Skip to content
CFB/LAB
Menu

UL Monroe

2026 season

Sun Belt
2026 preseason report

Historical preseason snapshot from 2026-07-29, including roster context and illustrative season projections. This is not a live injury feed.

What every system says

UL Monroe's rank in each system (1 = best). Middle rank 135 across 8 systems; best 133, worst 137, so they disagree by 4 places.

Lab EPA
#135
Through week 92026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
Lab SRS
#137
down 12026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.
SP+
#133
no change2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.
Elo
#135
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
FPI
#137
no change2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CORE
#133
down 1 · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:002026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9 · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
CFBD SRS
#137
down 12026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
WEPA
#135
down 22026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Event cutoff not supplied · captured 2026-11-06T12:01:15.459089+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.
Compare every team

FPI context

ESPN FPI via CFBD · 2026

Résumé and schedule

Results earned and schedule difficulty

Strength of record
#135 of 138
Schedule strength
#122 of 138
Remaining schedule strength
#107 of 138
Game control
#135 of 138

Unit efficiency

Performance by unit

Overall
#136 of 138
Offense
#130 of 138
Defense
#132 of 138
Special teams
#129 of 138

Ranks calculated among rated FBS teams; ties share rank. #1 means strongest résumé, hardest schedule, best game control or highest efficiency. These are separate measures, not a combined forecast. Captured Nov 6, 2026, 06:01:15 CST. FPI supplies no results-through week; capture time records when we received it.

Why the ratings disagree

UL Monroe · 2026. Each system answers a different question. The cards show each source's rank (published or computed here) and coverage, so a rank gap can also reflect which teams have data.

Record

1-7 wins–losses

No rank assigned

Results earned. Wins and losses do not account for opponent strength or victory margin.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

SP+ workbook record

Descriptive EPA

-0.204 net EPA/play

#135

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams · Through week 9. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

Observed per-play efficiency after opponent adjustment. FBS-vs-FBS plays; no preseason strength prior. Sparse schedules can produce sharp early movement.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; opponent adjusted ridge

Lab EPA from CFBD plays

Local predictive SRS

-18.52 points

#137 · Down 1 place since the previous CFBD cutoff

2026 · 138 FBS roster teams, including prior-only teams · Through week 9 · built 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings take separate places, ordered by team name.

This season's 8 games, with recent games counting a bit more: average margin -14.63 (with blowouts capped at 35 points and overtime games counted as a 1-point result, then 2.5 points of home field removed) against opponents averaging -7.20, schedule #124 of 138 (#1 = toughest); 1 FCS opponent counts at −25; FBS opponents alone average -4.87. That is worth -21.83 on its own; the preseason prior of -7.20 still carries 23% of the weight, giving -18.52.

How each game enters this SRS rating

UL Monroe · 2026, through CFBD Week 9. Margins are team minus opponent. The fit caps margins and treats overtime as a one-point result before adjusting for venue. Recent games carry more weight; the fit share includes the preseason prior in its denominator.

GameRaw margin → transformedVenue adjustmentRecency weightFit shareOpponent ratingMargin termOpponent termTotal term
Week 1 · Mississippi State
away · 2026-09-05 · ID 401856662
-49.00 → -35.00+2.500.73498.29%+2.03-2.6950.168-2.527
Week 2 · UAB
away · 2026-09-12 · ID 401862708
-6.00 → -6.00+2.500.76378.62%-8.93-0.302-0.769-1.071
Week 3 · SE Louisiana
home · 2026-09-19 · ID 401868317
-3.00 → -3.00-2.500.79378.96%-25.00 (fixed lower division)-0.493-2.239-2.731
Week 4 · Florida Atlantic
home · 2026-09-27 · ID 401862782
-28.00 → -28.00-2.500.82499.31%-5.43-2.839-0.505-3.344
Week 5 · South Alabama
away · 2026-10-03 · ID 401871089
-17.00 → -17.00+2.500.85729.67%-5.65-1.403-0.547-1.949
Week 7 · Louisiana Tech
home · 2026-10-18 · ID 401871091
-24.00 → -24.00-2.500.925910.45%+2.33-2.7680.244-2.525
Week 8 · Troy
away · 2026-10-24 · ID 401871094
+7.00 → +7.00+2.500.962210.86%-7.141.031-0.7750.256
Week 9 · Southern Miss
home · 2026-10-31 · ID 401871095
-14.00 → -14.00-2.501.000011.28%-10.17-1.862-1.148-3.010

Game terms -16.90 points; prior term -1.62 points. Their unrounded sum is the fitted rating -18.52 points. The preseason prior is -7.20 with 22.57% of the fit weight. Displayed values are rounded; the producer checks the unrounded identity within 0.00000001 points.

These are additive terms of the current fit, not the effect of removing a game. Opponent ratings already reflect the connected schedule. Lower-division opponents use the fixed anchor, not an individually fitted rating. The rating's model-based 95% band is ±8.8 points; this decomposition does not reduce uncertainty or assign causal effects.

Download fitted terms and source hashes

Estimated strength from schedule-adjusted scoring margins, margin caps, home-field adjustment and recency weighting. Half of prior-season strength, including postseason, carries forward with two games of weight. SRS includes FCS opponents under a fixed strength assumption. 8 current games; prior available.

2026, through CFBD Week 9; generated 2026-11-06T12:26:24.430328+00:00

Lab SRS from CFBD scores

External SP+

-24.9 SP+ points

#133 · Rank unchanged

2026 · 138 published SP+ teams · Provider week 10 · captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Published provider ranks; tie handling is not documented in this snapshot.

Bill Connelly's published predictive strength estimate. Its method and scale differ from local SRS.

