Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Middle Tennessee

2026 season

Conference USA
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Middle Tennessee's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 124.5 across 8 systems; best 110, worst 128, so they disagree by 18 places.

Lab EPA
#116
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#124
down 102026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#127
down 22026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#127
down 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#128
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#110
down 18 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#125
down 72026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#115
down 152026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#108 of 138
Schedule strength
#128 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#91 of 138
Game control
#122 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#126 of 138
Offense
#116 of 138
Defense
#121 of 138
Special teams
#98 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Middle Tennessee · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.114 net EPA/play

#116

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-9.89 points

#124 · Down 10 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -3.94 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -6.64, schedule #116 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -4.44. That is worth -10.58 on its own; the preseason prior of -7.52 still carries 23% of the weight, giving -9.89.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Middle Tennessee · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Murray State
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401867866
+24.00 → +24.00-2.500.73498.29%-25.00 (fixed lower division)1.783-2.073-0.290
Week 2 · Marshall
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401871045
-2.00 → -2.00+2.500.76378.62%-8.580.043-0.739-0.696
Week 3 · Nevada
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401864443
+7.00 → +7.00-2.500.79378.96%-5.870.403-0.526-0.123
Week 4 · Jacksonville State
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401871048
-10.00 → -10.00+2.500.82499.31%-0.62-0.698-0.058-0.756
Week 5 · Kansas
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401856807
-55.00 → -35.00+2.500.85729.67%+1.60-3.1440.154-2.989
Week 7 · Delaware
home · 2026-10-13 · ID 401871067
+3.00 → +3.00-2.500.925910.45%-4.080.052-0.427-0.374
Week 8 · Florida International
away · 2026-10-20 · ID 401871055
+3.00 → +3.00+2.500.962210.86%-6.670.597-0.725-0.127
Week 9 · Kennesaw State
home · 2026-10-28 · ID 401871058
-16.00 → -16.00-2.501.000011.28%-6.67-2.087-0.752-2.840

Game terms -8.20 points; prior term -1.70 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -9.89 points. The preseason prior is -7.52 with 22.57% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-16.5 SP+ points

#127 · Down 2 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-10.78 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#110 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -4.42 on 437 plays; defense 6.37 on 413 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Middle Tennessee 8 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-4 · conf 2-2 · home 3-1 · away 1-3 · expected wins 3.8
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 5-3 ATS (-1.5 avg) · 2025: 6-6 ATS (-3.8 avg)
Head coach
Derek Mason · hired 2023-12-06 · 6-18 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #119 (132 pts) · 2025 #98 (151 pts) · 2026 #119 (165 pts)
Returning
33% of production · 29% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing39%29%
Receiving26%33%
Rushing60%21%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back63.000.84525.07
Defensive Line133.000.830910.80
Linebacker43.000.82983.32
Offensive Line113.000.82839.11
Quarterback33.000.84682.54
Receiver103.000.83788.38
Running Back43.000.85363.41
Special Teams52.800.82014.10

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Roman Gagliano · QB

CFBD athlete 5194626. Middle Tennessee (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.19324959.7%
Pass 99.3% · Rush 16.3%

1st 53.4% · 2nd 59.9% · 3rd 74.5%

Standard downs 51.6% · Passing downs 75.9%

2024: 3★ · 0.8500
Terrence Brown Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5306988. Saginaw Valley State (2025–2025); Middle Tennessee (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1755020.4%
Pass 15.8% · Rush 27.4%

1st 20.5% · 2nd 20.7% · 3rd 21.8%

Standard downs 19.0% · Passing downs 23.1%

Not linked
Roman Gagliano · QB

CFBD athlete 5194626. Middle Tennessee (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1323759.7%
Pass 99.3% · Rush 16.3%

1st 53.4% · 2nd 59.9% · 3rd 74.5%

Standard downs 51.6% · Passing downs 75.9%

2024: 3★ · 0.8500
Dominic Bourgeois · PK

CFBD athlete 5383060. Middle Tennessee (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR9.02014—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
AJ Jones · WR

