Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Akron

2026 season

Mid-American
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Akron's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 134 across 8 systems; best 133, worst 138, so they disagree by 5 places.

Lab EPA
#133
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#134
down 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#134
up 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#138
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#134
up 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#136
down 1 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#136
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#133
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#136 of 138
Schedule strength
#91 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#122 of 138
Game control
#134 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#134 of 138
Offense
#120 of 138
Defense
#137 of 138
Special teams
#126 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Akron · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

1-7 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.189 net EPA/play

#133

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-16.37 points

#134 · Down 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -13.38 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -6.33, schedule #110 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -3.95. That is worth -19.71 on its own; the preseason prior of -5.13 still carries 23% of the weight, giving -16.37.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Akron · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Wake Forest
away · 2026-09-03 · ID 401858204
-22.00 → -22.00+2.500.73498.40%+14.40-1.6371.209-0.428
Week 2 · Robert Morris
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401866412
+35.00 → +35.00-2.500.76378.72%-25.00 (fixed lower division)2.836-2.1810.654
Week 3 · Minnesota
away · 2026-09-19 · ID 401858451
-34.00 → -34.00+2.500.79379.07%+2.17-2.8560.197-2.659
Week 4 · UNLV
home · 2026-09-26 · ID 401864512
-28.00 → -28.00-2.500.82499.42%-2.40-2.874-0.226-3.100
Week 5 · Central Michigan
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401866430
-24.00 → -24.00+2.500.85729.79%-8.69-2.106-0.851-2.957
Week 6 · Eastern Michigan
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401866435
-2.00 → -2.00-2.500.890910.18%-9.23-0.458-0.940-1.398
Week 7 · Miami (OH)
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401866478
-20.00 → -20.00+2.500.925910.58%-4.69-1.851-0.496-2.347
Week 8 · Kent State
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401866446
-15.00 → -15.00+2.500.962210.99%-14.48-1.374-1.592-2.966

Game terms -15.20 points; prior term -1.17 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -16.37 points. The preseason prior is -5.13 with 22.85% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-25.0 SP+ points

#134 · Up 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-21.79 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#136 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -7.81 on 389 plays; defense 13.98 on 396 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Akron 1 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
1-8 · conf 0-5 · home 1-3 · away 0-5 · expected wins 2.1
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 4-5 ATS (-4.9 avg) · 2025: 6-6 ATS (+1.2 avg)
Head coach
Joe Moorhead · hired 2021-12-04 · 11-25 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #101 (147 pts) · 2025 #128 (87 pts) · 2026 #133 (147 pts)
Returning
92% of production · 94% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing87%100%
Receiving92%83%
Rushing102%100%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back92.890.82447.42
Defensive Line83.000.82236.58
Linebacker73.000.82495.77
Offensive Line93.000.83397.51
Quarterback43.000.83133.33
Receiver52.600.81164.06
Running Back13.000.85500.85
Special Teams23.000.83641.67

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Brayden Roggow · QB

CFBD athlete 5146903. Akron (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.21519636.1%
Pass 64.1% · Rush 7.4%

1st 31.4% · 2nd 37.6% · 3rd 44.0%

Standard downs 29.9% · Passing downs 49.7%

2024: 3★ · 0.8230
Jordan Gant · RB

CFBD athlete 5084582. Akron (2025–2026); Tennessee State (2022–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.18011727.9%
Pass 10.0% · Rush 49.5%

1st 28.9% · 2nd 27.6% · 3rd 26.7%

Standard downs 32.5% · Passing downs 17.8%

2022: stars unavailable
Sean Patrick · RB

CFBD athlete 5146708. Akron (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1163310.3%
Pass 4.4% · Rush 17.4%

1st 12.7% · 2nd 10.4% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 11.4% · Passing downs 7.8%

2024: 3★ · 0.8550
Matthew Schramm · PK

CFBD athlete 5225257. Akron (2024–2026)

Kicker PAAR-4.5308—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Aidan Stire · PK

CFBD athlete 5296250. West Virginia (2025–2025); Akron (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.9204—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2025: stars unavailable
Brandon Hills · WR

