Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Western Kentucky

2026 season

Conference USA
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Western Kentucky's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 124 across 8 systems; best 116, worst 129, so they disagree by 13 places.

Lab EPA
#126
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#125
down 132026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#119
down 32026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#116
down 52026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#119
down 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#129
down 8 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#123
down 122026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#126
down 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#113 of 138
Schedule strength
#46 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#84 of 138
Game control
#109 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#123 of 138
Offense
#112 of 138
Defense
#116 of 138
Special teams
#102 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Western Kentucky · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

3-5 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.163 net EPA/play

#126

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-9.90 points

#125 · Down 13 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -7.25 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -5.24, schedule #96 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -2.51. That is worth -12.49 on its own; the preseason prior of -1.11 still carries 23% of the weight, giving -9.90.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Western Kentucky · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Nevada
away · 2026-09-06 · ID 401864432
-35.00 → -35.00+2.500.73498.36%-5.87-2.717-0.491-3.207
Week 2 · Georgia
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856673
-50.00 → -35.00+2.500.76378.69%+16.36-2.8231.422-1.402
Week 3 · Indiana
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858449
-38.00 → -35.00+2.500.79379.03%+14.82-2.9341.338-1.596
Week 4 · Mercyhurst
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401870745
+45.00 → +35.00-2.500.82499.38%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.049-2.3460.704
Week 5 · New Mexico State
away · 2026-10-02 · ID 401871049
-21.00 → -21.00+2.500.85729.75%-10.12-1.804-0.987-2.790
Week 6 · Missouri State
home · 2026-10-08 · ID 401871052
+21.00 → +21.00-2.500.890910.13%-9.591.875-0.9720.903
Week 7 · Sam Houston
away · 2026-10-15 · ID 401871068
+13.00 → +13.00+2.500.925910.53%-14.731.632-1.5510.081
Week 9 · Delaware
home · 2026-10-27 · ID 401871071
-14.00 → -14.00-2.501.000011.38%-4.08-1.877-0.465-2.341

Game terms -9.65 points; prior term -0.25 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -9.90 points. The preseason prior is -1.11 with 22.75% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-13.3 SP+ points

#119 · Down 3 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-18.63 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#129 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -13.40 on 444 plays; defense 5.23 on 364 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Western Kentucky 1 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
3-5 · conf 2-2 · home 2-1 · away 1-4 · expected wins 2.9
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-4 ATS (-4.2 avg) · 2025: 10-3 ATS (+3.8 avg)
Head coach
Tyson Helton · hired 2018-11-27 · 25-15 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #111 (140 pts) · 2025 #96 (153 pts) · 2026 #81 (185 pts)
Returning
84% of production · 78% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing95%99%
Receiving85%78%
Rushing55%49%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back83.000.84226.74
Defensive Line123.000.845010.14
Linebacker33.000.85392.56
Offensive Line83.000.83536.68
Quarterback33.000.84052.52
Receiver123.000.851210.21
Running Back53.000.84264.21
Special Teams13.000.82500.82

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Brock Glenn · QB

CFBD athlete 4920158. Florida State (2023–2025); Western Kentucky (2026–2026)

Passing WEPA0.08816342.6%
Pass 54.8% · Rush 30.4%

1st 40.3% · 2nd 39.9% · 3rd 50.7%

Standard downs 41.2% · Passing downs 45.1%

2023: 3★ · 0.8878
Rodney Tisdale Jr. · QB

CFBD athlete 5196864. Western Kentucky (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.11810933.9%
Pass 55.9% · Rush 10.1%

1st 28.0% · 2nd 36.2% · 3rd 39.3%

Standard downs 29.1% · Passing downs 43.0%

2024: 3★ · 0.8156
Ajay Allen · RB

CFBD athlete 4878394. Western Kentucky (2026–2026); Nebraska (2021–2022); Tulsa (2025–2025); Miami (2023–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.1119020.4%
Pass 9.2% · Rush 33.7%

1st 21.0% · 2nd 22.3% · 3rd 16.4%

Standard downs 22.9% · Passing downs 15.7%

2022: 3★ · 0.8837
Brock Glenn · QB

CFBD athlete 4920158. Florida State (2023–2025); Western Kentucky (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.3118542.6%
Pass 54.8% · Rush 30.4%

1st 40.3% · 2nd 39.9% · 3rd 50.7%

Standard downs 41.2% · Passing downs 45.1%

2023: 3★ · 0.8878
Karl Campbell · PK

CFBD athlete 5394214. Western Kentucky (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR4.1009—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
CC Ezirim · TE