CFBD athlete 5086628. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 5.6% · 3rd 3.9%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 4.1%

Not linked
Antonio Martin · RB

CFBD athlete 4685436. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.8%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 3.9%

Not linked
Brody Benke · TE

CFBD athlete 5194615. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 3.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.0% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Brooklen Davis · RB

CFBD athlete 5210055. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.3%
Pass 3.5% · Rush 9.6%

1st 4.3% · 2nd 5.9% · 3rd 11.5%

Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 9.3%

Not linked
Cam'Ron Lacy · WR

CFBD athlete 5091830. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——14.1%
Pass 25.2% · Rush 1.8%

1st 10.8% · 2nd 12.3% · 3rd 23.5%

Standard downs 12.6% · Passing downs 17.1%

Not linked
DJ Taylor · RB

CFBD athlete 5296412. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 1.9% · Rush 8.8%

1st 5.9% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 5.6%

Standard downs 4.7% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Evan Poticher · TE

CFBD athlete 5220390. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.1%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.6% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Hogan Wasson · WR

CFBD athlete 5084468. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.9%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 6.9%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 5.3%

Not linked
Koraun Perdue · TE

CFBD athlete 5383058. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.5%
Pass 8.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 2.2%

Standard downs 3.8% · Passing downs 5.8%

Not linked
Markus Allen · WR

CFBD athlete 4603185. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 7.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 6.4% · 3rd 3.0%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 5.8%

Not linked
Neo Clifton · WR

CFBD athlete 5217200. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.7%
Pass 12.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.2% · 2nd 8.0% · 3rd 2.0%

Standard downs 6.5% · Passing downs 7.1%

Not linked
Peter Costelli · QB

CFBD athlete 4565180. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.2%
Pass 2.8% · Rush 4.2%

1st 3.0% · 2nd 5.0% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Santana Fleming · WR

CFBD athlete 4870691. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.3% · Rush 0.8%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 1.7%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 1.1%

Not linked
Tayvion Galloway · TE

CFBD athlete 5079435. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 6.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 4.8%

Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 7.9%

Not linked
Ziyon Butler · WR

CFBD athlete 5291778. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.9%
Pass 9.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 7.5% · 2nd 0.8% · 3rd 6.2%

Standard downs 6.2% · Passing downs 2.3%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 20 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adrian Crespin · IOLVirginia Union2026-01-09— / —Immediate
Antonio Martin Jr. · RBKansas State2026-01-213★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ashton Taylor · LBJackson State2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Brennan Smith · IOLMississippi State2026-04-293★ / 0.8500Immediate
Chris Moreno · IOLMonmouth2026-01-123★ / 0.8300Immediate
Dominic Bourgeois · KSusquehanna2026-01-17— / —Immediate
Dyson McCutcheon · SWashington2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Hogan Wasson · WRCentral Missouri2026-01-093★ / 0.8200Immediate
James Johnson · CBUSC2026-01-153★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jason Hardy · CBGrand Valley State2026-01-082★ / —Immediate
Justin Bodford · DLMissouri2026-01-153★ / 0.8200Immediate
Kaven Call · EDGEEast Tennessee State2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
La'Garrius Sims · EDGEEast Central2026-01-21— / —Immediate
Markus Allen · WRMississippi State2026-01-173★ / 0.8200Immediate
Reese Tripp · IOLMinnesota2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ricky Lee III · CBSacramento State2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Terrance Brown Jr. · RBSaginaw Valley State2026-01-102★ / —Immediate
Trashun Griffin · EDGETroy2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Trevaris Edwards · IOLWest Florida2026-01-103★ / 0.8300Immediate
Victory Vaka · DLWestern Kentucky2026-08-20— / —Immediate
Outgoing · 18 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Alex Mitchell · LBApp State2026-01-093★ / 0.8500Immediate
Amorion Walker · WRUNLV2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Anthony Bynum · EDGEGeorgia Southern2026-01-123★ / 0.8300Immediate
E.J. Harris · IOLNot reported2025-12-043★ / —Immediate
Elijah Hunter Jr. · CBNot reported2025-12-073★ / —Immediate
Ethan Crite · WRMerrimack2026-01-213★ / —Immediate
Hunter Tipton · TEMemphis2026-01-073★ / 0.8200Immediate
Ja'Darious Morris · DLWest Georgia2026-01-29— / —Immediate
Jared Douglas · SCal Poly2026-02-04— / —Immediate
Jekail Middlebrook · RBVirginia2026-01-043★ / 0.8600Immediate
John Howse IV · SArkansas2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Juwon Gaston · SNot reported2026-01-133★ / —Immediate
Kaden Martin · QBLSU2026-05-06— / —Immediate
Mateo Guevara · IOLKennesaw State2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Muaaz Byard · LBUAB2026-01-153★ / 0.8400Immediate
Nahzae Cox · WRKansas2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Rickey Hunt Jr. · RBNot reported2025-12-243★ / —Immediate
Shakai Woods · DLArkansas State2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Middle Tennessee. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Derek Mason · career 33–73 across 10 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 3 appointments
  1. 2024–present · Derek Mason · active at capture

