Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Florida Atlantic

2026 season

American Athletic
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Florida Atlantic's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 107.5 across 8 systems; best 91, worst 115, so they disagree by 24 places.

Lab EPA
#109
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#99
no change2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#91
down 12026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#115
up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#110
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#106
down 5 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#91
up 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#109
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#78 of 138
Schedule strength
#96 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#79 of 138
Game control
#80 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#102 of 138
Offense
#60 of 138
Defense
#133 of 138
Special teams
#15 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Florida Atlantic · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

5-3 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.088 net EPA/play

#109

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-5.43 points

#99 · Rank unchanged since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin +0.56 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -6.10, schedule #107 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -3.40. That is worth -5.54 on its own; the preseason prior of -5.04 still carries 23% of the weight, giving -5.43.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Florida Atlantic · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Florida
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856637
-45.00 → -35.00+2.500.73498.29%+6.82-2.6950.565-2.129
Week 2 · Navy
home · 2026-09-12 · ID 401862703
+8.00 → +8.00-2.500.76378.62%-2.430.474-0.2100.264
Week 3 · Florida International
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401862771
+6.00 → +6.00-2.500.79378.96%-6.670.313-0.598-0.284
Week 4 · UL Monroe
away · 2026-09-27 · ID 401862782
+28.00 → +28.00+2.500.82499.31%-18.522.839-1.7241.115
Week 5 · Texas Southern
home · 2026-10-03 · ID 401862790
+56.00 → +35.00-2.500.85729.67%-25.00 (fixed lower division)3.144-2.4180.725
Week 7 · Army
away · 2026-10-17 · ID 401862802
-32.00 → -32.00+2.500.925910.45%+0.99-3.0820.103-2.979
Week 8 · Rice
home · 2026-10-24 · ID 401862809
+2.00 → +2.00-2.500.962210.86%-9.16-0.054-0.995-1.049
Week 9 · North Texas
away · 2026-10-29 · ID 401862812
-7.00 → -7.00+2.501.000011.28%+4.90-0.5080.5530.045

Game terms -4.29 points; prior term -1.14 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -5.43 points. The preseason prior is -5.04 with 22.57% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-4.3 SP+ points

#91 · Down 1 place

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-9.60 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#106 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense 1.91 on 471 plays; defense 11.52 on 399 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Florida Atlantic 10 places lower than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
6-3 · conf 3-2 · home 5-0 · away 1-3 · expected wins 5.4
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 6-3 ATS (+3.6 avg) · 2025: 7-5 ATS (-1.3 avg)
Head coach
Zach Kittley · hired 2024-12-02 · 4-8 over 2 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #79 (167 pts) · 2025 #85 (163 pts) · 2026 #130 (158 pts)
Returning
68% of production · 65% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing93%91%
Receiving48%46%
Rushing107%49%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back153.000.844612.67
Defensive Line63.000.84415.06
Linebacker53.000.83774.19
Offensive Line163.000.843613.50
Quarterback33.000.84002.52
Receiver123.000.844310.13
Running Back43.000.85123.40
Special Teams23.000.84901.70

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Caden Veltkamp · QB

CFBD athlete 4869991. Western Kentucky (2022–2024); Florida Atlantic (2025–2026)

Passing WEPA0.35832154.6%
Pass 93.8% · Rush 11.0%

1st 52.3% · 2nd 58.2% · 3rd 55.5%

Standard downs 49.7% · Passing downs 67.0%

2022: 3★ · 0.8670
Ethan Ervin · RB

CFBD athlete 5215500. Florida Atlantic (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1268916.0%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 33.1%

1st 16.0% · 2nd 15.0% · 3rd 17.8%

Standard downs 16.8% · Passing downs 14.0%

2025: 3★ · 0.8411
Leonard Farrow · RB

CFBD athlete 5390418. Florida Atlantic (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1717614.0%
Pass 3.5% · Rush 27.1%

1st 15.4% · 2nd 14.5% · 3rd 12.3%

Standard downs 16.2% · Passing downs 8.5%

Not linked
Collin Rogers · PK

CFBD athlete 5084095. Florida Atlantic (2026–2026); SMU (2022–2025)