CFBD athlete 5125726. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 8.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 7.0% · 3rd 4.9%

Standard downs 4.6% · Passing downs 4.0%

Not linked
Caleb McMickle · QB

CFBD athlete 5077114. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 6.3% · Rush 3.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 16.7%

Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Cameron Flowers · WR

CFBD athlete 5155579. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.8%
Pass 10.1% · Rush 1.6%

1st 5.8% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 8.0%

Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Coleson Arends · TE

CFBD athlete 5159815. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 5.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 2.8%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Devin Hamilton · WR

CFBD athlete 5291156. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 3.0%

Not linked
Jaden McGill · RB

CFBD athlete 5225936. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.8%
Pass 7.6% · Rush 10.5%

1st 11.2% · 2nd 9.3% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 10.8% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Jay Rockwell · WR

CFBD athlete 4689118. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Jeremiah Carroll · WR

CFBD athlete 5164039. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Jonathan Stafford Jr. · WR

CFBD athlete 5290902. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.0%
Pass 22.1% · Rush 3.6%

1st 11.9% · 2nd 13.8% · 3rd 14.3%

Standard downs 11.3% · Passing downs 16.2%

Not linked
Kalib Hicks · RB

CFBD athlete 4920135. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.1%
Pass 0.9% · Rush 9.3%

1st 4.4% · 2nd 7.1% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 6.8%

Not linked
Le'Kamren Meadows · RB

CFBD athlete 5290447. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.7%
Pass 1.2% · Rush 10.6%

1st 9.6% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 0.8%

Standard downs 7.6% · Passing downs 2.2%

Not linked
Lofton Howard · TE

CFBD athlete 5091828. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.5%
Pass 6.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.1% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 3.6%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 3.4%

Not linked
Moussa Barry · WR

CFBD athlete 5095915. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 8.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.9% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Nigel Johnson · WR

CFBD athlete 5159234. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.1% · 2nd 1.4% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 1.4% · Passing downs 1.4%

Not linked
Qua'Vez Humphreys · WR

CFBD athlete 5151200. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 6.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 1.8% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 3.6% · Passing downs 2.2%

Not linked
Quincy Burroughs · WR

CFBD athlete 4716507. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.2%
Pass 9.9% · Rush 0.4%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 3.2% · 3rd 7.1%

Standard downs 4.4% · Passing downs 6.9%

Not linked
Sincere Baines · RB

CFBD athlete 5300775. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 3.8%

Not linked
Zion Taylor · WR

CFBD athlete 4921322. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.5%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 1.7%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 5.7% · 3rd 2.5%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 5.2%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 19 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Alec Johnson · IOLGeorgia State2026-01-122★ / —Immediate
Alex Lopez · IOLMississippi State2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Brock Glenn · QBFlorida State2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
CC Ezirim · TEToledo2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
D'Cambren Verrett · STexas A&M-Kingsville2026-01-103★ / 0.8400Immediate
Garrison Madden · LBUSC2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Geajorm Akpaloo · LBCoastal Carolina2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Jacob Cosby-Mosley · SWake Forest2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jeremiah Carroll · WRNot reported2025-11-193★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jyzaiah Rockwell · WRPrairie View A&M2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kalib Hicks · RBOklahoma State2026-04-023★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kiawan Murphy · DLAkron2026-01-123★ / 0.8200Immediate
Nathan Gonzales · EDGEIndiana State2026-01-183★ / 0.8400Immediate
Nonso Omezi · IOLHouston Christian2026-01-103★ / 0.8300Immediate
Rhett Larson · IOLSam Houston2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Roq Montgomery · IOLAlabama2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Sincere Baines · RBMaine2026-01-083★ / 0.8400Immediate
Tai Ray · OTPittsburgh2026-01-133★ / 0.8300Immediate
Tyreek Major · IOLSouth Florida2026-01-163★ / 0.8400Immediate
Outgoing · 23 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Branden Hollis · OTNot reported2025-12-01— / —Immediate
Caleb Nitta · IOLOklahoma2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Chukwunedu Okeke · DLJames Madison2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Damari Jefferson · WRNot reported2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Dylan Flowers · CBDuke2026-01-033★ / 0.8700Immediate
Dylan Vickerson · WRAlabama State2025-12-153★ / —Immediate
Harper Holloman · EDGEWest Virginia2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Isaiah Myers · WRMissouri State2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jaavan Mack · CBNot reported2026-01-17— / —Immediate
Jack Cassidy · KWest Virginia2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Jai Eugene Jr. · SSyracuse2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jalen Emery · CBNot reported2026-01-143★ / —Immediate
Kennon Loftin · LBNot reported2025-12-153★ / —Immediate
Konner Olson · KNew Mexico2026-01-203★ / 0.8000Immediate
Koron Hayward · EDGETCU2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
La'Vell Wright · RBPittsburgh2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Laurence Seymore III · IOLTexas2026-01-153★ / 0.8700Immediate
Miller Malone · LBHouston2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Moussa Barry · WRNot reported2025-12-02— / —Immediate
Nazir Ward · CBSyracuse2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Noah Meyers · TESyracuse2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Robby Harrison · DLColorado State2026-01-153★ / 0.8400Immediate
Victory Vaka · DLMiddle Tennessee2026-08-20— / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Western Kentucky. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Tyson Helton · career 57–36 across 8 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 6 appointments
  1. 2019–present · Tyson Helton · active at capture

