Record
2-7 wins–losses
No rank assigned
Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.
2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00
SP+ workbook recordSacramento State
2026 season
Mid-American
2026 preseason report
Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.
What every system says
Sacramento State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 136 across 8 systems; best 134, worst 138, so they disagree by 4 places.
- Lab EPA
- #136
- Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- Lab SRS
- #136
- up 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
- SP+
- #135
- up 32026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
- Elo
- #134
- up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- FPI
- #138
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CORE
- #137
- up 1 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- CFBD SRS
- #138
- no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
- WEPA
- #136
- up 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI context
ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026
Résumé and schedule
Results earned and schedule difficulty
- Strength of record
- #137 of 138
- Schedule strength
- #136 of 138
- Remaining schedule strength
- #110 of 138
- Game control
- #135 of 138
Unit efficiency
Performance by unit
- Overall
- #138 of 138
- Offense
- #138 of 138
- Defense
- #135 of 138
- Special teams
- #23 of 138
Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.
Why the ratings disagree
Sacramento State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.
Descriptive EPA
-0.228 net EPA/play
#136
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.
2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge
Lab EPA from CFBD playsLocal predictive SRS
-17.39 points
#136 · Up 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff
2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
This season's 9 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -13.72 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -8.23, schedule #131 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -6.44. That is worth -21.95 on its own; with no prior-season rating, the preseason prior is set to average (0.00) and still carries 21% of the weight, giving -17.39.
How each game enters this SRS rating
Sacramento State · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.
| Game | Raw margin → transformed | Venue adjustment | Recency weight | Fit share | Opponent rating | Margin term | Opponent term | Total term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 · Eastern Michigan away · 2026-08-29 · ID 401866408 | -11.00 → -11.00 | +2.50 | 0.7349 | 7.63% | -9.23 | -0.649 | -0.704 | -1.353 |
| Week 1 · Mississippi Valley State home · 2026-09-06 · ID 401866411 | +52.00 → +35.00 | -2.50 | 0.7349 | 7.63% | -25.00 (fixed lower division) | 2.480 | -1.908 | 0.572 |
| Week 2 · Fresno State away · 2026-09-13 · ID 401860883 | -46.00 → -35.00 | +2.50 | 0.7637 | 7.93% | +3.43 | -2.577 | 0.272 | -2.306 |
| Week 3 · North Dakota State home · 2026-09-20 · ID 401864507 | -21.00 → -21.00 | -2.50 | 0.7937 | 8.24% | +5.80 | -1.937 | 0.478 | -1.459 |
| Week 4 · Massachusetts home · 2026-09-27 · ID 401866429 | -29.00 → -29.00 | -2.50 | 0.8249 | 8.56% | -8.26 | -2.698 | -0.708 | -3.406 |
| Week 6 · Bowling Green away · 2026-10-10 · ID 401866436 | -28.00 → -28.00 | +2.50 | 0.8909 | 9.25% | -11.59 | -2.359 | -1.072 | -3.431 |
| Week 7 · Ohio home · 2026-10-18 · ID 401866445 | -41.00 → -35.00 | -2.50 | 0.9259 | 9.61% | -1.28 | -3.605 | -0.123 | -3.728 |
| Week 8 · Ball State away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401866447 | -17.00 → -17.00 | +2.50 | 0.9622 | 9.99% | -12.52 | -1.449 | -1.251 | -2.699 |
| Week 9 · Kent State home · 2026-10-31 · ID 401866451 | +21.00 → +21.00 | -2.50 | 1.0000 | 10.38% | -14.48 | 1.921 | -1.504 | 0.417 |
Game terms -17.39 points; prior term 0.00 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -17.39 points. No prior-season estimate is available; the configured starting value is 0.00 with 20.77% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.
These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±9.6 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.
Download fitted terms and source hashesEstimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 9 current games; prior unavailable.
2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00
Lab SRS from CFBD scoresExternal SP+
-25.5 SP+ points
#135 · Up 3 places
2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.
2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00
Bill Connelly SP+ workbookExternal CORE
-23.80 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays
#137 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)
2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -19.45 on 397 plays; defense 4.35 on 421 plays.
2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00
CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defenseEPA and local SRS assign the same rank at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.
Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.
Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidenceProgram context
2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches- Record
- 2-8 · conf 1-6 · home 2-4 · away 0-4 · expected wins 2.4
- Polls (Week 10)
- unranked
- CFP latest
- unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
- CFP final
- not published
- Against the spread
- 2026: 4-6 ATS (-3.1 avg) · 2025: 6-6 ATS (+0.6 avg)
- Head coach
- Alonzo Carter · hired 2025-12-15 · 0-0 over 1 captured season
- Recruiting classes
- 2024 #131 (72 pts) · 2025 #127 (89 pts) · 2026 #125 (161 pts)
- Returning
- —
Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.
Recruiting by position group
2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC
| Position group | Commits | Avg. stars | Avg. rating | Total rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defensive Back | 5 | 2.80 | 0.8316 | 4.16 |
| Defensive Line | 9 | 2.89 | 0.8243 | 7.42 |
| Linebacker | 7 | 2.86 | 0.8264 | 5.79 |
| Offensive Line | 8 | 2.88 | 0.8140 | 6.51 |
| Quarterback | 4 | 3.00 | 0.8328 | 3.33 |
| Receiver | 12 | 2.58 | 0.8041 | 9.65 |
| Running Back | 2 | 3.00 | 0.8450 | 1.69 |
| Special Teams | 11 | 2.91 | 0.8367 | 9.20 |
Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.
Player efficiency and usage
2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTCPassing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions
| Player / history | Metric | Value | Plays / attempts | Overall usage | Usage detail | Recruiting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jackson Sharman · QBCFBD athlete 5158748. Sacramento State (2026–2026); Idaho State (2023–2025) | Passing WEPA | 0.056 | 228 | 49.4% | Pass 88.1% · Rush 9.0%1st 37.6% · 2nd 52.1% · 3rd 69.3% Standard downs 41.7% · Passing downs 66.5% | 2023: stars unavailable |
Isaiah Ene · RBCFBD athlete 5161820. Sacramento State (2026–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.080 | 71 | 15.9% | Pass 4.6% · Rush 30.4%1st 18.8% · 2nd 17.7% · 3rd 7.8% Standard downs 18.8% · Passing downs 10.0% | Not linked |
Daniel Swinney · RBCFBD athlete 5310132. Sacramento State (2026–2026) | Rushing WEPA | 0.084 | 41 | 9.6% | Pass 1.3% · Rush 19.1%1st 12.9% · 2nd 7.2% · 3rd 5.5% Standard downs 11.7% · Passing downs 4.9% | 2026: 3★ · 0.8622 |
Cincere Rhaney · RBCFBD athlete 5084459. Sacramento State (2026–2026); San Diego State (2024–2025) | Rushing WEPA | 0.122 | 35 | 8.4% | Pass 1.7% · Rush 16.2%1st 9.4% · 2nd 7.2% · 3rd 7.9% Standard downs 10.0% · Passing downs 4.9% | 2024: 3★ · 0.8647 |
Grant Meadors · PKCFBD athlete 5158467. Sacramento State (2025–2026); Oregon (2023–2024) | Kicker PAAR | -2.160 | 15 | — | Pass — · Rush —1st — · 2nd — · 3rd — Standard downs — · Passing downs — | 2023: 3★ · 0.8111 |
Brian Salazar · QBCFBD athlete 5401458. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 13.7% | Pass 25.4% · Rush 1.7%1st 12.8% · 2nd 11.1% · 3rd 15.1% Standard downs 11.2% · Passing downs 18.8% | Not linked |
Carson Conklin · QBCFBD athlete 4920192. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 75.0% | Pass 100.0% · Rush 6.3%1st 63.0% · 2nd 90.5% · 3rd 78.6% Standard downs 60.5% · Passing downs 96.2% | Not linked |
Cedric Anton · TECFBD athlete 5080786. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.1% | Pass 3.7% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.1% · 2nd 3.1% · 3rd 2.6% Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 1.6% | Not linked |
Davion Godley · RBCFBD athlete 5229947. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.1% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 6.3%1st 3.6% · 2nd 2.4% · 3rd 3.6% Standard downs 5.2% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Elias Brown · RBCFBD athlete 5301029. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.8% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 6.6%1st 4.1% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 1.8% Standard downs 4.0% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Elijah Huddle · TECFBD athlete 5301047. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.0% | Pass 3.6% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.2% · 2nd 3.0% · 3rd 2.1% Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 1.3% | Not linked |
Ellijah Washington · WRCFBD athlete 5166880. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 1.4% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 2.4%1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.2% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 6.7% | Not linked |