Kicker PAAR2.09013—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2022: 2★ · 0.7900
Almari Brown · RB

CFBD athlete 5219854. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 21.7%

1st 7.1% · 2nd 6.7% · 3rd 10.0%

Standard downs 11.6% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Antojuan Woody · WR

CFBD athlete 5390417. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.0%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.5% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 1.4% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Antonio Johnson · TE

CFBD athlete 4878788. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 3.6%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 5.3% · 3rd 2.9%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Brady Tillman · RB

CFBD athlete 5122155. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.1%
Pass 1.1% · Rush 12.1%

1st 6.5% · 2nd 6.6% · 3rd 5.3%

Standard downs 6.9% · Passing downs 4.1%

Not linked
Branden Hoch · WR

CFBD athlete 5215467. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.9%
Pass 11.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.0% · 2nd 7.4% · 3rd 5.1%

Standard downs 6.8% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Chase Hanning · WR

CFBD athlete 5295328. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.7%
Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 13.3% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 4.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Dom Henry · WR

CFBD athlete 4917048. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.5%
Pass 15.6% · Rush 0.6%

1st 7.5% · 2nd 9.5% · 3rd 9.6%

Standard downs 6.9% · Passing downs 12.5%

Not linked
Drew Devillier · QB

CFBD athlete 5219898. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.6%
Pass 8.3% · Rush 0.7%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 8.2%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Easton Messer · WR

CFBD athlete 4914830. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——14.9%
Pass 27.2% · Rush 1.3%

1st 14.7% · 2nd 15.5% · 3rd 15.1%

Standard downs 14.9% · Passing downs 15.0%

Not linked
Elijah West · WR

CFBD athlete 5290576. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.2%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.4% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 2.7%

Standard downs 0.8% · Passing downs 2.0%

Not linked
Jeremiah Daoud · QB

CFBD athlete 5302741. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.3%
Pass 13.3% · Rush 4.3%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 13.3% · 3rd 20.0%

Standard downs 7.0% · Passing downs 18.2%

Not linked
Jordan Magwood · QB

CFBD athlete 5215248. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.7%
Pass 4.5% · Rush 3.0%

1st 4.6% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 4.2%

Standard downs 3.0% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
Joshua Harriott · RB

CFBD athlete 5151828. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 4.3%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Kaden Shields-Dutton · RB

CFBD athlete 5146725. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.4%
Pass 2.3% · Rush 8.9%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 3.5%

Standard downs 6.8% · Passing downs 1.8%

Not linked
Kelby Valsin · WR

CFBD athlete 4920163. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——12.8%
Pass 23.7% · Rush 0.6%

1st 12.7% · 2nd 14.5% · 3rd 9.6%

Standard downs 11.9% · Passing downs 15.0%

Not linked
Owen Pollock · TE

CFBD athlete 5302737. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.5%
Pass 5.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.7% · 2nd 3.6% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 4.3%

Not linked
Peter Cannon · TE

CFBD athlete 5390431. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.9%
Pass 3.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
RJ Garcia II · WR

CFBD athlete 4683543. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 5.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 3.2% · 3rd 4.9%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 3.6%

