Total rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive Back | 16 | 3.13 | 0.8723 | 13.96 |
| Defensive Line | 10 | 3.00 | 0.8658 | 8.66 |
| Linebacker | 9 | 3.11 | 0.8706 | 7.84 |
| Offensive Line | 13 | 3.38 | 0.8841 | 11.49 |
| Quarterback | 6 | 3.17 | 0.8789 | 5.27 |
| Receiver | 11 | 3.09 | 0.8674 | 9.54 |
| Running Back | 5 | 3.20 | 0.8867 | 4.43 |
| Special Teams | 7 | 3.29 | 0.8848 | 6.19 |
Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.
Player efficiency and usage
2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTCPassing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions
| Player / history | Metric | Value | Plays / attempts | Overall usage | Usage detail | Recruiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Devon Dampier · QBCFBD athlete 5105849. New Mexico (2023–2024); Utah (2025–2026) | Passing WEPA | 0.422 | 224 | 53.1% | Pass 91.3% · Rush 22.7%1st 50.4% · 2nd 52.8% · 3rd 64.9% Standard downs 48.5% · Passing downs 66.9% | 2023: 3★ · 0.8392 |
Wayshawn Parker · RBCFBD athlete 5173431. Utah (2025–2026); Washington State (2024–2024) | Rushing WEPA | 0.396 | 103 | 23.9% | Pass 11.4% · Rush 35.2%1st 24.8% · 2nd 22.2% · 3rd 25.8% Standard downs 27.2% · Passing downs 14.1% | 2024: 3★ · 0.8467 |
Devon Dampier · QBCFBD athlete 5105849. New Mexico (2023–2024); Utah (2025–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.345 | 69 | 53.1% | Pass 91.3% · Rush 22.7%1st 50.4% · 2nd 52.8% · 3rd 64.9% Standard downs 48.5% · Passing downs 66.9% | 2023: 3★ · 0.8392 |
Daniel Bray · RBCFBD athlete 5203476. Utah (2025–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.260 | 31 | 8.1% | Pass 5.9% · Rush 10.2%1st 9.4% · 2nd 10.0% · 3rd 2.1% Standard downs 8.9% · Passing downs 5.6% | 2025: 3★ · 0.8675 |
Dillon Curtis · PKCFBD athlete 5257815. Utah (2025–2026) | Kicker PAAR | -1.570 | 7 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2025: 3★ · 0.8225 |
Braden Pegan · WRCFBD athlete 4869422. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 11.1% | Pass 24.0% · Rush 0.7%1st 10.4% · 2nd 11.1% · 3rd 14.4% Standard downs 10.5% · Passing downs 12.7% | Not linked |
Brandon Rose · QBCFBD athlete 4804885. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.6% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.1%1st 2.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 8.3% Standard downs 1.6% · Passing downs 6.7% | Not linked |
Byrd Ficklin · QBCFBD athlete 5294263. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 9.5% | Pass 10.2% · Rush 9.2%1st 10.4% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 10.3% Standard downs 10.1% · Passing downs 7.7% | Not linked |
Creed Whittemore · WRCFBD athlete 4871040. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 6.0% | Pass 13.4% · Rush 0.0%1st 4.7% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 9.3% Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 12.0% | Not linked |
Daidren Zipperer · WRCFBD athlete 5103514. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.6% | Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Hunter Andrews · TECFBD athlete 5148821. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.9% | Pass 5.9% · Rush 2.3%1st 2.9% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 4.7% Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 6.5% | Not linked |
Kyri Shoels · WRCFBD athlete 5220596. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.4% | Pass 2.8% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.5% · 2nd 1.1% · 3rd 1.9% Standard downs 0.9% · Passing downs 2.6% | Not linked |
LaMarcus Bell · RBCFBD athlete 5264742. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 5.0% | Pass 1.1% · Rush 8.0%1st 2.9% · 2nd 6.9% · 3rd 7.7% Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 9.4% | Not linked |
Larry Simmons · WRCFBD athlete 4685704. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.6% | Pass 5.7% · Rush 0.0%1st 4.3% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 2.7% Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 0.9% | Not linked |
Mana Carvalho · WRCFBD athlete 5294259. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.7% | Pass 6.3% · Rush 0.0%1st 2.8% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 2.4% | Not linked |
Mateaki Helu · RBCFBD athlete 5294267. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.6% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 8.2%1st 4.3% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 6.3% Standard downs 5.0% · Passing downs 3.1% | Not linked |
Noah Bennee · TECFBD athlete 4900351. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.6% | Pass 10.3% · Rush 0.0%1st 4.9% · 2nd 5.8% · 3rd 1.2% Standard downs 4.6% · Passing downs 4.6% | Not linked |