CFBD athlete 5076653. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.4%
Pass 5.9% · Rush 0.7%

1st 3.3% · 2nd 1.8% · 3rd 6.5%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 5.8%

Not linked
Cibastian Broughton · QB

CFBD athlete 5198324. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——42.9%
Pass 60.2% · Rush 26.5%

1st 39.5% · 2nd 44.8% · 3rd 47.6%

Standard downs 39.3% · Passing downs 51.5%

Not linked
Connor Cravaack · TE

CFBD athlete 5157315. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 7.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.2% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 3.9%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Elijah Alexander · TE

CFBD athlete 5397589. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 0.4%

1st 2.5% · 2nd 4.9% · 3rd 5.8%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Gentz Hilburn · WR

CFBD athlete 5397590. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 8.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 5.1% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked
Jean Louis III · WR

CFBD athlete 5157324. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 4.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 3.7%

Not linked
Kyan Mason · WR

CFBD athlete 5110019. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.5%
Pass 17.8% · Rush 1.1%

1st 10.1% · 2nd 9.0% · 3rd 7.8%

Standard downs 8.5% · Passing downs 11.5%

Not linked
Luke Sivon · WR

CFBD athlete 5295187. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——7.1%
Pass 14.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 6.5% · 2nd 8.0% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 5.6% · Passing downs 12.5%

Not linked
Marquese Williams · RB

CFBD athlete 4871050. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 0.7% · Rush 7.5%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 1.9%

Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 2.9%

Not linked
Miles Burris · WR

CFBD athlete 5193102. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.0%
Pass 12.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 6.2% · 3rd 6.9%

Standard downs 5.0% · Passing downs 8.4%

Not linked
Paul Davis · WR

CFBD athlete 5157316. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 9.1%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.0%

Not linked
Semaj Beals · QB

CFBD athlete 5209397. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.7%
Pass 2.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 7.7%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Taven Curry · RB

CFBD athlete 4912281. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.6%

1st 0.8% · 2nd 2.0% · 3rd 5.8%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Titus Myers · WR

CFBD athlete 5295925. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 3.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 1.7%

Not linked
Wyatt Hook · TE

CFBD athlete 5119873. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.2%
Pass 4.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.9% · 2nd 1.3% · 3rd 2.6%

Standard downs 1.9% · Passing downs 3.2%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 15 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aidan Stire · PWest Virginia2026-01-143★ / 0.8000Immediate
Brandon Smith · IOLSouth Dakota2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Caiden Newsome · CBHoly Cross2026-01-11— / —Immediate
Carlos Slayden · IOLSouthern Miss2026-01-163★ / 0.8300Immediate
Dawayne Galloway Jr. · CBWest Virginia2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Dwight Nunoo · LBFlorida International2026-01-193★ / 0.8200Immediate
Khory Moss · CBMiami (OH)2026-01-203★ / 0.8300Immediate
Kurtis Waye · EDGEClark Atlanta2026-01-12— / —Immediate
Miles Burris · WRCharlotte2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Nate Hampton · IOLNot reported2026-01-163★ / 0.8300Immediate
Reese Poffenbarger · QBNorth Texas2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Shamar McNeil · CBMissouri2026-01-193★ / 0.8500Immediate
Vaughn Highland · DLArkansas-Pine Bluff2026-01-123★ / 0.8400Immediate
Wyatt Hook · TEMichigan State2026-01-193★ / 0.8400Immediate
Zach Hobson · CBOld Dominion2026-01-193★ / 0.8200Immediate
Outgoing · 18 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adam Samaha · KEastern Michigan2026-01-212★ / —Immediate
Ben Kamara · CBNot reported2026-01-10— / —Immediate
Bruno Dall · EDGEUCF2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Cyrus Durham · EDGENot reported2026-02-073★ / 0.8400Withdrawn
Delvin Morris · IOLKansas State2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Elijah Reed · CBUtah2026-01-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Israel Polk · WROklahoma State2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jake Newell · TEToledo2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Julien Laventure · DLTexas Tech2026-01-053★ / 0.8300Immediate
Kenneth McManus IV · IOLAuburn2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Keylen Davis · IOLPittsburgh2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Khalil Witherspoon · TENot reported2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Kiawan Murphy · DLWestern Kentucky2026-01-123★ / 0.8200Immediate
Maasai King · OTIowa State2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
Markus Boswell · LBTexas2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Max Whisner · TESam Houston2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Melvin Spriggs · LBSouthern Miss2026-01-173★ / 0.8300Immediate
Rich Benenge · LBNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Akron. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Joe Moorhead · career 27–47 across 7 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 9 appointments
  1. 2022–present · Joe Moorhead · active at capture