2026, provider Week 10; captured 2026-11-02T14:10:13.208713+00:00

Bill Connelly SP+ workbook

External CORE

-20.80 net points per 100 offensive + 100 defensive plays

#133 of 138 by overall (ranked here; CORE publishes no rank)

2026 · 138 rated FBS teams in this CORE board · 2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00. Rank 1 is best; lower rank numbers are better. Higher rating values are better. Equal ratings share the best tied rank; the next rank skips places.

CFBD's context- and opponent-relative efficiency. Offense is higher-better; defense is points allowed above average, so lower is better; overall is offense minus defense. It counts only pass and rush plays from FBS-vs-FBS games, with no special teams, overtime or garbage time; early-week values are pulled toward average but are still uncertain, and it is not a résumé ranking. Its scale is not comparable to EPA, SRS or SP+. Offense -13.84 on 385 plays; defense 6.96 on 447 plays.

2026, through regular Week 9; model core-v1; captured 2026-11-06T12:03:20.826325+00:00

CFBD CORE ratingCORE board: offense vs defense

EPA ranks UL Monroe 2 places higher than local SRS at the matched cutoff. This identifies a disagreement; it does not isolate its cause. SP+ movement compares provider weeks 9 and 10. Provider weeks may differ from CFBD weeks, so no cross-provider rank gap is calculated. CORE reports its own inclusive cutoff and is shown beside these systems for comparison only; it is an external research rating and is never blended into the lab's opponent-adjusted EPA, local SRS or any pick.

Team ratings and rank gaps are not matchup spreads or win probabilities. Matchup context and a calibrated forecast mapping are required. Do not average EPA, SRS, SP+ and CORE values across their different scales.

Read local SRS assumptions and forecast evidence

Program context

2026 · CFBD records, polls, recruiting, coaches
Record
1-7 · conf 1-3 · home 0-4 · away 1-3 · expected wins 0.8
Polls (Week 10)
unranked
CFP latest
unranked · 2026 regular Week 10 · captured 2026-11-06
CFP final
not published
Against the spread
2026: 2-6 ATS (-6.1 avg) · 2025: 4-8 ATS (-7.8 avg)
Head coach
Bryant Vincent · hired 2023-12-05 · 8-16 over 3 captured seasons
Recruiting classes
2024 #114 (139 pts) · 2025 #115 (127 pts) · 2026 #127 (160 pts)
Returning
39% of production · 46% of usage
Passing, receiving and rushing detail
CategoryProductionUsage
Passing78%97%
Receiving26%34%
Rushing16%14%

Shares of prior-season PPA and usage returning in each category. Missing values are unavailable.

Provider values from CFBD captures dated 2026-09-22, 2026-11-06. head coach for the season; tenure counts cover only the captured seasons, hire date is the provider's. Returning usage carries no signal beyond returning production in this repo's research; neither is a model input.

Recruiting by position group

2023–2026 classes · High school · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06 UTC

Position groupCommitsAvg. starsAvg. ratingTotal rating
Defensive Back23.000.84501.69
Defensive Line13.000.83000.83
Linebacker23.000.83021.66
Offensive Line53.000.83324.17
Quarterback33.000.83182.50
Receiver73.000.83455.84
Running Back23.000.86121.72

Recruiting class aggregates, not current roster strength. Commits count recruits across the window; total rating also reflects class size. JUCO, prep-school and transfer ratings are excluded. These values do not enter the prediction model.

Player efficiency and usage

2026 · observed 2026-11-06 UTC

Passing and rushing WEPA adjust efficiency for opponents. Kicker PAAR measures points added above replacement. Higher is better within each metric. Metric rows are ordered by sample size, followed by usage-only players. Usage is the share of team plays involving the player within each category; categories overlap and should not be added. CFBD definitions

Player / historyMetricValuePlays / attemptsOverall usageUsage detailRecruiting
Aidan Armenta · QB

CFBD athlete 5122054. New Mexico (2023–2023); UL Monroe (2024–2026)

Passing WEPA0.29218148.0%
Pass 78.0% · Rush 15.4%

1st 44.8% · 2nd 49.4% · 3rd 52.4%

Standard downs 42.3% · Passing downs 61.0%

2023: stars unavailable
Bryson Roland · RB

CFBD athlete 5382856. UL Monroe (2026–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.0453610.2%
Pass 3.0% · Rush 18.8%

1st 12.3% · 2nd 11.6% · 3rd 6.0%

Standard downs 12.9% · Passing downs 4.2%

Not linked
Aidan Armenta · QB

CFBD athlete 5122054. New Mexico (2023–2023); UL Monroe (2024–2026)

Rushing WEPA0.1133448.0%
Pass 78.0% · Rush 15.4%

1st 44.8% · 2nd 49.4% · 3rd 52.4%

Standard downs 42.3% · Passing downs 61.0%

2023: stars unavailable
Zachary Palmer-Smith · RB

CFBD athlete 5097058. Richmond (2024–2024); UL Monroe (2025–2026); Wagner (2022–2023)

Rushing WEPA0.1153311.4%
Pass 2.3% · Rush 22.8%

1st 12.9% · 2nd 7.8% · 3rd 12.7%

Standard downs 13.2% · Passing downs 7.6%

Not linked
Abram Murray · PK

CFBD athlete 5085351. California (2025–2025); Miami (2024–2024); UL Monroe (2026–2026)

Kicker PAAR-3.67010—
Pass — · Rush —

1st — · 2nd — · 3rd —

Standard downs — · Passing downs —

2024: 3★ · 0.8219
Austin Carlisle · QB

CFBD athlete 5207934. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——27.0%
Pass 37.2% · Rush 18.6%

