Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

Oklahoma

2026 season

SEC
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

Oklahoma's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 36 across 8 systems; best 30, worst 48, so they disagree by 18 places.

Lab EPA
#36
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#48
down 92026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#46
down 132026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#36
down 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#30
down 112026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#30
down 8 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#42
down 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#36
down 122026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#33 of 138
Schedule strength
#5 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#6 of 138
Game control
#43 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#37 of 138
Offense
#79 of 138
Defense
#12 of 138
Special teams
#88 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

Oklahoma · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-4 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

0.083 net EPA/play

#36

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

4.27 points

#48 · Down 9 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -1.84 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging +6.04, schedule #6 of 138 (#1 = toughest). That is worth +4.20 on its own; the preseason prior of +4.52 still carries 22% of the weight, giving +4.27.

How each game enters this SRS rating

Oklahoma · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · UTEP
home · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856664
+51.00 → +35.00-2.500.73498.26%-17.242.685-1.4241.260
Week 2 · Michigan
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401856679
-7.00 → -7.00+2.500.76378.58%+5.88-0.3860.5040.118
Week 3 · New Mexico
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401856690
+8.00 → +8.00-2.500.79378.92%+6.530.4910.5821.073
Week 4 · Georgia
away · 2026-09-26 · ID 401856700
-28.00 → -28.00+2.500.82499.27%+16.36-2.3641.517-0.847
Week 6 · Texas
neutral · 2026-10-10 · ID 401856717
+3.00 → +3.000.000.890910.01%+14.930.3001.4951.796
Week 7 · Kentucky
home · 2026-10-17 · ID 401856722
-8.00 → -8.00-2.500.925910.41%+8.22-1.0930.856-0.237
Week 8 · Mississippi State
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401856730
+8.00 → +8.00+2.500.962210.82%+2.031.1360.2191.355
Week 9 · South Carolina
home · 2026-10-31 · ID 401856736
-17.00 → -17.00-2.501.000011.24%+8.25-2.1920.928-1.264

Game terms +3.25 points; prior term +1.02 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating +4.27 points. The preseason prior is +4.52 with 22.48% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.9 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

7.0 SP+ points

#46 · Down 13 places

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

10.11 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#30 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -3.63 on 456 plays; defense -13.74 on 431 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks Oklahoma 12 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-4 · conf 2-3 · home 2-2 · away 1-2 · expected wins 3.9
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 3-5 ATS (-6.1 avg) · 2025: 7-6 ATS (+0.3 avg)
Head coach
Brent Venables · hired 2021-12-05 · 26-13 over 4 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #8 (276 pts) · 2025 #17 (249 pts) · 2026 #15 (253 pts)
Returning
63% of production · 75% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing92%93%
Receiving42%41%
Rushing122%85%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back203.750.905018.10
Defensive Line193.680.909517.28
Linebacker113.450.89449.84
Offensive Line163.560.901814.43
Quarterback53.800.91954.60
Receiver133.850.912011.86
Running Back83.500.90627.25
Special Teams73.290.88426.19

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
John Mateer · QB

CFBD athlete 4915980. Oklahoma (2025–2026); Washington State (2022–2024)

Passing WEPA0.39027161.8%
Pass 98.5% · Rush 27.2%

1st 48.7% · 2nd 65.7% · 3rd 82.2%

Standard downs 52.5% · Passing downs 81.0%

2022: 3★ · 0.8267
Lloyd Avant · RB

CFBD athlete 5079298. Colorado State (2025–2025); Oklahoma (2026–2026); Tulsa (2024–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.1238017.0%
Pass 4.9% · Rush 30.7%

1st 25.2% · 2nd 11.6% · 3rd 9.3%

Standard downs 22.8% · Passing downs 5.2%

2024: 3★ · 0.8536
John Mateer · QB

CFBD athlete 4915980. Oklahoma (2025–2026); Washington State (2022–2024)

Rushing WEPA0.1246961.8%
Pass 98.5% · Rush 27.2%

1st 48.7% · 2nd 65.7% · 3rd 82.2%

Standard downs 52.5% · Passing downs 81.0%

2022: 3★ · 0.8267
Tory Blaylock · RB

CFBD athlete 5141386. Oklahoma (2025–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.148358.9%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 16.2%