    13–35 · 48 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2021-12-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2021–2021 · Oscar Rodriguez

    0–3 · 3 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2021-11-04. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2019–2021 · Tom Arth

    3–24 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2018-12-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2012–2018 · Terry Bowden

    35–52 · 87 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 2011-12-28. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2010–2011 · Rob Ianello

    2–22 · 24 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2009-12-10. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2004–2009 · J.D. Brookhart

    30–42 · 72 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2003-12-15. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1995–2003 · Lee Owens

    40–61 · 101 attributed games · 9 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1987–1994 · Gerry Faust

    36–49–3 · 88 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1975–1975 · Jim Dennison

    7–4 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Joe Moorhead · incomplete attribution0–0——-22.9-22133—
2025 · Joe Moorhead5–74–40–0-13.9-14.6128—
2024 · Joe Moorhead4–83–50–0-17.9-12.9101—
2023 · Joe Moorhead2–101–70–0-21.6-21.8109—
2022 · Joe Moorhead2–101–70–0-23.4-13.8127—
2021 · Tom Arth · incomplete attribution2–7——-23.1-22.6119—
2021 · Oscar Rodriguez · incomplete attribution0–3——-23.1-22.6119—
2020 · Tom Arth1–51–50–0-23.7—125—
2019 · Tom Arth0–120–80–0-29.8-34.7114—
2018 · Terry Bowden4–82–60–0-19.3-14.5127—
2017 · Terry Bowden7–76–30–1-17.6-8.9131—
2016 · Terry Bowden5–73–50–0-5.6-11.6132—
2015 · Terry Bowden8–55–31–0-0.8-5.4127—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-10-26 16:38:53 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play96 / 13830.7129 / 1386.6
Success rate72 / 13848.2109 / 13821.2
Explosiveness121 / 13812.4127 / 1388.0
Standard-down success74 / 13846.7101 / 13827.0
Passing-down success69 / 13850.4106 / 13823.4
Pass PPA104 / 13824.8131 / 1385.1
Rush PPA57 / 13859.1124 / 13810.2
Pass explosiveness103 / 13825.5135 / 1382.2
Rush explosiveness118 / 13814.6115 / 13816.8
Line yards13 / 13891.2117 / 13815.3
Second-level yards8 / 13894.9116 / 13816.1
Open-field yards121 / 13812.4134 / 1382.9
Stuff rate29 / 13879.695 / 13831.4
Power success87 / 13837.2T81 / 13840.9
Havoc135 / 1382.2T117 / 13815.0
Front-seven havocT96 / 13829.6131 / 1385.1
DB havoc138 / 1380.0T61 / 13854.7
Points / opportunity85 / 13838.7106 / 13823.4
Average field position135 / 1382.2128 / 1387.3
Field-position expected points135 / 1382.2125 / 1389.5