    57–36 · 93 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Hired 2018-11-27. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2017–2018 · Mike Sanford Jr.

    9–16 · 25 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2016-12-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2014–2016 · Jeff Brohm

    30–10 · 40 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2014-01-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2013–2013 · Bobby Petrino

    8–4 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2010–2012 · Willie Taggart

    16–20 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2009-11-23. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2007–2009 · David Elson

    9–27 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2003-03-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Tyson Helton · incomplete attribution0–0——-11.2-11.581—
2025 · Tyson Helton9–46–21–01.6-4.296—
2024 · Tyson Helton8–66–30–1-2.2-5.4111—
2023 · Tyson Helton8–55–31–0-2-2.8134—
2022 · Tyson Helton9–56–21–01.7-0.194—
2021 · Tyson Helton9–57–21–013.35136—
2020 · Tyson Helton5–74–30–1-3.2-10.280—
2019 · Tyson Helton9–46–21–01.7086—
2018 · Mike Sanford Jr.3–92–60–0-16.1-15.284—
2017 · Mike Sanford Jr.6–74–40–1-4.9-1582—
2016 · Jeff Brohm · incomplete attribution10–3——15.510.1101—
2015 · Jeff Brohm12–29–01–010.89.711124
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:07:52 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play111 / 13819.7108 / 13821.9
Success rate122 / 13811.771 / 13848.9
Explosiveness54 / 13861.3128 / 1387.3
Standard-down success114 / 13817.557 / 13859.1
Passing-down success111 / 13819.798 / 13829.2
Pass PPA125 / 1389.553 / 13862.0
Rush PPA95 / 13831.4128 / 1387.3
Pass explosiveness21 / 13885.4118 / 13814.6
Rush explosiveness109 / 13821.2128 / 1387.3
Line yards96 / 13830.7112 / 13819.0
Second-level yards92 / 13833.6117 / 13815.3
Open-field yards99 / 13828.5128 / 1387.3
Stuff rate100 / 13827.783 / 13840.1
Power success83 / 13840.1T113 / 13817.9
HavocT77 / 13844.2T86 / 13837.2
Front-seven havoc93 / 13832.8T85 / 13838.3
DB havocT48 / 13864.673 / 13847.4
Points / opportunity101 / 13827.0124 / 13810.2
Average field positionT96 / 13829.6T63 / 13851.8
Field-position expected points105 / 13824.183 / 13840.1