Jace Wilson · WRCFBD athlete 4833629. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.6% | Pass 7.5% · Rush 0.0%1st 1.8% · 2nd 4.8% · 3rd 6.0% Standard downs 2.4% · Passing downs 6.2% | Not linked |
Jamar Curtis · RBCFBD athlete 5083848. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 9.9% | Pass 4.8% · Rush 16.4%1st 13.5% · 2nd 10.8% · 3rd 2.7% Standard downs 11.4% · Passing downs 6.9% | Not linked |
Jaylen Patterson · QBCFBD athlete 5148654. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 3.1% | Pass 0.0% · Rush 6.5%1st 4.6% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 0.0% Standard downs 4.2% · Passing downs 0.0% | Not linked |
Jordan Williams · TECFBD athlete 4912040. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 6.6% | Pass 11.9% · Rush 0.0%1st 7.3% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 7.0% Standard downs 6.5% · Passing downs 6.9% | Not linked |
Kenyon Shabazz · WRCFBD athlete 5401457. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.7% | Pass 4.7% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.6% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 5.9% Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 4.4% | Not linked |
Khai Taylor · WRCFBD athlete 5077407. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.5% | Pass 4.7% · Rush 0.0%1st 0.0% · 2nd 2.1% · 3rd 7.9% Standard downs 0.5% · Passing downs 6.5% | Not linked |
Kyle Koontz · TECFBD athlete 5225846. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 2.7% | Pass 5.1% · Rush 0.0%1st 2.8% · 2nd 2.8% · 3rd 2.9% Standard downs 1.7% · Passing downs 5.4% | Not linked |
Matthew Coleman · WRCFBD athlete 5082587. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 12.6% | Pass 23.4% · Rush 0.3%1st 9.6% · 2nd 9.3% · 3rd 24.1% Standard downs 10.3% · Passing downs 17.5% | Not linked |
Onterrio Smith Jr. · WRCFBD athlete 5152796. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 11.4% | Pass 21.4% · Rush 0.0%1st 9.9% · 2nd 13.0% · 3rd 10.6% Standard downs 10.3% · Passing downs 13.7% | Not linked |
Raiden Brown · WRCFBD athlete 5158759. Team attribution from the captured season usage record. | Not available | — | — | 7.7% | Pass 14.3% · Rush 0.3%1st 5.0% · 2nd 11.6% · 3rd 7.1% Standard downs 6.5% · Passing downs 10.4% | Not linked |
Transfers
Incoming · 26 reported
| Player | From | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amari Wallace · CB | Miami | 2026-01-20 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Boogsie Silvera · S | South Florida | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8000 | Immediate |
| Carson Conklin · QB | Fresno State | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Cedric Anton · TE | Tiffin University | 2026-01-21 | 3★ / 0.8200 | Immediate |
| Cincere Rhaney · RB | San Diego State | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Darson Jeanty · S | Lafayette | 2026-01-23 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Davion Godley · RB | Weber State | 2026-01-17 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Dionte Thornton · S | Portland State | 2026-01-21 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Donovan Turner · CB | Illinois | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Ellijah Washington · WR | Oregon State | 2026-01-23 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Garrison Blank · OT | UCLA | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Isiah Chala Jr. · EDGE | Fresno State | 2026-01-21 | 3★ / 0.8200 | Immediate |
| Ivan Moore Jr. · EDGE | Northern Illinois | 2026-01-20 | 3★ / 0.8200 | Immediate |
| Jamel Howard Jr. · DL | Wisconsin | 2026-01-21 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Jaylen Patterson · QB | New Mexico State | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Kyle Koontz · TE | Houston Christian | 2026-01-21 | 3★ / 0.8100 | Immediate |
| Malikai Nichols · CB | Not reported | 2026-01-20 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Matthew Coleman · WR | San José State | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Nick Dimitris · DL | Florida A&M | 2026-01-23 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Nikko Klemm · S | Arizona State | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Noah King · CB | Colorado | 2026-01-20 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| Qualyn McQueen · CB | Not reported | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Raiden Brown · WR | Idaho State | 2026-04-26 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Tim Thomas · LB | Fresno State | 2026-01-20 | 3★ / 0.8200 | Immediate |
| Vae Soifua · IOL | Weber State | 2026-01-21 | 3★ / 0.8200 | Immediate |