Not linked
Tucker Holloway · WR

CFBD athlete 4840118. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.4% · 2nd 0.8% · 3rd 4.0%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 2.8%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 22 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Aiden Jones · OTVMI2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Amar Reynolds · CBIllinois2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Antonio Johnson · TEVillanova2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Aqil Meredith-Smith · IOLNot reported2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Benjamin Galloway · OTGeorgia Tech2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Bo Simpson-Nealy · SWestern Carolina2026-01-063★ / 0.8300Immediate
Brady Tillman III · RBNot reported2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Brooks Johnson · TECoastal Carolina2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Collin Rogers · KSMU2026-01-102★ / —Immediate
Drew Devillier · QBRice2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
JK Johnson · CBOklahoma State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jahmari Powell-Wonson · WRMaryland2026-01-033★ / —Immediate
Jay Crable · EDGEOhio2026-01-053★ / —Immediate
Jonathan Bax · EDGETCU2026-01-063★ / —Immediate
Joseph Sipp Jr. · LBKansas2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Kenyon Garner · EDGELivingstone2025-12-013★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kortez Winslow · OTLamar2026-01-07— / —Immediate
Leonard Farrow · RBFairmont State2025-11-183★ / 0.8300Immediate
Marcus Vinson · TENew Mexico2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
RJ Garcia II · WRBowling Green2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Reed Chandley · PGeorgia State2026-01-05— / —Immediate
Wallace Foster IV · CBLSU2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Outgoing · 30 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Andrew Nelms · KOld Dominion2026-01-13— / —Immediate
Antonio Robinson · CBNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Asaad Waseem · WRPurdue2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Billy Lyons · TEEast Tennessee State2026-01-26— / —Immediate
Brock Kuhl · TESam Houston2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Cameron Goggins · CBMercer2026-02-043★ / —Immediate
Carson Cruver · QBNot reported2026-02-02— / —Immediate
Chenellson Exume · DLEastern Kentucky2026-01-203★ / —Immediate
Daughtry Richardson · OTCoastal Carolina2026-01-193★ / 0.8300Immediate
Eric Brantley Jr. · EDGENot reported2025-12-103★ / —Immediate
Gemari Sands · RBFlorida State2026-01-163★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jabari Smith Jr. · WRBall State2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jarvis Johnson · LBEast Tennessee State2026-01-153★ / —Immediate
Jayshon Platt · WRIllinois2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kasen Weisman · QBNot reported2025-12-083★ / —Immediate
Lawrence Johnson · CBFlorida International2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Loren Hall · SNot reported2026-02-02— / —Immediate
MJ Hinson Jr. · CBNot reported2026-01-02— / —Immediate
Martavious Collins · TENot reported2025-12-013★ / —Immediate
Mike Wright III · SBowling Green2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
Qae'Shon Sapp · IOLNorth Carolina A&T2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Quincy Brown · WRNot reported2025-12-093★ / 0.8400Immediate
Reid Mikeska · TENot reported2026-01-203★ / —Immediate
Robert Lee · LBAustin Peay2026-01-233★ / —Immediate
Tamez Young · TENot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Tyler Stolsky · LBWest Virginia2026-01-073★ / 0.8500Immediate
Vince Fiacable · IOLNot reported2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Withdrawn
Wilky Denaud · DLNot reported2025-12-053★ / —Immediate
Xavier Terrell · RBNorthern Iowa2026-01-133★ / —Immediate
Zion Paret · CBUConn2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Florida Atlantic. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Zach Kittley · career 4–8 across 2 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 9 appointments
  1. 2025–present · Zach Kittley · active at capture

    4–8 · 12 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Hired 2024-12-02. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2024–2024 · Chad Lunsford · interim

    1–1 · 2 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2024-11-18. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2023–2024 · Tom Herman

    6–16 · 22 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2022-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2020–2022 · Willie Taggart

    15–18 · 33 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2019-12-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2017–2019 · Lane Kiffin

    27–13 · 40 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2016-12-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2014–2016 · Charlie Partridge

    9–27 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2013-12-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 2013–2013 · Brian Wright

    4–0 · 4 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2013-10-30. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 2012–2013 · Carl Pelini

    5–15 · 20 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2011-12-01. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 2004–2011 · Howard Schnellenberger