Ricky Johnson · WRCFBD athlete 5132652. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 4.9% | Pass 11.0% · Rush 0.0%1st 4.3% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 4.1% Standard downs 3.5% · Passing downs 9.2% | Not linked |
Semi Taulanga · TECFBD athlete 5221211. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.6% | Pass 3.0% · Rush 2.3%1st 2.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Steve Chavez-Soto · RBCFBD athlete 5296612. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 6.3% | Pass 3.2% · Rush 8.9%1st 5.0% · 2nd 7.9% · 3rd 6.3% Standard downs 6.8% · Passing downs 4.7% | Not linked |
Will Monney · TECFBD athlete 5114312. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.4% | Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.5% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 3.7% Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Transfers
Incoming · 17 reported
| Player | From | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braden Pegan · WR | Utah State | 2026-01-07 | 4★ / 0.9200 | Immediate |
| Brandon Rose · QB | Massachusetts | 2026-06-01 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Cedric Jefferson · OT | Montana State | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Elijah Reed · CB | Akron | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Ethan Day · DL | North Texas | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Isaiah Kema · IOL | Ohio State | 2026-01-08 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Jamal Wallace · DL | Tennessee | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| James Chenault Jr. · CB | South Florida | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Jireh Moe · DL | San José State | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Kyri Shoels · WR | San José State | 2026-01-08 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Lucas Samsula · DL | Wyoming | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Marcus Wimberly · S | Oklahoma | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Nick Brown · CB | Lamar | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Noah Bennee · TE | Weber State | 2026-01-18 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Ricky Johnson · WR | Mississippi State | 2026-01-16 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Steve Chavez-Soto · RB | San José State | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / 0.8800 | Immediate |
| Will Monney · TE | Oklahoma State | 2026-01-21 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
Outgoing · 22 reported
| Player | To | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake Cotton · CB | Not reported | 2026-08-20 | — / — | Immediate |
| Brendan Zurbrugg · QB | Walsh | 2026-02-02 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Christian Thatcher · LB | Memphis | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Dallas Vakalahi · DL | Penn State | 2026-01-08 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Devin Green · RB | Not reported | 2026-01-02 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Don Saunders · CB | Purdue | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Drew Clemens · TE | North Texas | 2026-01-22 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Isaac Wilson · QB | Colorado | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| JJ Buchanan · WR | Michigan | 2026-01-12 | 4★ / 0.9400 | Immediate |
| Jason Stokes Jr. · CB | Colorado | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Jaxson Jones · EDGE | Utah Tech | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Jaylen Moson · CB | South Alabama | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8200 | Immediate |
| John Henry Daley · EDGE | Michigan | 2026-01-09 | 4★ / 0.9300 | Immediate |
| Jonah Leaea · DL | Michigan | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Justin Stevenson · WR | North Texas | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Kalolo Ta'aga · OT | Washington State | 2026-01-13 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| LaTristan Thompson · CB | UTEP | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| NaQuari Rogers · RB | West Virginia | 2026-08-28 | — / — | Immediate |
| Raycine Guillory · RB | LSU | 2026-01-05 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Salesi Moa · CB | Michigan | 2026-01-12 | 4★ / 0.9000 | Immediate |
| Smith Snowden · CB | Michigan | 2026-01-13 | 4★ / 0.9200 | Immediate |
| Tao Johnson · S | UCLA | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.
Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.
Coaching eras
Continuous appointments at Utah. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.
Morgan Scalley · career 1–0 across 2 seasons and 1 schools
Tenure timeline · 17 appointments
2025–present · Morgan Scalley · active at capture
1–0 · 1 attributed games · 2 seasons
Hired 2025-12-13. Effective dates: 2025-12-31 to unknown.
2004–2025 · Kyle Whittingham
177–88 · 265 attributed games · 22 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2004-12-08. Effective dates: unknown to 2025-12-31.
2003–2004 · Urban Meyer
22–2 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution
Hired 2002-12-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.
1990–2002 · Ron McBride
88–63 · 151 attributed games · 13 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1985–1989 · Jim Fassel
25–33 · 58 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1982–1984 · Chuck Stobart
16–17–1 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1977–1981 · Wayne Howard
30–24–2 · 56 attributed games · 5 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1974–1976 · Tom Lovat
5–28 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1968–1973 · Bill Meek
33–31 · 64 attributed games · 6 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1966–1967 · Mike Giddings
9–12 · 21 attributed games · 2 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1958–1965 · Ray Nagel
42–39–1 · 82 attributed games · 8 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1950–1957 · Jack Curtice
45–32–4 · 81 attributed games · 8 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1925–1949 · Ike Armstrong
141–55–15 · 211 attributed games · 25 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1919–1924 · Thomas Fitzpatrick
23–17–3 · 43 attributed games · 6 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1914–1917 · Nelson Norgren
13–11 · 24 attributed games · 4 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1910–1913 · Fred Bennion
16–8–3 · 27 attributed games · 4 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
1905–1908 · Joseph Maddock
17–7–1 · 25 attributed games · 4 seasons
Exact effective dates unavailable.
Season résumé · 2015–2026
Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.
| Season / coach | Record | Conference | Postseason | SP+ | SRS | Recruiting rank | Final poll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · Morgan Scalley · incomplete attribution | 0–0 | — | — | 19.4 | 18.6 | 27 | — |
| 2025 · Kyle Whittingham | 10–2 | 7–2 | 0–0 | 22.2 | 21.3 | 40 | 14 |
| 2025 · Morgan Scalley | 1–0 | 0–0 | 1–0 | 22.2 | 21.3 | 40 | 14 |
| 2024 · Kyle Whittingham | 5–7 | 2–7 | 0–0 | 7.7 | 6.1 | 59 | — |
| 2023 · Kyle Whittingham | 8–5 | 5–4 | 0–1 | 8.5 | 8.1 | 20 | — |
| 2022 · Kyle Whittingham | 10–4 | 8–2 | 0–1 | 19.2 | 16.6 | 34 | 10 |
| 2021 · Kyle Whittingham | 10–4 | 9–1 | 0–1 | 15.2 | 15.3 | 33 | 12 |
| 2020 · Kyle Whittingham | 3–2 | 3–2 | 0–0 | 11.9 | — | 29 | — |
| 2019 · Kyle Whittingham | 11–3 | 8–2 | 0–1 | 19.5 | 18.8 | 42 | 16 |
| 2018 · Kyle Whittingham | 9–5 | 6–4 | 0–1 | 16.8 | 10.6 | 33 | — |
| 2017 · Kyle Whittingham | 7–6 | 3–6 | 1–0 | 12 | 7.3 | 33 | — |
| 2016 · Kyle Whittingham | 9–4 | 5–4 | 1–0 | 10.9 | 9.2 | 37 | 23 |
| 2015 · Kyle Whittingham | 10–3 | 6–3 | 1–0 | 11 | 11.8 | 45 | 17 |
Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.
CFBD season overview
2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.
Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data
Stat rankings
CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:09:12 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.
| Statistic | Offense rank / population | Percentile | Defense rank / population | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPA / play | 15 / 138 | 89.8 | 23 / 138 | 83.9 |
| Success rate | 7 / 138 | 95.6 | 17 / 138 | 88.3 |
| Explosiveness | 50 / 138 | 64.2 | 130 / 138 | 5.8 |
| Standard-down success | 24 / 138 | 83.2 | 13 / 138 | 91.2 |
| Passing-down success | 3 / 138 | 98.5 | 70 / 138 | 49.6 |
| Pass PPA | 36 / 138 | 74.5 | 17 / 138 | 88.3 |
| Rush PPA | 13 / 138 | 91.2 | 22 / 138 | 84.7 |
| Pass explosiveness | 109 / 138 | 21.2 | 126 / 138 | 8.8 |
| Rush explosiveness | 11 / 138 | 92.7 | 72 / 138 | 48.2 |
| Line yards | 21 / 138 | 85.4 | 67 / 138 | 51.8 |
| Second-level yards | 2 / 138 | 99.3 | 64 / 138 | 54.0 |
| Open-field yards | 15 / 138 | 89.8 | 69 / 138 | 50.4 |
| Stuff rate | 123 / 138 | 10.9 | 44 / 138 | 68.6 |
| Power success | T113 / 138 | 17.9 | 13 / 138 | 91.2 |
| Havoc | T65 / 138 | 52.6 | T31 / 138 | 77.4 |
| Front-seven havoc | T78 / 138 | 43.1 | T115 / 138 | 15.7 |
| DB havoc | T52 / 138 | 61.7 | 1 / 138 | 100.0 |
| Points / opportunity | 17 / 138 | 88.3 | 13 / 138 | 91.2 |
| Average field position | T52 / 138 | 61.7 | T6 / 138 | 95.3 |
| Field-position expected points | 43 / 138 | 69.3 | 4 / 138 | 97.8 |
Player PPA and usage
Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.
Devon Dampier · QBUsage 53.1% · Avg PPA 0.383 · Total 115.550
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.383 | 115.550 | 53.1% |
| Pass | 0.390 | 90.431 | 91.3% |
| Rush | 0.404 | 27.894 | 22.7% |
| 1st down | 0.228 | 31.928 | 50.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.235 | 22.297 | 52.8% |
| 3rd down | 1.031 | 64.978 | 64.9% |
| Standard downs | 0.237 | 48.989 | 48.5% |
| Passing downs | 0.701 | 66.561 | 66.9% |
Wayshawn Parker · RBUsage 23.9% · Avg PPA 0.451 · Total 61.343
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.451 | 61.343 | 23.9% |
| Pass | 0.844 | 24.477 | 11.4% |
| Rush | 0.345 | 36.866 | 35.2% |
| 1st down | 0.277 | 19.081 | 24.8% |
| 2nd down | 0.320 | 12.813 | 22.2% |
| 3rd down | 1.050 | 26.255 | 25.8% |
| Standard downs | 0.483 | 56.071 | 27.2% |
| Passing downs | 0.264 | 5.272 | 14.1% |
Braden Pegan · WRUsage 11.1% · Avg PPA 0.515 · Total 32.436
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.515 | 32.436 | 11.1% |
| Pass | 0.501 | 30.588 | 24.0% |
| Rush | 0.924 | 1.848 | 0.7% |
| 1st down | 0.463 | 13.433 | 10.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.062 | 1.236 | 11.1% |
| 3rd down | 1.269 | 17.766 | 14.4% |
| Standard downs | 0.262 | 11.784 | 10.5% |
| Passing downs | 1.147 | 20.652 | 12.7% |
Byrd Ficklin · QBUsage 9.5% · Avg PPA 0.118 · Total 6.387
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.118 | 6.387 | 9.5% |
| Pass | 0.070 | 1.825 | 10.2% |
| Rush | 0.163 | 4.562 | 9.2% |
| 1st down | 0.302 | 8.771 | 10.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.405 | 4.454 | 6.1% |
| 3rd down | 0.094 | 0.942 | 10.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.123 | 5.303 | 10.1% |
| Passing downs | 0.099 | 1.084 | 7.7% |
Daniel Bray · RBUsage 8.1% · Avg PPA 0.280 · Total 12.869
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.280 | 12.869 | 8.1% |
| Pass | 0.397 | 5.959 | 5.9% |
| Rush | 0.223 | 6.910 | 10.2% |
| 1st down | 0.161 | 4.192 | 9.4% |
| 2nd down | 0.406 | 7.315 | 10.0% |
| 3rd down | 0.681 | 1.361 | 2.1% |
| Standard downs | 0.262 | 9.943 | 8.9% |