1st 26.9% · 2nd 27.1% · 3rd 27.8%

Standard downs 24.8% · Passing downs 31.8%

Not linked
Brandon Buckhaulter · WR

CFBD athlete 4431516. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.0%
Pass 5.3% · Rush 0.8%

1st 1.8% · 2nd 4.6% · 3rd 3.3%

Standard downs 3.1% · Passing downs 2.5%

Not linked
Bryce Anderson · TE

CFBD athlete 5295371. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.2%
Pass 10.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 8.7% · 3rd 3.4%

Standard downs 4.8% · Passing downs 6.0%

Not linked
CJ Phillip · RB

CFBD athlete 5382854. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.7%
Pass 2.2% · Rush 9.8%

1st 7.0% · 2nd 4.6% · 3rd 3.4%

Standard downs 7.2% · Passing downs 2.4%

Not linked
Cade Callahan · TE

CFBD athlete 5225330. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.0%
Pass 6.8% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.7% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 11.1%

Standard downs 4.5% · Passing downs 2.7%

Not linked
Darrion Gilliam · WR

CFBD athlete 5447033. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.6%
Pass 5.0% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.4% · 2nd 2.3% · 3rd 1.8%

Standard downs 2.2% · Passing downs 3.5%

Not linked
Derrick Jameson · RB

CFBD athlete 5220666. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.3%
Pass 4.0% · Rush 15.1%

1st 11.0% · 2nd 9.2% · 3rd 5.7%

Standard downs 11.0% · Passing downs 5.6%

Not linked
Donald Chaney Jr. · RB

CFBD athlete 4685184. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——9.5%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 20.0%

1st 9.3% · 2nd 12.7% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 12.1% · Passing downs 4.4%

Not linked
JP Coulter · WR

CFBD athlete 5295735. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——6.7%
Pass 11.8% · Rush 1.6%

1st 6.6% · 2nd 7.5% · 3rd 6.0%

Standard downs 4.8% · Passing downs 10.8%

Not linked
Jaiden Tucker · WR

CFBD athlete 5274368. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——2.7%
Pass 3.8% · Rush 1.5%

1st 1.6% · 2nd 6.1% · 3rd 0.0%

Standard downs 2.8% · Passing downs 2.4%

Not linked
Jason Hoath Jr. · TE

CFBD athlete 5153517. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.5%
Pass 2.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 1.6% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 1.5% · Passing downs 1.6%

Not linked
Javon Campbell · WR

CFBD athlete 5220222. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——1.4%
Pass 3.3% · Rush 0.0%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 0.0% · 3rd 5.9%

Standard downs 0.0% · Passing downs 5.9%

Not linked
LT Robinson · WR

CFBD athlete 5382841. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.4%
Pass 8.5% · Rush 0.4%

1st 4.4% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 4.3%

Standard downs 3.7% · Passing downs 6.0%

Not linked
Landon Graves · QB

CFBD athlete 5158127. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——3.1%
Pass 4.8% · Rush 1.6%

1st 0.0% · 2nd 4.7% · 3rd 6.5%

Standard downs 1.1% · Passing downs 8.3%

Not linked
Marcellus Jackson · WR

CFBD athlete 5382869. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——10.9%
Pass 18.0% · Rush 4.0%

1st 10.3% · 2nd 13.7% · 3rd 9.9%

Standard downs 11.1% · Passing downs 10.4%

Not linked
Nic Trujillo · WR

CFBD athlete 5122072. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——8.3%
Pass 16.5% · Rush 0.0%

1st 9.2% · 2nd 4.0% · 3rd 11.1%

Standard downs 7.5% · Passing downs 10.2%

Not linked
Parker Fulghum · WR

CFBD athlete 5218754. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——5.0%
Pass 9.9% · Rush 0.0%

1st 3.9% · 2nd 5.2% · 3rd 6.8%

Standard downs 4.3% · Passing downs 6.6%

Not linked
Trevon Kinchen · RB

CFBD athlete 5382857. Team attribution from the captured season usage record.