    41–56 · 97 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Hired 1999-07-13. Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Zach Kittley · incomplete attribution0–0——-2.6-7.8130—
2025 · Zach Kittley4–83–50–0-8.7-11.285—
2024 · Tom Herman · incomplete attribution2–8——-12.7-15.479—
2024 · Chad Lunsford · incomplete attribution1–1——-12.7-15.479—
2023 · Tom Herman4–83–50–0-9.4-9.882—
2022 · Willie Taggart5–74–40–0-7.1-5.9124—
2021 · Willie Taggart5–73–50–0-5.2-7.682—
2020 · Willie Taggart5–44–20–1-0.3-8.273—
2019 · Lane Kiffin11–38–11–0-0.68.160—
2018 · Lane Kiffin5–73–50–0-0.8-475—
2017 · Lane Kiffin11–39–01–05.19.560—
2016 · Charlie Partridge3–92–60–0-14.1-2089—
2015 · Charlie Partridge3–93–50–0-9.8-14.579—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:08:23 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play42 / 13870.1136 / 1381.5
Success rate43 / 13869.3111 / 13819.7
Explosiveness61 / 13856.2136 / 1381.5
Standard-down success55 / 13860.6109 / 13821.2
Passing-down success22 / 13884.794 / 13832.1
Pass PPA28 / 13880.3124 / 13810.2
Rush PPA99 / 13828.5136 / 1381.5
Pass explosiveness112 / 13819.0120 / 13813.1
Rush explosiveness43 / 13869.3138 / 1380.0
Line yards121 / 13812.4101 / 13827.0
Second-level yards133 / 1383.699 / 13828.5
Open-field yards134 / 1382.9138 / 1380.0
Stuff rate85 / 13838.798 / 13829.2
Power success68 / 13851.1119 / 13813.9
Havoc70 / 13849.6T122 / 13811.3
Front-seven havocT55 / 13859.5T99 / 13826.6
DB havocT85 / 13837.2T128 / 1386.6
Points / opportunity35 / 13875.2130 / 1385.8
Average field positionT43 / 13868.6T59 / 13856.6
Field-position expected pointsT40 / 13871.2T63 / 13854.4