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Brock Glenn · QBUsage 42.6% · Avg PPA 0.112 · Total 28.331
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.11228.33142.6%
Pass0.0091.46054.8%
Rush0.37831.76330.4%
1st down0.0242.36740.3%
2nd down0.0846.28339.9%
3rd down0.37526.59750.7%
Standard downs0.09415.00141.2%
Passing downs0.14513.33045.1%
Rodney Tisdale Jr. · QBUsage 33.9% · Avg PPA 0.078 · Total 11.995
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.07811.99533.9%
Pass0.10413.81555.9%
Rush-0.087-1.82110.1%
1st down-0.272-14.41228.0%
2nd down0.0854.33836.2%
3rd down0.65227.38439.3%
Standard downs-0.112-9.65229.1%
Passing downs0.31821.64743.0%
Ajay Allen · RBUsage 20.4% · Avg PPA -0.053 · Total -6.354
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.053-6.35420.4%
Pass-0.064-1.7999.2%
Rush-0.049-4.55533.7%
1st down-0.125-6.39821.0%
2nd down0.0040.18922.3%
3rd down0.1713.94116.4%
Standard downs-0.146-13.03522.9%
Passing downs0.2096.68115.7%
Jonathan Stafford Jr. · WRUsage 13.0% · Avg PPA 0.254 · Total 19.547
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.25419.54713.0%
Pass0.34723.27122.1%
Rush-0.372-3.7243.6%
1st down-0.130-3.78011.9%
2nd down0.0681.75913.8%
3rd down1.07521.50014.3%
Standard downs-0.003-0.13511.3%
Passing downs0.59619.68116.2%
Jaden McGill · RBUsage 8.8% · Avg PPA -0.202 · Total -4.249
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.202-4.2498.8%
Pass0.1251.1277.6%
Rush-0.448-5.37610.5%
1st down-0.107-1.17211.2%
2nd down-0.366-2.5619.3%
3rd down-0.172-0.5165.3%
Standard downs-0.062-1.05210.8%
Passing downs-0.799-3.1964.9%
Cameron Flowers · WRUsage 5.8% · Avg PPA 0.412 · Total 12.353
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.41212.3535.8%
Pass0.49112.77510.1%
Rush-0.106-0.4221.6%
1st down-0.136-1.6285.8%
2nd down0.5614.4854.8%
3rd down0.9509.4968.0%
Standard downs-0.078-1.3325.2%
Passing downs1.05313.6857.1%
Le'Kamren Meadows · RBUsage 5.7% · Avg PPA -0.212 · Total -6.144
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.212-6.1445.7%
Pass0.0850.2561.2%
Rush-0.246-6.40010.6%
1st down0.0080.1629.6%
2nd down-0.735-5.8784.8%
3rd down-0.428-0.4280.8%
Standard downs-0.272-6.7937.6%
Passing downs0.1620.6492.2%
Quincy Burroughs · WRUsage 5.2% · Avg PPA -0.212 · Total -6.571
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.212-6.5715.2%
Pass-0.203-6.0919.9%
Rush-0.480-0.4800.4%
1st down-0.216-2.8045.3%
2nd down-0.482-2.8953.2%
3rd down0.7417.4077.1%
Standard downs-0.725-12.3314.4%
Passing downs0.4115.7606.9%
Kalib Hicks · RBUsage 5.1% · Avg PPA -0.166 · Total -1.829
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.166-1.8295.1%
Pass-0.694-0.6940.9%
Rush-0.113-1.1359.3%
1st down-0.758-3.0314.4%
2nd down-0.236-1.1797.1%
3rd down-0.222-0.2222.0%
Standard downs-0.150-0.9004.2%
Passing downs-0.186-0.9296.8%
Caleb McMickle · QBUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA 0.319 · Total 0.956
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3190.9564.5%
Pass-0.716-1.4326.3%
Rush2.3882.3883.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.716-1.43216.7%
Standard downs0.6441.2874.2%
Passing downs-0.331-0.3315.6%
CC Ezirim · TEUsage 4.4% · Avg PPA 0.565 · Total 9.032
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5659.0324.4%
Pass0.5659.0328.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7032.8102.6%
2nd down0.6365.0887.0%
3rd down0.2841.1344.9%
Standard downs0.4955.4424.6%
Passing downs0.7183.5904.0%
Moussa Barry · WRUsage 4.4% · Avg PPA 0.424 · Total 11.023
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.42411.0234.4%
Pass0.43810.9588.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3624.3494.9%
2nd down0.5854.6804.3%
3rd down0.3321.9954.3%
Standard downs0.5588.9284.1%
Passing downs0.2102.0954.9%
Lofton Howard · TEUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA 0.266 · Total 5.588
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2665.5883.5%
Pass0.2665.5886.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.067-0.3362.1%
2nd down0.0130.1265.3%
3rd down0.7603.8013.6%
Standard downs0.1812.5293.6%
Passing downs0.4373.0603.4%
Zion Taylor · WRUsage 3.5% · Avg PPA 0.268 · Total 4.829
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2684.8293.5%
Pass0.0971.3525.3%
Rush0.8693.4771.7%
1st down0.8755.2492.9%
2nd down-0.162-1.4585.7%
3rd down0.3461.0382.5%
Standard downs0.5464.9142.7%
Passing downs-0.009-0.0855.2%
Qua'Vez Humphreys · WRUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA 0.081 · Total 1.301
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0811.3013.1%
Pass0.0811.3016.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.136-0.8152.9%
2nd down0.5211.5631.8%
3rd down0.7884.7274.8%
Standard downs-0.226-2.7143.6%
Passing downs1.0044.0152.2%
Coleson Arends · TEUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.691 · Total 8.287
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6918.2872.7%
Pass0.6918.2875.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8765.2543.2%
2nd down0.5831.7482.2%
3rd down0.4281.2842.8%
Standard downs0.8666.9302.7%
Passing downs0.3391.3562.7%
Jeremiah Carroll · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -0.331 · Total -0.331
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.331-0.3311.5%
Pass-0.331-0.3313.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.331-0.3318.3%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.331-0.3315.6%
Devin Hamilton · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 0.198 · Total 0.198
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1980.1981.4%
Pass0.1980.1982.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.1980.1984.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs0.1980.1983.0%
Nigel Johnson · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 1.717 · Total 5.152
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.7175.1521.4%
Pass1.7175.1522.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.783-0.7831.1%
2nd down6.2556.2551.4%
3rd down-0.319-0.3192.0%
Standard downs2.7365.4721.4%
Passing downs-0.319-0.3191.4%
Jay Rockwell · WRUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA 0.520 · Total 0.520
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5200.5201.3%
Pass0.5200.5202.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.5200.5204.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5200.5201.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Sincere Baines · RBUsage 1.3% · Avg PPA -0.036 · Total -0.036
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.036-0.0361.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.036-0.0364.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.036-0.0364.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.036-0.0363.8%
Where Western Kentucky sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.027 (20th percentile; 138 teams)20thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.382 (12th percentile; 138 teams)12thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.260 (61st percentile; 138 teams)61stOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.016 (9th percentile; 138 teams)9thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.049 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31stDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.148 (22nd percentile; 138 teams)22ndDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.408 (49th percentile; 138 teams)49thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.377 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.149 (37th percentile; 138 teams)37th
Values and percentiles
Western Kentucky metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.02720th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.38212th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.26061st138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.0169th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.04931st138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.14822nd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.40849th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.3777th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.14937th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 292 attempts charted. Average depth of target 6.9 yards (6th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.4 per completion. Completion 59.2%, 6.1 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.09.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense57.8%64.7%-7.0258 / 292
Defense allowed61.9%61.8%+0.1194 / 241