1st 9.5% · 2nd 10.7% · 3rd 4.7%

Standard downs 8.3% · Passing downs 9.9%

2025: 4★ · 0.9112
Jonathan Hatton Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 5159029. Oklahoma (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.060318.7%
Pass 4.4% · Rush 13.7%

1st 12.2% · 2nd 8.1% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 10.4% · Passing downs 5.2%

2026: 4★ · 0.9638
Tate Sandell · PK

CFBD athlete 4900756. Oklahoma (2025–2026); UTSA (2022–2024)

Kicker PAAR0.07018—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2022: 2★ · 0.7800
Liam Evans · PK

CFBD athlete 5192411. Oklahoma (2024–2026)

Kicker PAAR0.6101—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Andy Bass · RB

CFBD athlete 5147405. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 5.3%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
Ben McCreary · RB

CFBD athlete 5302489. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.0%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 15.8%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 9.1% · 3rd 18.2%

Standard downs 8.5% · Passing downs 15.4%

Not linked
Bowe Bentley · QB

CFBD athlete 5245123. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 9.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 9.1%

Standard downs 2.1% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
Elijah Thomas · WR

CFBD athlete 5141719. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 11.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.8% · 2nd 8.0% · 3rd 3.8%

Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 6.7%

Not linked
Hayden Hansen · TE

CFBD athlete 4878109. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.1%
Pass 4.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.2% · 2nd 1.5% · 3rd 4.6%

Standard downs 0.8% · Passing downs 4.9%

Not linked
Isaiah Sategna · WR

CFBD athlete 5080703. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——15.4%
Pass 27.8% · Rush 3.5%

1st 13.3% · 2nd 15.5% · 3rd 20.3%

Standard downs 14.7% · Passing downs 16.7%

Not linked
Ivan Carreon · WR

CFBD athlete 5114593. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.1%
Pass 15.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 12.1% · 2nd 7.7% · 3rd 5.9%

Standard downs 10.0% · Passing downs 7.4%

Not linked
Jacob Jordan · WR

CFBD athlete 5218767. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 4.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.8% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 4.8%

Not linked
Jer'Michael Carter · WR

CFBD athlete 5155000. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.2%
Pass 8.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 4.3% · 3rd 5.7%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
Mackenzie Alleyne · WR

CFBD athlete 5228149. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 1.4%

Standard downs 2.7% · Passing downs 5.7%

Not linked
Manny Choice · WR

CFBD athlete 5293827. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.7%
Pass 7.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 4.6% · 2nd 2.9% · 3rd 2.2%

Standard downs 3.3% · Passing downs 4.5%

Not linked
Parker Livingstone · WR

CFBD athlete 5079556. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.8%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 0.6%

1st 1.4% · 2nd 2.7% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 1.8% · Passing downs 1.9%

Not linked
Rocky Beers · TE

CFBD athlete 4907786. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.4%
Pass 16.3% · Rush 0.8%

1st 5.3% · 2nd 9.4% · 3rd 12.7%

Standard downs 5.3% · Passing downs 14.9%

Not linked
Trell Harris · WR

CFBD athlete 4912130. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.9%
Pass 19.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.9% · 2nd 9.3% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 7.7% · Passing downs 12.1%

Not linked
Whitt Newbauer · QB

CFBD athlete 5224237. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.0%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 5.3%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 6.4% · Passing downs 0.0%

Not linked
Xavier Robinson · RB

CFBD athlete 5122554. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.7%
Pass 3.4% · Rush 10.0%