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Brayden Roggow · QBUsage 41.4% · Avg PPA 0.110 · Total 24.223
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.11024.22341.4%
Pass0.16231.82472.4%
Rush0.0571.1898.6%
1st down0.0937.96636.0%
2nd down0.0312.48143.4%
3rd down0.40420.60049.5%
Standard downs-0.024-2.94334.3%
Passing downs0.28627.16656.5%
Cibastian Broughton · QBUsage 35.9% · Avg PPA 0.118 · Total 11.109
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.11811.10935.9%
Pass0.0463.21850.4%
Rush0.3297.89120.9%
1st down-0.066-2.59232.8%
2nd down0.32710.48036.4%
3rd down0.3297.23544.0%
Standard downs-0.043-2.58132.6%
Passing downs0.40313.69043.6%
Jordan Gant · RBUsage 28.4% · Avg PPA 0.079 · Total 11.979
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.07911.97928.4%
Pass-0.080-2.1589.9%
Rush0.11414.13751.0%
1st down0.0140.99530.5%
2nd down0.0502.49927.5%
3rd down0.66417.26125.2%
Standard downs0.0384.59933.2%
Passing downs0.2467.38117.9%
Sean Patrick · RBUsage 11.0% · Avg PPA 0.221 · Total 11.276
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.22111.27611.0%
Pass0.5566.1214.7%
Rush0.1295.15518.8%
1st down0.2336.74613.6%
2nd down0.1592.71111.0%
3rd down-0.383-1.5334.5%
Standard downs0.1355.25212.3%
Passing downs0.5026.0248.3%
Kyan Mason · WRUsage 9.4% · Avg PPA 0.160 · Total 8.004
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1608.0049.4%
Pass0.1597.81018.0%
Rush0.1940.1940.4%
1st down0.1553.72310.0%
2nd down0.0661.1299.3%
3rd down0.6285.0267.8%
Standard downs0.0571.7028.2%
Passing downs0.3156.30211.9%
Luke Sivon · WRUsage 7.1% · Avg PPA 0.298 · Total 1.489
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2981.4897.1%
Pass0.2981.48914.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1290.2586.5%
2nd down0.4570.9158.0%
3rd down0.3170.3177.7%
Standard downs0.1920.5755.6%
Passing downs0.4570.91512.5%
Miles Burris · WRUsage 5.8% · Avg PPA 0.443 · Total 13.742
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.44313.7425.8%
Pass0.44313.74211.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1852.2235.0%
2nd down0.4014.8076.6%
3rd down0.9596.7126.8%
Standard downs0.0961.5354.4%
Passing downs0.81412.2078.9%
Gentz Hilburn · WRUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA 0.189 · Total 1.703
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1891.7034.5%
Pass0.1891.7038.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.128-0.7706.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down0.8242.4737.7%
Standard downs-0.233-1.6335.1%
Passing downs1.6683.3363.3%
Marquese Williams · RBUsage 4.0% · Avg PPA 0.358 · Total 6.800
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3586.8004.0%
Pass3.1553.1550.4%
Rush0.2033.6458.4%
1st down0.2231.7873.8%
2nd down0.1741.5705.6%
3rd down1.7223.4432.2%
Standard downs0.0490.7364.7%
Passing downs1.5166.0642.7%
Elijah Alexander · TEUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 0.516 · Total 10.834
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.51610.8343.9%
Pass0.4859.7017.4%
Rush1.1321.1320.4%
1st down0.7724.6292.5%
2nd down0.3823.4374.9%
3rd down0.4612.7675.8%
Standard downs0.77810.8893.8%
Passing downs-0.008-0.0554.2%
Brandon Hills · WRUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.658 · Total 7.236
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6587.2363.4%
Pass0.7567.5635.9%
Rush-0.328-0.3280.7%
1st down0.4232.1143.3%
2nd down0.1120.2251.8%
3rd down1.2244.8976.5%
Standard downs0.4232.1142.2%
Passing downs0.8545.1225.8%
Connor Cravaack · TEUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA -0.018 · Total -0.235
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.018-0.2352.8%
Pass-0.018-0.2355.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.5253.1492.8%
2nd down0.1910.7632.5%
3rd down-0.067-0.1332.2%
Standard downs0.0090.0933.1%
Passing downs-0.109-0.3282.0%
Jean Louis III · WRUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA 0.969 · Total 5.813
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9695.8132.2%
Pass0.9695.8134.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.077-0.2322.4%
2nd down1.0582.1152.0%
3rd down3.9303.9301.9%
Standard downs-0.077-0.2321.5%
Passing downs2.0156.0453.7%
Taven Curry · RBUsage 2.2% · Avg PPA 0.416 · Total 2.494
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4162.4942.2%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.4162.4944.6%
1st down0.9360.9360.8%
2nd down-0.005-0.0102.0%
3rd down0.5231.5695.8%
Standard downs0.4162.4943.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Wyatt Hook · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 0.410 · Total 1.229
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4101.2292.1%
Pass0.4101.2294.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4101.2294.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.4101.2292.9%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Titus Myers · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA 0.291 · Total 1.165
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2911.1652.0%
Pass0.2911.1653.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down0.2911.1655.9%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.1800.5402.1%
Passing downs0.6250.6251.7%
Semaj Beals · QBUsage 1.7% · Avg PPA -0.155 · Total -0.155
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.155-0.1551.7%
Pass-0.155-0.1552.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.155-0.1557.7%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.155-0.1554.2%
Paul Davis · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA 1.419 · Total 1.419
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.4191.4191.4%
Pass1.4191.4192.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down1.4191.4199.1%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs1.4191.4195.0%
Where Akron sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.081 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31stOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.423 (48th percentile; 138 teams)48thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.131 (12th percentile; 138 teams)12thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.100 (25th percentile; 138 teams)25thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.119 (59th percentile; 138 teams)59thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.238 (7th percentile; 138 teams)7thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.438 (21st percentile; 138 teams)21stDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.374 (8th percentile; 138 teams)8thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.131 (15th percentile; 138 teams)15th
Values and percentiles
Akron metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.08131st138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.42348th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.13112th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.10025th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.11959th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.2387th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.43821st138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.3748th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.13115th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 293 attempts charted. Average depth of target 7.7 yards (22nd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.9 per completion. Completion 63.8%, 6.6 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.13.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense61.0%63.1%-2.1259 / 293
Defense allowed56.2%59.8%-3.6226 / 257

