Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

San José State

2026 season

Mountain West
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

San José State's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 103.5 across 8 systems; best 74, worst 114, so they disagree by 40 places.

Lab EPA
#74
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#111
up 82026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#114
no change2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#96
up 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#111
up 62026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#92
up 4 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#112
up 82026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#75
up 32026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#109 of 138
Schedule strength
#98 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#97 of 138
Game control
#108 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#113 of 138
Offense
#129 of 138
Defense
#79 of 138
Special teams
#87 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

San José State · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

4-5 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.022 net EPA/play

#74

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-7.54 points

#111 · Up 8 places since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 9 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -2.00 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -5.83, schedule #105 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -3.71. That is worth -7.83 on its own; the preseason prior of -6.40 still carries 21% of the weight, giving -7.54.

How each game enters this SRS rating

San José State · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · USC
away · 2026-08-29 · ID 401864494
-16.00 → -16.00+2.500.73497.60%+9.64-1.0270.733-0.294
Week 1 · Eastern Michigan
away · 2026-09-04 · ID 401864495
+6.00 → +6.00+2.500.73497.60%-9.230.646-0.702-0.056
Week 2 · Cal Poly
home · 2026-09-13 · ID 401864504
+10.00 → +10.00-2.500.76377.90%-25.00 (fixed lower division)0.593-1.976-1.383
Week 3 · Fresno State
home · 2026-09-20 · ID 401860888
-16.00 → -16.00-2.500.79378.21%+3.43-1.5190.281-1.238
Week 5 · Hawai'i
away · 2026-10-04 · ID 401864513
+4.00 → +4.00+2.500.85728.87%-7.490.577-0.665-0.088
Week 6 · Wyoming
home · 2026-10-10 · ID 401864519
-3.00 → -1.00 (OT)-2.500.89099.22%-7.98-0.323-0.736-1.059
Week 7 · UTEP
away · 2026-10-18 · ID 401864523
+13.00 → +13.00+2.500.92599.58%-17.241.485-1.652-0.167
Week 8 · Nevada
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401864528
-15.00 → -15.00+2.500.96229.96%-5.87-1.245-0.584-1.829
Week 9 · New Mexico
home · 2026-10-31 · ID 401864529
-5.00 → -5.00-2.501.000010.35%+6.53-0.7760.676-0.101

Game terms -6.21 points; prior term -1.32 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -7.54 points. The preseason prior is -6.40 with 20.70% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.5 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 9 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-11.3 SP+ points

#114 · Rank unchanged

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-7.12 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#92 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -9.38 on 475 plays; defense -2.26 on 541 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks San José State 37 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
4-5 · conf 2-3 · home 1-3 · away 3-2 · expected wins 5.0
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 5-4 ATS (+1.3 avg) · 2025: 4-8 ATS (-10.6 avg)
Head coach
Ken Niumatalolo · hired 2024-01-21 · 10-15 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #104 (145 pts) · 2025 #117 (124 pts) · 2026 #129 (159 pts)
Returning
4% of production · 14% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing-8%13%
Receiving3%6%
Rushing36%26%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back53.000.82074.10
Defensive Line112.730.82149.03
Linebacker52.800.81944.10
Offensive Line142.790.822911.52
Quarterback42.750.82033.28
Receiver93.000.83917.55
Running Back42.750.81103.24
Special Teams62.830.83094.99

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Luke Weaver · QB

CFBD athlete 5295238. San José State (2026–2026); Hawai'i (2025–2025)

Passing WEPA0.27222357.0%
Pass 92.3% · Rush 19.0%

1st 51.1% · 2nd 54.4% · 3rd 70.9%

Standard downs 53.4% · Passing downs 63.2%

2025: 3★ · 0.8200
Jabari Bates · RB

CFBD athlete 4685254. San José State (2022–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.02812531.2%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 62.0%

1st 37.6% · 2nd 32.4% · 3rd 18.2%

Standard downs 34.3% · Passing downs 25.8%

2022: 3★ · 0.8528
Viliami Teu · RB

CFBD athlete 5151338. San José State (2023–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.265499.7%
Pass 0.4% · Rush 19.7%

1st 12.3% · 2nd 8.9% · 3rd 6.5%

Standard downs 11.7% · Passing downs 6.0%

2022: 3★ · 0.8006
Luke Weaver · QB

CFBD athlete 5295238. San José State (2026–2026); Hawai'i (2025–2025)