| Passing downs | 0.366 | 2.926 | 5.6% |
Steve Chavez-Soto · RBUsage 6.3% · Avg PPA -0.191 · Total -3.446
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.191 | -3.446 | 6.3% |
| Pass | -0.497 | -1.990 | 3.2% |
| Rush | -0.104 | -1.456 | 8.9% |
| 1st down | -0.484 | -3.391 | 5.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.308 | 2.159 | 7.9% |
| 3rd down | 0.691 | 2.073 | 6.3% |
| Standard downs | -0.236 | -3.537 | 6.8% |
| Passing downs | 0.030 | 0.091 | 4.7% |
Creed Whittemore · WRUsage 6.0% · Avg PPA 0.640 · Total 21.764
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.640 | 21.764 | 6.0% |
| Pass | 0.640 | 21.764 | 13.4% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.332 | 4.322 | 4.7% |
| 2nd down | 0.354 | 4.251 | 6.7% |
| 3rd down | 1.466 | 13.192 | 9.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.200 | 3.401 | 4.0% |
| Passing downs | 1.080 | 18.363 | 12.0% |
LaMarcus Bell · RBUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA 0.400 · Total 4.405
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.400 | 4.405 | 5.0% |
| Pass | 0.046 | 0.046 | 1.1% |
| Rush | 0.436 | 4.359 | 8.0% |
| 1st down | 0.804 | 2.411 | 2.9% |
| 2nd down | -0.849 | -4.244 | 6.9% |
| 3rd down | 2.079 | 6.238 | 7.7% |
| Standard downs | -0.019 | -0.113 | 3.6% |
| Passing downs | 0.904 | 4.519 | 9.4% |
Ricky Johnson · WRUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.445 · Total 12.469
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.445 | 12.469 | 4.9% |
| Pass | 0.445 | 12.469 | 11.0% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.453 | 5.437 | 4.3% |
| 2nd down | 0.236 | 2.831 | 6.7% |
| 3rd down | 1.050 | 4.202 | 4.1% |
| Standard downs | 0.577 | 8.659 | 3.5% |
| Passing downs | 0.293 | 3.810 | 9.2% |
Mateaki Helu · RBUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA 0.186 · Total 2.424
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.186 | 2.424 | 4.6% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | 0.186 | 2.424 | 8.2% |
| 1st down | 0.073 | 0.441 | 4.3% |
| 2nd down | -0.064 | -0.256 | 4.5% |
| 3rd down | 0.746 | 2.239 | 6.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.106 | 1.165 | 5.0% |
| Passing downs | 0.630 | 1.259 | 3.1% |
Noah Bennee · TEUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA 0.702 · Total 16.144
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.702 | 16.144 | 4.6% |
| Pass | 0.702 | 16.144 | 10.3% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.598 | 7.172 | 4.9% |
| 2nd down | 0.228 | 2.050 | 5.8% |
| 3rd down | 2.454 | 2.454 | 1.2% |
| Standard downs | 0.856 | 14.557 | 4.6% |
| Passing downs | 0.264 | 1.587 | 4.6% |
Hunter Andrews · TEUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 0.997 · Total 18.949
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.997 | 18.949 | 3.9% |
| Pass | 1.349 | 17.539 | 5.9% |
| Rush | 0.235 | 1.410 | 2.3% |
| 1st down | 0.445 | 3.113 | 2.9% |
| 2nd down | 0.599 | 4.788 | 5.2% |
| 3rd down | 2.762 | 11.048 | 4.7% |
| Standard downs | 0.719 | 7.912 | 3.0% |
| Passing downs | 1.380 | 11.038 | 6.5% |
Mana Carvalho · WRUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA -0.741 · Total -2.962
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.741 | -2.962 | 2.7% |
| Pass | -0.741 | -2.962 | 6.3% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.163 | 0.325 | 2.8% |
| 2nd down | 0.838 | 0.838 | 2.1% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -1.267 | -3.801 | 2.8% |
| Passing downs | 0.838 | 0.838 | 2.4% |
Brandon Rose · QBUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.313 · Total 0.626