| Will Weber · DL | UTEP | 2026-01-20 | 3★ / 0.8000 | Immediate |
Outgoing · 22 reported
| Player | To | Date | Stars / rating | Eligibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anta'Veon McKenzie · S | UAB | 2026-01-12 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Bear Tenney · TE | New Mexico | 2026-02-05 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Cardell Williams · QB | Maryland | 2026-05-30 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Damian Henderson II · RB | Colorado | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8600 | Immediate |
| DeSean Watts · DL | Washington | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Derek Houston · LB | Not reported | 2025-12-29 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Dontae Robinson · TE | Central Michigan | 2026-01-15 | 3★ / 0.8000 | Immediate |
| Dylan Hampsten · EDGE | Fresno State | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Ernest Campbell · WR | Colorado | 2026-01-07 | 3★ / 0.8700 | Immediate |
| Gavin Nelson · TE | Cal Poly | 2026-02-04 | — / — | Immediate |
| JaQuail Smith · RB | Colorado | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Jaden Rashada · QB | Mississippi State | 2026-01-22 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Jamar Curtis · RB | Not reported | 2026-01-11 | 3★ / 0.8000 | Withdrawn |
| James Gillespie · DL | Nevada | 2026-01-16 | — / — | Immediate |
| Jason Oliver · CB | San Diego State | 2026-01-06 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Jayland McGlothen · DL | San José State | 2026-01-14 | 3★ / 0.8300 | Immediate |
| Jose Soto · IOL | Colorado | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / 0.8400 | Immediate |
| Koa Akui · S | Rice | 2026-01-10 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
| Lamont Johnson-Burrell · CB | Not reported | 2025-12-30 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Micah Mosley · EDGE | Fresno State | 2026-01-04 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Nash Burkart · ATH | Not reported | 2026-01-09 | 3★ / — | Immediate |
| Ricky Lee III · CB | Middle Tennessee | 2026-01-18 | 3★ / 0.8500 | Immediate |
Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.
Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.
Coaching eras
Continuous appointments at Sacramento State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.
Alonzo Carter · career 0–0 across 1 seasons and 1 schools
Tenure timeline · 1 appointments
2026–present · Alonzo Carter · active at capture
0–0 · 0 attributed games · 1 seasons
Hired 2025-12-15. Exact effective dates unavailable.
Season résumé · 2015–2026
Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.
| Season / coach | Record | Conference | Postseason | SP+ | SRS | Recruiting rank | Final poll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · Alonzo Carter · incomplete attribution | 0–0 | — | — | -26.1 | -28.9 | 125 | — |
Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.
CFBD season overview
2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.
Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data
Stat rankings
CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:06:59 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.
| Statistic | Offense rank / population | Percentile | Defense rank / population | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPA / play | 135 / 138 | 2.2 | 83 / 138 | 40.1 |
| Success rate | 124 / 138 | 10.2 | 43 / 138 | 69.3 |
| Explosiveness | 136 / 138 | 1.5 | 121 / 138 | 12.4 |
| Standard-down success | 103 / 138 | 25.5 | 64 / 138 | 54.0 |
| Passing-down success | 137 / 138 | 0.7 | T9 / 138 | 93.8 |
| Pass PPA | 128 / 138 | 7.3 | 107 / 138 | 22.6 |
| Rush PPA | 135 / 138 | 2.2 | 60 / 138 | 56.9 |
| Pass explosiveness | 127 / 138 | 8.0 | 112 / 138 | 19.0 |
| Rush explosiveness | 133 / 138 | 3.6 | 125 / 138 | 9.5 |
| Line yards | 134 / 138 | 2.9 | 115 / 138 | 16.8 |
| Second-level yards | 118 / 138 | 14.6 | 59 / 138 | 57.7 |
| Open-field yards | 89 / 138 | 35.8 | 91 / 138 | 34.3 |
| Stuff rate | 136 / 138 | 1.5 | 123 / 138 | 10.9 |
| Power success | T95 / 138 | 31.0 | T35 / 138 | 74.8 |
| Havoc | T119 / 138 | 13.5 | 130 / 138 | 5.8 |
| Front-seven havoc | T91 / 138 | 33.9 | 124 / 138 | 10.2 |
| DB havoc | T122 / 138 | 9.9 | T123 / 138 | 10.2 |
| Points / opportunity | 129 / 138 | 6.6 | T101 / 138 | 26.6 |
| Average field position | T100 / 138 | 27.4 | 81 / 138 | 41.6 |
| Field-position expected points | 98 / 138 | 29.2 | T88 / 138 | 36.1 |
Player PPA and usage
Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.