1st 7.4% · 2nd 4.5% · 3rd 9.4%

Standard downs 8.5% · Passing downs 2.5%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 18 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Bishop Thomas · DLGeorgia State2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Braxton Fely · DLBoise State2026-09-033★ / —Immediate
Caleb Nitta · IOLWestern Kentucky2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Cole Sullivan · LBMichigan2026-01-073★ / 0.8700Immediate
D'Yoni Hill · CBWisconsin2026-09-073★ / —Immediate
Dakoda Fields · CBOregon2026-01-053★ / 0.8700Immediate
E'Marion Harris · OTArkansas2026-01-054★ / 0.9300Immediate
Fred Hinton · OTEastern Kentucky2026-01-313★ / 0.8300Immediate
Hayden Hansen · TEFlorida2026-01-043★ / 0.8800Immediate
Jack Van Dorselaer · TETennessee2026-01-144★ / 0.9000Immediate
Kenny Ozowalu · EDGEUTSA2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Lloyd Avant · RBColorado State2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Mackenzie Alleyne · WRWashington State2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate
Parker Livingstone · WRTexas2026-01-064★ / 0.9200Immediate
Peyton Joseph · OTGeorgia Tech2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Prince Ijioma · CBMississippi Valley State2026-01-163★ / 0.8300Immediate
Rocky Beers · TEColorado State2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Trell Harris · WRVirginia2026-01-054★ / 0.9300Immediate
Outgoing · 29 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Adepoju Adebawore · EDGENot reported2026-01-125★ / —Withdrawn
Carson Kent · TEPittsburgh2026-01-093★ / 0.8700Immediate
Devon Jordan · CBBaylor2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Gentry Williams · CBGeorgia2026-01-133★ / 0.8700Immediate
Isaiah Dent · OTMississippi State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ivan Carreon · WRNot reported2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Withdrawn
JaVonnie Gibson · WRCincinnati2026-01-113★ / 0.8900Immediate
Jacob Sexton · OTOklahoma State2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jake Taylor · OTIowa State2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jaydan Hardy · SColorado2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jayden Gibson · WRSouth Carolina2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Josiah Martin · WRNorth Texas2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Jovantae Barnes · RBKentucky2026-01-063★ / 0.8600Immediate
KJ Daniels · WRUAB2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Kaden Helms · TEMinnesota2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kendel Dolby · SMississippi State2026-01-123★ / 0.8600Immediate
Kobie McKinzie · LBNorthwestern2026-01-064★ / 0.9000Immediate
Logan Howland · OTVirginia Tech2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Luke Baklenko · OTArizona State2026-01-103★ / 0.8600Immediate
Maliek Hawkins · CBWest Virginia2026-01-053★ / 0.8500Immediate
Marcus Wimberly · SUtah2026-01-063★ / 0.8500Immediate
Markus Strong · DLClemson2026-01-083★ / 0.8700Immediate
Michael Hawkins Jr. · QBWest Virginia2026-01-053★ / 0.8600Immediate
Ricky Lolohea · DLApp State2026-05-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Sammy Omosigho · LBUCLA2026-01-134★ / 0.9100Immediate
Taylor Tatum · RBMichigan2026-01-083★ / 0.8800Immediate
Troy Everett · IOLOle Miss2026-01-133★ / 0.8500Immediate
Zion Kearney · WRWisconsin2026-01-193★ / 0.8600Immediate
Zion Ragins · WRMississippi State2026-01-113★ / 0.8500Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at Oklahoma. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Brent Venables · career 32–20 across 5 seasons and 1 schools

Tenure timeline · 22 appointments
  1. 2022–present · Brent Venables · active at capture

    32–20 · 52 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2021-12-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2021–2021 · Bob Stoops

    1–0 · 1 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2017–2021 · Lincoln Riley

    55–10 · 65 attributed games · 5 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2017-06-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 1999–2016 · Bob Stoops

    190–48 · 238 attributed games · 18 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 1996–1998 · John Blake

    12–22 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 1995–1995 · Howard Schnellenberger

    5–5–1 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1989–1994 · Gary Gibbs

    44–23–2 · 69 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1973–1988 · Barry Switzer

    157–29–4 · 190 attributed games · 16 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1967–1972 · Chuck Fairbanks

    52–15–1 · 68 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1966–1966 · Jim MacKenzie

    6–4 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1964–1965 · Gomer Jones

    9–11–1 · 21 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1947–1963 · Bud Wilkinson

    145–29–4 · 178 attributed games · 17 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1946–1946 · Jim Tatum

    8–3 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1941–1945 · Snorter Luster

    27–18–3 · 48 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1937–1940 · Tom Stidham

    27–8–3 · 38 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1935–1936 · Biff Jones