    6–18 · 24 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2023-12-06. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2006–2023 · Rick Stockstill

    113–111 · 224 attributed games · 18 seasons

    Hired 2005-12-12. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 1999–2005 · Andy McCollum

    34–45 · 79 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Derek Mason · incomplete attribution0–0——-17.3-13.6119—
2025 · Derek Mason3–92–60–0-16-18.498—
2024 · Derek Mason3–92–60–0-24.4-23.2119—
2023 · Rick Stockstill4–83–50–0-9.5-8.1120—
2022 · Rick Stockstill8–54–41–0-6.9-7.7120—
2021 · Rick Stockstill7–64–41–0-4-8.2123—
2020 · Rick Stockstill3–62–30–0-11.7-13.690—
2019 · Rick Stockstill4–83–50–0-11.3-7.685—
2018 · Rick Stockstill8–67–20–1-3.8-0.9104—
2017 · Rick Stockstill7–64–41–0-4.9-8.891—
2016 · Rick Stockstill8–55–30–1-1.9-9.496—
2015 · Rick Stockstill7–66–20–1-4.6-3.686—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:08:06 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play95 / 13831.4118 / 13814.6
Success rate104 / 13824.8131 / 1385.1
Explosiveness73 / 13847.443 / 13869.3
Standard-down success112 / 13819.0132 / 1384.4
Passing-down successT82 / 13840.589 / 13835.8
Pass PPA105 / 13824.189 / 13835.8
Rush PPA73 / 13847.4126 / 1388.8
Pass explosiveness97 / 13829.934 / 13875.9
Rush explosiveness45 / 13867.998 / 13829.2
Line yards40 / 13871.5135 / 1382.2
Second-level yards5 / 13897.1134 / 1382.9
Open-field yards76 / 13845.374 / 13846.7
Stuff rate73 / 13847.4116 / 13816.1
Power successT122 / 13811.360 / 13856.9
HavocT68 / 13850.7135 / 1382.2
Front-seven havocT28 / 13879.9T135 / 1381.8
DB havocT110 / 13818.2T119 / 13812.8
Points / opportunity84 / 13839.4100 / 13827.7
Average field positionT91 / 13833.9T63 / 13851.8
Field-position expected points89 / 13835.868 / 13851.1