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Caden Veltkamp · QBUsage 56.0% · Avg PPA 0.300 · Total 105.801
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.300105.80156.0%
Pass0.383123.82493.6%
Rush-0.448-12.98310.8%
1st down0.21831.58053.7%
2nd down0.13215.82360.0%
3rd down0.86161.98855.4%
Standard downs0.11826.80350.9%
Passing downs0.62778.99868.5%
Ethan Ervin · RBUsage 15.6% · Avg PPA 0.121 · Total 11.854
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.12111.85415.6%
Pass0.3692.5842.0%
Rush0.1029.27033.8%
1st down-0.195-8.17215.6%
2nd down0.0240.69114.5%
3rd down0.70915.60916.9%
Standard downs0.1289.43816.6%
Passing downs0.1012.41613.0%
Easton Messer · WRUsage 15.1% · Avg PPA 0.726 · Total 68.973
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.72668.97315.1%
Pass0.70264.55226.7%
Rush1.4744.4211.1%
1st down0.36013.69414.1%
2nd down0.52217.23616.5%
3rd down1.65733.14115.4%
Standard downs0.38125.51115.0%
Passing downs1.55243.46215.2%
Leonard Farrow · RBUsage 13.5% · Avg PPA 0.178 · Total 15.147
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.17815.14713.5%
Pass0.2201.9782.6%
Rush0.17313.16928.3%
1st down0.2078.50615.2%
2nd down0.0381.05214.0%
3rd down0.5497.68010.8%
Standard downs0.16011.20715.7%
Passing downs0.2633.9408.2%
Kelby Valsin · WRUsage 13.2% · Avg PPA 0.560 · Total 46.457
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.56046.45713.2%
Pass0.55544.98523.5%
Rush0.7361.4710.7%
1st down0.75527.17813.3%
2nd down0.50014.50014.5%
3rd down0.79910.39110.0%
Standard downs0.45824.71312.1%
Passing downs0.75021.74315.8%
Almari Brown · RBUsage 9.3% · Avg PPA 0.558 · Total 2.789
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5582.7899.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.5582.78921.7%
1st down0.4440.8897.1%
2nd down-0.554-0.5546.7%
3rd down-0.332-0.33210.0%
Standard downs0.5582.78911.6%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jeremiah Daoud · QBUsage 9.3% · Avg PPA 0.047 · Total 0.234
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0470.2349.3%
Pass-0.531-2.12313.3%
Rush2.3572.3574.3%
1st down0.3160.3163.6%
2nd down-0.908-1.81713.3%
3rd down0.8681.73620.0%
Standard downs-0.500-1.5017.0%
Passing downs0.8681.73618.2%
Dom Henry · WRUsage 8.7% · Avg PPA 0.531 · Total 29.216
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.53129.2168.7%
Pass0.57831.20215.7%
Rush-1.986-1.9860.4%
1st down0.48011.0408.5%
2nd down0.1222.3219.5%
3rd down0.97311.6759.2%
Standard downs0.2598.2917.2%
Passing downs0.91020.92512.5%
Brady Tillman · RBUsage 6.9% · Avg PPA -0.164 · Total -5.254
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.164-5.2546.9%
Pass-1.680-5.0411.2%
Rush-0.007-0.21314.6%
1st down-0.124-1.7327.2%
2nd down-0.156-1.7117.5%
3rd down0.2601.5596.1%
Standard downs-0.055-1.4187.9%
Passing downs-0.639-3.8364.6%
Branden Hoch · WRUsage 6.9% · Avg PPA 0.069 · Total 1.854
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0691.8546.9%
Pass0.0691.85411.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.358-4.2977.0%
2nd down-0.408-3.6757.4%
3rd down1.6806.7205.1%
Standard downs-0.154-2.9246.8%
Passing downs0.5974.7777.1%
Kaden Shields-Dutton · RBUsage 5.6% · Avg PPA 0.112 · Total 3.017
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1123.0175.6%
Pass0.4343.0392.6%
Rush-0.007-0.1399.5%
1st down0.0831.2527.2%
2nd down0.0120.0985.1%
3rd down0.4171.6684.1%
Standard downs0.1132.7027.1%
Passing downs0.1050.3152.0%
Drew Devillier · QBUsage 4.6% · Avg PPA -0.262 · Total -3.663
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.262-3.6634.6%
Pass-0.211-2.7428.3%
Rush-0.921-0.9210.7%
1st down-1.277-8.9385.3%
2nd down1.9353.8702.1%
3rd down0.2811.4058.2%
Standard downs-0.916-8.2404.1%
Passing downs0.9154.5775.9%
Chase Hanning · WRUsage 3.7% · Avg PPA -0.908 · Total -1.817
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.908-1.8173.7%
Pass-0.908-1.8176.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.908-1.81713.3%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.908-1.8174.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Jordan Magwood · QBUsage 3.7% · Avg PPA -0.208 · Total -1.038
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.208-1.0383.7%
Pass-0.096-0.2894.5%
Rush-0.375-0.7493.0%
1st down-0.222-0.6664.6%
2nd down-0.310-0.3102.3%
3rd down-0.062-0.0624.2%
Standard downs-0.222-0.6663.0%
Passing downs-0.186-0.3725.9%
Antonio Johnson · TEUsage 3.4% · Avg PPA 0.340 · Total 4.763
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3404.7633.4%
Pass0.0260.3165.5%
Rush2.2244.4471.1%
1st down-0.595-1.1901.2%
2nd down0.0640.4515.3%
3rd down0.3521.0563.4%
Standard downs0.5563.3352.1%
Passing downs0.1791.4286.7%
RJ Garcia II · WRUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.003 · Total 0.024
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0030.0242.7%
Pass0.0030.0245.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.394-0.7881.6%
2nd down0.8272.4803.2%
3rd down-0.556-1.6684.9%
Standard downs0.0370.1832.4%
Passing downs-0.053-0.1593.6%
Owen Pollock · TEUsage 2.5% · Avg PPA 0.154 · Total 0.309
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1540.3092.5%
Pass0.1540.3095.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.0950.0952.7%
2nd down0.2140.2143.6%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0950.0951.7%
Passing downs0.2140.2144.3%
Tucker Holloway · WRUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 1.020 · Total 8.162
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.0208.1622.1%
Pass1.0208.1624.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8813.5262.4%
2nd down0.2840.2840.8%
3rd down1.4514.3534.0%
Standard downs0.7623.8091.8%
Passing downs1.4514.3532.8%
Antojuan Woody · WRUsage 2.0% · Avg PPA -0.043 · Total -0.260
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.043-0.2602.0%
Pass-0.043-0.2603.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.588-3.1771.5%
2nd down1.1702.3392.1%
3rd down0.2890.5773.3%
Standard downs-0.970-2.9101.4%
Passing downs0.8832.6503.5%
Joshua Harriott · RBUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA -0.432 · Total -0.432
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.432-0.4321.9%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.432-0.4324.3%
1st down-0.432-0.4323.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.432-0.4322.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Peter Cannon · TEUsage 1.9% · Avg PPA 0.316 · Total 0.316
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3160.3161.9%
Pass0.3160.3163.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3160.3163.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.3160.3162.3%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Elijah West · WRUsage 1.2% · Avg PPA -0.602 · Total -1.204
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.602-1.2041.2%
Pass-0.602-1.2042.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.643-0.6431.4%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.561-0.5612.7%
Standard downs-0.643-0.6430.8%
Passing downs-0.561-0.5612.0%
Where Florida Atlantic sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.192 (70th percentile; 138 teams)70thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.456 (69th percentile; 138 teams)69thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.255 (56th percentile; 138 teams)56thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.339 (80th percentile; 138 teams)80thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.041 (28th percentile; 138 teams)28thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.272 (1st percentile; 138 teams)1stDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.441 (20th percentile; 138 teams)20thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.469 (1st percentile; 138 teams)1stDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.124 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11th
Values and percentiles
Florida Atlantic metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.19270th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.45669th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.25556th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.33980th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.04128th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.2721st138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.44120th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.4691st138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.12411th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 366 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.4 yards (39th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.5 per completion. Completion 69.9%, 7.8 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.42.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense70.1%61.1%+9.0331 / 366
Defense allowed61.8%60.7%+1.1212 / 242