    9–6–3 · 18 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1932–1934 · Lewie Hardage

    11–12–4 · 27 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1927–1931 · Adrian Lindsey

    19–19–6 · 44 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1912–1926 · Bennie Owen

    80–39–12 · 131 attributed games · 15 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  20. 1909–1909 · Bennie Owen

    6–4 · 10 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  21. 1905–1905 · Bennie Owen

    7–2 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  22. 1903–1903 · Mark McMahon

    5–4–3 · 12 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Brent Venables · incomplete attribution0–0——9.88.815—
2025 · Brent Venables10–36–20–118.312.71713
2024 · Brent Venables6–72–60–19.578—
2023 · Brent Venables10–37–20–11519.1415
2022 · Brent Venables6–73–60–115.410.28—
2021 · Lincoln Riley · incomplete attribution10–2——16.89.51110
2021 · Bob Stoops · incomplete attribution1–0——16.89.51110
2020 · Lincoln Riley9–27–21–017.820.2116
2019 · Lincoln Riley12–29–10–122.920.167
2018 · Lincoln Riley12–29–10–124.921.49—
2017 · Lincoln Riley12–29–10–125.522.783
2016 · Bob Stoops11–29–01–026.117.2195
2015 · Bob Stoops11–28–10–122.723.1155
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:06:27 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play123 / 13810.99 / 13894.2
Success rate125 / 1389.513 / 13891.2
Explosiveness124 / 13810.2112 / 13819.0
Standard-down success133 / 1383.611 / 13892.7
Passing-down success74 / 13846.729 / 13879.6
Pass PPA75 / 13846.016 / 13889.1
Rush PPA137 / 1380.737 / 13873.7
Pass explosiveness80 / 13842.392 / 13833.6
Rush explosiveness136 / 1381.5116 / 13816.1
Line yards126 / 1388.854 / 13861.3
Second-level yards135 / 1382.252 / 13862.8
Open-field yards113 / 13818.267 / 13851.8
Stuff rate111 / 13819.767 / 13851.8
Power successT122 / 13811.355 / 13860.6
HavocT90 / 13834.336 / 13874.5
Front-seven havocT104 / 13823.725 / 13882.5
DB havocT56 / 13858.0T71 / 13848.5
Points / opportunity116 / 13816.125 / 13882.5
Average field positionT118 / 13812.4T122 / 13811.3
Field-position expected pointsT114 / 13817.2119 / 13813.9