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Akron.

Target mix by zone, Akron offense
Short left27% · 74Short middle20% · 57Short right40% · 112Deep left5% · 13Deep middle4% · 12Deep right4% · 11

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Akron passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense29399%7.74.963.8%0.13-2.1 pp259
Passing defense257100%9.07.357.6%0.37-3.6 pp226

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense3094.149.3%0.163.401.300.7013.9%71.8%
Defense allowed2835.946.9%0.213.301.102.1014.0%69.4%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense301 / 3092971225340279 / 280 · 99.6%
Defense allowed277 / 283260235670271 / 271 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -2.1 pp. 8 of 9 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-11.60.612.7W1W1 vs Wake Forest: +10.8 ppW2W3W3 vs Minnesota: -11.0 ppW4W4 vs UNLV: -6.8 ppW5W5 vs Central Michigan: -11.6 ppW6W6 vs Eastern Michigan: +12.7 ppW7W7 vs Miami (OH): -4.1 ppW8W8 vs Kent State: +3.6 ppW10W10 vs Ohio: -6.1 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Wake Forest333384.8%74.0%+10.8 pp1.00.16354.10.01
W2Robert Morris330———6.10.42396.40.43
W3Minnesota393953.8%64.8%-11.0 pp7.5-0.04212.3-0.07
W4UNLV262653.8%60.7%-6.8 pp9.5-0.30333.20.11
W5Central Michigan313046.7%58.2%-11.6 pp10.5-0.00364.30.43
W6Eastern Michigan242470.8%58.2%+12.7 pp11.00.83334.80.07
W7Miami (OH)383857.9%62.0%-4.1 pp8.50.12322.5-0.02
W8Kent State343458.8%55.2%+3.6 pp12.50.28374.40.13
W10Ohio353562.9%69.0%-6.1 pp3.9-0.21433.60.15

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

36 punts · 41.0 gross yards/punt · 33.0 net yards/punt

6 inside the 20 · 3 touchbacks · 1 blocked

Known gross yards: 36/36 punts. Known net yards: 28/36 punts.

Our punt returns

8 returns · 6.3 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

1 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 8/8 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 10 · Ohio157.037.01/1
Week 8 · Kent State243.036.01/2
Week 7 · Miami (OH)535.630.84/5
Week 6 · Eastern Michigan531.027.85/5
Week 5 · Central Michigan544.035.33/5
Team style
Rating history