Not available——4.3%
Pass 0.0% · Rush 9.8%

1st 3.5% · 2nd 1.5% · 3rd 8.3%

Standard downs 4.7% · Passing downs 3.3%

Not linked

Transfers

Incoming · 20 reported
PlayerFromDateStars / ratingEligibility
Abram Murray · KCalifornia2026-01-223★ / 0.8000Immediate
Armoni Rue · CBMichigan State2026-01-222★ / 0.7900Immediate
Austin Carlisle · QBHouston2026-01-133★ / 0.8600Immediate
Bright Fagbamiye · OTTiffin University2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Bryce Anderson · TEMemphis2026-01-223★ / 0.8600Immediate
Bryson Roland · RBArkansas Tech2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
CJ Wilson Jr. · EDGEButler2026-01-223★ / 0.8300Immediate
Cade Callahan · TEMerrimack2026-01-223★ / 0.8200Immediate
Chris Payne · SLake Erie2026-01-223★ / 0.8300Immediate
Damarcco Blanton · WRArkansas State2026-01-223★ / 0.8400Immediate
Derrick Jameson · RBUtah State2026-01-223★ / 0.8400Immediate
Don Chaney Jr. · RBCharlotte2026-01-223★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jase Hoath · TETennessee State2026-01-223★ / 0.8300Immediate
Julian Walker · RBNot reported2026-01-223★ / 0.8400Immediate
Larell Howling · CBCoastal Carolina2026-01-223★ / 0.8400Immediate
Le'Kell McGowan · EDGEMemphis2026-01-183★ / 0.8500Immediate
Parker Fulghum · WRClemson2026-01-133★ / 0.8200Immediate
Sean Dugery · IOLMemphis2026-01-213★ / 0.8400Immediate
Taijh Overton · SArkansas2026-01-223★ / 0.8600Immediate
Willie Wilson · SAmerican International2026-01-223★ / 0.8300Immediate
Outgoing · 17 reported
PlayerToDateStars / ratingEligibility
Amarion Ware · DLNot reported2025-12-16— / —Immediate
Bam McReynolds · RBUAB2026-01-133★ / 0.8400Immediate
D'Shaun Ford · RBNot reported2026-01-103★ / —Immediate
Hunter Herring · TEAuburn2026-01-223★ / 0.8500Immediate
Jaden Hamlin · DLNot reported2026-01-093★ / —Immediate
Jerome Simmons · DLOregon2026-01-143★ / 0.8600Immediate
Jonathan Bibbs · WRUCF2026-01-083★ / 0.8500Immediate
Kamrin Canterbury · SNot reported2025-12-113★ / 0.8300Immediate
Kevontay Wells · EDGENot reported2025-12-103★ / 0.8500Immediate
Ozarrio Smith · RBNot reported2026-01-092★ / —Immediate
Que McBroom · IOLNot reported2026-01-083★ / —Immediate
Seidrion Langston · LBSouth Alabama2026-01-173★ / 0.8500Immediate
Stephen Saywahn · SNot reported2026-01-102★ / —Immediate
Tae Woody · DLTexas State2026-01-203★ / 0.8400Immediate
Tyler Griffin · WREast Tennessee State2026-01-133★ / —Immediate
Tyrell Reed Jr. · RBNot reported2026-01-023★ / —Immediate
Ziggy Loa · EDGENorthern Arizona2026-01-20— / —Immediate

Transfer observations can include unresolved destinations. CFBD supplies no timezone for transfer dates and no athlete ID linking these records to the efficiency table. These observations do not establish current roster membership or game availability.

Descriptive context only; no player or transfer value enters the prediction model. Adjusted metrics require unambiguous season/team history. Usage-only rows use the captured athlete ID and team; conflicting usage identities are omitted. Missing values are unavailable, not zero. Provider coverage is incomplete.

Coaching eras

Continuous appointments at UL Monroe. Records are CFBD-attributed results; active tenures and the current season may be incomplete.

Bryant Vincent · career 15–22 across 4 seasons and 2 schools

Tenure timeline · 11 appointments
  1. 2024–present · Bryant Vincent · active at capture

    8–16 · 24 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2023-12-05. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  2. 2021–2023 · Terry Bowden

    10–26 · 36 attributed games · 3 seasons

    Hired 2020-12-23. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  3. 2016–2020 · Matt Viator

    19–39 · 58 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Hired 2015-12-14. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  4. 2010–2015 · Todd Berry

    29–45 · 73 attributed games · 6 seasons

    Hired 2009-12-19. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  5. 2003–2009 · Charlie Weatherbie

    31–51 · 82 attributed games · 7 seasons

    Hired 2003-05-07. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  6. 2002–2002 · Mike Collins

    3–6 · 9 attributed games · 1 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Hired 2002-11-20. Exact effective dates unavailable.

  7. 1999–2002 · Bobby Keasler

    8–28 · 36 attributed games · 4 seasons · incomplete attribution

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  8. 1994–1998 · Ed Zaunbrecher

    20–36 · 56 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  9. 1981–1981 · Pat Collins

    5–6 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  10. 1976–1980 · John David Crow

    20–34–1 · 55 attributed games · 5 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

  11. 1975–1975 · Ollie Keller

    4–6–1 · 11 attributed games · 1 seasons

    Exact effective dates unavailable.

Season résumé · 2015–2026

Coach-attributed records appear beside team-season ratings, recruiting and poll context. Shared seasons appear once per coach; rows are not assigned to individual stints. Ratings describe team performance, not a causal coaching effect.

Season / coachRecordConferencePostseasonSP+SRSRecruiting rankFinal poll
2026 · Bryant Vincent · incomplete attribution0–0——-27.4-22.6127—
2025 · Bryant Vincent3–91–70–0-21.6-20115—
2024 · Bryant Vincent5–73–50–0-16.7-9.8114—
2023 · Terry Bowden2–100–80–0-21.6-17.1126—
2022 · Terry Bowden4–83–50–0-15.7-12.2134—
2021 · Terry Bowden4–82–60–0-20.3-14.4113—
2020 · Matt Viator0–100–70–0-18.4-24.5120—
2019 · Matt Viator5–74–40–0-10.7-9128—
2018 · Matt Viator6–64–40–0-10.9-10.9118—
2017 · Matt Viator4–84–40–0-12.9-12.7102—
2016 · Matt Viator4–83–50–0-21.3-19.6124—
2015 · Todd Berry · incomplete attribution2–11——-14.7-25108—
Download coaching history JSON

Source: CFBD · captured 2026-10-26T02:02:59.394463+00:00 UTC. Season résumé covers 2015–2026; timeline spans all returned tenures. — means unavailable. Career summaries cover active coaches at capture. This snapshot is descriptive and is not a pregame cutoff.

CFBD season overview

2026 stored season snapshot, including postseason and garbage time. Raw CFBD PPA is not opponent-adjusted EPA or player WEPA. No week cutoff; these values do not enter our forecasts.

Captured 2026-11-02 13:51:41.272114 UTC · Source data

Stat rankings

CFBD FBS ranks · source updated 2026-11-01 14:09:49 UTC · calculated 2026-11-02 13:47:25 UTC · provider cache expiry 2026-11-02 13:57:25 UTC. Rank 1 is best; percentiles use CFBD’s 0–100 scale.