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.313 | 0.626 | 2.6% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | 0.313 | 0.626 | 4.1% |
| 1st down | -0.337 | -0.337 | 2.6% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | 0.963 | 0.963 | 8.3% |
| Standard downs | -0.337 | -0.337 | 1.6% |
| Passing downs | 0.963 | 0.963 | 6.7% |
Larry Simmons · WRUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.682 · Total 7.505
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.682 | 7.505 | 2.6% |
| Pass | 0.682 | 7.505 | 5.7% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.551 | 4.956 | 4.3% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | 1.275 | 2.549 | 2.7% |
| Standard downs | 0.433 | 4.326 | 3.1% |
| Passing downs | 3.179 | 3.179 | 0.9% |
Semi Taulanga · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 1.099 · Total 2.198
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.099 | 2.198 | 2.6% |
| Pass | 2.786 | 2.786 | 3.0% |
| Rush | -0.587 | -0.587 | 2.3% |
| 1st down | -0.587 | -0.587 | 2.6% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 1.099 | 2.198 | 3.4% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Daidren Zipperer · WRUsage 1.6% · Avg PPA -3.883 · Total -3.883
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -3.883 | -3.883 | 1.6% |
| Pass | -3.883 | -3.883 | 3.4% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | -3.883 | -3.883 | 1.9% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Kyri Shoels · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.625 · Total -2.499
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.625 | -2.499 | 1.4% |
| Pass | -0.625 | -2.499 | 2.8% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.477 | -0.953 | 1.5% |
| 2nd down | -0.821 | -0.821 | 1.1% |
| 3rd down | -0.725 | -0.725 | 1.9% |
| Standard downs | -0.477 | -0.953 | 0.9% |
| Passing downs | -0.773 | -1.546 | 2.6% |
Will Monney · TEUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.644 · Total -1.289
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.644 | -1.289 | 1.4% |
| Pass | -0.644 | -1.289 | 2.9% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.957 | -0.957 | 1.5% |
| 2nd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 3rd down | -0.332 | -0.332 | 3.7% |
| Standard downs | -0.644 | -1.289 | 1.9% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.
Values and percentiles
| Metric | Value | Percentile | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense PPA/play | 0.252 | 90th138 teams | higher |
| Offense success rate | 0.504 | 96th138 teams | higher |
| Offense explosiveness | 1.266 | 64th138 teams | higher |
| Offense pass PPA/play | 0.313 | 74th138 teams | higher |
| Offense rush PPA/play | 0.226 | 91st138 teams | higher |
| Defense PPA/play | -0.034 | 84th138 teams | lower |
| Defense success rate | 0.355 | 88th138 teams | lower |
| Defense explosiveness | 1.385 | 6th138 teams | lower |
| Defense havoc created | 0.180 | 77th138 teams | higher |
Passing profile
2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPACaptured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 247 attempts charted. Average depth of target 9.5 yards (72nd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.8 per completion. Completion 68.4%, 8.4 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.37.
| Side | Actual | Expected | CPOE (pp) | Qualifying / all attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 68.9% | 61.8% | +7.2 | 219 / 247 |
| Defense allowed | 52.6% | 61.0% | -8.3 | 247 / 280 |
Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.