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Roman Gagliano · QBUsage 59.7% · Avg PPA 0.115 · Total 34.951
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.11534.95159.7%
Pass0.11129.68899.3%
Rush0.1425.26316.3%
1st down-0.052-6.39653.4%
2nd down0.36535.38759.9%
3rd down0.16912.85474.5%
Standard downs0.0376.56151.6%
Passing downs0.22028.38975.9%
Terrence Brown Jr. · RBUsage 20.4% · Avg PPA 0.102 · Total 9.170
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1029.17020.4%
Pass-0.031-1.16915.8%
Rush0.19910.33927.4%
1st down-0.034-1.42820.5%
2nd down0.3088.94020.7%
3rd down0.0871.65821.8%
Standard downs0.0241.32619.0%
Passing downs0.2317.84423.1%
Cam'Ron Lacy · WRUsage 14.1% · Avg PPA 0.482 · Total 34.729
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.48234.72914.1%
Pass0.54537.05625.2%
Rush-0.582-2.3261.8%
1st down-0.148-3.69710.8%
2nd down0.4889.75612.3%
3rd down0.97023.28223.5%
Standard downs0.2329.95612.6%
Passing downs0.85424.77417.1%
Neo Clifton · WRUsage 6.7% · Avg PPA 0.390 · Total 13.245
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.39013.2456.7%
Pass0.39013.24512.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2624.9748.2%
2nd down0.7059.1608.0%
3rd down-0.445-0.8902.0%
Standard downs0.2144.7116.5%
Passing downs0.7118.5347.1%
Brooklen Davis · RBUsage 6.3% · Avg PPA -0.166 · Total -1.159
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.166-1.1596.3%
Pass-0.664-1.3293.5%
Rush0.0340.1699.6%
1st down-0.309-0.6174.3%
2nd down-0.318-0.6365.9%
3rd down0.0310.09411.5%
Standard downs-0.483-1.4494.3%
Passing downs0.0730.2909.3%
Ziyon Butler · WRUsage 4.9% · Avg PPA 0.077 · Total 1.469
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0771.4694.9%
Pass0.0771.4699.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3214.1757.5%
2nd down-0.394-0.3940.8%
3rd down-0.462-2.3126.2%
Standard downs0.1282.0486.2%
Passing downs-0.193-0.5792.3%
DJ Taylor · RBUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA -0.093 · Total -0.841
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.093-0.8414.8%
Pass0.3630.7271.9%
Rush-0.224-1.5688.8%
1st down-0.114-0.5725.9%
2nd down-0.498-0.9963.3%
3rd down0.3630.7275.6%
Standard downs-0.211-1.2664.7%
Passing downs0.1420.4254.9%
Koraun Perdue · TEUsage 4.5% · Avg PPA 0.329 · Total 6.580
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3296.5804.5%
Pass0.3296.5808.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3993.9935.0%
2nd down0.6404.4785.0%
3rd down0.9331.8662.2%
Standard downs0.2552.8103.8%
Passing downs0.4193.7715.8%
Markus Allen · WRUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.657 · Total 9.855
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.6579.8554.3%
Pass0.6579.8557.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8104.8613.7%
2nd down0.8626.0336.4%
3rd down-0.520-1.0393.0%
Standard downs0.9577.6573.4%
Passing downs0.3142.1985.8%
Tayvion Galloway · TEUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA -0.770 · Total -3.849
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.770-3.8494.2%
Pass-0.770-3.8496.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.1130.2253.4%
2nd down0.1750.1752.6%
3rd down-0.307-0.3074.8%
Standard downs0.1130.2252.4%
Passing downs-1.358-4.0747.9%
AJ Jones · WRUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA 0.218 · Total 4.363
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2184.3633.9%
Pass0.2184.3637.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2771.6642.6%
2nd down0.1721.5445.6%
3rd down-0.417-1.6673.9%
Standard downs0.2553.3153.8%
Passing downs0.1501.0484.1%
Hogan Wasson · WRUsage 3.9% · Avg PPA -0.059 · Total -1.181
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.059-1.1813.9%
Pass-0.059-1.1817.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.353-2.4683.0%
2nd down0.2811.6893.7%
3rd down-0.057-0.4026.9%
Standard downs-0.096-1.0573.2%
Passing downs-0.014-0.1245.3%
Peter Costelli · QBUsage 3.2% · Avg PPA -0.620 · Total -1.240
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.620-1.2403.2%
Pass-0.284-0.2842.8%
Rush-0.956-0.9564.2%
1st down-0.956-0.9563.0%
2nd down-0.284-0.2845.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-0.956-0.9562.4%
Passing downs-0.284-0.2844.8%
Antonio Martin · RBUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA -0.186 · Total -1.491
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.186-1.4913.1%
Pass-0.422-2.9555.3%
Rush1.4641.4640.8%
1st down0.7542.2612.6%
2nd down-0.750-3.7526.1%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.0710.3552.8%
Passing downs-0.615-1.8463.9%
Brody Benke · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 3.101 · Total 3.101
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall3.1013.1011.5%
Pass3.1013.1013.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down3.1013.1014.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs3.1013.1012.0%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Santana Fleming · WRUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA -1.266 · Total -5.063
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-1.266-5.0631.5%
Pass-1.819-5.4562.3%
Rush0.3940.3940.8%
1st down-0.366-0.7311.8%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.133-0.1331.7%
Standard downs-1.643-4.9301.8%
Passing downs-0.133-0.1331.1%
Evan Poticher · TEUsage 1.1% · Avg PPA 0.234 · Total 0.234
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2340.2341.1%
Pass0.2340.2342.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2340.2342.6%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.2340.2341.7%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Where Middle Tennessee sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.083 (31st percentile; 138 teams)31stOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.397 (25th percentile; 138 teams)25thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.227 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.097 (24th percentile; 138 teams)24thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: 0.085 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.180 (15th percentile; 138 teams)15thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.473 (5th percentile; 138 teams)5thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.184 (69th percentile; 138 teams)69thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.106 (2nd percentile; 138 teams)2nd
Values and percentiles
Middle Tennessee metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.08331st138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.39725th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.22747th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.09724th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play0.08547th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.18015th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.4735th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.18469th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.1062nd138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 262 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.0 yards (27th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.5 per completion. Completion 56.9%, 6.1 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.15.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense52.3%62.0%-9.7199 / 262
Defense allowed64.6%61.8%+2.8144 / 207