Rushing WEPA0.1463757.0%
Pass 92.3% · Rush 19.0%

1st 51.1% · 2nd 54.4% · 3rd 70.9%

Standard downs 53.4% · Passing downs 63.2%

2025: 3★ · 0.8200
Trajan Sinatra · PK

CFBD athlete 5298628. San José State (2026–2026); Idaho State (2025–2025)

Kicker PAAR3.05021—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

Not linked
Anthony Ivey · WR

CFBD athlete 4685396. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.7%
Pass 9.4% · Rush 0.0%

1st 5.4% · 2nd 3.3% · 3rd 5.5%

Standard downs 4.9% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
Carson Clark · WR

CFBD athlete 5161012. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——13.5%
Pass 26.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 11.0% · 2nd 12.8% · 3rd 18.5%

Standard downs 12.9% · Passing downs 14.6%

Not linked
Cooper Hoch · WR

CFBD athlete 5151342. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.0%
Pass 15.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.5% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 9.6%

Standard downs 8.2% · Passing downs 7.7%

Not linked
Daniel Rolovich · QB

CFBD athlete 5215357. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——30.8%
Pass 51.9% · Rush 13.3%

1st 21.3% · 2nd 38.1% · 3rd 35.7%

Standard downs 26.9% · Passing downs 38.5%

Not linked
Dominique McKenzie · WR

CFBD athlete 5219662. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.6%
Pass 6.7% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.8% · 2nd 2.2% · 3rd 6.0%

Standard downs 3.4% · Passing downs 4.1%

Not linked
Isaiah Carlson · RB

CFBD athlete 4870662. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.8%
Pass 0.6% · Rush 9.9%

1st 6.3% · 2nd 2.6% · 3rd 4.5%

Standard downs 6.1% · Passing downs 2.0%

Not linked
Jase Nix · WR

CFBD athlete 5214408. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.3%
Pass 6.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 1.5% · 2nd 3.7% · 3rd 6.4%

Standard downs 1.0% · Passing downs 7.6%

Not linked
Jerry Mcclure · WR

CFBD athlete 4920229. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.7%
Pass 17.2% · Rush 0.0%

1st 8.1% · 2nd 8.9% · 3rd 9.7%

Standard downs 8.4% · Passing downs 9.3%

Not linked
Jordan Anderson · WR

CFBD athlete 5079299. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.1%
Pass 7.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 6.3% · 3rd 2.4%

Standard downs 4.1% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Kamaehu Kopa-Kaawalauole · TE

CFBD athlete 5151350. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 5.1% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.1% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 1.1%

Standard downs 3.2% · Passing downs 1.4%

Not linked
Malachi Riley · WR

CFBD athlete 4870994. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.4%
Pass 4.6% · Rush 0.0%

1st 2.0% · 2nd 2.4% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 2.5% · Passing downs 2.1%

Not linked
Robert McDaniel · QB

CFBD athlete 5205684. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——33.3%
Pass 53.3% · Rush 11.5%

1st 22.7% · 2nd 28.6% · 3rd 57.1%

Standard downs 21.2% · Passing downs 50.0%

Not linked
Tama Amisone · WR

CFBD athlete 5296610. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.8%
Pass 7.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 7.1% · 3rd 6.3%

Standard downs 2.3% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 17 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Agenhart Ellis IV · SCal Lutheran2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Aizik Mahuka · LBWeber State2026-01-113★ / —Immediate
Anthony Ivey · WRPenn State2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Brian Dukes Jr. · SCal Poly2026-01-143★ / 0.8400Immediate
Brian Tapu · OTNebraska2026-01-213★ / 0.8600Immediate
Dominique McKenzie · WRBYU2026-01-073★ / —Immediate
Dylan Aguilera · LSLafayette2026-02-03— / —Immediate
Ian Shewell · DLArizona State2026-01-153★ / 0.8200Immediate
Ikinasio Tupou · OTBYU2026-01-163★ / 0.8500Immediate
Isaiah Buxton · CBSan Diego State2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jackson Barton · SNevada2026-02-013★ / 0.8100Immediate
Jayland McGlothen · DLSacramento State2026-01-143★ / 0.8300Immediate
Jerry McClure · WRSan Diego State2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Jonathan Watts · SIdaho State2026-02-023★ / 0.8000Immediate
Lavaka Taukeiaho · IOLOklahoma State2026-01-203★ / 0.8500Immediate
Luke Weaver · QBHawai'i2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Tyler Jacklich · RBWest Virginia2026-01-223★ / 0.8200Immediate
Outgoing · 16 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Caleb Presley · CBColorado State2026-01-153★ / 0.8600Immediate
Danny Scudero · WRColorado2026-01-043★ / 0.8700Immediate
Denaris DeRosa · IOLNot reported2026-01-033★ / —Immediate
Isiah Revis · SNot reported2026-01-143★ / —Immediate
JT Taylor · CBEastern Washington2026-01-303★ / —Immediate
Jaylen Thomas · CBWashington State2026-01-043★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jireh Moe · DLUtah2026-01-113★ / 0.8600Immediate
Joseph Bey · SNot reported2025-12-313★ / —Immediate
Kyri Shoels · WRUtah2026-01-083★ / 0.8600Immediate
Leland Smith · WRUCLA2026-01-073★ / 0.8600Immediate
Matthew Coleman · WRSacramento State2026-01-143★ / 0.8500Immediate
Nate Hale · OTArizona2026-01-113★ / 0.8400Immediate
Noah McNeal-Franklin · LBNot reported2026-01-173★ / —Immediate
Steve Chavez-Soto · RBUtah2026-01-133★ / 0.8800Immediate
Vili Taufatofua · EDGEColorado2026-01-093★ / 0.8600Immediate
Walker Eget · QBDuke2026-01-263★ / 0.8600Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at San José State. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Ken Niumatalolo · career 119–98 across 19 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 19 appointments
  1. 2024–present · Ken Niumatalolo · active at capture