138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Utah.
Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.
Defense and rushing detail
| Side | Attempts | Charted | ADOT | YAC | Comp % | PPA | CPOE | CPOE att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing offense | 247 | 99% | 9.5 | 5.8 | 68.4% | 0.37 | +7.2 pp | 219 |
| Passing defense | 280 | 99% | 8.9 | 6.3 | 50.4% | 0.07 | -8.3 pp | 247 |
Rushing production
| Side | Attempts | Yards / carry | Success | PPA | Line yards / rush | Second-level yards / rush | Open-field yards / rush | Stuff rate | Power success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 317 | 5.8 | 51.5% | 0.28 | 3.40 | 1.40 | 1.90 | 17.4% | 65.2% |
| Defense allowed | 228 | 3.7 | 36.8% | 0.00 | 2.70 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 20.3% | 60.9% |
Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.
Rushing sample and attribution
| Side | Yards recorded | Individual | Unattributed | Sacks | Kneels | Team rushes | Multiple carriers | Direction located / eligible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 306 / 317 | 293 | 24 | 10 | 13 | 14 | 1 | 290 / 293 · 99.0% |
| Defense allowed | 221 / 228 | 221 | 7 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 207 / 212 · 97.6% |
Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.
Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.
Game-by-game passing and rushing
2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +7.2 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.
CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.
Game log and attempt coverage
| Week | Opponent | Pass att | CPOE att | Comp %* | Expected %* | CPOE | ADOT | Pass PPA | Rush att | Rush yds/carry | Rush PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | Idaho | 26 | 0 | — | — | — | 15.6 | 0.68 | 49 | 7.5 | 0.48 |
| W2 | Arkansas | 28 | 28 | 71.4% | 60.6% | +10.8 pp | 8.5 | 0.37 | 34 | 4.2 | 0.48 |
| W3 | Utah State | 37 | 37 | 67.6% | 62.8% | +4.7 pp | 9.3 | 0.32 | 38 | 5.1 | 0.14 |
| W4 | Iowa State | 27 | 26 | 65.4% | 64.7% | +0.7 pp | 7.8 | 0.43 | 33 | 6.1 | 0.33 |
| W6 | Kansas | 31 | 31 | 77.4% | 61.0% | +16.4 pp | 9.9 | 0.48 | 47 | 6.6 | 0.47 |
| W7 | Colorado | 41 | 41 | 58.5% | 58.3% | +0.2 pp | 10.1 | 0.20 | 39 | 3.4 | 0.01 |
| W8 | Houston | 26 | 26 | 69.2% | 61.9% | +7.3 pp | 9.3 | 0.28 | 35 | 6.5 | 0.45 |
| W9 | Cincinnati | 31 | 30 | 76.7% | 64.4% | +12.3 pp | 6.0 | 0.30 | 42 | 6.5 | -0.08 |
*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.
Punting and returns
2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.
Our punts
22 punts · 43.4 gross yards/punt · 43.2 net yards/punt
6 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked
Known gross yards: 22/22 punts. Known net yards: 19/22 punts.
Our punt returns
15 returns · 5.7 yards/return · 0 touchdowns
0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked
Known return yards: 15/15 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.
Recent games
| Game | Punts | Gross yd/punt | Net yd/punt | Known net yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 9 · Cincinnati | 2 | 51.5 | 53.0 | 2/2 |
| Week 8 · Houston | 4 | 43.5 | 38.5 | 4/4 |
| Week 7 · Colorado | 5 | 38.0 | 37.0 | 4/5 |
| Week 6 · Kansas | 2 | 46.0 | 46.0 | 2/2 |
| Week 4 · Iowa State | 4 | 38.8 | 39.7 | 3/4 |