StatisticOffense rank / populationPercentileDefense rank / populationPercentile
PPA / play133 / 1383.6124 / 13810.2
Success rate98 / 13829.2115 / 13816.8
Explosiveness130 / 1385.871 / 13848.9
Standard-down success85 / 13838.7T102 / 13825.9
Passing-down success116 / 13816.1T117 / 13815.0
Pass PPA117 / 13815.3112 / 13819.0
Rush PPA126 / 1388.8127 / 1388.0
Pass explosiveness118 / 13814.669 / 13850.4
Rush explosiveness123 / 13810.9106 / 13823.4
Line yards94 / 13832.1113 / 13818.2
Second-level yards112 / 13819.087 / 13837.2
Open-field yards125 / 1389.5109 / 13821.2
Stuff rate55 / 13860.6130 / 1385.8
Power success119 / 13813.9T91 / 13832.8
Havoc127 / 1388.0T122 / 13811.3
Front-seven havoc95 / 13831.4123 / 13810.9
DB havoc132 / 1384.4T104 / 13824.1
Points / opportunity119 / 13813.9111 / 13819.7
Average field position128 / 1387.3T133 / 1383.3
Field-position expected points131 / 1385.1135 / 1382.2

Player PPA and usage

Ordered by overall usage. Open a player for pass, rush, down and situation splits. Usage is the provider’s share of team plays in each situation; PPA is the provider’s average or total for that player. Missing values stay blank (—); play counts are not supplied here. Standard downs are 1st down, 2nd-and-7 or shorter, and 3rd/4th-and-4 or shorter; other situations are passing downs.