Carson Conklin · QBUsage 75.0% · Avg PPA -0.140 · Total -6.724
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.140 | -6.724 | 75.0% |
| Pass | -0.137 | -6.462 | 100.0% |
| Rush | -0.262 | -0.262 | 6.3% |
| 1st down | -0.141 | -2.391 | 63.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.065 | -1.241 | 90.5% |
| 3rd down | 0.060 | 0.662 | 78.6% |
| Standard downs | -0.100 | -2.290 | 60.5% |
| Passing downs | -0.177 | -4.434 | 96.2% |
Jackson Sharman · QBUsage 52.1% · Avg PPA -0.058 · Total -15.883
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.058 | -15.883 | 52.1% |
| Pass | 0.036 | 9.122 | 94.4% |
| Rush | -0.729 | -16.756 | 9.2% |
| 1st down | -0.099 | -9.281 | 40.9% |
| 2nd down | -0.101 | -9.306 | 53.5% |
| 3rd down | 0.165 | 13.376 | 73.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.009 | 1.518 | 44.5% |
| Passing downs | -0.157 | -17.401 | 69.8% |
Isaiah Ene · RBUsage 15.3% · Avg PPA -0.007 · Total -0.672
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.007 | -0.672 | 15.3% |
| Pass | 0.245 | 3.428 | 4.5% |
| Rush | -0.053 | -4.099 | 28.9% |
| 1st down | 0.155 | 7.306 | 18.3% |
| 2nd down | -0.132 | -4.233 | 16.6% |
| 3rd down | 0.463 | 4.164 | 7.2% |
| Standard downs | 0.043 | 3.203 | 18.1% |
| Passing downs | -0.228 | -3.874 | 9.2% |
Matthew Coleman · WRUsage 12.3% · Avg PPA 0.307 · Total 22.395
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.307 | 22.395 | 12.3% |
| Pass | 0.322 | 23.168 | 23.0% |
| Rush | -0.773 | -0.773 | 0.4% |
| 1st down | 0.279 | 6.691 | 9.3% |
| 2nd down | 0.319 | 5.111 | 8.3% |
| 3rd down | 0.571 | 17.711 | 24.8% |
| Standard downs | 0.437 | 17.471 | 9.8% |
| Passing downs | 0.149 | 4.924 | 17.8% |
Onterrio Smith Jr. · WRUsage 11.6% · Avg PPA 0.088 · Total 6.093
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.088 | 6.093 | 11.6% |
| Pass | 0.088 | 6.093 | 22.0% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.123 | 3.328 | 10.5% |
| 2nd down | 0.283 | 7.345 | 13.5% |
| 3rd down | 0.061 | 0.795 | 10.4% |
| Standard downs | 0.277 | 12.173 | 10.8% |
| Passing downs | -0.243 | -6.080 | 13.5% |
Jamar Curtis · RBUsage 10.2% · Avg PPA -0.131 · Total -6.046
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.131 | -6.046 | 10.2% |
| Pass | -0.086 | -1.037 | 5.1% |
| Rush | -0.147 | -5.009 | 16.6% |
| 1st down | -0.087 | -2.262 | 13.1% |
| 2nd down | -0.157 | -2.675 | 11.7% |
| 3rd down | -0.370 | -1.110 | 3.1% |
| Standard downs | -0.055 | -1.885 | 11.2% |
| Passing downs | -0.347 | -4.161 | 8.2% |
Daniel Swinney · RBUsage 10.0% · Avg PPA 0.038 · Total 2.008
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.038 | 2.008 | 10.0% |
| Pass | -0.332 | -1.326 | 1.5% |
| Rush | 0.068 | 3.334 | 19.6% |
| 1st down | 0.093 | 2.795 | 13.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.021 | -0.274 | 7.6% |
| 3rd down | -0.096 | -0.673 | 6.3% |
| Standard downs | 0.105 | 4.720 | 12.1% |
| Passing downs | -0.339 | -2.712 | 5.0% |
Cincere Rhaney · RBUsage 8.7% · Avg PPA 0.086 · Total 3.947
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.086 | 3.947 | 8.7% |
| Pass | -0.421 | -1.684 | 1.5% |
| Rush | 0.134 | 5.631 | 16.8% |
| 1st down | -0.002 | -0.033 | 9.6% |
| 2nd down | 0.013 | 0.183 | 8.1% |
| 3rd down | 0.001 | 0.009 | 7.2% |
| Standard downs | 0.143 | 5.453 | 10.2% |
| Passing downs | -0.188 | -1.506 | 5.0% |
Raiden Brown · WRUsage 7.2% · Avg PPA 0.044 · Total 1.895