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Florida Atlantic.

Target mix by zone, Florida Atlantic offense
Short left35% · 124Short middle15% · 52Short right37% · 131Deep left4% · 14Deep middle6% · 20Deep right4% · 15

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Florida Atlantic passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense36699%8.44.569.9%0.42+9.0 pp331
Passing defense24299%8.96.162.0%0.36+1.1 pp212

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense3303.943.0%0.113.000.900.9015.1%71.7%
Defense allowed3696.044.3%0.323.101.102.6015.7%77.3%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense326 / 3303151516990305 / 305 · 100.0%
Defense allowed361 / 3693492015340349 / 350 · 99.7%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +9.0 pp. 8 of 9 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

0.010.120.1W1W1 vs Florida: +1.3 ppW2W2 vs Navy: +20.1 ppW3W3 vs Florida International: +2.6 ppW4W4 vs UL Monroe: +14.2 ppW5W7W7 vs Army: +6.2 ppW8W8 vs Rice: +15.2 ppW9W9 vs North Texas: +7.1 ppW10W10 vs UTSA: +13.2 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Florida535364.2%62.9%+1.3 pp6.80.01373.3-0.01
W2Navy343180.6%60.5%+20.1 pp9.30.77432.1-0.01
W3Florida International363666.7%64.1%+2.6 pp6.40.24311.8-0.04
W4UL Monroe434273.8%59.6%+14.2 pp8.20.33475.20.32
W5Texas Southern300———11.50.51235.70.35
W7Army504969.4%63.2%+6.2 pp8.10.38283.90.17
W8Rice373778.4%63.2%+15.2 pp7.80.55442.80.18
W9North Texas575764.9%57.8%+7.1 pp9.90.52282.5-0.36
W10UTSA262669.2%56.0%+13.2 pp8.90.79497.30.28

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

24 punts · 42.2 gross yards/punt · 42.7 net yards/punt

8 inside the 20 · 0 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 24/24 punts. Known net yards: 16/24 punts.

Our punt returns

12 returns · 21.3 yards/return · 2 touchdowns

0 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 12/12 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 10 · UTSA353.751.73/3
Week 9 · North Texas245.544.01/2
Week 8 · Rice538.639.03/5
Week 7 · Army0——0/0
Week 5 · Texas Southern337.331.01/3
Team style
Rating history