Aidan Armenta · QBUsage 48.0% · Avg PPA 0.106 · Total 24.359
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.10624.35948.0%
Pass0.15229.59178.0%
Rush-0.026-0.86715.4%
1st down0.0908.08744.8%
2nd down0.0614.63449.4%
3rd down0.45725.14252.4%
Standard downs0.0344.72342.3%
Passing downs0.22119.63661.0%
Austin Carlisle · QBUsage 27.0% · Avg PPA -0.064 · Total -7.114
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.064-7.11427.0%
Pass-0.265-19.63737.2%
Rush0.33012.52318.6%
1st down-0.114-5.37626.9%
2nd down-0.031-1.12627.1%
3rd down0.1934.81627.8%
Standard downs-0.085-6.00624.8%
Passing downs-0.027-1.10831.8%
Zachary Palmer-Smith · RBUsage 11.4% · Avg PPA 0.101 · Total 3.725
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1013.72511.4%
Pass0.1420.5692.3%
Rush0.0963.15722.8%
1st down-0.018-0.31612.9%
2nd down-0.154-1.2337.8%
3rd down0.1751.57512.7%
Standard downs0.1835.31313.2%
Passing downs-0.198-1.5877.6%
Marcellus Jackson · WRUsage 10.9% · Avg PPA 0.372 · Total 19.341
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.37219.34110.9%
Pass0.50421.67318.0%
Rush-0.259-2.3324.0%
1st down0.3156.62310.3%
2nd down0.3717.80013.7%
3rd down0.4924.9179.9%
Standard downs0.2208.13811.1%
Passing downs0.74711.20210.4%
Bryson Roland · RBUsage 10.2% · Avg PPA -0.304 · Total -14.279
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.304-14.27910.2%
Pass-0.302-2.1163.0%
Rush-0.304-12.16318.8%
1st down-0.376-9.02712.3%
2nd down-0.102-1.72811.6%
3rd down-0.587-3.5246.0%
Standard downs-0.320-13.12812.9%
Passing downs-0.192-1.1504.2%
Donald Chaney Jr. · RBUsage 9.5% · Avg PPA -0.084 · Total -1.605
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.084-1.6059.5%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush-0.084-1.60520.0%
1st down0.1641.3099.3%
2nd down-0.892-7.13812.7%
3rd down1.4084.2256.8%
Standard downs-0.081-1.29512.1%
Passing downs-0.103-0.3104.4%
Derrick Jameson · RBUsage 9.3% · Avg PPA 0.063 · Total 2.378
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0632.3789.3%
Pass0.6104.8834.0%
Rush-0.083-2.50515.1%
1st down-0.024-0.45811.0%
2nd down0.1912.2899.2%
3rd down-0.141-0.7045.7%
Standard downs0.1063.27711.0%
Passing downs-0.128-0.8995.6%
Nic Trujillo · WRUsage 8.3% · Avg PPA -0.071 · Total -3.175
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.071-3.1758.3%
Pass-0.071-3.17516.5%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.386-8.1099.2%
2nd down0.9876.9114.0%
3rd down0.1411.83111.1%
Standard downs-0.044-1.2457.5%
Passing downs-0.114-1.93010.2%
JP Coulter · WRUsage 6.7% · Avg PPA 0.070 · Total 2.509
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0702.5096.7%
Pass0.0551.76311.8%
Rush0.1870.7471.6%
1st down-0.035-0.5256.6%
2nd down0.1171.5217.5%
3rd down0.7605.3176.0%
Standard downs-0.056-1.0064.8%
Passing downs0.1953.51510.8%
CJ Phillip · RBUsage 5.7% · Avg PPA -0.044 · Total -1.362
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.044-1.3625.7%
Pass0.4462.6782.2%
Rush-0.162-4.0409.8%
1st down-0.048-0.7697.0%
2nd down-0.006-0.0494.6%
3rd down-0.252-1.0073.4%
Standard downs-0.024-0.6557.2%
Passing downs-0.177-0.7082.4%
Bryce Anderson · TEUsage 5.2% · Avg PPA 0.427 · Total 11.961
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.42711.9615.2%
Pass0.42711.96110.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down1.0699.6223.9%
2nd down-0.185-2.7808.7%
3rd down1.2805.1183.4%
Standard downs0.5199.3344.8%
Passing downs0.2632.6276.0%
Parker Fulghum · WRUsage 5.0% · Avg PPA 0.427 · Total 11.521
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.42711.5215.0%
Pass0.42711.5219.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down-0.037-0.3353.9%
2nd down0.8617.7455.2%
3rd down1.0478.3736.8%
Standard downs-0.120-1.9174.3%
Passing downs1.22213.4386.6%
LT Robinson · WRUsage 4.4% · Avg PPA 0.095 · Total 2.280
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.0952.2804.4%
Pass0.1483.4068.5%
Rush-1.126-1.1260.4%
1st down0.4664.6574.4%
2nd down-0.164-1.4745.2%
3rd down-0.181-0.9044.3%
Standard downs0.3945.5223.7%
Passing downs-0.324-3.2426.0%
Trevon Kinchen · RBUsage 4.3% · Avg PPA 0.123 · Total 1.111
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1231.1114.3%
Pass—0.0000.0%
Rush0.1231.1119.8%
1st down-0.246-0.7383.5%
2nd down-0.448-0.4481.5%
3rd down0.0590.2348.3%
Standard downs0.2421.6974.7%
Passing downs-0.293-0.5863.3%
Cade Callahan · TEUsage 4.0% · Avg PPA 0.191 · Total 0.957
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.1910.9574.0%
Pass0.1910.9576.8%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.8931.7863.7%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.276-0.82911.1%
Standard downs0.1840.7374.5%
Passing downs0.2200.2202.7%
Landon Graves · QBUsage 3.1% · Avg PPA -0.383 · Total -1.534
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.383-1.5343.1%
Pass-0.442-1.3274.8%
Rush-0.207-0.2071.6%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.429-0.8574.7%
3rd down-0.338-0.6766.5%
Standard downs-0.651-0.6511.1%
Passing downs-0.294-0.8838.3%
Brandon Buckhaulter · WRUsage 3.0% · Avg PPA -0.088 · Total -0.705
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.088-0.7053.0%
Pass-0.062-0.4335.3%
Rush-0.273-0.2730.8%
1st down-0.440-0.8811.8%
2nd down0.1020.4084.6%
3rd down-0.116-0.2323.3%
Standard downs-0.079-0.4733.1%
Passing downs-0.116-0.2322.5%
Jaiden Tucker · WRUsage 2.7% · Avg PPA 0.853 · Total 3.410
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.8533.4102.7%
Pass0.8952.6853.8%
Rush0.7250.7251.5%
1st down2.4312.4311.6%
2nd down0.3270.9806.1%
3rd down—0.0000.0%
Standard downs1.1963.5882.8%
Passing downs-0.178-0.1782.4%
Darrion Gilliam · WRUsage 2.6% · Avg PPA 0.770 · Total 5.387
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.7705.3872.6%
Pass0.7705.3875.0%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down0.9903.9593.4%
2nd down0.8921.7842.3%
3rd down-0.357-0.3571.8%
Standard downs0.9903.9592.2%
Passing downs0.4761.4283.5%
Jason Hoath Jr. · TEUsage 1.5% · Avg PPA 0.570 · Total 1.711
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall0.5701.7111.5%
Pass0.5701.7112.9%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down-0.477-0.4771.6%
3rd down1.0942.1884.3%
Standard downs0.9891.9771.5%
Passing downs-0.266-0.2661.6%
Javon Campbell · WRUsage 1.4% · Avg PPA -0.224 · Total -0.224
SplitAverage PPATotal PPAUsage
Overall-0.224-0.2241.4%
Pass-0.224-0.2243.3%
Rush—0.0000.0%
1st down—0.0000.0%
2nd down—0.0000.0%
3rd down-0.224-0.2245.9%
Standard downs—0.0000.0%
Passing downs-0.224-0.2245.9%
Where UL Monroe sits · 2026 FBS distributions138 teams · raw PPA

2026 · Through provider Week 9. Each metric uses only published FBS teams with a numeric value. Higher percentile is better; tied values receive the midpoint of their positions, rounded to a whole percentile. Missing values are unranked.

Offense PPA/playOffense PPA/play: -0.042 (4th percentile; 138 teams)4thOffense success rateOffense success rate: 0.404 (29th percentile; 138 teams)29thOffense explosivenessOffense explosiveness: 1.104 (6th percentile; 138 teams)6thOffense pass PPA/playOffense pass PPA/play: 0.032 (15th percentile; 138 teams)15thOffense rush PPA/playOffense rush PPA/play: -0.047 (9th percentile; 138 teams)9thDefense PPA/playDefense PPA/play: 0.219 (10th percentile; 138 teams)10thDefense success rateDefense success rate: 0.445 (17th percentile; 138 teams)17thDefense explosivenessDefense explosiveness: 1.226 (49th percentile; 138 teams)49thDefense havoc createdDefense havoc created: 0.124 (11th percentile; 138 teams)11th
Values and percentiles
UL Monroe metric values with FBS percentiles, 2026
MetricValuePercentileBetter
Offense PPA/play-0.0424th138 teamshigher
Offense success rate0.40429th138 teamshigher
Offense explosiveness1.1046th138 teamshigher
Offense pass PPA/play0.03215th138 teamshigher
Offense rush PPA/play-0.0479th138 teamshigher
Defense PPA/play0.21910th138 teamslower
Defense success rate0.44517th138 teamslower
Defense explosiveness1.22649th138 teamslower
Defense havoc created0.12411th138 teamshigher

Passing profile

2026 · CFBD passing family · raw PPA

Captured 2026-11-06. Offense: 99% of 258 attempts charted. Average depth of target 8.1 yards (31st percentile of FBS). Yards after catch 5.8 per completion. Completion 60.9%, 6.5 yards per attempt, pass PPA 0.08.