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

John Mateer · QBUsage 61.8% · Avg PPA 0.149 · Total 49.322
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.14949.32261.8%
Pass0.23159.94898.5%
Rush-0.055-3.81827.2%
1st down-0.093-10.26048.7%
2nd down0.23728.18965.7%
3rd down0.27426.56782.2%
Standard downs0.0213.99452.5%
Passing downs0.32145.32881.0%
Lloyd Avant · RBUsage 17.0% · Avg PPA -0.012 · Total -1.135
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.012-1.13517.0%
Pass0.1912.4774.9%
Rush-0.046-3.61230.7%
1st down-0.021-1.17425.2%
2nd down0.0020.04511.6%
3rd down0.7608.3609.3%
Standard downs-0.012-0.99222.8%
Passing downs-0.016-0.1435.2%
Isaiah Sategna · WRUsage 15.4% · Avg PPA 0.350 · Total 28.724
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.35028.72415.4%
Pass0.38828.35727.8%
Rush0.0410.3673.5%
1st down0.0330.98113.3%
2nd down0.61417.20415.5%
3rd down0.43910.53920.3%
Standard downs0.0633.34014.7%
Passing downs0.87525.38416.7%
Ben McCreary · RBUsage 10.0% · Avg PPA 0.235 · Total 1.411
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.2351.41110.0%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.2351.41115.8%
1st down-0.453-0.9077.4%
2nd down-0.109-0.2179.1%
3rd down1.2672.53518.2%
Standard downs0.4341.7368.5%
Passing downs-0.163-0.32515.4%
Ivan Carreon · WRUsage 9.1% · Avg PPA 0.936 · Total 6.549
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.9366.5499.1%
Pass0.9366.54915.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.6682.67112.1%
2nd down0.8351.6707.7%
3rd down2.2082.2085.9%
Standard downs0.3081.54210.0%
Passing downs2.5035.0077.4%
Tory Blaylock · RBUsage 8.9% · Avg PPA -0.039 · Total -1.629
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.039-1.6298.9%
Pass-0.184-1.2912.9%
Rush-0.010-0.33816.2%
1st down-0.191-3.6259.5%
2nd down0.0611.04010.7%
3rd down-0.138-0.6904.7%
Standard downs-0.008-0.2038.3%
Passing downs-0.089-1.4269.9%
Trell Harris · WRUsage 8.9% · Avg PPA 0.788 · Total 8.672
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7888.6728.9%
Pass0.7888.67219.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3231.6148.9%
2nd down0.8023.2069.3%
3rd down1.9263.8528.3%
Standard downs0.8045.6267.7%
Passing downs0.7623.04712.1%
Jonathan Hatton Jr. · RBUsage 8.7% · Avg PPA -0.165 · Total -6.780
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.165-6.7808.7%
Pass0.2112.1064.4%
Rush-0.287-8.88613.7%
1st down-0.229-5.49012.2%
2nd down-0.222-2.8898.1%
3rd down0.4001.5993.8%
Standard downs-0.258-8.51910.4%
Passing downs0.2171.7385.2%
Rocky Beers · TEUsage 8.4% · Avg PPA 0.478 · Total 21.524
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.47821.5248.4%
Pass0.72331.07616.3%
Rush-4.776-9.5520.8%
1st down-0.227-2.7215.3%
2nd down0.70011.8959.4%
3rd down1.06515.97412.7%
Standard downs-0.151-2.8745.3%
Passing downs0.93824.39814.9%
Xavier Robinson · RBUsage 6.7% · Avg PPA -0.115 · Total -1.950
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.115-1.9506.7%
Pass-0.340-1.3603.4%
Rush-0.045-0.59010.0%
1st down-0.296-2.3717.4%
2nd down-0.256-1.0244.5%
3rd down0.2891.4459.4%
Standard downs-0.139-2.0818.5%
Passing downs0.0660.1312.5%
Whitt Newbauer · QBUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA 0.550 · Total 1.651
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5501.6515.0%
Pass0.1860.1864.8%
Rush0.7321.4645.3%
1st down-0.280-0.5617.4%
2nd down2.2112.2114.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs0.5501.6516.4%
Passing downs—0.0000.0%
Elijah Thomas · WRUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA -0.225 · Total -2.701
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.225-2.7014.8%
Pass-0.225-2.70111.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.150-0.4492.8%
2nd down-0.151-1.0578.0%
3rd down-0.597-1.1943.8%
Standard downs-0.232-1.6274.0%
Passing downs-0.215-1.0746.7%
Jer'Michael Carter · WRUsage 4.2% · Avg PPA -0.243 · Total -1.459
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.243-1.4594.2%
Pass-0.243-1.4598.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.222-0.4443.4%
2nd down0.0060.0124.3%
3rd down-0.514-1.0275.7%
Standard downs-0.222-0.4442.2%
Passing downs-0.254-1.0157.7%
Manny Choice · WRUsage 3.7% · Avg PPA 0.582 · Total 8.731
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5828.7313.7%
Pass0.5828.7317.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3642.9134.6%
2nd down-0.119-0.4742.9%
3rd down1.4772.9532.2%
Standard downs0.3132.8203.3%
Passing downs0.9855.9114.5%
Mackenzie Alleyne · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.123 · Total 1.472
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1231.4723.6%
Pass0.1231.4727.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.611-3.0533.5%
2nd down0.7904.7395.2%
3rd down-0.214-0.2141.4%
Standard downs-0.049-0.2952.7%
Passing downs0.2941.7675.7%
Andy Bass · RBUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA -0.627 · Total -1.255
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.627-1.2553.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.627-1.2555.3%
1st down-1.307-1.3073.7%
2nd down0.0530.0534.5%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs-1.307-1.3072.1%
Passing downs0.0530.0537.7%
Bowe Bentley · QBUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA -0.770 · Total -1.539
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.770-1.5393.3%
Pass-0.770-1.5399.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.895-0.8953.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.644-0.6449.1%
Standard downs-0.895-0.8952.1%
Passing downs-0.644-0.6447.7%
Jacob Jordan · WRUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 0.395 · Total 2.762
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3952.7622.4%
Pass0.3952.7624.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-1.114-1.1140.8%
2nd down0.5961.7873.1%
3rd down0.6962.0894.5%
Standard downs-0.721-1.4421.1%
Passing downs0.8414.2044.8%
Hayden Hansen · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA 1.295 · Total 10.359
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.29510.3592.1%
Pass1.29510.3594.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.8823.7651.2%
2nd down-0.328-0.6561.5%
3rd down1.8137.2514.6%
Standard downs1.8823.7650.8%
Passing downs1.0996.5954.9%
Parker Livingstone · WRUsage 1.8% · Avg PPA 0.144 · Total 0.864
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1440.8641.8%
Pass1.0855.4243.4%
Rush-4.560-4.5600.6%
1st down0.8571.7151.4%
2nd down-1.374-4.1212.7%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.1504.6011.8%
Passing downs-1.869-3.7371.9%
Where Oklahoma sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.000 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.376 (9th percentile; 138 teams)9thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.125 (10th percentile; 138 teams)10thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.196 (46th percentile; 138 teams)46thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.141 (1st percentile; 138 teams)1stDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: -0.071 (94th percentile; 138 teams)94thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.343 (91st percentile; 138 teams)91stDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.306 (19th percentile; 138 teams)19thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.178 (74th percentile; 138 teams)74th
Values and percentiles
Oklahoma metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.00011th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.3769th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.12510th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.19646th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.1411st138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play-0.07194th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.34391st138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.30619th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.17874th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 98% of 252 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.3 yards (35th percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.3 per completion. Completion 65.1%, 7.3 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.21.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense65.2%62.8%+2.4227 / 252
Defense allowed62.9%60.8%+2.1178 / 197