    10–15 · 25 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2024-01-21. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2017–2023 · Brent Brennan

    34–48 · 82 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 2016-12-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2013–2016 · Ron Caragher

    19–30 · 49 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2012-12-17. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2010–2012 · Mike MacIntyre

    16–21 · 37 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2009-12-16. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2005–2009 · Dick Tomey

    25–35 · 60 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2004-12-28. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2001–2004 · Fitz Hill

    14–33 · 47 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Hired 2000-12-13. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1997–2000 · Dave Baldwin

    18–27 · 45 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1993–1996 · John Ralston

    11–34 · 45 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1992–1992 · Ron Turner

    7–4 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1990–1991 · Terry Shea

    15–6–2 · 23 attributed games · 2 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1984–1989 · Claude Gilbert

    38–30–1 · 69 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  12. 1979–1983 · Jack Elway

    35–20–1 · 56 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  13. 1976–1978 · Lynn Stiles

    18–16 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  14. 1973–1975 · Darryl Rogers

    22–9–3 · 34 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  15. 1970–1972 · DeWayne King

    10–20–1 · 31 attributed games · 3 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  16. 1969–1970 · Joe McMullen

    3–10 · 13 attributed games · 2 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  17. 1965–1968 · Harry Anderson

    13–26 · 39 attributed games · 4 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  18. 1957–1964 · Robert Titchenal

    33–45–1 · 79 attributed games · 8 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  19. 1950–1956 · Robert Bronzan

    32–30–5 · 67 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Ken Niumatalolo · incomplete attribution0–0——-9.3-13.7129—
2025 · Ken Niumatalolo3–92–60–0-14.3-14.4117—
2024 · Ken Niumatalolo7–63–40–1-5.5-7.1104—
2023 · Brent Brennan7–66–20–1-3.42.8112—
2022 · Brent Brennan7–55–30–1-4.3-6.575—
2021 · Brent Brennan5–73–50–0-1.9-9.9120—
2020 · Brent Brennan7–17–00–10.18.611424
2019 · Brent Brennan5–72–60–0-7.2-7.5118—
2018 · Brent Brennan1–111–70–0-17.1-14.194—
2017 · Brent Brennan2–111–70–0-20-26.798—
2016 · Ron Caragher4–83–50–0-13.6-17.284—
2015 · Ron Caragher6–74–41–0-4.5-6.962—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:06:34 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play100 / 13827.752 / 13862.8
Success rate126 / 1388.8110 / 13820.4
Explosiveness93 / 13832.811 / 13892.7
Standard-down success102 / 13826.3121 / 13812.4
Passing-down success133 / 1383.664 / 13854.0
Pass PPA74 / 13846.731 / 13878.1
Rush PPA121 / 13812.494 / 13832.1
Pass explosiveness116 / 13816.126 / 13881.8
Rush explosiveness78 / 13843.830 / 13878.8
Line yards93 / 13832.850 / 13864.2
Second-level yards96 / 13830.7128 / 1387.3
Open-field yards123 / 13810.944 / 13868.6
Stuff rate109 / 13821.2101 / 13827.0
Power successT111 / 13819.3T81 / 13840.9
HavocT111 / 13819.3T76 / 13843.8
Front-seven havocT100 / 13826.6T69 / 13849.6
DB havocT101 / 13825.9T74 / 13845.6
Points / opportunity120 / 13813.124 / 13883.2
Average field positionT71 / 13847.1T84 / 13839.1
Field-position expected points72 / 13848.279 / 13843.1