Completion percentage over expected (CPOE)
SideActualExpectedCPOE (pp)Qualifying / all attempts
Offense61.1%64.9%-3.8180 / 258
Defense allowed63.9%58.6%+5.3169 / 215

Actual and expected use the same qualifying attempts, which can be fewer than all passes. CPOE is their difference in percentage points (pp); higher is better on offense, lower allowed is better on defense. CFBD models FBS-vs-FBS passes, excluding spikes, throwaways, intentional grounding and attempts without air yards. — means unavailable; small samples have fewer than 40 qualifying attempts.

Depth of target vs yards after catch, FBS offenses
Air Force: ADOT 13.0, YAC 3.9Akron: ADOT 7.7, YAC 4.9Alabama: ADOT 9.9, YAC 5.3App State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.3Arizona: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Arizona State: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.1Arkansas: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Arkansas State: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.3Army: ADOT 12.5, YAC 3.7Auburn: ADOT 7.9, YAC 5.1BYU: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9Ball State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.4Baylor: ADOT 10.2, YAC 5.1Boise State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 5.0Boston College: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.6Bowling Green: ADOT 6.4, YAC 5.6Buffalo: ADOT 10.1, YAC 2.2California: ADOT 6.2, YAC 5.6Central Michigan: ADOT 9.0, YAC 5.5Charlotte: ADOT 7.1, YAC 5.5Cincinnati: ADOT 7.2, YAC 6.7Clemson: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.8Coastal Carolina: ADOT 10.6, YAC 5.8Colorado: ADOT 8.6, YAC 7.1Colorado State: ADOT 5.6, YAC 8.3Delaware: ADOT 9.4, YAC 6.4Duke: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.6East Carolina: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.2Eastern Michigan: ADOT 7.2, YAC 5.3Florida: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.7Florida Atlantic: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.5Florida International: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.3Florida State: ADOT 10.4, YAC 8.1Fresno State: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.0Georgia: ADOT 8.2, YAC 7.7Georgia Southern: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.1Georgia State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Georgia Tech: ADOT 7.3, YAC 4.7Hawai'i: ADOT 8.4, YAC 4.2Houston: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.7Illinois: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.0Indiana: ADOT 11.3, YAC 4.9Iowa: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.2Iowa State: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.3Jacksonville State: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.8James Madison: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Kansas: ADOT 12.5, YAC 5.2Kansas State: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.3Kennesaw State: ADOT 6.7, YAC 4.9Kent State: ADOT 9.4, YAC 5.2Kentucky: ADOT 6.7, YAC 7.0LSU: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.9Liberty: ADOT 11.3, YAC 6.0Louisiana: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Louisiana Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 6.2Louisville: ADOT 9.1, YAC 7.1Marshall: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.3Maryland: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.0Massachusetts: ADOT 10.4, YAC 4.6Memphis: ADOT 10.3, YAC 5.6Miami: ADOT 7.3, YAC 7.2Miami (OH): ADOT 10.7, YAC 6.2Michigan: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.8Michigan State: ADOT 7.6, YAC 4.1Middle Tennessee: ADOT 8.0, YAC 5.5Minnesota: ADOT 6.1, YAC 6.1Mississippi State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.6Missouri: ADOT 10.1, YAC 5.1Missouri State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.7NC State: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.4Navy: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.0Nebraska: ADOT 8.6, YAC 5.9Nevada: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.1New Mexico: ADOT 9.9, YAC 6.1New Mexico State: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.4North Carolina: ADOT 7.4, YAC 6.4North Dakota State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 4.6North Texas: ADOT 9.2, YAC 6.0Northern Illinois: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.5Northwestern: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.5Notre Dame: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.9Ohio: ADOT 9.6, YAC 6.1Ohio State: ADOT 11.0, YAC 5.1Oklahoma: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Oklahoma State: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.2Old Dominion: ADOT 10.9, YAC 4.3Ole Miss: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.1Oregon: ADOT 7.6, YAC 6.5Oregon State: ADOT 8.8, YAC 7.7Penn State: ADOT 9.8, YAC 5.1Pittsburgh: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.6Purdue: ADOT 8.5, YAC 6.9Rice: ADOT 10.8, YAC 4.9Rutgers: ADOT 11.3, YAC 5.5SMU: ADOT 8.4, YAC 6.3Sacramento State: ADOT 8.2, YAC 4.3Sam Houston: ADOT 7.8, YAC 5.5San Diego State: ADOT 9.7, YAC 5.2San José State: ADOT 10.0, YAC 3.7South Alabama: ADOT 10.7, YAC 5.2South Carolina: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.9South Florida: ADOT 7.7, YAC 6.3Southern Miss: ADOT 8.2, YAC 5.1Stanford: ADOT 8.9, YAC 4.9Syracuse: ADOT 8.9, YAC 5.5TCU: ADOT 9.5, YAC 4.6Temple: ADOT 9.0, YAC 6.9Tennessee: ADOT 6.9, YAC 6.8Texas: ADOT 8.3, YAC 6.3Texas A&M: ADOT 8.8, YAC 5.3Texas State: ADOT 8.6, YAC 6.8Texas Tech: ADOT 9.6, YAC 4.7Toledo: ADOT 9.1, YAC 6.1Troy: ADOT 8.9, YAC 6.5Tulane: ADOT 9.2, YAC 4.9Tulsa: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.7UAB: ADOT 9.8, YAC 4.4UCF: ADOT 7.0, YAC 5.4UCLA: ADOT 9.1, YAC 5.8UConn: ADOT 11.2, YAC 6.3UNLV: ADOT 10.5, YAC 4.3USC: ADOT 8.0, YAC 6.4UTEP: ADOT 8.7, YAC 4.9UTSA: ADOT 7.1, YAC 6.0Utah: ADOT 9.5, YAC 5.8Utah State: ADOT 9.9, YAC 4.5Vanderbilt: ADOT 9.2, YAC 5.1Virginia: ADOT 8.3, YAC 5.3Virginia Tech: ADOT 6.5, YAC 7.0Wake Forest: ADOT 8.7, YAC 6.0Washington: ADOT 7.9, YAC 6.5Washington State: ADOT 7.1, YAC 4.0West Virginia: ADOT 13.8, YAC 8.5Western Kentucky: ADOT 6.9, YAC 5.4Western Michigan: ADOT 8.5, YAC 5.1Wisconsin: ADOT 7.5, YAC 6.9Wyoming: ADOT 8.4, YAC 5.6UL Monroe: ADOT 8.1, YAC 5.8Average depth of target (yards) →Yards after catch per completion →