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Western Kentucky.

Target mix by zone, Western Kentucky offense
Short left28% · 80Short middle17% · 47Short right45% · 126Deep left4% · 10Deep middle1% · 3Deep right5% · 15

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Western Kentucky passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense29299%6.95.459.2%0.09-7.0 pp258
Passing defense24199%8.96.360.2%0.14+0.1 pp194

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2914.143.1%0.093.001.001.0017.5%71.1%
Defense allowed2595.344.4%0.243.301.101.8016.0%79.3%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense283 / 2912791218441268 / 269 · 99.6%
Defense allowed257 / 259251810660242 / 243 · 99.6%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -7.0 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-15.5-6.32.9W1W1 vs Nevada: -5.3 ppW2W2 vs Georgia: -15.5 ppW3W3 vs Indiana: -9.5 ppW4W5W5 vs New Mexico State: +2.9 ppW6W6 vs Missouri State: -4.7 ppW7W7 vs Sam Houston: -15.3 ppW9W9 vs Delaware: -4.9 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Nevada404060.0%65.3%-5.3 pp6.80.18434.2-0.04
W2Georgia373650.0%65.5%-15.5 pp6.1-0.17373.0-0.09
W3Indiana323253.1%62.6%-9.5 pp7.1-0.32292.3-0.39
W4Mercyhurst310———7.71.04345.40.29
W5New Mexico State434269.0%66.2%+2.9 pp6.50.11311.3-0.07
W6Missouri State353557.1%61.9%-4.7 pp9.80.28405.90.33
W7Sam Houston313148.4%63.6%-15.3 pp7.50.10433.1-0.01
W9Delaware434261.9%66.8%-4.9 pp4.8-0.32346.60.59

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

41 punts · 43.3 gross yards/punt · 37.1 net yards/punt

4 inside the 20 · 4 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 41/41 punts. Known net yards: 31/41 punts.

Our punt returns

7 returns · 10.0 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 7/7 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Delaware235.031.01/2
Week 7 · Sam Houston642.034.84/6
Week 6 · Missouri State449.335.52/4
Week 5 · New Mexico State642.540.45/6
Week 4 · Mercyhurst0——0/0
Team style
Rating history