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Luke Weaver · QBUsage 57.0% · Avg PPA 0.181 · Total 54.252
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.18154.25257.0%
Pass0.25062.82292.3%
Rush-0.054-2.48719.0%
1st down0.13515.24551.1%
2nd down0.11411.25654.4%
3rd down0.41632.46170.9%
Standard downs0.26046.52053.4%
Passing downs0.0647.73263.2%
Robert McDaniel · QBUsage 33.3% · Avg PPA -0.458 · Total -8.701
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.458-8.70133.3%
Pass-0.512-8.19253.3%
Rush-0.170-0.50911.5%
1st down-0.807-4.03622.7%
2nd down-0.014-0.08428.6%
3rd down-0.573-4.58057.1%
Standard downs-0.191-1.33621.2%
Passing downs-0.614-7.36550.0%
Jabari Bates · RBUsage 31.2% · Avg PPA -0.033 · Total -5.456
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.033-5.45631.2%
Pass0.2453.4305.1%
Rush-0.059-8.88662.0%
1st down-0.185-15.39337.6%
2nd down0.0492.87032.4%
3rd down0.54310.85118.2%
Standard downs-0.088-10.14034.3%
Passing downs0.0964.68425.8%
Daniel Rolovich · QBUsage 30.8% · Avg PPA 0.143 · Total 5.161
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1435.16130.8%
Pass0.1383.85851.9%
Rush0.1631.30313.3%
1st down-0.196-1.95721.3%
2nd down0.4787.65638.1%
3rd down-0.054-0.53835.7%
Standard downs0.3387.10626.9%
Passing downs-0.130-1.94538.5%
Carson Clark · WRUsage 13.5% · Avg PPA 0.359 · Total 28.343
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.35928.34313.5%
Pass0.35928.34326.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.3008.11011.0%
2nd down0.3579.27712.8%
3rd down0.68615.77618.5%
Standard downs0.56527.66712.9%
Passing downs0.0230.67614.6%
Viliami Teu · RBUsage 9.7% · Avg PPA 0.212 · Total 10.599
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.21210.5999.7%
Pass-0.585-0.5850.4%
Rush0.22811.18319.7%
1st down0.0040.10312.3%
2nd down-0.080-1.2778.9%
3rd down1.68211.7736.5%
Standard downs0.26710.40011.7%
Passing downs0.0180.1986.0%
Jerry Mcclure · WRUsage 8.7% · Avg PPA 0.239 · Total 12.193
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.23912.1938.7%
Pass0.23912.19317.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.076-1.5128.1%
2nd down0.4648.3558.9%
3rd down0.2673.2039.7%
Standard downs0.2166.8978.4%
Passing downs0.2795.2969.3%
Cooper Hoch · WRUsage 8.0% · Avg PPA 0.804 · Total 26.547
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.80426.5478.0%
Pass0.80426.54715.2%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4076.1108.5%
2nd down1.41612.7456.3%
3rd down0.7175.7399.6%
Standard downs0.88019.3618.2%
Passing downs0.6537.1867.7%
Isaiah Carlson · RBUsage 4.8% · Avg PPA -0.232 · Total -3.713
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.232-3.7134.8%
Pass-0.276-0.2760.6%
Rush-0.229-3.4379.9%
1st down-0.119-1.0676.3%
2nd down0.1890.5662.6%
3rd down0.3571.0704.5%
Standard downs-0.280-3.9276.1%
Passing downs0.1070.2142.0%
Anthony Ivey · WRUsage 4.7% · Avg PPA 0.350 · Total 8.750
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3508.7504.7%
Pass0.3508.7509.4%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.2823.3815.4%
2nd down0.9055.4283.3%
3rd down0.6073.6415.5%
Standard downs0.3455.8694.9%
Passing downs0.3602.8814.4%
Jordan Anderson · WRUsage 4.1% · Avg PPA 0.387 · Total 6.579
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.3876.5794.1%
Pass0.3876.5797.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.4452.6713.4%
2nd down0.1241.1176.3%
3rd down1.3952.7902.4%
Standard downs0.3814.1894.1%
Passing downs0.3982.3904.2%
Tama Amisone · WRUsage 3.8% · Avg PPA -0.739 · Total -2.216
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.739-2.2163.8%
Pass-0.739-2.2167.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.983-1.9657.1%
3rd down-0.251-0.2516.3%
Standard downs-1.127-1.1272.3%
Passing downs-0.545-1.0895.9%
Dominique McKenzie · WRUsage 3.6% · Avg PPA 0.548 · Total 7.671
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5487.6713.6%
Pass0.5487.6716.7%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9285.5693.8%
2nd down-0.486-1.4572.2%
3rd down0.7123.5596.0%
Standard downs0.6405.1183.4%
Passing downs0.4262.5534.1%
Jase Nix · WRUsage 3.3% · Avg PPA 0.408 · Total 6.121
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.4086.1213.3%
Pass0.4086.1216.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7422.2261.5%
2nd down0.5983.5903.7%
3rd down0.0510.3046.4%
Standard downs0.7422.2261.0%
Passing downs0.3253.8947.6%
Kamaehu Kopa-Kaawalauole · TEUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.091 · Total 0.909
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0910.9092.6%
Pass0.0910.9095.1%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.079-0.3963.1%
2nd down-0.202-0.6052.3%
3rd down-0.325-0.3251.1%
Standard downs0.1721.3783.2%
Passing downs-0.234-0.4691.4%
Malachi Riley · WRUsage 2.4% · Avg PPA 1.431 · Total 4.293
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall1.4314.2932.4%
Pass1.4314.2934.6%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.7760.7762.0%
2nd down1.3521.3522.4%
3rd down2.1652.1653.3%
Standard downs1.0642.1282.5%
Passing downs2.1652.1652.1%
Where San José State sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: 0.071 (28th percentile; 138 teams)28thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.374 (9th percentile; 138 teams)9thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.199 (33rd percentile; 138 teams)33rdOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.197 (47th percentile; 138 teams)47thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.013 (12th percentile; 138 teams)12thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.043 (63rd percentile; 138 teams)63rdDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.439 (20th percentile; 138 teams)20thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.093 (93rd percentile; 138 teams)93rdDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.153 (44th percentile; 138 teams)44th
Values and percentiles
San José State metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play0.07128th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.3749th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.19933rd138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.19747th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.01312th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.04363rd138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.43920th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.09393rd138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.15344th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 100% of 283 attempts charted. Average depth of target 10.0 yards (83rd percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 3.7 per completion. Completion 60.8%, 7.3 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.28.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense60.5%59.4%+1.1248 / 283
Defense allowed65.7%62.6%+3.1245 / 290