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Oklahoma.

Target mix by zone, Oklahoma offense
Short left29% · 70Short middle22% · 52Short right35% · 84Deep left3% · 8Deep middle5% · 13Deep right5% · 13

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
Oklahoma passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense25298%8.35.365.1%0.21+2.4 pp227
Passing defense197100%10.05.262.4%0.12+2.1 pp178

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2683.336.6%0.002.800.700.6018.1%66.7%
Defense allowed2783.733.5%-0.022.800.901.1017.7%68.2%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense265 / 268260820550243 / 243 · 100.0%
Defense allowed272 / 278271723110252 / 254 · 99.2%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +2.4 pp. 7 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-11.30.812.9W1W2W2 vs Michigan: -11.3 ppW3W3 vs New Mexico: +11.2 ppW4W4 vs Georgia: +5.6 ppW6W6 vs Texas: +6.0 ppW7W7 vs Kentucky: -0.5 ppW8W8 vs Mississippi State: +12.9 ppW9W9 vs South Carolina: -0.8 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1UTEP200———12.10.90394.40.16
W2Michigan333351.5%62.8%-11.3 pp8.3-0.22293.50.07
W3New Mexico262576.0%64.8%+11.2 pp7.60.43321.9-0.14
W4Georgia343271.9%66.2%+5.6 pp6.30.23342.6-0.31
W6Texas262669.2%63.2%+6.0 pp8.70.25312.7-0.11
W7Kentucky414060.0%60.5%-0.5 pp8.4-0.01312.40.21
W8Mississippi State292875.0%62.1%+12.9 pp8.70.40414.50.10
W9South Carolina434360.5%61.2%-0.8 pp8.10.13313.70.01

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

37 punts · 44.7 gross yards/punt · 41.2 net yards/punt

9 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 37/37 punts. Known net yards: 33/37 punts.

Our punt returns

11 returns · 14.3 yards/return · 2 touchdowns

1 muffs · 1 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 11/11 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · South Carolina645.740.85/6
Week 8 · Mississippi State242.538.02/2
Week 7 · Kentucky345.045.03/3
Week 6 · Texas941.641.18/9
Week 4 · Georgia648.845.56/6
Team style
Rating history