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Middle Tennessee.

Target mix by zone, Middle Tennessee offense
Short left34% · 86Short middle20% · 52Short right33% · 84Deep left5% · 13Deep middle4% · 9Deep right5% · 12

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Middle Tennessee passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense26299%8.05.556.9%0.15-9.7 pp199
Passing defense20799%8.06.663.8%0.25+2.8 pp144

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2364.844.3%0.133.201.301.1014.9%64.3%
Defense allowed2835.352.8%0.263.701.401.2011.7%68.9%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense226 / 2361151218770220 / 221 · 99.5%
Defense allowed277 / 2832602310780263 / 265 · 99.2%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -9.7 pp. 6 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-27.2-13.50.2W1W2W2 vs Marshall: -7.6 ppW3W3 vs Nevada: -7.8 ppW4W4 vs Jacksonville State: +0.2 ppW5W5 vs Kansas: -27.2 ppW7W8W8 vs Florida International: -2.0 ppW9W9 vs Kennesaw State: -14.0 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Murray State260———6.80.32228.60.52
W2Marshall474753.2%60.8%-7.6 pp8.60.25224.80.04
W3Nevada292853.6%61.3%-7.8 pp8.30.30384.10.23
W4Jacksonville State282864.3%64.1%+0.2 pp7.20.39293.40.01
W5Kansas262634.6%61.8%-27.2 pp9.2-0.31163.4-0.61
W7Delaware350———7.30.38254.20.21
W8Florida International272759.3%61.3%-2.0 pp8.10.38396.30.12
W9Kennesaw State444348.8%62.8%-14.0 pp8.0-0.39454.40.15

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

38 punts · 48.9 gross yards/punt · 36.9 net yards/punt

9 inside the 20 · 6 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 38/38 punts. Known net yards: 31/38 punts.

Our punt returns

9 returns · 6.4 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 9/9 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Kennesaw State547.226.03/5
Week 8 · Florida International441.833.73/4
Week 7 · Delaware553.250.54/5
Week 5 · Kansas951.835.17/9
Week 4 · Jacksonville State549.234.54/5
Team style
Rating history