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is San José State.

Target mix by zone, San José State offense
Short left30% · 81Short middle16% · 44Short right40% · 110Deep left5% · 13Deep middle4% · 10Deep right6% · 16

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
San José State passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense283100%10.03.760.8%0.28+1.1 pp248
Passing defense29098%8.15.164.1%0.15+3.1 pp245

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2983.633.1%-0.012.901.000.7019.6%65.5%
Defense allowed3463.950.5%0.153.301.200.9013.7%72.7%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense293 / 298291721220274 / 275 · 99.6%
Defense allowed340 / 3463222430990307 / 307 · 100.0%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season +1.1 pp. 8 of 9 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-10.30.411.2W1W1 vs USC: +6.7 ppW1W1 vs Eastern Michigan: -3.6 ppW2W3W3 vs Fresno State: -3.9 ppW5W5 vs Hawai'i: +7.7 ppW6W6 vs Wyoming: +8.2 ppW7W7 vs UTEP: -7.3 ppW8W8 vs Nevada: -10.3 ppW9W9 vs New Mexico: +11.2 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1USC323265.6%58.9%+6.7 pp9.90.38244.30.06
W1Eastern Michigan414057.5%61.1%-3.6 pp8.80.39363.7-0.06
W2Cal Poly340———10.70.42445.70.06
W3Fresno State383855.3%59.2%-3.9 pp11.0-0.21322.8-0.05
W5Hawai'i282867.9%60.1%+7.7 pp8.90.55342.3-0.10
W6Wyoming383868.4%60.2%+8.2 pp8.80.33282.70.13
W7UTEP232352.2%59.5%-7.3 pp9.50.30356.60.40
W8Nevada262646.2%56.5%-10.3 pp12.50.07302.2-0.18
W9New Mexico232369.6%58.4%+11.2 pp10.40.33351.6-0.37

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

49 punts · 44.1 gross yards/punt · 37.7 net yards/punt

16 inside the 20 · 3 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 49/49 punts. Known net yards: 43/49 punts.

Our punt returns

12 returns · 7.5 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

3 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 11/12 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · New Mexico337.037.03/3
Week 8 · Nevada1146.443.39/11
Week 7 · UTEP642.337.76/6
Week 6 · Wyoming345.334.03/3
Week 5 · Hawai'i649.849.84/6
Team style
Rating history