138 teams with at least 40 charted attempts. The highlighted point is UL Monroe.

Target mix by zone, UL Monroe offense
Short left30% · 74Short middle21% · 52Short right35% · 86Deep left6% · 14Deep middle4% · 11Deep right5% · 12

Highlighted bars are deep zones. Shares are of located attempts only.

Defense and rushing detail
UL Monroe passing defense and rushing profile, 2026
SideAttemptsChartedADOTYACComp %PPACPOECPOE att
Passing offense25899%8.15.860.9%0.08-3.8 pp180
Passing defense21599%9.15.364.2%0.36+5.3 pp169

Rushing production

SideAttemptsYards / carrySuccessPPALine yards / rushSecond-level yards / rushOpen-field yards / rushStuff ratePower success
Offense2713.442.8%0.053.000.800.5014.4%63.2%
Defense allowed3425.246.9%0.233.401.101.6011.8%76.5%

Second-level yards are gained 5–10 yards past the line; open-field yards are beyond 10. These are provider per-rush averages, not totals. Power success measures success with two or fewer yards needed. Exact line-metric and power-success denominators are not supplied in this feed.

Rushing sample and attribution

SideYards recordedIndividualUnattributedSacksKneelsTeam rushesMultiple carriersDirection located / eligible
Offense262 / 2712591218130249 / 250 · 99.6%
Defense allowed339 / 342333914660321 / 322 · 99.7%

Counts are attempts. Team totals include sacks, kneels, team-only rushes and unresolved attribution; these categories can overlap and must not be summed. Direction coverage uses ordinary direction-eligible rushes, not all attempts. Missing fields in older captures remain unavailable.

Raw provider values, no opponent adjustment; not model inputs. CFBD metric definitions.

Game-by-game passing and rushing

2026 · Passing CPOE · percentage points. Dashed line: season -3.8 pp. 6 of 8 captured games have this metric. Missing observations break the line.

-16.2-2.411.4W1W1 vs Mississippi State: -12.6 ppW2W2 vs UAB: -16.2 ppW3W4W4 vs Florida Atlantic: +11.4 ppW5W5 vs South Alabama: -1.3 ppW7W7 vs Louisiana Tech: -4.7 ppW8W9W9 vs Southern Miss: -5.1 pp

CPOE is completion percentage over expected on qualifying FBS-vs-FBS attempts; positive means more completions than expected. PPA is raw provider PPA. These are game observations, not opponent-adjusted forecasts. P labels postseason weeks.

Game log and attempt coverage
WeekOpponentPass attCPOE attComp %*Expected %*CPOEADOTPass PPARush attRush yds/carryRush PPA
W1Mississippi State282857.1%69.7%-12.6 pp4.10.00403.1-0.04
W2UAB201952.6%68.8%-16.2 pp3.7-0.35434.80.06
W3SE Louisiana450———11.8-0.16355.20.51
W4Florida Atlantic303076.7%65.3%+11.4 pp7.30.58252.3-0.13
W5South Alabama414062.5%63.7%-1.3 pp6.20.48282.40.10
W7Louisiana Tech292958.6%63.3%-4.7 pp9.7-0.20262.4-0.37
W8Troy310———9.40.10302.80.04
W9Southern Miss343455.9%61.0%-5.1 pp9.30.02443.40.10

*Completion and expected rates use the same CPOE-eligible attempts. ADOT uses available air-yard attempts; a game needs at least one. No missing family is filled with the other family’s data.

Punting and returns

2026 season to date · CFBD · captured 2026-11-06T12:25:52.746993+00:00. Descriptive totals, including postseason when present.

Our punts

46 punts · 41.6 gross yards/punt · 35.1 net yards/punt

8 inside the 20 · 1 touchbacks · 0 blocked

Known gross yards: 46/46 punts. Known net yards: 39/46 punts.

Our punt returns

9 returns · 1.3 yards/return · 0 touchdowns

0 muffs · 0 opponent punts blocked

Known return yards: 9/9 returns. Return totals include team-only and unattributed plays.

Recent games
GamePuntsGross yd/puntNet yd/puntKnown net yards
Week 9 · Southern Miss443.541.34/4
Week 8 · Troy941.439.08/9
Week 7 · Louisiana Tech737.132.45/7
Week 5 · South Alabama438.336.84/4
Week 4 · Florida Atlantic742.726.04/7
Team style
Rating history