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.044 | 1.895 | 7.2% |
| Pass | 0.014 | 0.593 | 13.4% |
| Rush | 1.302 | 1.302 | 0.4% |
| 1st down | 0.278 | 2.780 | 3.9% |
| 2nd down | 0.340 | 7.138 | 10.9% |
| 3rd down | -0.078 | -0.776 | 8.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.201 | 4.829 | 5.9% |
| Passing downs | -0.154 | -2.933 | 10.3% |
Jordan Williams · TEUsage 6.6% · Avg PPA -0.063 · Total -1.456
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.063 | -1.456 | 6.6% |
| Pass | -0.063 | -1.456 | 11.9% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.613 | 6.743 | 7.3% |
| 2nd down | -0.371 | -2.225 | 5.2% |
| 3rd down | -0.413 | -2.067 | 7.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.007 | 0.114 | 6.5% |
| Passing downs | -0.224 | -1.570 | 6.9% |
Brian Salazar · QBUsage 6.0% · Avg PPA 0.113 · Total 1.248
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.113 | 1.248 | 6.0% |
| Pass | 0.113 | 1.248 | 12.4% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.791 | 3.956 | 6.0% |
| 2nd down | 0.410 | 1.231 | 5.1% |
| 3rd down | -0.073 | -0.145 | 5.4% |
| Standard downs | 0.791 | 3.956 | 3.8% |
| Passing downs | -0.451 | -2.707 | 11.1% |
Jace Wilson · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 1.298 · Total 16.877
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1.298 | 16.877 | 4.1% |
| Pass | 1.298 | 16.877 | 8.7% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 1.343 | 4.028 | 2.1% |
| 2nd down | 0.867 | 4.333 | 4.9% |
| 3rd down | 1.703 | 8.516 | 7.5% |
| Standard downs | 0.976 | 5.857 | 2.8% |
| Passing downs | 1.574 | 11.020 | 6.7% |
Davion Godley · RBUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA -0.621 · Total -2.485
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.621 | -2.485 | 3.1% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | -0.621 | -2.485 | 6.3% |
| 1st down | -0.727 | -1.454 | 3.6% |
| 2nd down | -0.150 | -0.150 | 2.4% |
| 3rd down | -0.881 | -0.881 | 3.6% |
| Standard downs | -0.621 | -2.485 | 5.2% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Jaylen Patterson · QBUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA 0.381 · Total 2.287
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.381 | 2.287 | 3.1% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | 0.381 | 2.287 | 6.5% |
| 1st down | -0.661 | -2.643 | 4.6% |
| 2nd down | 2.465 | 4.930 | 3.3% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | 0.381 | 2.287 | 4.2% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Kenyon Shabazz · WRUsage 2.9% · Avg PPA 0.552 · Total 4.968
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.552 | 4.968 | 2.9% |
| Pass | 0.552 | 4.968 | 5.2% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 3.095 | 3.095 | 0.7% |
| 2nd down | 0.379 | 1.516 | 4.0% |
| 3rd down | 0.089 | 0.357 | 5.8% |
| Standard downs | 2.056 | 6.169 | 1.5% |
| Passing downs | -0.200 | -1.201 | 5.5% |
Elias Brown · RBUsage 2.8% · Avg PPA -0.235 · Total -1.880
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.235 | -1.880 | 2.8% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | -0.235 | -1.880 | 6.6% |
| 1st down | -0.318 | -1.590 | 4.1% |
| 2nd down | 0.483 | 0.967 | 2.1% |
| 3rd down | -1.257 | -1.257 | 1.8% |
| Standard downs | -0.235 | -1.880 | 4.0% |
| Passing downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
Kyle Koontz · TEUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA -0.057 · Total -0.516
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.057 | -0.516 | 2.7% |
| Pass | -0.057 | -0.516 | 5.1% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.021 | -0.083 | 2.8% |
| 2nd down | -0.063 | -0.189 | 2.8% |
| 3rd down | -0.122 | -0.245 | 2.9% |
| Standard downs | -0.021 | -0.083 | 1.7% |
| Passing downs | -0.087 | -0.434 | 5.4% |
Elijah Huddle · TEUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 0.233 · Total 0.698
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.233 | 0.698 | 2.3% |
| Pass | 0.233 | 0.698 | 4.1% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | -0.969 | -0.969 | 1.8% |
| 2nd down | 0.652 | 0.652 | 2.3% |
| 3rd down | 1.015 | 1.015 | 3.2% |
| Standard downs | -0.159 | -0.317 | 2.5% |
| Passing downs | 1.015 | 1.015 | 1.9% |
Khai Taylor · WRUsage 2.3% · Avg PPA 0.060 · Total 0.301
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0.060 | 0.301 | 2.3% |
| Pass | 0.060 | 0.301 | 4.4% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | -0.654 | -1.307 | 2.7% |
| 3rd down | 0.536 | 1.608 | 6.4% |
| Standard downs | 0.838 | 0.838 | 0.7% |
| Passing downs | -0.134 | -0.538 | 6.1% |
Cedric Anton · TEUsage 2.1% · Avg PPA -0.334 · Total -1.334
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -0.334 | -1.334 | 2.1% |
| Pass | -0.334 | -1.334 | 3.7% |
| Rush | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 1st down | 0.162 | 0.162 | 1.1% |
| 2nd down | -0.602 | -1.204 | 3.1% |
| 3rd down | -0.292 | -0.292 | 2.6% |
| Standard downs | -0.230 | -0.689 | 2.3% |
| Passing downs | -0.645 | -0.645 | 1.6% |
Ellijah Washington · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -1.040 · Total -1.040
| Split | Average PPA | Total PPA | Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | -1.040 | -1.040 | 1.4% |
| Pass | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Rush | -1.040 | -1.040 | 2.4% |
| 1st down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| 2nd down | -1.040 | -1.040 | 4.2% |
| 3rd down | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Standard downs | — | 0.000 | 0.0% |
| Passing downs | -1.040 | -1.040 | 6.7% |
2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.
Values and percentiles
| Metric | Value | Percentile | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense PPA/play | -0.081 | 2nd138 teams | higher |
| Offense success rate | 0.379 | 10th138 teams | higher |
| Offense explosiveness | 1.068 | 1st138 teams | higher |
| Offense pass PPA/play | -0.004 | 7th138 teams | higher |
| Offense rush PPA/play | -0.136 | 2nd138 teams | higher |
| Defense PPA/play | 0.099 | 40th138 teams | lower |
| Defense success rate | 0.385 | 69th138 teams | lower |
| Defense explosiveness | 1.346 | 12th138 teams | lower |
| Defense havoc created | 0.118 | 6th138 teams | higher |
Passing profile
2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPACaptured 2026-11-06. Offense: 100% of 335 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.2 yards (33rd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 4.3 per completion. Completion 57.0%, 5.8 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.02.
| Side | Actual | Expected | CPOE (pp) | Qualifying / all attempts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 56.4% | 61.9% | -5.5 | 243 / 335 |
| Defense allowed | 62.8% | 61.0% | +1.9 | 191 / 251 |
Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.
138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is Sacramento State.
Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.
Defense and rushing detail
| Side | Attempts | Charted | ADOT | YAC | Comp % | PPA | CPOE | CPOE att |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing offense | 335 | 100% | 8.2 | 4.3 | 57.0% | 0.02 | -5.5 pp | 243 |
| Passing defense | 251 | 98% | 9.5 | 5.7 | 62.2% | 0.20 | +1.9 pp | 191 |
Rushing production
| Side | Attempts | Yards / carry | Success | PPA | Line yards / rush | Second-level yards / rush | Open-field yards / rush | Stuff rate | Power success |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 310 | 3.3 | 42.0% | -0.06 | 2.70 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 22.8% | 66.0% |
| Defense allowed | 366 | 4.7 | 39.1% | 0.12 | 3.20 | 0.90 | 1.20 | 11.4% | 67.6% |
Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.
Rushing sample and attribution
| Side | Yards recorded | Individual | Unattributed | Sacks | Kneels | Team rushes | Multiple carriers | Direction located / eligible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 306 / 310 | 290 | 20 | 21 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 280 / 281 · 99.6% |
| Defense allowed | 353 / 366 | 334 | 32 | 14 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 341 / 343 · 99.4% |
Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.
Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.
Game-by-game passing and rushing
2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -5.5 pp. 7 of 10 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.
CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.
Game log and attempt coverage
| Week | Opponent | Pass att | CPOE att | Comp %* | Expected %* | CPOE | ADOT | Pass PPA | Rush att | Rush yds/carry | Rush PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W1 | Eastern Michigan | 47 | 46 | 54.3% | 63.5% | -9.1 pp | 6.7 | -0.11 | 17 | 2.9 | 0.01 |
| W1 | Mississippi Valley State | 29 | 0 | — | — | — | 10.3 | 0.45 | 42 | 5.0 | 0.19 |
| W2 | Fresno State | 32 | 32 | 50.0% | 58.1% | -8.2 pp | 9.8 | -0.42 | 33 | 3.8 | 0.04 |
| W3 | North Dakota State | 41 | 41 | 61.0% | 58.1% | +2.9 pp | 9.9 | 0.15 | 25 | 4.1 | -0.32 |
| W4 | Massachusetts | 43 | 43 | 55.8% | 62.2% | -6.4 pp | 7.3 | -0.06 | 34 | 3.0 | -0.06 |
| W6 | Bowling Green | 28 | 0 | — | — | — | 9.6 | -0.02 | 35 | 2.2 | -0.00 |
| W7 | Ohio | 26 | 26 | 57.7% | 66.0% | -8.3 pp | 6.6 | -0.06 | 26 | 5.0 | -0.08 |
| W8 | Ball State | 31 | 30 | 60.0% | 60.8% | -0.8 pp | 7.6 | 0.19 | 26 | 2.3 | -0.21 |
| W9 | Kent State | 25 | 25 | 56.0% | 66.1% | -10.1 pp | 5.9 | 0.21 | 41 | 4.0 | -0.16 |
| W10 | Toledo | 33 | 0 | — | — | — | 8.8 | 0.01 | 31 | 0.3 | -0.13 |
*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.
Punting and returns
2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.
Our punts
54 punts · 42.1 gross yards/punt · 39.1 net yards/punt
13 inside the 20 · 2 touchbacks · 0 blocked
Known gross yards: 54/54 punts. Known net yards: 41/54 punts.
Our punt returns
11 returns · 10.6 yards/return · 0 touchdowns
2 muffs · 3 opponent punts blocked
Known return yards: 11/11 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.
Recent games
| Game | Punts | Gross yd/punt | Net yd/punt | Known net yards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 10 · Toledo | 7 | 41.4 | 41.0 | 5/7 |
| Week 9 · Kent State | 6 | 45.3 | 31.8 | 4/6 |
| Week 8 · Ball State | 6 | 45.3 | 39.0 | 4/6 |
| Week 7 · Ohio | 7 | 43.1 | 40.0 | 5/7 |
| Week 6 · Bowling Green | 4 | 41.3 | 41.0 | 2/4 |